Strategy and Assets Committee

 

 

Meeting Date:    Tuesday, 18 April, 2017

Location:            Council Chambers, City Administrative Centre, Bridge Road, Nowra

Time:                   5:00pm

 

 

Membership (Quorum - 5)

Clr Andrew Guile - Chairperson

All Councillors

General Manager or nominee

 

 

 

Please note: Council’s Code of Meeting Practice permits the electronic recording and broadcast of the proceedings of meetings of the Council which are open to the public. Your attendance at this meeting is taken as consent to the possibility that your image and/or voice may be recorded and broadcast to the public.

 

 

 

Agenda

 

1.    Apologies / Leave of Absence

2.    Confirmation of Minutes

·      Strategy and Assets Committee - 21 March 2017....................................................... 1

3.    Declarations of Interest

4.    Mayoral Minute

5.    Deputations and Presentations

6.    Notices of Motion / Questions on Notice

SA17.90...... Notice of Motion - Council Meetings - Order of Business............................ 22

SA17.91...... Notice of Motion - Callala Beach Community Centre - Vegetation Issues.. 23

SA17.92...... Notice of Motion - Shaolin Temple Foundation............................................ 25

7.    Reports

SA17.93...... Delegations to the General Manager............................................................ 26

SA17.94...... Response from Risk & Audit Committee on matters raised by Mark Crowther   28

SA17.95...... Risk and Audit Committee Annual Report 2015 - 2016............................... 31

SA17.96...... Risk and Audit Committee Charter Amendments and Appointment of Risk and Audit Committee Chair.......................................................................................... 32

SA17.97...... Council Policy Revision - BMX Circuits, Skate Parks, Temporary Storage (shipping) Containers on Public Land and Community Gardens.................................. 42

SA17.98...... Milton Showground - Second Croquet Court Options - Follow Up Report.. 57

SA17.99...... Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence - Project Status Update....... 76

SA17.100.... Community Infrastructure Guidelines.......................................................... 81

SA17.101.... Future operations and management of Nowra Showground....................... 83

SA17.102.... Community War Memorials Grant Funding - Nowra Showground Memorial Gates...................................................................................................................... 90

SA17.103.... Request for annual donation - Missionaries of Charity Soup Kitchen - Nowra School of Arts Annex.................................................................................................... 92

SA17.104.... Request for annual donation - Helping the Homeless Soup Kitchen - Nowra Showground Pavilion.................................................................................... 94

SA17.105.... Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan ................................................ 96

SA17.106.... Council Policy Revision - Road Naming Policy and Property Addressing Policy 98

SA17.107.... Local Government Conference - 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government - Proposed Motions .............................................................. 107

SA17.108.... Public Transport in the Shoalhaven............................................................ 111

SA17.109.... Path Construction and Funding Strategy................................................... 114

SA17.110.... Recycling and Waste Facilities Review..................................................... 117

SA17.111.... Professional Property Officers Conference............................................... 137

SA17.112.... Policy review and adoption - Management of Mobile Food Vending Vehicles on Council Owned or Managed Land ............................................................. 140  

SA17.113.... Acquisition of Easement for Sewerage Purposes - 35 Brighton Parade, Culburra Beach.......................................................................................................... 141

SA17.114.... Review of Shoalhaven Water Group Policies............................................ 144

SA17.115.... Community Energy Congress - Conference Report................................. 146

SA17.116.... Tourism Conference 2017.......................................................................... 150    

8.    Confidential Reports     

Reports

CSA17.8...... Disposal of Land - Part 445 The Wool Road, St Georges Basin - Part Lot 2 DP827728

Local Government Act - Section 10A(2)(d)(i) - Commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests.


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page iii

 

Strategy and Assets Committee

 

Delegation:

Pursuant to s377 (1) of the Local Government Act 1993 the Committee is delegated the functions conferred on Council by the Local Government Act 1993 (LG Act) or any other Act or delegated to Council, as are specified in the Schedule, subject to the following limitations:

i.        The Committee cannot exercise any function delegated to the Council which by the terms of that delegation cannot be sub-delegated;

ii.       The Committee cannot exercise any function which s377(1) of the LG Act provides cannot be delegated by Council;

iii.      The Committee cannot exercise a function which is expressly required by the LG Act or any other Act to be exercised by resolution of the Council; and

iv.      The Committee cannot exercise any function which is a function of the General Manager under s335 of the LG Act.

