Strategy and Assets Committee
Meeting Date: Tuesday, 16 May, 2017
Location: Council Chambers, City Administrative Centre, Bridge Road, Nowra
Time: 5:00pm
Clr Andrew Guile - Chairperson
All Councillors
General Manager or nominee
Please note: Council’s Code of Meeting Practice permits the electronic recording and broadcast of the proceedings of meetings of the Council which are open to the public. Your attendance at this meeting is taken as consent to the possibility that your image and/or voice may be recorded and broadcast to the public.
Agenda
1. Apologies / Leave of Absence
2. Confirmation of Minutes
· Strategy and Assets Committee - 18 April 2017.......................................................... 1
3. Declarations of Interest
4. Mayoral Minute
5. Deputations and Presentations
6. Notices of Motion / Questions on Notice
Nil
7. Committee Reports
SA17.117.... Report of the Nowra CBD Revitalisation Strategy Committee - 19 April 2017 19
CBD17.26... Additional Item - Applications for Membership Interview Panel
8. Reports
SA17.118.... Public Policy for Review - Anzac Day Services - Wreath Laying Ceremonies 20
SA17.119.... Proposal to commence Part Year Rating.................................................... 24
SA17.120.... March 2017 Quarterly Budget Review......................................................... 26
SA17.121.... Paringa Park - Adoption of Non motorised Water Sports Hub Master Plan 44
SA17.122.... Improvements to Nowra Showground - Nowra Ideas Day.......................... 58
SA17.123.... Grant Funding - Sanctuary Point Shop CCTV additional cameras ............ 67
SA17.124.... Shoalhaven Tourism Advisory Group - Quorum and Membership............. 70
SA17.125.... 2017 NSW Local Roads Congress - Making Our Roads Work................... 73
SA17.126.... Local Government Remuneration Tribunal - Determination - Councillor and Mayoral Fees, and the Categorisation of Councils 2017/18....................................... 76
SA17.127.... Huskisson Public Wharves - Access Working Party................................... 79
SA17.128.... Accessible Car Parking Spaces - Graham Street and McGrath Ave Nowra 81
SA17.129.... Outdoor dining on public footpaths - Review of fee waiver......................... 83
SA17.130.... Update Council on negotiations with property owners affected by the Bomaderry Nowra Regional Sports & Community Precinct Master Plan...................... 86
SA17.131.... Proposed Deed of Agreement with adjoining owner - Lot 25A DP5996 Bryces Road, Far Meadow.................................................................................................. 88
SA17.132.... Surrender of Lease - Reflections Cafe - Slice of Life.................................. 89
SA17.133.... Old Bakery - Disposal of property 124 -126 Jacobs Drive, Sussex Inlet.... 91
SA17.134.... Progress on Community Concept Plan - Larmer Ave, Sanctuary Point..... 93
SA17.135.... Re-Adoption of Pesticides Use Notification Plan - 2017.............................. 96
SA17.136.... Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Performance Reporting 2015-2016................... 107
SA17.137.... Review of Shoalhaven Water Group Policies ........................................... 112
SA17.138.... Extinguishment of Water Supply Easement - 55 Meroo Road Bomaderry 125
Reports
CSA17.9...... Renewal Agreement - Illuminated Street Name Signs - Claude Outdoor Pty Ltd
Local Government Act - Section 10A(2)(d)(i) - Commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests.
CSA17.10.... Proposed Deed of Agreement with adjoining owner - Lot 25A DP5996 Bryces Road, Far Meadow
Local Government Act - Section 10A(2)(c) - Information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page iv |
Strategy and Assets Committee
Delegation:
Pursuant to s377 (1) of the Local Government Act 1993 the Committee is delegated the functions conferred on Council by the Local Government Act 1993 (LG Act) or any other Act or delegated to Council, as are specified in the Schedule, subject to the following limitations:
i. The Committee cannot exercise any function delegated to the Council which by the terms of that delegation cannot be sub-delegated;
ii. The Committee cannot exercise any function which s377(1) of the LG Act provides cannot be delegated by Council;
iii. The Committee cannot exercise a function which is expressly required by the LG Act or any other Act to be exercised by resolution of the Council; and
iv. The Committee cannot exercise any function which is a function of the General Manager under s335 of the LG Act.
Schedule:
1. Make recommendations to Council and consider, formulate, review and adopt policies in relation to Council’s corporate & community planning under Part 2 of Chapter 13 of the LG Act, asset management and in connection with the other functions listed in this Schedule and in particular to make recommendations to Council in respect of the content of Council’s community strategic plan, delivery program, resourcing strategy and operational plan within the meaning of Part 2 of Chapter 13 of the LG Act;
2. Make recommendations to Council and consider, formulate, review and adopt Council policies, plans and strategies other than those in respect of town planning and environmental matters, and any other matter referred to the Committee by the General Manager.
3. Make recommendations in respect of the introduction of new fees or charges or the alteration of existing fees and charges for inclusion in the Council’s next operational plan within the meaning of s405 of the LG Act;
4. Monitor, review and consider matters relating to the operations and strategic direction of Council’s Holiday Haven Tourist Parks Group;
5. All functions in respect of the management of, and facilities provided on Crown Land in respect of which Council is the ‘reserve trust manager’ within the meaning of s92 of the Crown Lands Act 1989, and the making of recommendations to Council regarding such matters where the function cannot be delegated by Council;
6. Provision of corporate direction to the Shoalhaven Water Group in respect of powers delegated to it by Council regarding the construction, alteration or maintenance of water and sewerage works, effluent works and pump out removal;
7. Authorise the expenditure of funds raised under s64 of the LG Act within the limits outlined in, and in accordance with Council’s adopted Development Servicing Plan and other relevant adopted Council policies;
8. Make recommendations to Council in respect of fees and charges for water and wastewater services provided by Council;
9. Develop, implement, review and adopt strategic policies for water, sewerage and effluent operations of Council;
10. Undertake preliminary investigations (feasibility, cost benefit, risk analysis, etc.) into development opportunities for Council’s strategic land holdings and make recommendations to Council.
11. Review and make recommendations to Council in relation to:
a) The sale prices of land in connection with residential and industrial Council subdivisions;
b) The sale of Council property or the purchase or resumption of land;
c) The compensation to be offered in respect of land resumed by Council; and
d) Properties leased or rented by Council, other than those delegated to the General Manager for approval and execution in accordance with MIN14.912 and MIN15.237 of the Council.
12. To determine and accept all tenders with a value of $1 Million or more, except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council (MIN17.334).
Minutes of the Strategy and Assets Committee
Meeting Date: Tuesday, 18 April 2017
Location: Council Chambers, City Administrative Centre, Bridge Road, Nowra
Time: 5:00pm
The following members were present:
Clr Andrew Guile - Chairperson
Clr Joanna Gash
Clr John Wells
Clr Patricia White
Clr John Levett
Clr Nina Cheyne
Clr Kaye Gartner
Clr Amanda Findley
Clr Mitchell Pakes
Clr Greg Watson
Clr Mark Kitchener
Clr Bob Proudfoot
Mr Russ Pigg - General Manager
Apologies / Leave of Absence |
An apology was received from Clr Alldrick.
Confirmation of the Minutes |
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr White) MIN17.292 That the Minutes of the Strategy and Assets Committee held on Tuesday 21 March 2017 be confirmed. CARRIED
|
Declarations of Interest |
Clr Kitchener – “SA17.98” – less than significant non pecuniary interest declaration – will remain the room and will take part in discussion or vote – “some members of the management committee are known to him for many years and he taught some children, he is not on the management committee”.
Deputations and Presentations
Presentations
SA17.95 – Risk and Audit Committee Annual Report 2015 -2016
Mr Phillip Ross (Chairperson of the Risk and Audit Committee) – made a presentation to the Committee in relation to the Risk and Audit Committee, its role, activities during 2016 and matters arising from the self audit.
Deputations
SA17.98 – Milton Showground – Second Croquet Court Options – Follow Up Report
Mr Jim Mison from the Milton Showground Management Committee addressed the committee to speak against the staff recommendation.
Procedural Motion - Bring Item Forward |
RESOLVED (Clr Guile / Clr Pakes) MIN17.293 That the following matters be brought forward for consideration:
CARRIED
|
SA17.95 Risk and Audit Committee Annual Report 2015 - 2016 |
HPERM Ref: D17/102147 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council receive and note the Risk and Audit Committee annual report 2015 – 2016.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Wells) MIN17.294 That Council receive and note the Risk and Audit Committee annual report 2015 – 2016. CARRIED
|
SA17.98 Milton Showground - Second Croquet Court Options - Follow Up Report |
HPERM Ref: D17/67958 |
Clr Kitchener – less than significant non pecuniary interest declaration –remained in the room and will take part in discussion and vote – “some members of the management committee are known to him for many years and he taught some children, he is not on the management committee”. |
|
Recommendation That: 1. Council endorse construction of a second croquet court at Milton Showground which is consistent with Council’s adopted Milton Showground Plan of Management. 2. Council continue to work with the Milton Showground Management Committee and Milton Show Society to minimise the impact of a second croquet court at Milton Showground and to increase use of all areas of the Showground. 3. Council continue to work with land owners adjacent to Milton Showground to formalise offsite parking options via a licence agreement to increase capacity for future large events at the Showground. 4. Council adopt the Croquet User Agreement (as outlined in the report to Council’s Strategy & Assets Committee meeting on 11 October 2016) and inform both Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club & Milton Showground Management Committee that they are to abide by this agreement. 5. Council advise both the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club & Milton Showground Management Committee of the above Council resolution. |
|
Recommendation (Clr White / Clr Findley) That Council: 1. Decline the opportunity to construct a second croquet court at Milton Showground. 2. Actively work with Milton Croquet Club to relocate the croquet facilities to suitable premises within 18 months. The new location is to contain sufficient land for two courts, a club house and the option for further extension in future years. 3. Establish a working group of available Councillors, Executive of Milton Croquet Club and Council staff to facilitate the relocation. 4. Allocate funding for project planning in 2017/2018; and in 2018/2019 for construction of one Croquet Court; the relocation of a club house; and landscaping in the new location 5. Continue to work with the Showground Management Committee and owners adjacent to Milton Showground to formalise offsite parking options via a licence agreement to increase capacity for future large events at the Showground. 6. Review the Milton Showground Management Plan within 12 months, in consultation with the Showground Management Committee. 7. Advise both the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club & Milton Showground Management Committee of the above Council resolution. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Nil CARRIED |
Notices of Motion / Questions on Notice
SA17.90 Notice of Motion - Council Meetings - Order of Business |
HPERM Ref: D17/107475 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That 1. Council changes the Order of Business for future meetings and places Notices of Motions at the end of the business paper; 2. The Ordinary council meetings commence at 4pm; 3. A further review take place after six months.
|
|
Motion (Clr Gash / Clr Wells) That: 1. Council changes the Order of Business for future meetings and places Notices of Motions at the end of the business paper; 2. The Ordinary council meetings commence at 4pm; 3. A further review take place after six months. For: Clr Gash and Clr Wells Against: Clr Guile, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg lost
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Guile) MIN17.295 That in relation to Council Meetings – Order of Business: 1. The status quo remain and a review take place at the September Call Meeting 2. The General Manager call a workshop prior to the September Call Meeting to discuss and present options for changing the order of business for Council meetings. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Nil CARRIED
|
|
Note: In preparing the Briefing notes for the Workshop, options from other Council areas be included. |
SA17.91 Notice of Motion - Callala Beach Community Centre - Vegetation Issues |
HPERM Ref: D17/114249 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council authorise the Callala Beach Community Hall Facilities Committee to undertake selective pruning of vegetation located: 1. Adjacent to the Eastern windows of the Callala Beach Hall which is obscuring the view of Jervis Bay 2. The area immediately behind the Tennis Courts to clear a pathway around the tennis courts
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr White / Clr Pakes) MIN17.296 That Council authorise the Callala Beach Community Hall Facilities Committee to undertake selective pruning of vegetation located: 1. Adjacent to the Eastern windows of the Callala Beach Hall which is obscuring the view of Jervis Bay 2. The area immediately behind the Tennis Courts to clear a pathway around the tennis courts. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr White, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener and Clr Proudfoot Against: Clr Wells, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley and Russ Pigg CARRIED |
|
Note: In actioning the Resolution, staff note the last paragraph of the background in the report. |
SA17.92 Notice of Motion - Shaolin Temple Foundation |
HPERM Ref: D17/114693 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council write to the Shaolin Temple Foundation to make enquiries as to when they intend to start work on the project.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Watson / Clr Pakes) MIN17.297 That Council write to the Shaolin Temple Foundation to make enquiries as to when they intend to start work on the project. CARRIED
|
Procedural Motion - Bring Item Forward |
RESOLVED (Clr Guile / Clr Pakes) MIN17.298 That the matter of item SA17.101 – Future operations and management of Nowra Showground be brought forward for consideration. CARRIED
|
SA17.101 Future operations and management of Nowra Showground |
HPERM Ref: D17/97283 |
Recommendation That Council: 1. Continue to retain existing arrangements at Nowra Showground which involves daily Ranger site visits. 2. Consider a preferred “caretaker model” (if any) from the options within the report and request further details or analysis. 3. Consider whether additional funding is needed in the 2017/18 budget to increase Ranger site visits and security night patrols to the Nowra Showground to ensure adequate surveillance and enforcement of compliance requirements. 4. Receive a further report at its May 2017 Strategy and Assets Committee Meeting regarding feedback from the Nowra Showground Ideas Day held with the community to address Council Minute MIN16.886.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr White / Clr Guile) That Council: 1. Continue to retain existing arrangements at Nowra Showground which involves daily Ranger site visits until a formal Section 355 Management Committee over the Nowra Showground precinct is established including Nowra show society and other community representatives. 2. Advertise for members of the Section 355 Management Committee 3. Reconsider the caretaker model following a report in May with the community feedback 4. Increase the 2017/18 budget for the Ranger site visits and security night patrols to the Nowra Showground to ensure adequate surveillance and enforcement of compliance requirements. 5. Receive a further report at its May 2017 Strategy and Assets Committee Meeting regarding feedback from the Nowra Showground Ideas Day held with the community to address Council Minute MIN16.886. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Nil CARRIED
|
Procedural Motion - Adjournment of Meeting |
RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr White) That the meeting be adjourned for 10 minutes. CARRIED
|
The meeting adjourned the time being 7.34pm
The meeting reconvened the time being 7.44pm
The following members were present:
Clr Andrew Guile - Chairperson
Clr Joanna Gash
Clr John Wells
Clr Patricia White
Clr John Levett
Clr Nina Cheyne
Clr Kaye Gartner
Clr Amanda Findley
Clr Mitchell Pakes
Clr Greg Watson
Clr Mark Kitchener
Clr Bob Proudfoot
Mr Russ Pigg - General Manager
Reports
SA17.93 Delegations to the General Manager |
HPERM Ref: D17/112674 |
Recommendation That Council 1. Delegate authority to the Strategy & Assets Committee to determine and accept all tenders with a value of $1M or more, except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council; 2. Delegate authority to the General Manager to determine and accept any tenders with a value less than $1M except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council; and 3. Delegate authority to the General Manager to determine and accept any tenders initiated by the Illawarra (Pilot) Joint Organisation (IPJO) on behalf of all or a majority of member councils.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Findley / Clr Wells) That Council: 1. Delegate authority to the Strategy & Assets Committee to determine and accept all tenders with a value of $1M or more, except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council; 2. Delegate authority to the General Manager to determine and accept any tenders with a value less than $1M except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council; and 3. Delegate authority to the General Manager to determine and accept any tenders initiated by the Illawarra (Pilot) Joint Organisation (IPJO) on behalf of all or a majority of member councils. CARRIED
|
SA17.94 Response from Risk & Audit Committee on matters raised by Mark Crowther |
HPERM Ref: D17/112239 |
|||||||||
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council: 1. Receive the report for information noting that the Audit Office of NSW has identified the Issue of Risk of “Fair Valuation of Infrastructure, property, plant & equipment (IPPE)” as a Key Issue in the Audit Plan for 2016/17 as follows:
2. Note the resolution of the Risk & Audit Committee.
|
||||||||||
RESOLVED (Clr White / Clr Gash) MIN17.299 That Council: 1. Receive the report for information noting that the Audit Office of NSW has identified the Issue of Risk of “Fair Valuation of Infrastructure, property, plant & equipment (IPPE)” as a Key Issue in the Audit Plan for 2016/17 as follows:
2. Note the resolution of the Risk & Audit Committee. CARRIED
|
SA17.95 Risk and Audit Committee Annual Report 2015 - 2016 |
HPERM Ref: D17/102147 |
Item dealt with earlier in the meeting see MIN17.294.