 

Schedule:

1.       Make recommendations to Council and consider, formulate, review and adopt policies in relation to Council’s corporate & community planning under Part 2 of Chapter 13 of the LG Act, asset management and in connection with the other functions listed in this Schedule and in particular to make recommendations to Council in respect of the content of Council’s community strategic plan, delivery program, resourcing strategy and operational plan within the meaning of Part 2 of Chapter 13 of the LG Act;

2.       Make recommendations to Council and consider, formulate, review and adopt Council policies, plans and strategies other than those in respect of town planning and environmental matters, and any other matter referred to the Committee by the General Manager.

3.       Make recommendations in respect of the introduction of new fees or charges or the alteration of existing fees and charges for inclusion in the Council’s next operational plan within the meaning of s405 of the LG Act;

4.       Monitor, review and consider matters relating to the operations and strategic direction of Council’s Holiday Haven Tourist Parks Group;

5.       All functions in respect of the management of, and facilities provided on Crown Land in respect of which Council is the ‘reserve trust manager’ within the meaning of s92 of the Crown Lands Act 1989, and the making of recommendations to Council regarding such matters where the function cannot be delegated by Council;

6.       Provision of corporate direction to the Shoalhaven Water Group in respect of powers delegated to it by Council regarding the construction, alteration or  maintenance  of water and sewerage works, effluent works and pump out removal;

7.       Authorise the expenditure of funds raised under s64 of the LG Act within the limits outlined in, and in accordance with Council’s adopted Development Servicing Plan and other relevant adopted Council policies;

8.       Make recommendations to Council in respect of fees and charges for water and wastewater services provided by Council;

9.       Develop, implement, review and adopt strategic policies for water, sewerage and effluent operations of Council;

10.     Undertake preliminary investigations (feasibility, cost benefit, risk analysis, etc.) into development opportunities for Council’s strategic land holdings and make recommendations to Council.

11.     Review and make recommendations to Council in relation to:

a)      The sale prices of land in connection with residential and industrial Council subdivisions;

b)      The sale of Council property or the purchase or resumption of land;

c)      The compensation to be offered in respect of land resumed by Council; and

d)      Properties leased or rented by Council, other than those delegated to the General Manager for approval and execution in accordance with MIN14.912 and MIN15.237 of the Council.

 

 


 

 

 

 

Minutes of the Strategy and Assets Committee

 

 

Meeting Date:    Tuesday, 21 March 2017

Location:            Council Chambers, City Administrative Centre, Bridge Road, Nowra

Time:                   5:00pm

 

 

The following members were present:

 

Clr Andrew Guile - Chairperson

Clr Joanna Gash

Clr John Wells

Clr Patricia White

Clr John Levett

Clr Nina Cheyne

Clr Annette Alldrick

Clr Kaye Gartner – left the meeting 7.19pm

Clr Amanda Findley

Clr Mitchell Pakes

Clr Mark Kitchener

Clr Bob Proudfoot

Mr Russ Pigg - General Manager

 

 

 

 

Apologies / Leave of Absence

Clr Watson

 

 

Confirmation of the Minutes

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Cheyne)                                                                                MIN17.184

 

That the Minutes of the Strategy and Assets Committee held on Tuesday 21 February 2017 be confirmed.

CARRIED

 

 

Declarations of Interest

 

Conflict of Interest Declaration – Russ Pigg - pecuniary interest – SA17.82 Ratepayers Advance Kerb & Gutter Construction - 58 - 64 Basin View Pde, Basin View – he is one of the property owners – will leave the room, will not take part in discussion or vote.

 

Conflict of Interest Declaration – Clr White – less than significant non pecuniary interest – SA17.71 Telstra Tech Savvy Seniors Grant Funding – her husband is a previous Telstra Dealer, Council is receiving grant funding of $1800 for library programs and no remuneration or advantage will be received by her husband  – will leave the room, will not take part in discussion or vote.

 

Conflict of Interest Declaration - Clr Proudfoot – less than significant non pecuniary interest – SA17.87 Dealing With Development Applications Lodged by Council Staff or Councillors – he has a Development Application before Council – will leave the room, will not take part in discussion or vote.