|
SA17.96 Risk and Audit Committee Charter Amendments and Appointment of Risk and Audit Committee Chair |
HPERM Ref: D17/102563 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council: 1. Endorse the proposed amendments to the Risk and Audit Committee Charter. 2. Endorse the appointment of Dr Philp Ross as the Risk and Audit Committee Chair.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Wells) MIN17.300 That Council: 1. Endorse the proposed amendments to the Risk and Audit Committee Charter. 2. Endorse the appointment of Dr Philp Ross as the Risk and Audit Committee Chair. 3. Council write to Mr Messner and thank him for his time as the Chairperson. CARRIED
|
SA17.97 Council Policy Revision - BMX Circuits, Skate Parks, Temporary Storage (shipping) Containers on Public Land and Community Gardens |
HPERM Ref: D17/57934 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council adopt the revision of the following policies with minor changes as detailed in this report: · BMX Circuits · Skate parks · Temporary Storage (shipping) Container Public Land · Community Gardens
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr White) MIN17.301 That Council adopt the revision of the following policies with minor changes as detailed in this report: · BMX Circuits · Skate parks · Temporary Storage (shipping) Container Public Land · Community Gardens CARRIED
|
SA17.98 Milton Showground - Second Croquet Court Options - Follow Up Report |
HPERM Ref: D17/67958 |
Item dealt with earlier in the meeting.
|
SA17.99 Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence - Project Status Update |
HPERM Ref: D17/67960 |
Recommended (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council 1. Accept the status report for stage 1 of the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence. 2. Lodge a DA application for the remaining area of Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence Master Plan. 3. Work with the Berry Riding Club to negotiate a future licence area that aligns with relevant Development Application approvals. 4. Note that the budget reallocations as detailed in the report will form part of the March Quarterly Budget Report submitted in May.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Proudfoot / Clr Wells) MIN17.302 That Council: 1. Accept the status report for stage 1 of the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence. 2. Lodge a DA application for the remaining area of Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence Master Plan. 3. Work with the Berry Riding Club to negotiate a future licence area that aligns with relevant Development Application approvals. 4. Note that the budget reallocations as detailed in the report will form part of the March Quarterly Budget Report submitted in May. CARRIED
|
SA17.100 Community Infrastructure Guidelines |
HPERM Ref: D17/95343 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council notes the Community Infrastructure Guidelines report for information.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr White / Clr Findley) MIN17.303 That: 1. Council notes the Community Infrastructure Guidelines report for information. 2. A Councillor Briefing be scheduled on the Community Infrastructure Guidelines. CARRIED
|
SA17.101 Future Operations and Management of Nowra Showground |
HPERM Ref: D17/97283 |
Item dealt with earlier in the meeting.
|
SA17.102 Community War Memorials Grant Funding - Nowra Showground Memorial Gates |
HPERM Ref: D17/97733 |
Recommendation That 1. Council accept the NSW Community War Memorial Fund grant and vote the funds of $5,000 to engage a stonemason to fund repairs and to colour match and repoint in tuck-pointing on the Nowra Showground Memorial Gates. 2. Write to the NSW Community War Memorial Fund accepting and thanking them for the grant offer.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Proudfoot / Clr Guile) That: 1. Council accept the NSW Community War Memorial Fund grant and vote the funds of $5,000 to engage a stonemason to fund repairs and to colour match and repoint in tuck-pointing on the Nowra Showground Memorial Gates. 2. Write to the NSW Community War Memorial Fund accepting and thanking them for the grant offer. CARRIED
|
SA17.103 Request for annual donation - Missionaries of Charity Soup Kitchen - Nowra School of Arts Annex |
HPERM Ref: D17/101457 |
Recommendation That Council provide an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees (as per Council’s Fees & Charges) for the Lay Missionaries of Charity Soup Kitchen to operate weekly in the Nowra School of Arts Annex.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Gartner / Clr Cheyne) That Council provide an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees (as per Council’s Fees & Charges) for the Lay Missionaries of Charity Soup Kitchen to operate weekly in the Nowra School of Arts Annex. CARRIED
|
SA17.104 Request for annual donation - Helping the Homeless Soup Kitchen - Nowra Showground Pavilion |
HPERM Ref: D17/101517 |
Recommendation That Council provide an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees (as per Council’s Fees & Charges) for the Helping the Homeless Soup Kitchen to operate weekly in the Nowra Showground Pavilion.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Wells / Clr Gartner) That Council provide an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees (as per Council’s Fees & Charges) for the Helping the Homeless Soup Kitchen to operate weekly in the Nowra Showground Pavilion. CARRIED
|
SA17.105 Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan |
HPERM Ref: D17/99881 |
Clr Watson – significant non pecuniary interest declaration – he has a 90% mobility impairment - will remain in the room and will take part in discussion and vote. |
|
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council: 1. Endorse public exhibition of the draft Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan for a period of 28 days. 2. Advise stakeholders involved in the preparation of the draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan of its Public Exhibition 3. Receive a further report after the public exhibition of the draft Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Cheyne / Clr Gartner) MIN17.304 That Council: 1. Endorse public exhibition of the draft Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan for a period of 28 days. 2. Advise stakeholders involved in the preparation of the draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan of its Public Exhibition 3. Receive a further report after the public exhibition of the draft Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan. CARRIED
|
SA17.106 Council Policy Revision - Road Naming Policy and Property Addressing Policy |
HPERM Ref: D17/86701 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council adopt the revision of the following policies with minor changes as detailed in this report: 1. Road Naming 2. Property Addressing
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Cheyne / Clr Gartner) MIN17.305 That: 1. Council adopt the revision of the following policies with minor changes as detailed in this report: a. Road Naming b. Property Addressing 2. The Aboriginal Community through the Aboriginal Advisory Committee be consulted on appropriate indigenous names for roads. CARRIED
|
SA17.107 Local Government Conference - 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government - Proposed Motions |
HPERM Ref: D17/108863 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council endorse the six (6) motions as detailed in this report for submission to the Australian Local Government Association – 2017 National Assembly.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr Findley) MIN17.306 That Council endorse the six (6) motions as detailed in this report for submission to the Australian Local Government Association – 2017 National Assembly. CARRIED
|
SA17.108 Public Transport in the Shoalhaven |
HPERM Ref: D16/324854 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That 1. The Shoalhaven Integrated Transport Strategy be initially reviewed by the Shoalhaven Transport Working Group to recommend the scope and resources necessary for the formal review process 2. The Strategy retain its public transport focus and be re-named the Shoalhaven Public Transport Strategy. 3. That Council consider a budget allocation of $15,000 in 2017/18 to undertake a review of the Strategy.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Gash / Clr Guile) MIN17.307 That: 1. Shoalhaven Integrated Transport Strategy be initially reviewed by the Shoalhaven Transport Working Group to recommend the scope and resources necessary for the formal review process 2. The Strategy retain its public transport focus and be re-named the Shoalhaven Public Transport Strategy. 3. Council consider a budget allocation of $15,000 in 2017/18 to undertake a review of the Strategy. 4. Council consult with the Chamber of Commerce and the Shoalhaven Professional Business Association (SPBA) on the review of the Strategy. CARRIED
|
SA17.109 Path Construction and Funding Strategy |
HPERM Ref: D17/47911 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That the path construction projects identified from 2017/18 until 2020/21 in this report be included in Council’s draft Four Year Delivery Program and annual Operational Plan
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr White) MIN17.308 That 1. The path construction projects identified from 2017/18 until 2020/21 in this report be included in Council’s draft Four Year Delivery Program and annual Operational Plan. 2. Extension of the pathway along Walmer Avenue via Loralyn Avenue to Island Point Road be prioritised and seek Grant funding from RMS in 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 CARRIED
|
SA17.110 Recycling and Waste Facilities Review |
HPERM Ref: D17/85988 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council make changes to the operation of the Recycling and Waste Facilities as follows: 1. Berry and Callala - change the operating days to three days per week, Friday, Saturday and Sunday and open the buyback facilities on Saturday and Sunday mornings; 2. Sussex Inlet - change the operating hours to 9am to 3pm, Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday and open the buyback facilities on Saturday and Sunday mornings; 3. Kangaroo Valley - change the operating days to three days per week, Saturday, Sunday and Monday and open the buyback facility on a Sunday morning; 4. Kioloa - change the operating days to three days per week, Friday, Saturday and Sunday; 5. Lake Conjola - change the operation to 2 mornings per weekend from 8am to 12pm; 6. Bendalong - change the operation to 2 afternoons per weekend from 1pm to 5pm; 7. Continue operating all facilities for 7 days per week from Christmas to the end of the January school holidays with the exception of Bendalong, Lake Conjola, Kioloa and Kangaroo Valley; 8. Operate Lake Conjola, Bendalong, Kioloa and Kangaroo Valley for 5 days per week during the Christmas school holidays, on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday and Wednesday; 9. Public holidays - close all ten recycling and waste facilities on all public holidays; 10. Close and remove the bottle bank at Currarong, Berry, Culburra and Nowra 11. The changes become effective as of 1 July 2017.
|
|
Motion (Clr Pakes / Clr Guile) That Council retain all current operations for Recycling and Waste Facilities. For: Clr Guile, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener and Clr Proudfoot Against: Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley and Russ Pigg lost
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Gash) MIN17.309 That: 1. Council make changes to the operation of the Recycling and Waste Facilities as follows: a. Berry retain current operations – operating four days per week, Friday Saturday, Sunday and Monday and open the buyback facilities on Saturday and Sunday mornings. b. Callala – retain current operations - operating four days per week, Friday, Saturday and Sunday and Monday and open the buyback facilities on Saturday and Sunday mornings; c. Sussex Inlet - change the operating hours to 9am to 3pm, Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday and open the buyback facilities on Saturday and Sunday mornings; d. Kangaroo Valley - change the operating days to three days per week, Saturday, Sunday and Monday and open the buyback facility on a Sunday morning; e. Kioloa - change the operating days to three days per week, Friday, Saturday and Sunday; f. Lake Conjola - change the operation to 2 mornings per weekend from 8am to 12pm; g. Bendalong - change the operation to 2 afternoons per weekend from 1pm to 5pm; h. Continue operating all facilities for 7 days per week from Christmas to the end of the January school holidays with the exception of Bendalong, Lake Conjola, Kioloa and Kangaroo Valley; i. Operate Lake Conjola, Bendalong, Kioloa and Kangaroo Valley for 5 days per week during the Christmas school holidays, on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday and Wednesday; j. Public holidays - close all ten recycling and waste facilities on all public holidays, except Easter Monday; 2. Close and remove the bottle bank at Currarong, Berry, Culburra and Nowra 3. The changes become effective as of 1 July 2017. 4. Further reports be provided to Council on a 6 monthly basis on the operation of the Recycling and Waste Facilities. For: Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Guile, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener and Clr Proudfoot CARRIED |
|
Note: A Rescission Motion has been received on this item. |
SA17.111 Professional Property Officers Conference |
HPERM Ref: D17/88410 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) Council receive the report for information
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Proudfoot / Clr White) MIN17.310 That: 1. Council receive the report for information 2. Council staff be congratulated on their efforts in securing and organising the conference. CARRIED
|
SA17.112 Policy review and adoption - Management of Mobile Food Vending Vehicles on Council Owned or Managed Land |
HPERM Ref: D17/97403 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council adopt the Management of Mobile Food Vending Vehicles on Council Owned or Managed Land Local Approvals Policy, with minor amendments as outlined in the report.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Gartner / Clr Cheyne) MIN17.311 That Council adopt the Management of Mobile Food Vending Vehicles on Council Owned or Managed Land Local Approvals Policy, with minor amendments as outlined in the report. For: Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Guile CARRIED
|
SA17.113 Acquisition of Easement for Sewerage Purposes - 35 Brighton Parade, Culburra Beach |
HPERM Ref: D17/90672 |
Recommendation That 1. Council resolve to acquire the Easement for Sewerage Purposes 3m wide over Lot 1454 DP12278 at Culburra Beach, as shown on copy of DP645066 marked Attachment ‘1’. 2. Council pay compensation of $8,250 and reasonable legal and valuation costs associated with the acquisition, in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, from Council’s Sewer Fund. 3. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven be affixed to any documents required to be sealed.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Wells / Clr Proudfoot) That 1. Council resolve to acquire the Easement for Sewerage Purposes 3m wide over Lot 1454 DP12278 at Culburra Beach, as shown on copy of DP645066 marked Attachment ‘1’. 2. Council pay compensation of $8,250 and reasonable legal and valuation costs associated with the acquisition, in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, from Council’s Sewer Fund. 3. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven be affixed to any documents required to be sealed. CARRIED
|
SA17.114 Review of Shoalhaven Water Group Policies |
HPERM Ref: D17/101606 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council: 1. Change from a Local Approval Policy to a Public Policy and reaffirm with minor changes the following policy a. POL16/55 – Liquid Trade Waste Discharge to the Sewerage System 2. Reaffirm the following policies with minor changes: a. POL16/85 – Drinking Water Policy b. POL16/88 – Reclaimed Water Policy
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr White) MIN17.312 That Council: 1. Change from a Local Approval Policy to a Public Policy and reaffirm with minor changes the following policy a. POL16/55 – Liquid Trade Waste Discharge to the Sewerage System 2. Reaffirm the following policies with minor changes: a. POL16/85 – Drinking Water Policy b. POL16/88 – Reclaimed Water Policy CARRIED
|
SA17.115 Community Energy Congress - Conference Report |
HPERM Ref: D17/96037 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That the Committee receive and note the report from Clr John Wells and Clr Patricia White on the Community Energy Congress for information.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Gash / Clr Proudfoot) MIN17.313 That the Committee receive and note the report from Clr John Wells and Clr Patricia White on the Community Energy Congress for information. CARRIED
|
SA17.116 Tourism Conference 2017 |
HPERM Ref: D17/107708 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council receive the report from Clr Mark Kitchener on the Tourism Conference 2017 for information.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Kitchener / Clr Levett) MIN17.314 That Council receive the report from Clr Mark Kitchener on the Tourism Conference 2017 for information. CARRIED
|
Confidential Reports
Pursuant to Section 10A(4) the public were invited to make representation to the meeting before any part of the meeting is closed, as to whether that part of the meeting should be closed.