 

 

Deputations and Presentations

 

Mr Paul Davies addresed the Committee in relation to Item SA17.75 Funding Options - Sealing - Bishops Drive, Mollymook

 

Ms Jenny Brodie addressed the Committee in relation to Item SA17.74 Bomaderry Aquatic Centre & Nowra Aquatic Park - Winter Swimming in Northern Shoalhaven

 

 

Procedural Motion - Bring Item Forward

RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Kitchener)                                                                              MIN17.185

That the matter of items SA17.75 Funding Options - Sealing - Bishops Drive Mollymook and SA17.74 Bomaderry Aquatic Centre & Nowra Aquatic Park - Winter Swimming in Northern Shoalhaven be brought forward for consideration.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.75     Funding Options - Sealing - Bishops Drive Mollymook

HPERM Ref: D17/37745

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the report on the sealing of 150 metres of Bishop Drive be received for information and the works not be funded in the 2017/18 budget.

 

Motion (Clr Kitchener / Clr Proudfoot)

That Council consider sealing the 150 metres of Bishop Drive, Mollymook as a priority for the next scheduled road works and the $213,000 cost for the works be funded in the 2017/18 budget.

For:            Clr Guile, Clr Pakes, Clr Kitchener and Clr Proudfoot

Against:    Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Alldrick, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley and Russ Pigg

lost

RESOLVED (Clr Gash / Clr Gartner)                                                                                   MIN17.186

That the report on the sealing of 150 metres of Bishop Drive be received for information and the works not be funded in the 2017/18 budget.

For:            Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Alldrick, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley and Russ Pigg

Against:    Clr Guile, Clr Pakes, Clr Kitchener and Clr Proudfoot

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.74     Bomaderry Aquatic Centre & Nowra Aquatic Park - Winter Swimming in Northern Shoalhaven

HPERM Ref: D17/83607

Recommendation

That Council

1.    Within the Shoalhaven Swim & Fitness area, maintain the operation of:

a.    Bomaderry Aquatic Centre 25 metre indoor pool – all year

b.    Bomaderry Aquatic Centre 50 metre outdoor pool – all year

c.    Nowra Aquatic Park 50 metre outdoor pool - close 30 June 2017 until 1 November 2017

d.    To be funded within existing 2016/17 budgets

2.    Undertake a comprehensive Community Engagement Process to outline the proposed six (6) options for summer and winter swimming in the northern Shoalhaven (Bomaderry Aquatic Centre and Nowra Aquatic Park) as outlined in this report.  That this consultation seek the community’s views on which is the preferred option taking into consideration all factors including service level provision and costs. This be undertaken as part of the DPOP consultation and be reported back to Council as part of the budget process.

3.    Upon receipt of the feedback, determine which option of the six considered it will fund in future budgets.

 

Recommendation (Clr Pakes / Clr Findley)

That Council:

1.    Undertake a comprehensive Community Engagement Process in plain English to outline the proposed six (6) options for summer and winter swimming in the northern Shoalhaven (Bomaderry Aquatic Centre and Nowra Aquatic Park) as outlined in this report.  That this consultation seek the community’s views, including swimming community members, on which is the preferred option taking into consideration all factors including service level provision and costs. This be undertaken as part of the DPOP consultation and be reported back to Council as part of the budget process.

2.    Upon receipt of the feedback, determine which option of the six considered it will fund in future budgets.

For:            Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Alldrick, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Kitchener and Russ Pigg

Against:    Clr Guile and Clr Proudfoot

CARRIED

 

 

Procedural Motion - Bring Item Forward

RESOLVED (Clr Cheyne / Clr Findley)                                                                                MIN17.187

That the matter of item SA17.68 Shoalhaven Family Day Care - Consultation process and feedback re transfer of service be brought forward for consideration.

CARRIED

 

 

 

 

 

SA17.68     Shoalhaven Family Day Care - Consultation process and feedback re transfer of service

HPERM Ref: D17/8966

Recommendation

1.    That Council receive the report for information on the consultation process with affected staff, Educators and Families and feedback regarding potential transfer of the Shoalhaven Family Day Care Service to a suitable provider for information.

2.    That Council adopt Option 4 Performance Targets met or transfer and that an update report be provided to Council in April 2018.

3.    That as part of the public exhibition/community engagement period for the draft 2017/18 DP/OP council specifically gain feedback on the matter of ‘ratepayer subsidy’ for the FDC service.

 

Recommendation (Clr Cheyne / Clr Wells)

1.      That Council receive the report for information on the consultation process with affected staff, Educators and Families and feedback regarding potential transfer of the Shoalhaven Family Day Care Service to a suitable provider for information.