No members of the public made representations.
RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Proudfoot) MIN17.315
That the press and public be excluded from the Meeting, pursuant to section 10A(1)(a) of the Local Government Act, 1993, to consider the following items of a confidential nature.
CSA17.8 Disposal of Land - Part 445 The Wool Road, St Georges Basin - Part Lot 2 DP827728 Commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.10(A)(2)(d)(i)
There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests. CARRIED
|
The meeting moved into confidential the time being 8.52pm.
The meeting moved into open session, the time being 8.56pm.
Note: A rescission motion was received in relation to SA17.110 - Recycling and Waste Facilities Review . It will be considered at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Wednesday 26 April 2017 at 5.00pm at the Wandandian Progress Hall.
There being no further business, the meeting concluded, the time being 8.57pm.
Clr Guile
CHAIRPERSON
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 18 |
SA17.117 Report of the Nowra CBD Revitalisation Strategy Committee - 19 April 2017
HPERM Ref: D17/134919
CBD17.26 Additional Item - Applications for Membership Interview Panel |
1. That appointments to the Nowra CBD Revitalisation Strategy Committee be made by the Council following recommendation from the Committee. 2. Recommendations for appointment as members will be made to the Nowra CBD Revitalisation Strategy Committee by a Membership Appointment Panel comprising of: - Chairperson or Nominee of the Chairperson - Council staff Committee member or staff nominee - Governance Unit Business Manager 3. Update the Committee’s Terms of Reference to reflect the changes.
|
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 19 |
SA17.118 Public Policy for Review - Anzac Day Services - Wreath Laying Ceremonies
HPERM Ref: D17/140747
Group: General Manager's Group
Attachments: 1. Public Policy - Anzac Day Services - Wreath Laying Ceremonies - POL16/135 ⇩
Purpose / Summary
Council needs to review all Policies within 12 months of the election. This Policy is presented for consideration together with some suggested additions.
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That the public policy, Anzac Day Services - Wreath Laying Ceremonies, be adopted with with changes as indicated in the Attachment.
|
Options
1. Adopt the Policy as recommended.
Implications: The General Manager & Mayor will continue to implement the Policy to ensure a cordinated approach is taken and council has official representation at each ceremony across the City. Each councillor is assigned to a ceremony however it may not always be their “1st choice”.
2. Make amendments to the Policy and allow councillors to attend whichever ceremony they nominate. Council to provide one wreath per ceremony.
Implications: Council could supply one wreath for each ceremony and should two or more councillors wish to attend then they would either work out between themselves who lays the wreath or they jointly lay the wreath. Some ceremonies may not have a councillor representative if there is no coordination at all however that would be a matter for the councillors & Mayor to liaise.
3. Make amendments to the Policy and provide a wreath to each councillor and allow each councillor to attend and lay the wreath at the ceremony of their choice.
Implications: Council may be represented by several councillors at one ceremony and have no wreath or representative at other ceremonies.
Background
This Policy was originally adopted in 1979 and has been reaffirmed since that time. Historically council has taken a coordinated approach to ensure attendance at each ceremony however on enquiry with other councils many simply allow councillors to “work it out amoungst themselves”. In the case of Kiama only the Mayor or Deputy Mayor officially represent council unless one of them is unable to attend.
Community Engagement
This matter is not considered to require community engagement before its adoption.
Financial Implications
Council has assisted several ceremonies over the years from existing staff resources. The cost for wreaths for each ceremony is within existing budget.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 23 |
SA17.119 Proposal to commence Part Year Rating
HPERM Ref: D17/130565
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Finance
Purpose / Summary
This report discusses the proposal to commence Part Year Rating. The report also outlines the additional work and resources associated with this process.
That Council commence Part Year Rating from the 2017/18 Rating Year and approve the creation of a new full-time Rates Officer position.
|
Options
1. Approve the recommendation
Implications: It is estimated that, in 2016/17, approximately $232,000 would have been raised in additional rate revenue if Council were Part Year Rating. The rate revenue will vary from year to year, depending on the number of subdivisions. The total cost of part year rating is estimated to be $73,000 per year, including on-costs.
2. Reject the recommendation
Implications: Council will still be required to part year rate the Fire and Emergency Services Levy at a cost to Council estimated to be $73,000 per year, including on-costs.
Background
Under the Fire and Emergency Services Levy Act 2017 (FESL), a levy is to be “…proportionate to the portion of the year for which land is leviable land” (Part 2 Section 13; for example, subdivisions) or from the time of a change to a particular property classification or sub-classification (Part 5 Division 7 Section 71). To operationalise this requirement, it is proposed that any changes to the levy apply from the quarter following a change.
The additional work expected to support this requirement is significant. Based on the same data used to estimate the additional revenue, some of this additional workload includes 158 properties requiring credit adjustments, 669 properties requiring levies to be raised and then checked before the rate notices are sent to our printing supplier to be printed. Then there will be potentially 669 s603 Certificates being issued and 1,338 s603 Certificate updates provided.
Given the need for additional resources, it is opportune to explore whether Council can commence Part Year Rating for our own purposes at the same time. This would generate additional revenue for Council. As the additional work that is necessary to part year rate the FESL, would be substantially the same as that required to allow Council to part year rate, it would lead to a slight increase in workload if Council decides to generate this additional revenue. The Office of Local Government's (OLG) Council Rating and Revenue Raising Manual states at 24.4 the following on this issue: "The levying of rates mid year will not adversely affect a council’s maximum general income limit as supplementary valuations furnished during the year are included when the notional general income for the previous year is calculated.”
If the recommendation is accepted, once Council receives new supplementary land valuations in the case of subdivisions, it would be able to Part Year Rate the new properties (lots), from the commencement of the following quarter. Part Year Rating will also require an adjustment to the amount levied on the original property (lot). Currently, rates are levied on the new properties, for the first time, at the start of the following rating year.
All of the other Illawarra Pilot Joint Organisation (IPJO) councils, that is, Wollongong, Shellharbour and Kiama, do Part Year Rating at the time of subdivision.
The implementation of Part Year Rating will create an additional workload for the Revenue Unit. This will include the need to update all records once subdivisions are received, along with adjusting rates already levied, levying rates on new lots and the production of Part Year Rate Levy Notices. It will also lengthen the Section 603 certificate production time. These certificates provide details on the amount (if any) of rates and charges due and payable to Council at that point in time. Council regularly receives requests for 603 certificates on newly subdivided land.
Community Engagement
No external community engagement required in relation to this as it is a requirement of the NSW Government that we implement Part Year Rating for the Fire and Emergency Services Levy.
Financial Implications
Based on the Supplementary Land Valuations data up to 8 April 2017, we would have been able to generate additional net revenue of $232,000 levied on 669 new properties if Council were Part Year Rating. The rate revenue will vary from year to year, depending on the number of subdivisions. The total cost of Part Year Rating is estimated to be $73,000 per year, including on-costs, for one full time employee.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 25 |
SA17.120 March 2017 Quarterly Budget Review
HPERM Ref: D17/130938
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Finance
Attachments: 1. March 2017 Quarterly Budget Review (under separate cover) ⇨
Purpose / Summary
In accordance with Regulation 203(1) of the Local Government (General) Regulation (2005), the responsible accounting officer must prepare and submit to the Council a budget review statement after the end of each quarter. This has been carried out for the third quarter of the 2016/17 financial year.
That the March Quarterly Budget Review and vote movements outlined in the Quarterly Budget Review Statement be adopted by Council.
|
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
Implications: Nil
2. Adopt the recommendation as above and also resolve to fund Sussex Inlet Streetscape for the full scope of works, which will cost Council an additional $500K. Council has identified $500,000 in the draft 2017/18 DP/OP & budget documents for “Streetscape renewals” funded by the SRV. This could be allocated to Sussex Inlet Stage 2 if council decides to adopt the 13.2% rate increase approved by IPART.
Implications: Council could decide to approve the Stage 1 & Stage 2 works to proceed now and allocate funds from “unallocated general fund cash” this year on the basis that these funds would be returned from the final budget adopted for 2017/18.
3. Not adopt the recommendation and make an alternative resolution
Implications: Staff will need to rework the quarterly budget review in accordance with the alternative resolution.
Background
The budget review involves an analysis of Council’s annual budget for each Group to determine whether any changes in votes are required for the period. This process has been undertaken for the period to 31st March 2017, and any changes have been reported in the Quarterly Budget Review Document. This report also analyses the progress of each group in achieving its financial objectives.
General Fund
The original budget adopted by Council produced an operating profit of $2.8M after capital grants, an operating loss before Capital Grants and Contributions of $14M, a reduction in our cash and investments of $14M and an unrestricted cash deficit of $2.8M. The revotes carried forward and adjustments made in this quarterly review have resulted in a projected year end cash deficit position of $990K, as per the following table.
The March Quarterly Budget Review Statement details the recommended budget adjustments with comments on these adjustments and any significant variances. Below is a summary of the adjustments and results to date.
Revenue
As at 31st March, General Fund has achieved 77% of the revised budget. This is primarily due to the raising of rates revenue in full. Excluding rate income, General Fund has achieved 69% of the revised budget. The March Quarterly Budget Review Statement recommends a revenue increase of $2.7M. The major adjustments in the review are:
· $1.658M increase for Internal Corporate Services – of which $998K relates to section 94, offset to reserve; $507K relates to Plant and Fleet, offset to reserve; $78K for internal revenue for staff time on capital works, offset by expenditure; $68K for insurance reimbursement, offset to reserve.
· $685K increase for Roads and Transport – of which $241K is for higher than expected reimbursement for Street Lighting, partially offset by expenditure; and $350K Waterways Infrastructure Grant received, offset by expenditure and recognition of $94K grant income on projects that will be funded in 2017/18, to match the expenditure that has already occurred.
· $257K increase for Waste & Recycling, of which $230K is Waste Levy Rebate.
· $272K net decrease for Economic Development – of which $1.15M reduction relates to a grant funded project ($750K cashflowed to 2017/18 financial year for receipt, $400K being claimed by third party, offset by expenditure reductions), $563K increase due to grant received, $308K increase for dividend received, offset to reserve.
Operating Expenditure
General Fund is on target with operating expenditure at 73% of the revised budget. The March Quarterly Budget Review Statement recommends an expenditure increase of $913K, made up of:
· $299K increase for Open Spaces, of which $200K is for tree management and $99K offset by revenue.
· $211K increase for Roads and Transport, of which $100K is funded from Plant and Fleet Reserve, and $111K is offset by reimbursement of street lighting expenses.
· $184K increase for Internal Corporate Services, of which $72K is offset by additional internal revenue, and $200K offset by Plant and Fleet Reserve, and a net reduction of $88K from within Finance and Corporate Services.
· $98K increase for Land Use Planning, of which $143K is proponent funded, and $40K has been returned to the General Fund as the Citywide LEP & DCP project has been completed.
· $69K decrease for Governance and Civic, $54 of which relates to final costs for the election being less than budgeted and $15K relates to a transfer for the community reference panel
· $66K increase for Environmental and Natural Areas, $50K of which relates to a Grant received for South Mollymook, $16K relates to private works expenditure (offsetting revenue)
· $58K increase for Buildings. $50K of which relates to offsetting internal revenue, $19K relates to MIN16.988 from Property Reserve & $10K transfer to non-operating expenditure for capital purchases
· $29K increase for Economic Development, of which $5K is a grant received for Business Networking, $20K is a transfer from capital for operational works and $4K is a recovery of prior expenses.
Non-Operating Expenditure
Capital Expenditure as at 31st March is 42% of the revised budget (excluding commitments). The March Quarterly Budget Review Statement recommends a budget decrease of $1.14M. This decrease consists of:
· $1.96M decrease for Economic Development due to the following - cashflowing of Ulladulla Harbour Berthing facility ($1.13M cashflowed to 17/18, $400K being third party); $400K uncommitted funds returned to reserve for expenditure in 2017/18; $20K transfer to operating expenditure for maintenance on Industrial Land.
· $100K increase for Entertainment Centre from Asset Compliance Reserve for compliance works.
· $192K decrease for Management and Support - $40K transfer to operating, $152K return to plant and fleet reserve.
· $623K overall increase for Roads & Transport, comprising a $122K increase for additional heavy patching and sealing projects, funded from plant and fleet reserve; $350K grant from Better Boating for Waterways infrastructure; $94K of expenditure offset by early recognition of 2017/18 grant funds, $10K from section 94 recoupment for Winnima Lane
· $233K increase for Waste plant, funded by reserve.
· Rural Fire Service – a number of projects have been completed on behalf of the RFS, however, there are four projects where the grant funding allocated has been insufficient. Two notable projects in this category are the construction of the West Nowra Fire Station (shortfall of $115K) and the Group Support facilities (shortfall of $46K). Preliminary discussions have commenced with the RFS in order to work through these funding issues.
Asset Sales
Asset sales are at 79% of the revised budget. An increase of $201K has been recommended this quarter, relating to the sales of industrial lands exceeding forecast, and are offset by reserve movement.
Key Performance Indicators
Operating Performance Ratio: The slight decline in this ratio relates to the increase in operating expenditure being more than the increase in income (excluding Capital Grants and Contributions).
Own Source Operating Revenue Ratio: This is remaining consistent.
Unrestricted Current Ratio: The main reason for the improvement in this ratio, is due to the cash flowing of projects in line with their predicted rate of spend. This has resulted in a projected increase in unrestricted cash as at 30 June 2017.
Debt Service Cover Ratio: This is remaining consistent.
Rates, Annual Charges Ratio: This is remaining consistent.
Cash Expense Cover Ratio: This has improved due to a projected increase in cash as at 30 June 2017.
Infrastructure Renewal Ratio: The 2015/16 results (based on actual spend) for General Fund was 53.0%. The projected year end budget result currently stands at 74.3%, which is an increase over the original 2016/17 budget at 58.3%. The projected year end budget result also assumes that all funds committed to Infrastructure projects will be fully expended by 30 June 2017. Should any projects not be completed during 2016/17 (this will be determined during the June quarterly review), the projected year end result will be adjusted accordingly. Projects added during this quarterly review which have increased this ratio are related to Grants (Better Boating Now & Black Spot) and an increase to the Local Roads Repair Programme, funded from Plant & Fleet Reserve.
Infrastructure Backlog Ratio: This is remaining consistent.
Asset Maintenance Ratio: The improvement in this ratio when compared to the 2015/16 Results is due to Council’s continued focus on maintaining our assets. The Original Budget for 2016/17 contained expenditure increases to allow for this. During the course of the financial year to date, it has become apparent that some categories of assets have required additional funding. These areas are Parks, Roads and Tree Maintenance, which is why the indicator has risen from 0.97 (taking into account the original budget, as well as carry forwards and revotes from 2015/16 year) to the projected year end result of 1.07.
General Manager’s Group
The recommended budget changes, revised budget and result to date for the General Manager’s Group are summarised below, details of the adjustments and variances are included in the March Quarterly Budget Review Statement.
General Manager’s Comments:
Results to date are considered satisfactory. In addition to the comments included above in the overall General Fund summary the revenue adjustments also includes an additional $56k cost recovery for legal services (offset by expenditure increase) and an extra $10k for Conduct review expenses.
Finance, Corporate and Community Services
The recommended budget changes, revised budget and result to date for the Finance, Corporate and Community Services Group are summarised below, details of the adjustments and variances are included in the March Quarterly Budget Review Statement.
Group Director’s Comments:
This quarter has seen an increase in Section 94 receipts due to a high level of development activity in the Shoalhaven. The operating expenditure for the group is tracking well, slightly below the 75% mark. Captial Works is currently 17% spent, the key project in this group is the Shoalhaven Indoor Sports Centre. Zauner construction have been directed to proceed with the Trade packages with a construction budget of approximately $10.7M that has been previously allocated by Council for 2017/18; the fitout budget is still required. Civil works package for the Sports Centre have been advertised and minor works packages such as Traffic Control have been awarded.
An adjustment to the non-operating expenditure of $100K relates to BCA compliance works to be undertaken at the Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre.
Planning, Environment and Development Services
The recommended budget changes, revised budget and result to date for the Planning, Environment and Development Services Group are summarised below, details of the adjustments and variances are included in the March Quarterly Budget Review Statement.
Group Director’s Comments:
Revenue is tracking strongly given the continued high level of development activity; in this respect it is slightly above expectations. Grant funds related to the East Coast Low (recognised in budgets last quarterly review) will be received upon achievement of milestones, and this is skewing the income percentage. Expenditure is on track.
Small Lot Rural Subdivision
Nebraska Estate: $69,333 remains for progressing rezoning investigations.
Verons Estate: The $150,000 borrowed in 2006 to fund the rezoning investigations has been fully spent. A total of $25,000 has now been transferred from the Strategic Planning Consultants budget, which has been overspent by $1,413. During the fourth quarter review, it will be considered if the overspend should be transferred from Verons road construction. Further transfer(s) may be necessary to complete the project.
Road investigations and construction: The balance of the roadwork design budget for Nebraska Estate for 2016/2017 is $10,646. The balance of the construction budgets for Jerberra, Verons and Nebraska Estates for 2016/2017 are $3.1M, $5,764 and $13,519 respectively.
Assets and Works
The recommended budget changes, revised budget and result to date for the Assets and Works Group are summarised below, details of the adjustments and variances are included in the March Quarterly Budget Review Statement.
Group Director’s Comments:
Operating expenditure is tracking well and each Section of the Assets and Works Group operated close to budget, with operational expenditure being on target at 74%.
Large capital projects that were grant funded have commenced such as Naval College Road widening and Woodburn Road hazard removal (Federal Blackspot) and Culburra Road widening and upgrade (State). A number of major road upgrades have also commenced such as Prince Edward Avenue, Coolangatta Road and Beach Road renewals. A key project in the program is the upgrade of the full length of Flinders Road, with the award of a contract determined in April and substantial changes to underground services already completed.
Another key project is the Shoalhaven Indoor Sports Centre. Zauner construction have been directed to proceed with the Trade packages with a construction budget of approximately $10.7M that has been previously allocated by Council for 2017/18; the fitout budget is still required. Civil works package for the Sports Centre have been advertised and minor works packages such as Traffic Control awarded.
The northern Ulladulla Harbour boat ramp upgrade and jetty has commenced and documents have been finalised for Fisherman’s paradise pontoon on Lake Conjola and Dent Street paddle craft launching area on Currambene Creek. Recent boat ramp upgrades have exceeded the budget, due to poor ground conditions adjacent to some of these works; additional funds have been sourced from RMS, through the Better Boating Now Program, and will partly offset the overrun.
A key issue was the significant wet weather that has delayed major road projects at Culburra, with an impact on those planned for Greenwell Point Road and Albatross Road. This may lead to works continuing into the 2017/18 financial year.
Stormwater Levy
Spending against the Stormwater Levy is 48% of budget.
Group Director’s Comments:
Drainage was completed early in the third quarter at Penguins Head Road, Culburra and pipes and associated pits have been ordered for the Greenwell Point Road and Bolong Road drainage projects.
St Andrews Way, Coolangatta and The Park Drive, Sanctuary Point continue to be delayed due to land matters. During Quarter 4, there may be an opportunity to transfer funds from these works to the Bolong Road drainage, which is associated with flooding adjacent to the sports ovals.
Special Rate Variation
Spending against the Special Rate Variation is 33% of budget.
Group Director’s Comments:
Coolangatta Road works has commenced and is progressing well and the services have been relocated at the intersection with Bolong Road. Agars Lane Sealing has been completed and costs will be finalised in the next quarter.
The Streetscape improvements at Jacobs Drive, Sussex Inlet are only funded for Stage 1. Numerous representations have been made by the CCB and the Business Chamber to fund the full scope. However, additional funds haven’t been allocated and works will proceed for this Stage only, unless a funding source is identified for Stage 2.
Shoalhaven Water (General Fund)
The recommended budget changes, revised budget and result to date for the Shoalhaven Water Group (General Fund) are summarised below. Details of the adjustments and variances are included in the March Quarterly Budget Review Statement.
Group Director’s Comments:
The Shoalhaven Water General Fund Group is operating on target, with operational expenditure and revenue tracking at 76% of budget. The adjustment to operating expenditure mainly relates to the demolition of the old Cambewarra communication tower.
Water Fund
The budget adopted by Council produced an operating profit of $1M, an operating profit before Capital Grants and Contributions of $27K and a reduction in cash and investments of $13M. The revotes carried forward and adjustments made in this quarterly review have resulted in the following:
The recommended budget changes, revised budget and result to date for the Shoalhaven Water Group (Water Fund) are summarised below, details of the adjustments and variances are included in the March Quarterly Budget Review Statement.
Revenue
As at 31st March, Water Fund has achieved 86% of the revised budget. An adjustment of $845K is recommended, mainly due to resource recoupment, insurance claims received after the June 2016 storm event, an increase in water connection installs and additional section 64 receipts.
Operating Expenditure
Water Fund is on target with operating expenditure at 74% of the revised budget. The March Quarterly Budget Review Statement recommends an increase of $95K. This increase mainly relates to a budget transfer from non-operating expenditure of $40k, due to the reclassification of an expenditure type, and contract negotiations for the communication towers $50k.
Non-Operating Expenditure
Capital Expenditure as at 31st March is 61% of the revised budget (excluding commitments). A reduction of $1.748M is recommended after reviewing the timing of a number of key projects and the tender for the water main replacement between Burrill Lake and Lake Tabourie coming in under budget $1M.
Asset Sales
Asset sales is at 86% of the revised budget, there is an adjustment of $17K recommended.
Cashflow – Financing Activities
An adjustment of $7k is recommended to align the dividend payment with the financial statements.
Key Performance Indicators
Operating Performance Ratio: The increase in this ratio relates to the additional income expected, when compared to the operating expenditure.
Own Source Operating Revenue Ratio: This has slightly decreased due to the additional Section 64 contributions expected.
Unrestricted Current Ratio: The main reason for the improvement in this ratio, is due to the cash flowing of projects in line with their predicted rate of spend. This has resulted in a projected increase in externally unrestricted cash as at 30 June 2017.
Debt Service Cover Ratio: This ratio is high due to this year being the final year for loan repayments.
Rates, Annual Charges Ratio: This is remaining consistent.
Cash Expense Cover Ratio: This has improved due to a projected increase in cash as at 30 June 2017.
Infrastructure Renewal Ratio: This ratio has reduced, due to the cash flowing of projects to 2017/18 financial year.
Infrastructure Backlog Ratio: There is no backlog.
Asset Maintenance Ratio: This is remaining consistent.
Group Director’s Comments:
The Water Fund is operating on target, with operational expenditure at 74% and revenue tracking slightly higher at 86% of budget. The adjustment to revenue relates to Section 64 income tracking higher than expected due to increased developer activity, resource reallocations and an insurance claim received after the storm event in June 2016. The capital program is progressing and requires a number of adjustments this quarter. These adjustments mainly relate to the water main replacement between Burrill Lake & Lake Tabourie coming in under budget and the reforecasting of cashflow on a number of capital projects. The reforecasting adjustments have been included in the budget on exhibition.
Sewer Fund
The budget adopted by Council produced an operating profit of $12.2M, an operating profit before Capital Grants and Contributions of $11.2M and a reduction in cash and investments of $6M. The revotes carried forward and adjustments made in this quarterly review have resulted in the following:
The recommended budget changes, revised budget and result to date for the Shoalhaven Water Group (Sewer Fund) are summarised below. Details of the adjustments and variances are included in the March Quarterly Budget Review Statement.
Revenue
As at 31st March, Sewer Fund has achieved 80% of the revised budget. An adjustment of $1,352K recommended for this review. The major adjustments include increases to: section 64 receipts, chargeable private works and other income received from fees and charges, trade waste income increased with higher usage and the reforecasting of interest received, due to changes in the timing of capital disbursements.
Operating Expenditure
Sewer Fund is slightly below target with operating expenditure at 71% of the revised budget. The March Quarterly Budget Review Statement recommends an increase of $20K mainly due to a budget transfer from non-operating expenditure of ($20k) due to the reclassification of an expenditure type.
Non-Operating Expenditure
Capital Expenditure as at 31st March is 41% of the revised budget (excluding commitments). A reduction of $29.949M is recommended, mainly due to reforecasting the REMS1B cashflow.
Asset Sales
Asset sales are at 96% of the revised budget, no adjustments are required.
Cashflow – Financing Activities
An adjustment of $73k is recommended to align the dividend payment with the financial statements.
Key Performance Indicators
Operating Performance Ratio: The increase in this ratio relates to the additional income expected, when compared to the operating expenditure.
Own Source Operating Revenue Ratio: This has slightly decreased due to the additional Section 64 contributions expected.
Unrestricted Current Ratio: The main reason for the improvement in this ratio, is due to the cash flowing of projects in line with their predicted rate of spend. This has resulted in a projected increase in externally unrestricted cash as at 30 June 2017.
Debt Service Cover Ratio: This ratio has improved as the increase in projected income has been higher than the increase in projected operating expenditure.
Rates, Annual Charges Ratio: This is remaining consistent.
Cash Expense Cover Ratio: This has improved due to a projected increase in cash as at 30 June 2017.
Infrastructure Renewal Ratio: This ratio has reduced, due to the cash flowing of projects to 2017/18 financial year.
Infrastructure Backlog Ratio: There is no backlog.
Asset Maintenance Ratio: This is remaining consistent.
Group Director’s Comments:
The Sewer Fund has operated close to budget over the last nine months, with operational expenditure on target at 71% and operating revenue tracking slightly above budget at 80%. The capital program is progressing and requires a number of adjustments this quarter. These adjustments mainly relate to reforecasting the cash flow for the REMS1B project. These adjustments have been included in the budget on exhibition.
Financial Implications
Adjustments made in the March quarter budget review have resulted in a continued projected cash deficit budget. The current projected cash deficit is $990K. Council will need to be mindful of the situation and not introduce new works or services unless a funding source is clearly identified.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 43 |
SA17.121 Paringa Park - Adoption of Non motorised Water Sports Hub Master Plan
HPERM Ref: D17/78736
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Recreation Community & Culture
Attachments: 1. Previous related Council report ⇩
2. Submission summary ⇩
Purpose / Summary
To seek Council approval to finalise and adopt the draft Non-motorised Water Sports Hub Master Plan – Paringa Park.
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation.
Implications: This will allow finalisation of the plan and be able to progress to detail design when funding is allocated to the project.
2. Adopt the recommendations with amendment(s).
Implications: Council may resolve to remove or add to the recommendations and this may require re-exhibition of the master plan.
3. Council not adopt the draft master plan and provide a different strategic direction to staff.
Implications: This may not meet the expectations of our community current users and staff.
Background
Related Council resolution
Council’s November 2016 Strategy & Assets Committee meeting resolved:
1. Council endorse public exhibition of the draft master plan for a non-motorised water sports hub in Paringa Park for a period of 28 days.
2. Council continue to work with Nowra Sea Scouts, Nowra Community Sailing Club, Nowra Water Dragons, Nowra Rowing Club and other relevant stakeholders during and after the exhibition period to engage with the broader community on this initiative.
3. Council receive a further report after public exhibition of the draft master plan for a non-motorised water sports hub in Paringa Park.
4. Council consider an allocation of $80,000 in the 2017/18 budget to undertake the detailed design of the key elements of the master plan for a non-motorised water sports hub in Paringa Park in order that the project is shovel ready for possible grant applications.
The report pertaining to the above recommendation can be viewed in Attachment 1.
Public exhibition process
In actioning the above resolution, Council advertised public exhibition of draft master plan from 1 to 28 February 2017 and wrote to landowners adjacent to or in immediate view line of Paringa Park to advise them of the exhibition. Through this process, the community was invited to comment on the draft master plan which was available for viewing on Council’s website and at Council’s Administration Building, Nowra Library and Nowra Aquatic Park.
Submission / feedback received
As a result of public exhibition of the draft master plan, Council received 13 submissions which are provided with staff comments in Attachment 2. As noted in the attached document, these submission comments were relatively minor in content, a number of submissions had concerns regarding the space having restricted access however this is not the case as it is a multipurpose co-located facility for the whole community, and the reserve will be enhanced to allow for greater and more diverse use by the community.
The submissions have resulted in the following minor amendments to the Master Plan Notes.
· Addition of BBQ facilities
· Noting path connection to existing path
Community Engagement
As mention above, Council exhibited the draft master plan from 1 February to 28 February 2017 which involved advertising it in the press and on Councils website, and writing to adjacent landowners.
Financial Implications
To continue advancement of the detailed design so the project can be shovel ready for grant funding / project delivery in the future requires consideration to allocate $80,000 in the 2017/18 financial year.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 57 |
SA17.122 Improvements to Nowra Showground - Nowra Ideas Day
HPERM Ref: D17/115403
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Recreation Community & Culture
Attachments: 1. Nowra Showground Ideas Day Feedback ⇩
2. Management Committee Guidelines (under separate cover) ⇨
3. Nowra Show Society comment on proposed population of Nowra Showground Management committee ⇩
4. Report - Future operations and management of Nowra Showground - Strategy & Assets Committee 18 April 2017 (councillors information folder) ⇨
Purpose / Summary
To address MIN 16.886:
“That staff prepare a report to Council on a suite of improvements and approximate costs that could improve the Nowra Showgrounds, including but not limited to improving the lookout and picnic facilities, sealing of the roads within the showgrounds, landscaping and demarcation for camping”
Options
1. Adopt all of the recommendations without amendment and provide further directions to staff.
Implications: This would allow Council to progress matters in a timely and direct manner.
2. Adopt some or all of the recommendations with amendments and provide further directions for staff.
Implications: Unknown until the amended recommendations are known.
3. Not adopt the recommendations and provide an alternate resolution with directions for staff.
Implications: Could delay any improvements on the matters outlined and further accentuate any community unrest.
Background
At Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 22 December 2016, Council resolved:
“That staff prepare a report to Council on a suite of improvements and approximate costs that could improve the Nowra Showgrounds, including but not limited to improving the lookout and picnic facilities, sealing of the roads within the showgrounds, landscaping and demarcation for camping. NOTE: The Mayor amended the content of the Mayoral Minutes to reflect that Council is continuing to work through the homelessness issue within the showgrounds area” (MIN 16.886)
To assist Council staff in their research, the Nowra Showground Ideas Day was held on 26 February 2017. This event facilitated ideas from over 70 community members (including current users, neighbours, residents and community) regarding improvements to the showground.
There was a wide variety of issues discussed however three main ideas formed the key suggestions - for a full overview of discussions see Attachment 1 - Nowra Showground Ideas Day Feedback.
The three key suggestions were:
1. To establish a Nowra Showground Caretaker
2. To complete road upgrades
3. To undertake a review of how the showground is used (including but not limited to camping and caravanning) and to establish a strategy for future use of the site.
1. Caretaker
The most broadly supported suggestion that came out of the Ideas Day was the implementation of a caretaker at the showground. This was suggested primarily as a means of addressing the issue of homeless people residing at the site, however is also seen as a way of better monitoring, maintaining and managing the site.
If Council were to pursue the establishment of a caretaker, there are a number of matters that would need to be considered – they include:
· The context and definition of a ‘caretaker’ – defining their roles and responsibilities and their jurisdictional authority
· Human resourcing and costs of a caretaker, estimated to be approx. $130,000 per year, plus call out fees for out of hours calls, and relief manager costs (to cover leave) of approx. $1,800 per week
· Establishment of a caretaker cottage, which would need a Development Application and which would need to be an option through the Plan of Management for the site (currently under Aboriginal land claim) . It may be possible to have a nearby resident take on this role, however the feedback from residents at the Ideas Day was for an ‘on site” caretaker.
There is a history of Council discussions, activities and decisions that need to be understood when considering suggestions about the management of the Nowra Showground – a timeline is provided below.
October 2016 – at Council’s Ordinary Meeting on 4 October 2016, in relation to a number of existing Section 355 Management Committees, Council resolved MIN16.706 part (3):
“The following Section 355 Management Committees be renewed, however discussions commence to transition these Committees to an occupancy agreement within 2 years:
a. Ahimsa Sailing Club Management Committee
b. Jervis Bay Maritime Museum
c. Nowra Communal Hall
d. Vincentia Sailing Club
e. West Street Oval”
Council’s Property Unit is working towards an occupancy agreement with Nowra Showground Gymnastics in relation to the Nowra Communal Hall.
February 2017 – on 26 February 2017, Council staff held the Nowra Showground Ideas Day to explore a range of ideas and solutions to improve the Showground. The most popular idea put forward at the event was the establishment of a caretaker.
April 2017 – at Council’s Ordinary Council Meeting on 26 April 2017, in relation to future operations and management of Nowra Showground Council resolved:
MOTION (RESOLVED) (Clr Gash / Clr Pakes) MIN17.335 That Council: 1. Continue to retain existing arrangements at Nowra Showground which involves daily Ranger site visits until a formal Section 355 Management Committee over the Nowra Showground precinct is established including Nowra show society and other community representatives. 2. Defer advertising for members of the Section 355 Management Committee until the results of the Nowra Showground Ideas Day are known and further negotiations are held with the Nowra Show Society. 3. Reconsider the caretaker model following a report in May with the community feedback 4. Increase the 2017/18 budget for the Ranger site visits and security night patrols to the Nowra Showground to ensure adequate surveillance and enforcement of compliance requirements. 5. Receive a further report at its May 2017 Strategy and Assets Committee Meeting regarding feedback from the Nowra Showground Ideas Day held with the community to address Council |
The above timeline demonstrates the recent history of changes in decisions, suggestions and recommendations that have been made in relation to the land use and management of the Nowra Showground.
The most recent recommendation is to establish a Section 355 Management Committee for the Nowra Showground. If this is to be pursued, Council, along with any applicants for the Nowra Showground Management Committee roles would need to be made aware of the functions and responsibilities involved this.
Full details of Management Committee roles, functions and responsibilities are provided in Attachment 2 – Management Committee Guidelines.
The Nowra Show Society has a strong objection towards continuation and membership of the current Section 355 Management Committee for the Nowra Communal Hall as outlined in their letter which is provided as an attachment to the report – Attachment 3.
For the above mentioned points, the establishment of a Section 355 Management Committee for the Nowra Showground or continuation / renewal of a Section 355 Management Committee for the Nowra Communal Hall should be considered with caution.
These considerations and others are outlined in full detail in Attachment 4 - ‘Future operations and management of Nowra Showground’ (SA17.101) along with information about the existing cottage on site which is currently licensed to three (3) community groups until 2024.
2. Road upgrades
There were several requests for the roads within the showground to be improved/resealed. Council’s Asset Team have also identified the need to reseal the roads, in particular, the western perimeter road, the road from the main gate to the lookout, and the car parks adjacent to the arena.
The complete cost for this project is approximated at $354,000, it is identified on Councils work schedules and is currently unfunded. Council have identified this work as part of the Expression of Interest submission for the Environment and Tourism Grant, which is also for embellishments to the cattle yards, improvements to the camping facilities, roadworks and drainage.
3. Showground review and strategy
The community put forward the suggestion to review current use of the showground (to include camping and caravanning use) and to establish a strategy to enhance future use of the site.
Such a process could include a review of current and future camping and caravanning, other possible land uses of the site and suitable management frameworks (including but not limited to a caretaker and/or a Section 355 Management Committee or other options). It is estimated this process would cost approx. $10,000.
Other improvements
Council has recently applied to Crown Lands Public Reserves Management Fund Program to seek funding for the completion of the fencing, replacement of the wooden seating in the showground around the main arena and for tiered seating in the added area. If this grant is unsuccessful Council will continue to seek funds to complete these much needed works. The costs of these works are estimated at $100,000 and are currently unfunded.
An allocation of $600,000 had been made in the draft 2018/19 budget for repainting and refurbishing buildings in the Showground. These funds were to come from Special Rate Variation revenue. However, following IPART’s recent decision not to grant the SRV beyond 2017/18, the building works are currently unfunded.
The Nowra Show Society are currently seeking a Heritage Grant in consultation with Council and Council’s Heritage Advisor to seek solutions to address the leak in the roof of the pavilion and works to rectify damages that have occurred. The costs to rectify this are unknown and subject to investigation works for which the funding is being sourced via a grant funding application.
Community Engagement
On 26 February, 2017, the Social Infrastructure and Planning and Community Development Units held the Nowra Ideas Day. At this event Council staff worked cohesively with representatives from the Nowra Show Society and 70 community members to explore and discuss issues and solutions to improve the showground.
The community had identified its priorities within the facilitated workshop. Further engagement was available to those who could not attend via the ‘Council’s Get Involved Page’. The feedback page closed on 26 March. A total of 246 suggestions were documented, a number of these were duplicated, and hence the feedback was reviewed and then compiled into 79 suggestions.
Policy Implications
Nowra Showground Review and Strategy
The current Plan of Management for the Nowra Showgrounds provides guidance and direction on various uses of the site. Any recommendations that result from the review and subsequent strategy would need to be in line with any legislative and policy guidelines referenced in the Plan of Management. These would need to be incorporated into the revised Plan of Management.
It should be noted that at the present time the Nowra Showground is impacted by the current Aboriginal land claim on all Crown lands.
If a Section 355 Management Committee for Nowra Showground is to be established for the showground and its facilities, the management committee would need to adhere to all of the roles and responsibilities as outlined in the Management Committee Guidelines (attachment 2).
Financial Implications
Council currently do not have any funds allocated for this project. Anticipated costs would be:
· Increase Ranger site visits and security night patrols – Ranger wages (to visit mornings and afternoons) at approx. $60,000 per year
· Extra security patrols (2 extra visits per day) would cost an additional $20 per day which equates to $7,280 per year.
· Nowra Showground Review and Strategy – based on similar works, an external consultant would cost approx. $10,000 to complete this review.
· Road upgrades – it is estimated these works would cost approx. $354,000. Council currently have no allocated funds.
· Completion of the fencing, replacement of the wooden seating in the showground around the main arena and for tiered seating in the added area. The costs of these works are estimated at $100,000
· Internal and external painting of the pavilion and committee room, including the public toilets - approx. $410,000
· Investigation of the leak in the pavilion – estimate up to $40,000
· Costs to rectify - this is unknown and subject to the outcome of the investigation works
The total of these current identified works are $981,280.
It is proposed at this stage that Council should:
· Continue to retain existing arrangements at Nowra Showground which involves daily Ranger site visits and
· Increase the 2017/18 budget for the additional Ranger site visits and security night patrols to the Nowra Showground to ensure adequate surveillance and enforcement of compliance requirements.
· Allocate $10,000 in 2017/18 to develop a Nowra Showground Review and Strategy which will consider but not limited to the future camping, caravanning and management structure options.
· Allocate $354,000 in 2017/18 budget to undertake identified road sealing and maintenance works.
Risk Implications
Community wellbeing (including residents, users of the show ground facilities and the homeless) could be further negatively impacted if these matters are not addressed in a timely, careful and sensitive manner.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 65 |
SA17.123 Grant Funding - Sanctuary Point Shop CCTV additional cameras
HPERM Ref: D17/133195
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Recreation Community & Culture
Attachments: 1. Sanctuary Point shops rear CCTV Grant Letter ⇩
Purpose / Summary
To advise Council on the successful funding application submitted to the Safer Communities Fund (the Programme) through the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (DIIS) to enable the installation of two additional CCTV units at the rear of the Sanctuary Point Shops.
That Council accept the Safer Communities Funding to the value of $31,000 to enable the installation of two additional CCTV units at the rear of the Sanctuary Point Shops and vote the funds for the works. |
Options
1. Council adopt the recommendations.
Implications: This will ensure funding to install two additional cameras to provide surveillance for the rear of the shops.
2. Council reject the recommendation and provide an alternate.
Implications: Funding offer is declined and the installation of the two cameras does not proceed.
Background
Councils Community Development Unit applied to the Federal Department of Innovation Industry and Science for $31,000 to assist with the installation of two additional cameras at the rear of Sanctuary Point Shops for the total cost of $44,499.
Shoalhaven City Council will purchase, contract and install two cameras to be located at the back of the Sanctuary Point Shops. Poles, switches and boxes will be installed. Cameras will complement the seven cameras currently at the front of the shop.
The Sanctuary Point community have been advocating for the additional two cameras. The installation of cameras is one tool available to reduce criminal activity and anti-social behaviour in this location. The large field behind the shop site which includes the skate park, schools and civic amenities has minimal surveillance. Community and shop keepers have a perception of improved safety with the installation of cameras. Consultation with Police and community resolved that cameras will be beneficial as a crime detection tool.
Community Engagement
Previous engagement regarding the installation for the seven cameras at the front of the Sanctuary Point shops had included the community and retailers requesting cameras for the rear of the shops.
Policy Implications
No policy implications.
Financial Implications
An additional $13,499 required beyond the $31,000 grant funding will be met by Council from within an existing Community Development operational budget. Ongoing maintenance of this asset will be the responsibility of Council.
Risk Implications
The program will not introduce additional risk.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 68 |
SA17.124 Shoalhaven Tourism Advisory Group - Quorum and Membership
HPERM Ref: D17/137336
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Human Resources, Governance & Customer Service
Purpose / Summary
To seek Council approval on the amendment of the Terms of Reference regarding membership and the quorum number for the Shoalhaven Tourism Advisory Group (STAG).
Options
1. Council except the recommendation and changes be made to the Terms or Reference.
Implications: Greater industry influence in STAG and fewer numbers in membership will allow the STAG to carry out business with less numbers.
2. Council except part one of the recommendation
Implications: Membership be updated to reflect fewer voting numbers but does not recognise an official change to the quorum.
3. Council except part two of the recommendation
Implications: Voting membership to stay as ‘it is’, but quorum to be changed to fewer members to allow STAG to carry on business with fewer members present.
Background
The STAG has seen two (2) recent meetings not go ahead due to lack of quorum and several meetings where members have had to leave early due to busy schedules. The members feel that the total membership and resulting quorum, which is currently at majority of members, is currently too high.
In 2016, STAG membership, as per the Terms of Reference, was set to 16 total members and quorum set to half plus one, 9 members.
Membership included:
- A maximum of 9 skills based Industry Representatives
- A maximum of 5 Councillors
- Chairperson of the Shoalhaven Sports Board
- The Mayor
Changes have been recommended from Council in recent times bringing the total STAG membership to 18 and the quorum to 10 members.
Changes included:
- An additional Councillor was added to the membership
- An additional position was created and allocated to NPWS
Current Membership
9 Industry representatives
Ms Lynne Locke
Ms Annie Cochrane
Mr Matthew Forbes
Ms Catherine Shields
Ms Jo Thomas
Ms Louise Hallum
Mr Paul McLeod
Mr Rob Crow
Mr Neil Rodgers
6 Councillors plus the Mayor
Mayor Amanda Findley
Cllr Gash
Cllr Kitchener
Cllr Watson
Cllr Wells
Cllr Alldrick
Cllr John Levett
Sports Board Chair
Mr David Goodman
NPWS Representative
STAG recognises the critical part Councillors play in leadership and support of tourism, both in industry development and strategy. It is the wish of the group that all Councillors are offered membership, as both current members and additional Councillors who attend meetings regularly, are of critical importance to the group for their experienced input, guidance and support. It is also recognised that Councillors hold full calendars and are often very busy with lots of commitments.
As the industry grows and takes on a greater leadership role in STAG, it is requested that Council recognise the important role industry play in tourism and formally allow the voting membership to reflect this.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 71 |
SA17.125 2017 NSW Local Roads Congress - Making Our Roads Work
HPERM Ref: D17/142413
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Human Resources, Governance & Customer Service
Attachments: 1. Weekly Circular 16/17 - LGSA - Item 18: Free Registration Opportunity for Councillors for the 2017 NSW Local Roads Congress - Making Our Roads Work ⇩
Purpose / Summary
To consider Councillor attendance at the 2017 NSW Local Roads Congress - Making our Roads Work scheduled for Monday 5 June 2017 in Parliament House, Sydney NSW.
Options
1. As per the recommendation.
Implications: Travel, accommodation and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses be met in accordance with its adopted policy
2. That Council limit the number of Councillors attending the Conference to a defined number and such attendance be deemed Council Business.
Implications: This would limit the expense to the Council for matters
Background
The 2017 NSW Local Roads Congress - Making our Roads Work is considered relevant to local government, Information in relation to the conference is attached to this report
Costs associated with the conference are estimated as follows:
· registration : The Roads and Transport Directorate and LGNSW are offering free registration for Councillors for the Local Roads Congress and Congress Dinner
· Travel, accommodation and out of pocket expenses: not yet determined.
The Conference commences at 5.00pm.
The following Council Business is scheduled within the period of the conference:
· Councillors Briefing - Development Matters - 4.00pm
· Development Committee - 5.00pm.
Policy Implications
The Council Members – Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy limits attendance at conferences to three per annum per councillor exclusive of any conference arranged by either the State or National Local Government Associations.
Financial Implications:
Funds are available for Councillors to attend this conference.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 74 |
SA17.126 Local Government Remuneration Tribunal - Determination - Councillor and Mayoral Fees, and the Categorisation of Councils 2017/18
HPERM Ref: D17/143049
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Human Resources, Governance & Customer Service
Attachments: 1. 2017 Annual Determination - Local Government Remuneration Tribunal (under separate cover) ⇨
Purpose / Summary
The purpose of this report is to note and consider the attached determination from the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal and to adopt the fees payable to the Mayor and Councillors for the 2017/18 financial year.
That Council note the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal review of annual fees and agree to adjust Councillor and Mayoral fees for the 2017/18 financial year to $19,310 and $42,120 respectively.
|
Options
1. As recommended
2. Adjust the Councillor and Mayoral fees to a lesser amount.
Background
The Local Government Remuneration Tribunal (the Tribunal) has awarded an annual fee increase of 2.5 per cent, with effect from Saturday 1 July 2017. Section 241 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) requires the Tribunal to determine each year the maximum and minimum amounts of annual fees payable during the following year to Mayors and Councillors. Section 248 and 249 of the Act require Councils to fix and pay an annual fee based on the Tribunal’s determination.
The Tribunal has advised since the making of the 2016 determination a number of Councils have been amalgamated resulting in the creation of 20 new Councils. The impact of those structural changes is an overall reduction in the number of Councils in NSW from 152 to 128. The significant change has prompted a review of the existing categories and the allocation of Councils into each of those categories.
The Tribunal has determined a categorisation model which differentiate Councils primarily on the basis of their geographic location. Other factors which differentiate Councils for the purpose of categorisation include population, the Council’s economic influence and regional servicing degree.
The Categories are as follows:
Metropolitan |
Non-metropolitan |
Principal CBD |
Regional City |
Major CBD |
Regional Strategic Area |
Metropolitan Large |
Regional Rural |
Metropolitan Medium |
Rural |
Metropolitan Small |
|
Shoalhaven City Council remains in the Regional Rural Category. Councils categorised as Regional Rural will typically have a minimum population of 20,000 (and less than 150,000).
The Tribunal advised that the majority of Councils will receive an increase of 2.5 per cent only which is consistent with the Government’s Wages Policy.
Councils are to fix Councillor and Mayoral fees for the 2017/18 financial year based on the Tribunal’s Determination. The level of fees paid will depend on what category the Council is in. A Council cannot fix a fee higher than the maximum amount determined by the Tribunal. If a Council does not fix a fee, the Council must pay the minimum fee determined by the Tribunal.
The recommendation outlined in the report reflects the maximum fee payable, as has been the practice of Shoalhaven City Council for a number of years.
The Councillor and Mayoral fee adoption is distinct and separate to the payment of expenses and provision of facilities to Councillors. The Mayoral Fee is an amount paid to the Mayor in addition to the Councillor Fee.
Please see attached 28 April 2017 Annual Report and Determination of the Local Government Tribunal under Sections 239 and 241 of the Local Government Act 1993 for further information.
Community Engagement
Council is not required to undertake community consultation in relation to the adoption of the fee amendment determination process.
Financial Implications
Current 2016/17 budgeted fees paid to Shoalhaven City Mayor/Chairperson and City Councillors/Members:
CATEGORY |
Councillor Annual Fee |
Mayor Additional Fee* |
Regional Rural |
$18,840 |
$41,090 |
Proposed fees to Shoalhaven City Councillors and Mayor 2017/18 financial year:
2017/18 Determination - Pursuant to Section 241 of Fees for Councillors and Mayors
CATEGORY |
Councillor Annual Fee |
Mayor Additional Fee* |
||
Minimum |
Maximum |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
Regional Rural |
$8,750 |
$19,310 |
$18,630 |
$42,120 |
*this fee must be paid in addition to the fee paid to the Mayor as a Councillor/Member (s429(2)).
The proposed Budget allocation in the Draft 2017/18 Budget for Councillors/Mayoral fees is $307,000 which is sufficient to cover the maximum fees as recommended in this report.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 77 |
SA17.127 Huskisson Public Wharves - Access Working Party
HPERM Ref: D17/131844
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Asset Management
Purpose / Summary
To report on the results of the Huskisson Public Wharves Access Working Party
Option
1. As recommended receive the report for information
Implication: The outcomes of the Huskisson Wharf working party will be implemented. Signage will be provided to indicate that the two critical zones are “loading zones”, this supports the management committee and the working group in their endeavours to ensure inclusive tourism and access for all at the wharf.
2. Propose an alternative recommendation
Background
Council at its meeting on 28 February 2017 considered a deputation in relation to access issues at the Huskisson public wharves and resolved that:
“Council establish a Huskisson Wharf working party, made up of representatives of RMS, Crown Lands, Jervis Bay Wild (Brendan Aulsebrook), Huskisson Wharf Management Committee (David MacDonald & Terry O’Connor) and Inclusive Tourism (Chris Mitchell) be established immediately with a meeting to be held within 21 days to discuss the ongoing issues at Huskisson Wharf of disability access for inclusive tourism.”
The working party met on site on 21 March 2017 and recommended that :
a. Signage/markings be provided to delineate the critical loading/uploading zones for Port Venture and Huskisson Ferry
b. Refer the matter to the Huskisson Wharf Management Committee(HWMC) for consideration
c. That if the HWMC agreed, signage would be implemented and there would be no further need for the working party to meet again
d. RMS to provide examples of signage/that has been used elsewhere
The Huskisson Wharf Management Committee met on 26 April 2017 and unanimously agreed with the recommendation subject to signage being provided to indicate that the two critical zones are “loading zones”, with the key benefit of informing vessel operators using the wharf.
Community Engagement
The Huskisson Wharf Management Committee is the relevant consultative group for operational matters concerning management of the Wharf.
Financial Implications
Provision of signage can be funded from the Waterways Maintenance budget.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 79 |
SA17.128 Accessible Car Parking Spaces - Graham Street and McGrath Ave Nowra
HPERM Ref: D17/96657
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Asset Management
Purpose / Summary
To report on the possibility of creating a dedicated disabled parking space within the angled parking on the eastern side of Graham Street, Nowra as requested by the Shoalhaven Access Advisory Committee (SAAC) following a Notice of Motion (MIN17.152).
Options
1. As recommended, council installs an accessible parking space and associated works within the currently time restricted 90 degree parking on McGrath Avenue. (Recommended)
Implications: Council’s CBD parking strategy has identified parking within McGrath Avenue closer to the toilets, which will align with other parking proposals within this street. Funding is available in the 2017/18 budget for this location.
2. Recommended originally by Shoalhaven Access Advisory Committee (SAAC) (not recommended)
Implications: The proposed location of works would not be suitable due to site constraints. A longer distance to walk to the public toilets would also be required from the space.
Background
The Shoalhaven Access Advisory Committee (SAAC) resolved at its meeting on 27 July 2016 that
· A report back to the Shoalhaven Access Advisory Committee on the possibility of an accessible car park to be included for:
a) the 45 degree parking area at Graham St Nowra (near the public toilet);
b) Meroo Rd Bomaderry (near the pub).
Council also resolved, in part, at its meeting on 28 February 2017 (minute MIN17.152) that
· Council refer the following recommendation from the SAAC to the Council Traffic Staff for review and report back to Council:
1. Convert the 2 x 45 degree existing car parking spaces in Graham Street to one accessible car parking space.
2. Include the new accessible icon signage.
The SAAC requested Council investigate providing accessible parking on the eastern side of Graham Street to provide increased access to the toilets located within Harry Sawkins Park for mobility parking scheme (MPS) permit holders.
In contrast, Council has proposed to extend the existing 45 degree parking on Graham Street in this location. Also installation of a kerb ramp is problematic, and the distance to the public toilets is longer than from the McGrath Avenue location.
The one hour (1P) parking spaces on the northern side of McGrath Avenue have been identified in the Nowra CBD parking strategy for amendment to all-day parking. These spaces are adjacent to the Harry Sawkins Park toilets.
As an alternative to the original SAAC reccommendation, it is now proposed to allocate two of these proposed all-day parking spaces to accessible parking allowing for increased access to the toilets and surrounding infrastructure by mobility parking scheme (MPS) permit holders. This has been subsequently supported during an onsite meeting held with SAAC representatives on the 12th April 2017.
Community Engagement
Discussions have occurred with SAAC representatives. Broader community consultation for the proposed changes and those identified in the Nowra CBD parking strategy within McGrath Avenue will be undertaken prior to planned works.
Financial Implications
The provision of an accessible space on McGrath Avenue to be used by permit holders is estimated to cost approximately $9000. Funding is available from the existing budget in 2017/18.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 81 |
SA17.129 Outdoor dining on public footpaths - Review of fee waiver
HPERM Ref: D17/122659
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Business & Property
Purpose / Summary
To review the current practice of waiving annual outdoor dinning fees for users of public footpaths.
Council reintroduce annual outdoor dining fees for the use and occupation of public footpaths across the Shoalhaven at the flat rate of $62.4/m2 per annum and an application fee of $161.2, commencing 1st July 2017.
|
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
Implications: Council will gain a source of revenue to assist in supporting financial sustainability. This would be similar to other Councils charging the users and occupiers of public footpaths, resulting in an increase to Council’s revenue base. The fee is currently in the Fees and Charges and has been advertised but is waived.
2. Not adopt the recommendation, provide further direction to staff and propose an alternative
Implications: Will result in the status quo - continuation of not charging for the occupation and use of public footpaths with Council foregoing revenue generating opportunities. Service levels remain the same.
Background
Currently Council grants approvals for outdoor dining on public footpaths under Section 125 of the Roads Act 1993, and in accordance with the progression of the following Council resolutions:
At Council’s Ordinary meeting on Tuesday 9th June 2009 it was resolved in part (MIN09.732) to:
a) Council resolve to prepare a draft DCP for the Commercial Use of Public Footpaths and place this document on public exhibition in accordance with Clause 18 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (EP&A) Regulation 2000 and that this draft DCP be incorporated into Council’s draft citywide DCP 2009;
b) In the spirit of encouraging the uptake of future applications for alfresco dining in the Shoalhaven, Council set the current fee for the licencing component for alfresco dining on public footpaths as; no licence fees for the first two years, a 50% reduction for the life of the alfresco dining, and retains the 50% reduction in DA fees, but completely removes the Section 94 Developers Contribution component for off-street car parking in the assessment of DAs for out-door dining within Council’s footpath reserve;
Whilst the intention of the above MIN09.732 was to encourage the uptake of outdoor dining on public footpaths in the City, it did not produce the desired outcome. Informal feedback from businesses indicated the pricing system under MIN09.732, in particular exemptions and discounts, was confusing as was the need for a second approval after development consent and the fact that some businesses had been carrying out the activity for years without hinderance. Consequently there were more non-compliant businesses occupying public footpaths for outdoor dining than compliant.
A report to Council’s Ordinary meeting on Tuesday 26th March 2013 that looked to address the above noted issue and in an attempt to simplify the charging regime resulted in the resolution under MIN13.303 in part:
c) A two year trial on not charging licence fees be undertaken
Subsequently a review was undertaken in March 2015 that resulted in a report to Council’s Property Steering Committee on the 3rd March 2015 and a resolution under delegation to:
“…….continue not to charge annual fees for Outdoor Dining on public footpath subject to the following conditions:
a) Review be undertaken in 2 years; and
b) Council review the decision to charge fees if Outdoor Dining becomes difficult to manage in a particular footpath area.
c) That correspondence be sent to relevant Business Owners (food shops) in CBD areas to inform them of Councils Policy.”
Notwithstanding the review period had not expired, Council resolved in part at Council’s Ordinary meeting on the 15th March 2016 (MIN16.196) as part of the adoption of the 2016/2017 list of fees, charges and rentals to:
b) Continue to not charge annual fees for Outdoor Dining on public footpaths until 1 July 2017 and that this be subject to a further review as part of the 2017/18 budget process.
Financial Implications
Council has 51 outdoor dining approvals in place across the Shoalhaven, where an initial application fee of $155 is currently charged this is proposed as $161.20 in 2017/18. The table below shows the current level of outdoor dining approvals, listed by year:
Calander year |
No of Approvals granted |
Pre 2013 |
3 |
2013 |
7 |
2014 |
10 |
2015 |
16 |
2016 |
11 |
2017 to April |
4 |
Total |
51 |
At the fixed rate of $60/m2 Council is currently foregoing $25,000 to $30,000 pa in fees across the 51 approvals. Since the inception of fee waiving Council has foregone income of between approximately $100,000 and $120,000.
The table below shows a comparison to a cross section of other Councils fees and charges for outdoor dining applications and rate per m2 compared to the Shoalhaven:
Council Area |
Application fee $ |
Charge rate per m2 |
Comment |
Cronulla |
165 |
90 – 310 |
4 zones |
Griffith |
145 |
52 |
Flat rate |
Port Macquarie |
377 |
62 – 142 |
Currently 1 year waiver for Wauchope & Laurieton only |
Kiama |
260 |
|
Charge per chair |
Hornsby |
270 |
270 |
Flat rate except Hornsby Mall at $539 |
Tweed |
350 |
91 or 143 |
Two rates – other & CBD |
Ballina |
165 |
18 – 56 |
Multiple rates |
Lake Macquarie |
410 |
75 or 135 |
Two tiers |
Wingecarribee |
|
48 or 162 |
Other and premium |
Eurobodalla |
163 |
91 or 124 |
Other & Batemans Bay |
Shoalhaven |
161.2 |
0 |
Draft 2017/18 |
Risk Implications
Should outdoor dining fees be reintroduced, businesses may not continue to offer outdoor dining on the public footpath, restricting amenity and impacting on the ability to encourage vibrant streetscapes.
As is the case with the introduction of a new fee, the reintroduction of a waived fee, especially after 4 years, will have risk attached. In this case the risk of losing al fresco dining in the streetscape neeeds to be considered.
Council has an opportunity to gain additional revenue which supports the financial sustainability of Council.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 84 |
SA17.130 Update Council on negotiations with property owners affected by the Bomaderry Nowra Regional Sports & Community Precinct Master Plan
HPERM Ref: D17/137888
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Business & Property
Purpose / Summary
To inform Council of the current status of negotiations with affected property owners being 109,111,111a and 113 Cambewarra Road, Bomaderry
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) Receive the report for information on negotiation with property owners.
|
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
Implications: Council will be updated on the current status of negotiations
2. Not adopt the recommendation and provide further direction to staff
Background
Council resolved at its Ordinary Meeting on the 12th December 2016 under MIN16.987 in part to:
9. Council continue to liaise with affected property owners being 109,111,111a and 113 Cambewarra Road, Bomaderry, and report back to Council on the owners current position.
Based on the above formal negotiations have commenced with the affected property owners, they all have indicated their willingness to negotiate in respect to their properties.
Negotiations are being conducted under the “Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991 No 22”. The Act requires the assessment of compensation to consider:
Section 55(a) – Market Value
Section 55(b) – Any Special Value
Section 55(c) – Any loss attributed to severance
Section 55(d) – Any loss attributed to disturbance
Section 55(e) – The disadvantage resulting from relocation (set at $75,000 if principal place of residence or part thereof if a tenant, based on a sliding scale for length of occupation to a max of 50%)
Section 55(f) – Any increase or decrease in other land
Of the above, Market Value is determined by the respective Valuers representing each party and Council agreeing to the amount. Notwithstanding, in some cases property owners have a different view of what they consider their properties to be worth.
In the case of the four affected properties “loss attributed to severance” and “any increase or decrease in other land” are not applicable.
Disadvantage resulting from relocation (the old solatium) is set by legislation as described above.
The remaining Sections above of Special Value and loss attributed to disturbance are variables and agreed between each party and Council.
Notwithstanding negotiations are well underway, given the property market continues to rise and the time lag that can result between agreement and Council approval, reports seeking approval to purchase with detailed compensation amounts will be presented to a confidential session directly to Council’s Ordinary meeting in May.
If a resolution is made to proceed contracts can be exchanged, with owners receiving monies no later than 42 days thereafter.
A further report to Council will be provided to seek a determination based on the outcome of the negotiation.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 86 |
SA17.131 Proposed Deed of Agreement with adjoining owner - Lot 25A DP5996 Bryces Road, Far Meadow
HPERM Ref: D17/142513
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Business & Property
Purpose / Summary
Local Governemnt Act – Section 10A(2)(c) – Information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice and person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests.
This report recommends the consideration of a separate confidential report, this includes consideration of a proposed agreement with the owners of Lot 6 DP618525 to facilitate the lodgement of a Development Application for a boundary adjustment/subdivision of the adjoining Council owned land comprised in Lot 25A DP5996 Bryces Road, Far Meadow.
That Council, in accordance with Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993, consider a separate confidential report on this matter.
|
Options
1. Council accept the recommendation as presented.
Implications: Consider a separate confidential report which outlines the proposal.
2. Provide further direction to staff and propose an alternative
Background
The subject land was transferred to Council for ‘reservoir purposes’ in 1920. The land was never utilised for the intended purpose and is no longer required resulting in it being surplus to Council’s operational requirements.
A watercourse passes through the centre of the lot which impacts the building envelope, and the ability to meet the minimum setback requirements from the watercourse and property boundaries.
To facilitate the construction of a dwelling, a boundary adjustment/subdivision is proposed to relocate the building envelope to a site within the adjoining Lot 6 and Council retains ownership of an equal sized parcel with a dwelling entitlement.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 87 |
SA17.132 Surrender of Lease - Reflections Cafe - Slice of Life
HPERM Ref: D17/137786
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Business & Property
Purpose / Summary
To seek approval from Council as Reserve Trust Manager of the Worrigee (R97869) Reserve Trust to the surrender of the lease with Slice of Life (Aust) Pty Limited for the Reflections Cafe.
Council, in its capacity as the Worrigee (R97869) Reserve Trust agrees to the surrender by Slice of Life Australia of the Reflections Café lease as at 31 May 2017.
|
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
Implications: The lease will be surrendered thus providing Council as Reserve Trust Manager the ability to consider other options for the provision of the café services at the Crematorium.
2. Not adopt the recommendation and provide further direction to staff
Implications: Café services will not be provided at the Crematorium following memorial services.
Background
Slice of Life (Aust) Pty Limited has been in occupation of the subject property since 2008 providing catering for services held at the Shoalhaven Memorial Gardens & Crematorium. At the expiry of their lease in 2015, expressions of interest were advertised with Slice of Life (Aust) Pty Limited being the sole party to submit an expression of interest.
Due to ongoing financial pressures, Slice of Life (Aust) Pty Limited, a Shoalhaven-based not for profit organisation has now been forced to cease operations.
In the circumstances, there does not appear to be any reason to refuse to permit the surrender of the lease, particularly as it appears likely that the company is to be wound up
The Shoalhaven Memorial Gardens & Crematorium Manager has indicated an interest in operating the café in-house on a trial basis for six (6) months providing catering for services held at the facility. As catering for services from this café reflects on the Council as the Reserve Trust manager, operating it in-house would provide the Council greater control of the standard of catering services provided to customers.
Community Engagement
This matter is considered to be a Local Area Low Impact issue as detailed in Council’s Community Engagement Policy and Handbook and no community engagement has taken place.
Financial Implications
The current rent is $4,195.66 per annum. As Slice of Life (Aust) Pty Limited was the sole party to submit an expression of interest in 2015, there is no evidence to suggest that an expression of interest process would be successful in securing a new tenant. In that case, the café will be left vacant and so catering would not be provided at the facility. If the Shoalhaven Memorial Gardens & Crematorium is to take up operation of the café in-house, additional income will be generated for the Council.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 89 |
SA17.133 Old Bakery - Disposal of property 124 -126 Jacobs Drive, Sussex Inlet
HPERM Ref: D17/139588
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Business & Property
Purpose / Summary
To consider a recommendation to authorise the sale of the “Old Bakery at Sussex Inlet” located at 124 – 126 Jacobs Drive, Sussex Inlet.
Council: 1. Advertise its intention to dispose of the Old Sussex Inlet Bakery in accordance with Policy 16/256 and if no objections are received, authorise the sale by public auction of the property located at 124-126 Jacobs Drive, Sussex Inlet comprised in Lots 97 & 98 DP 21038 2. Authorise the General Manager to set the auction reserve (based on valuation advice) and to finalise the terms of a sale within 10% of the reserve or list price in the case of a private treaty sale if the property fails to sell at auction. 3. Fund all costs associated with the sale from job 88818 and the net income be placed in the Strategic Property Reserve; and 4. Grant authority to affix the Common Seal of the Council to any documents required to be sealed and that the General Manager be authorised to sign any documents necessary to give effect to this resolution.
|
Options
1. Adopt the recommendations
Implications: The proposed sale will be advertised and if no objections to the sale of the property are received it will go to auction. The proposed sale will generate additional income for Council and dispose of a property asset that does not currently support community needs. If objections are received a further report to Council will be provided.
2. Not adopt the recommendations and provide further direction to staff
Implications: The property will be retained with Council responsible for ongoing maintenance and property related costs
Background
At Council’s Ordinary meeting on the 24th May 2016 (MIN16.394) the following Notice of Motion was adopted:
“…the General Manager develop a Report to Council considering the proposed sale of Council owned land known as “The Old Bakery” on Jacobs Drive Sussex Inlet.”
The subject property is comprised of two parcels of land comprised in Lots 97 & 98 DP 21038 and is 1903.29 sq m in area. The land is classified Operational with a zoning of R2 Low Density Residential under Shoalhaven LEP 2014.
Council purchased the property in 2012 for $206,000 with the intention of using it as a Visitor Information Centre. Unfortunately the building has remained vacant, has become a target for vandalism and has deteriorated to almost derelict status over this time.
Although the building has undergone numerous alterations over its life, redevelopment was required in order for the building to be brought up to the standard required for community uses and it was estimated in 2009 (shortly prior to purchase) that such work would cost Council over $250,000. The estimate covered internal and external works such as reroofing; rewiring of the electricals; weather sealing; wall damage repair; the installation of a stormwater system; painting (internal & external); floor coverings and removal of the oven. This cost was deemed prohibitive and so Council did not proceed with the work and the property remained vacant.
In the circumstances, it is now proposed to demolish the building and other structures and dispose of the vacant land, 2 lots as one parcel by way of public auction.
Council has received a quote to demolish the building and other structures on the land for $45,000. This quote includes the removal of all building waste together with a large commercial oven and levelling of the land in readiness for sale.
Council staff have considered the proposed disposal of this property and no objections have been received as a result of that consultation.
The proposal to dispose of this property asset is in line with recommendations in the Community Infrastructure Strategic Plan.
Community Engagement
The proposed sale of the Old Sussex Inlet Bakery is considered to be a local area low impact issue as outlined in Council’s Community Engagement Policy and Handbook and appropriate community consultation will occur.
Consultation will include newspaper advertising of the proposed sale in the South Coast Register and notification on Council’s website and Facebook page. Any objections received will be considered and resolved before proceeding with the sale and may be the subject of a further report to Council.
The local Community Consultative Body (Sussex Inlet and Districts Community Forum) is aware of the intention to sell, however they will be informed of the auction date once known.
Financial Implications
The proposed sale of this land will generate additional income for Council to be set aside for future land development and disposal projects. This represents potential for an improved return on assets which is considered to be in the best interests of the wider community.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 91 |
SA17.134 Progress on Community Concept Plan - Larmer Ave, Sanctuary Point
HPERM Ref: D17/133284
Group: Planning Environment & Development Group
Section: Environmental Services
Attachments: 1. Bherwerre Wetland Concept Plan 3 (4) ⇩
Purpose / Summary
Over the past 12 months staff have worked with the Bay and Basin Community to develop a concept plan for the flood liable Council land on Larmer Avenue (Bherwerre Wetland). After much consultation, the draft concept plan has been completed and has wide community support.
Options
1. Endorse the attached plan for Bherwerre Wetland as the basis for future negotiations once funding is available and congratulate both the Basin Villages Forum and The Bay and Basin Community Resources for actively leading local residents through a cooperative planning process.
Implications: Council recognises the level of consultation which has occurred to develop this concept plan that is a solutions based approach to community issues and provide positive feedback on a job well done.
2. Council note the progress on this community driven planning process
Implications: Council stays abreast of the progress of this project but does not recognise the community participation in the process.
3. Council requests more information and detail.
Implications: Staff will provide a supplementary report.
Background
In 2012 thirty hectares of flood liable land covered in an endangered ecological community came into Councils ownership as Operational land. In 2015, staff approached the Basin Villages Forum and facilitated a ‘community steering group' of people representing key community groups to come up with a plan for the future use of the land. The Community Steering Committee was hosted by Bay and Basin Community Resources. Tight parameters were set in order to respect the natural values of the site and capacity of the land. The previous 12 months of consultation (details in Community Engagement) and collaboration has achieved a workable concept plan acceptable to the whole community. All views and ideas put forward have been considered and balanced against one another by the Community Steering Committee. The latest Concept Plan (attached) incorporates passive recreation, disabled access, concerns from neighbours, conservation outcomes and educational outcomes.
A community survey (online and street stalls) found that 98% of respondents were supportive of the measures illustrated in the concept plan. The latest plan has been mailed out to surrounding landholders for their information. It will also be promoted by the Village Forum and Bay and Basin Community Resources.
The Community Planning process leading to this concept plan has been entered for a Local Government NSW Excellence in the Environment Award.
In order to activate the outcomes in this plan a Biodiversity Banking Assessment has been undertaken. Credits calculated will cover the proposed activities if a buyer can be found. The credits have been floated on the Biobanking Public Credit Register for prospective buyers. It could take some time to find a buyer but having the community supported concept plan ready will expedite the process once this occurs.
Community Engagement
Presentations at the Basin Villages Forum and Sanctuary Point Pride, information on the websites of the Forum and Bay and Basin Community Resources, street stalls, letters to surrounding land holders, community radio and an online survey and calling for submissions.
Development of a Community Steering Committee (through calls of expressions of interest to community groups) has been key to this project. This group has met regularly over the past 12 months to consider submissions and feedback and develop the Concept plan. The Basin Villages Forum has actively assisted with engagement and dissemination of information.
Financial Implications
If a buyer for the credits cannot be found the only other way for this project to proceed is for Council to consider a future budget allocation.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 94 |
SA17.135 Re-Adoption of Pesticides Use Notification Plan - 2017
HPERM Ref: D17/137060
Group: Planning Environment & Development Group
Section: Environmental Services
Attachments: 1. Revised - Pesticide Use Notification Plan - 2017 ⇩
Purpose / Summary
To consider the re-affirmation of the existing Pesticide Use Notification Plan, which addresses Council’s obligations concerning the use of pesticides under S. 19 (1) (a) and (b) of the Pesticides Regulation 2009 and to ensure that Council gives public notice of the proposed use of pesticide in accordance with the Regulations and the provisions of the Plan.
Council ensures pesticides are applied to its public places in a safe, responsible manner, minimising harm to the community or the environment.
Council’s Pesticide Use Notification Plan has been revised to ensure that it is compliant with the provisions of the Pesticides Regulation 2009.
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council re-affirm the Pesticides Use Notification Plan with minor amendments outlined in the report.
|
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
Implications: Minor revision will ensure compliance with the provisions of the Pesticdes Regulation 2009.
2. Not adopt the recommendation and give further instruction to staff
Background
Council is required under the Pesticides Regulation 2009 to have an endorsed process whereby Council will notify the public and other interested parties about how Council will manage its use of pesticides in the local government area.
The adoption of the revised Pesticide Use Notification Plan will address this obligation and will ensure that Council is compliant with the provisions of the Pesticides Regulation 2009.
Council staff will continue to ensure that pesticides that are applied in public places are used in a safe, responsible manner, minimising harm to the community or the environment.
Community Engagement
No community engagement carried out as only minor changes to meet regulatory requirements.
Policy Implications
If the policy is not re-affirmed a new policy will need to be developed to meet regulatory requirements.
Risk Implications
If the policy is not re-affrimed it may impact on the ability to carry out weed management.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 105 |
SA17.136 Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Performance Reporting 2015-2016
HPERM Ref: D17/113031
Group: Shoalhaven Water Group
Section: Water Customer & Business Services
Attachments: 1. WS TBL 2015-16 Shoalhaven (councillors information folder) ⇨
2. SGE TBL 2015-16 Shoalhaven (councillors information folder) ⇨
Purpose / Summary
The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the outcomes for Shoalhaven Water as contained within the NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) – Water, Triple Bottom Line Reporting.
The TBL is provided to Council’s each year to assist in the benchmarking process for NSW Local Government Water Utilities (LWU’s) and to allow Councils to make comparisons of their performance in respect of Water Supply and Sewerage services.
It is a requirement for Councils to review and provide an action plan addressing any areas of “under performance” identified in the TBL and this is to ensure compliance with the NSW Government Best Practice Management of Water Supply and Sewerage Guidelines.
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That the information in this report be noted and council acknowledge the excellent results.
|
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
2. Council can add to any of the proposed Action Plan responses to the TBL or seek additonal information on any of the indicator results.
Implications: May be governed by any additions to the proposed Action Plan.
3. Not resolve as recommended and provide further directions to staff.
Background
Following an analysis by the DPI Water, the TBL performance reports are made available to Water Utilities for comparison approximately 12 months after the end of each financial year to which they refer. The results and action plan must be reported to Council in order to comply with the Water Supply and Sewerage Best Practice Management Guidelines
The TBL has four broad Performance Indicators (Utility, Social, Environmental and Economic) and a subset of seven parameters (water) and eight parameters (sewer) to which performance is linked. Performance is also measured against National trends where applicable via the Bureau of Meteorology Urban Utility Reporting mechanism. A full copy of the 2015/2016 TBL Water and Sewerage Performance Comparison is located in the Councillors Information folder.
Whilst the TBL provides a ranking for Shoalhaven Water for each criteria against all LWU’s and those with > 10,000 properties, a low numerical ranking is not necessarily reflective of a negative result. For example, low water charges are given a low ranking and Shoalhaven is ranked 5 for its Typical Residential Bill for Water (which means it has one of the lowest bills in the category). Interpretation of the tabular results therefore needs to be done in an informed manner. Shoalhaven Water received a total of seven results across both its water and sewer businesses in the ranking of 5. A ranking of 5 indicates performance in the bottom 20% of utilities.
|
Water |
Sewer |
Total |
Shoalhaven Water |
4 |
3 |
7 |
It should be noted that 3 of the 4 water business low rankings shown above for Shoalhaven Water were due to the low charge applied for water supply services. This is not considered to be a poor result for customers.
In summary, the TBL revealed positive key results highlighted by the DPI Water analysis including;
Water Supply Performance
· Achievement of 100% compliance with all of the Best Practice Management Water Supply Guidelines Performance Criteria,
· Full Cost Recovery pricing, without significant cross subsidies,
· Renewals expenditure (1.2%) of the capital replacement cost was significantly higher than the state wide median of 0.6%,
· Typical Residential Bill was $328 which was significantly less than the state wide median of $601 and national median of $623,
· Residential revenue from usage charges (76%) was higher than the state wide median of 73% and 66%,
· Average annual residential water consumption of 150 kilolitres which is less than the state wide median of 162 and national median of 181 kilolitres,
· The operating cost per 100km of water main was $858 and this was significantly less than the state wide median of $1,120,
· The operating cost per property was $278 and this was significantly less than the state wide median of $440 and national median of $485,
· The management cost per property was $141 and this was less than the state wide median of $148,
· Water main cost per property was $53 and this was significantly less than the state wide median of $71,
· Water quality complaints of 0.2 per 1,000 properties was less than the state wide median of 3 and national median of 2,
· Water service complaints of 0.5 per 1,000 properties was significantly less than the state wide median of 4 and equal to the national median, and
· Compliance with microbiological water quality, physical and chemical compliance was 100% and equal to the state wide and national median.
Sewerage Performance
· Achievement of 100% compliance with all of the Best Practice Management Sewerage Supply Guidelines Performance Criteria,
· Sewerage service complaints (per 1,000 properties) was 0.5 which is significantly less than the state wide median of 5 and less than the national median of 1,
· Average sewerage interruption (minutes) was 47 which is significantly less than the state wide median of 108 and national median of 101 minutes,
· Sewer main breaks and chokes (per 100km of main) was 13 which is significantly less than the state wide median of 38 and national of 20
· Biosolids re-used was 100% consistent with the state wide median and higher than the national average of 90%, and
· Treatment cost ($ per property) was $126 which is less than the state wide median of $159.
Key Issues
The following is a summary of those indicators required for reference within the Action Plan for inclusion in the Shoalhaven Water Strategic Business Plan, as required by the Best Practice Management Guidelines;
*ranking in the table below refers to the result in column 2 of the TBL comparison. The ranking is relative to other LWU’s with >10,000 properties. The rankings are based on the top 20% being measured as 1 and the bottom 20% being ranked as 5.
The Analysis/Action Plan comments which are provided below represent any ranking score of 5 which have been extracted from the TBL Performance Comparison.
*Water Supply
TBL Indicator |
Indicator |
Result |
Analysis/Action Plan Comments (if applicable) - Indicators |
Best Practice Management Guidelines and Summary
|
Complied with all the required criteria. Performance ranking against other LWU’s was at the better end of the scale for all indicators resulting in an excellent overall report. |
Nil.
|
|
Utility - Characteristics |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil Issues |
|
|
Social – Charges & Bills 2013/2014 and 2014/15 |
|
|
|
12a |
Residential water usage charge (c/kl) |
165 c/kl in 2015-16. |
This is the 5th year that Shoalhaven Water’s water usage charge is significantly lower in comparison to the NSW median of 228c/kl and National median of 190c/kl. There is no requirement or plan to increase the usage charges beyond the current Long Term financial Plan pricing path of matching inflation when required. The pricing strategy is consistent with the NSW BPM Guidelines and to meet the % of revenue as required under those Guidelines. Nil action required. |
12 |
Residential water usage charge (c/kl) |
170 c/kl in 2016-17. |
As per above. This is consistent with the Financial Plan with an inflationary increase in 2016-17. Nil action. |
17 |
Revenue per property – water ($/property) |
$530 |
As per above. The level of revenue (combined usage and fixed charges) is significantly less than both the NSW median ($928) and National ($921). Shoalhaven revenue per property is consistent with the Long Term Financial Plan and Asset Management to ensure the continued viability of the business. Nil action required. |
Social – Health |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil Issues |
|
|
Social – Service Levels |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil Issues |
|
|
Environmental – Natural Resource Management |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil Issues |
|
|
Economic - Finance |
|
|
|
42 |
Current replacement cost ($ per assessment) |
$12,400 |
This indicator is reflective of the size of the scheme and is consistent with previous years. The level of increase is less than both the NSW median and National replacement cost increases. |
Economic - Efficiency |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil Issues |
|
|
*Sewerage
TBL Indicator |
Indicator |
Result |
Analysis/Action Plan |
Best Practice Management Guidelines and Summary |
Complied with all the required criteria. Performance ranking against other LWU’s was at the better end of the scale for all indicators resulting in an excellent overall report.
|
|
|
Utility - Characteristics |
|
|
|
8 |
Employees (# per 1,000 properties) |
2 |
This is slightly higher than the NSW median of 1.7. The Shoalhaven result is a consequence of the size of the sewerage schemes. |
Social – Charges & Bills |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil Issues |
|
|
Social – Health |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil Issues |
|
|
Social – Service Levels |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil Issues |
|
|
Environmental – Natural Resource Management |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil issues |
|
|
Environmental – Performance |
|
|
|
35 |
Sewer overflows reported to the environmental regulator (# per 100km main) |
4.4 |
This is higher than the NSW median of 0.9. Further analysis of this figure has indicated that the methodoogy for reporting has changed – and a poorer result is partly due to the higher number of sewerage schemes in the Shoalhaven. It is also reflective of significant wet weather events. Further work on inflow and infiltration is required for Shoalhaven schemes. |
Economic - Finance |
|
|
|
43 |
Revenue from non-residential and trade waste charges (%) |
15 |
The is slightly lesser than the NSW median of 19% and the result of a phased increase commenced in 2013 to lessen the impact on non residential customers. |
Economic - Efficiency |
|
|
|
NA |
Nil Issues |
|
|
Community Engagement
A copy of the TBL performance report will be included within the Shoalhaven Water Strategic Business Plan. The Customer Service Plan performance benchmarking are closely linked to the results of the TBL. The plan will be updated during 2017 to encompass these results together with the BOM National Performance report.
The documents indicated above are all publically available and a summary with links to Shoalhaven’s performance will also be promulgated for customers on the Shoalhaven Water website.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 109 |
SA17.137 Review of Shoalhaven Water Group Policies
HPERM Ref: D17/118362
Group: Shoalhaven Water Group
Section: Water Customer & Business Services
Attachments: 1. Community Service Obligations - Water Supply, Wastewater, Effluent, Trade Waste Services and Section 64 Contributions ⇩
2. Water Meter Services - Downsize, Disconnect or Nominal Sizing ⇩
Purpose / Summary
All Public and Local Approval Policies are to be submitted to Council within 12 months of the election of Council. The two Public Policies proposed for reaffirmation represent “Round 3” of this requirement in respect of the Shoalhaven Water Group responsibilities.
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation as written.
Implications: Minor changes will assist for currency. There are no significant changes.
2. Not adopt the recommendation.
Implications: Council can request further details, seek further community input or make other changes.
Background
The purpose of the first policy statement is to outline Council’s determining criteria for recognition of Community Service Obligation and the charging policy of water, wastewater, effluent, trade waste services and Section 64 contributions for approved Community Service Obligation organizations or projects. The policy is still relevant and current.
Minor tracked changes have been made to the policy as shown on the attachment. The changes relate to updating the currency of wording, titles and general formatting.
The second policy provides guidance to customers on making an application to downsize, upsize, disconnect or nominal sizing of water meter service connections and the process involved. The policy is still relevant and current. Minor tracked changes have been made to the policy as shown on the attachment. The changes relate to updating the currency of wording, titles and general formatting.
Community Engagement
There is no statutory requirement to publicly exhibit any of the policies contained in this report. Council may choose to do so should they consider any changes of significance.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 122 |
SA17.138 Extinguishment of Water Supply Easement - 55 Meroo Road Bomaderry
HPERM Ref: D17/147203
Group: Shoalhaven Water Group
Section: Water Asset Planning & Development
Attachments: 1. Map ⇩
Purpose / Summary
This report is submitted to seek Council approval to extinguish an obsolete Easement for Water Supply over Lot 1 DP249217, Property No. 55 Meroo Road Bomaderry, owned by Mr Darryl Callaghan.
That 1. Council resolve to extinguish the Easement for Water Supply 3.048 wide over Lot 1 DP249217 at Bomaderry, as shown by hatching on copy of DP249217 marked ‘Attachment 1’. 2. Council’s costs to extinguish the easement are to be met from Shoalhaven Water’s Water Fund. 3. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven be affixed to any documents required to be sealed.
|
Options
1. Resolve as recommended. The easements are no longer required by Council.
2. Not resolve as recommended and provide further directions to staff.
Background
The subject property is affected by an easement for a water main located diagonally across the rear corner of a residential allotment. The easement has been made obsolete by construction of an alternative water main and the pipeline has been disconnected.
The landowner has submitted an application for construction of a storage shed which will be partly over the existing easement. He has requested that the easement be removed from his title to the property to enable the proposed building to be approved.
The pipe within the easement is asbestos cement and, in accordance with Shoalhaven Water policy, is to be capped, removed and the land made good. The landowner has agreed to that arrangement.
Financial Implications
Council is to pay its own costs to extinguish the easement from Shoalhaven Water’s Water Fund.
Risk Implications
Shoalhaven Water is to remove the asbestos pipe in conjunction with extinguishment of the easement.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 16 May 2017 Page 125 |
Local Government Amendment (governance & planning) act 2016
Chapter 3, Section 8A Guiding principles for councils
(1) Exercise of functions generally
The following general principles apply to the exercise of functions by councils:
(a) Councils should provide strong and effective representation, leadership, planning and decision-making.
(b) Councils should carry out functions in a way that provides the best possible value for residents and ratepayers.
(c) Councils should plan strategically, using the integrated planning and reporting framework, for the provision of effective and efficient services and regulation to meet the diverse needs of the local community.
(d) Councils should apply the integrated planning and reporting framework in carrying out their functions so as to achieve desired outcomes and continuous improvements.
(e) Councils should work co-operatively with other councils and the State government to achieve desired outcomes for the local community.
(f) Councils should manage lands and other assets so that current and future local community needs can be met in an affordable way.
(g) Councils should work with others to secure appropriate services for local community needs.
(h) Councils should act fairly, ethically and without bias in the interests of the local community.
(i) Councils should be responsible employers and provide a consultative and supportive working environment for staff.
(2) Decision-making
The following principles apply to decision-making by councils (subject to any other applicable law):
(a) Councils should recognise diverse local community needs and interests.
(b) Councils should consider social justice principles.
(c) Councils should consider the long term and cumulative effects of actions on future generations.
(d) Councils should consider the principles of ecologically sustainable development.
(e) Council decision-making should be transparent and decision-makers are to be accountable for decisions and omissions.
(3) Community participation
Councils should actively engage with their local communities, through the use of the integrated planning and reporting framework and other measures.
Chapter 3, Section 8B Principles of sound financial management
The following principles of sound financial management apply to councils:
(a) Council spending should be responsible and sustainable, aligning general revenue and expenses.
(b) Councils should invest in responsible and sustainable infrastructure for the benefit of the local community.
(c) Councils should have effective financial and asset management, including sound policies and processes for the following:
(i) performance management and reporting,
(ii) asset maintenance and enhancement,
(iii) funding decisions,
(iv) risk management practices.
(d) Councils should have regard to achieving intergenerational equity, including ensuring the following:
(i) policy decisions are made after considering their financial effects on future generations,
(ii) the current generation funds the cost of its services
Chapter 3, 8C Integrated planning and reporting principles that apply to councils
The following principles for strategic planning apply to the development of the integrated planning and reporting framework by councils:
(a) Councils should identify and prioritise key local community needs and aspirations and consider regional priorities.
(b) Councils should identify strategic goals to meet those needs and aspirations.
(c) Councils should develop activities, and prioritise actions, to work towards the strategic goals.
(d) Councils should ensure that the strategic goals and activities to work towards them may be achieved within council resources.
(e) Councils should regularly review and evaluate progress towards achieving strategic goals.
(f) Councils should maintain an integrated approach to planning, delivering, monitoring and reporting on strategic goals.
(g) Councils should collaborate with others to maximise achievement of strategic goals.
(h) Councils should manage risks to the local community or area or to the council effectively and proactively.
(i) Councils should make appropriate evidence-based adaptations to meet changing needs and circumstances.