2.      Council adopt performance targets to improve services it provides and report back in April 2018 when more clarity around federal funding is available.

3.      That as part of the public exhibition/community engagement period for the draft 2017/18 DP/OP council specifically gain feedback on the matter of ‘ratepayer subsidy’ for the FDC service.

4.      Council acknowledge that high quality child care services are a fundamental responsibility of the Federal Government and acknowledge that the current service  of the Family Day Care Service reaches an exceeding level and congratulate the staff and the educators for that high level recognition.

5.      That Council continue to lobby the Federal Government for Federal Government support and funding.

CARRIED

 

Note: That Clr Cheyne read to the Committee a letter submitted by educator, Jamie Horton.

 

 

 

Notices of Motion / Questions on Notice

 

SA17.62     Notice of Motion - Code of Meeting Practice - Adjournment of Meetings

HPERM Ref: D17/72458

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council consider a ten minute adjournment at all meetings after two hours. 

 

RESOLVED (Clr Gash / Clr Findley)                                                                                   MIN17.188

That Council consider a ten minute adjournment at all meetings after two hours.

CARRIED

 

 

 

SA17.63     Question on Notice - Traveller Rest Areas

HPERM Ref: D17/82219

Question

What is the Council policy or plan on the provision of short time traveller rest areas.

Background

There appears to be a growing need for roadside areas that can be utilised for overnight traveller stays, with basic toilet and shower facilities.  A number of locations are now used which appear to be inadequate for the pupose in particular the roadside area opposite the Bewong Café.

Response

Roadside rest areas primarily come under the responsibility of NSW Roads & Maritime Services, they provide rest stops in various locations on the Princes Highway within the Shoalhaven region. The rest areas are placed in locations where traffic flow is high enough to justify the cost of establishing such a facility for passing travellers, rather than overnight site accommodation.  There is often shelters and toilets provided at rest areas.  Areas such as Bewong and Rotary Park (South Nowra) are designed to provide rest stops, not overnight site accommodation. 

The provision of overnight site accommodation with adequate facilities is covered under the Local Government Regulations (Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds).  Overnight site accommodation of this type is provided by over 80 approved caravan parks in the Shoalhaven.  There are alternative primitive camping areas and camp grounds provided in National Parks.

Under State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) (Infrastructure) 2007, certain development can be exempt, if development can be carried out by or on behalf of a public authority in connection with a road or road infrastructure facilities and complies with Clause 20 of that SEPP.

This includes roadside facilities and rest areas, if the development does not involve the installation of toilets and involves no greater disturbance to the ground or vegetation than necessary.

http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/EPI/2007/641/part3/div17/subdiv1/cl97

Refer to Clause 97 (1) (ix).

Clause 20 of the SEPP states:

RESOLVED (Clr Levett / Clr Findley)                                                                                  MIN17.189

That Question on Notice - Traveller Rest Areas be recevied for information.

CARRIED

 


 

 

SA17.64     Question on Notice - "Adopt a Road" Scheme

HPERM Ref: D17/82232

Question

Could Councillors be given an explanation of the operation and success of the “Adopt-a-Road” scheme in the Shoalhaven, is it still actively worked, and could it be expanded as a means of coping with the roadside rubbish issue.

Response

Shoalhaven City Council does participate in the “Adopt A Road” programme.   Currently there is one formal “Adopt A Road” group which is the Adopt A Road Bendigo Bank Parkcare Group which removes litter as necessary along all roads in Sanctuary Point, St Georges Basin and Basin View.  The group began in 2012 and the Parkcare Action Plan was adopted by Council in March 2013 (D13/4640).  The group was supplied with personal protection equipment by Council and has been very effective and donated over 190 hours of labour, to the task, since its creation.

Council’s Parkcare Programme in many areas is very successful and provides an opportunity for volunteers to provide higher levels of services which are currently unable to be funded by Council due to large area serviced.  It also provides a fantastic opportunity for volunteers to “give back” to their community and demonstrate pride in the local area.  Council provides all groups with financial support and assistance by staff to set up their groups and develop their Action Plans which are then put forward to Council for consideration and adoption.  New Parkcare groups require approximately $400 per year in funding which forms part of the recommendation at the time of the Action Plans adoption.

The Adopt A Road programme can be easily expanded if there are willing volunteers to assist Council in control of litter.

RESOLVED (Clr Levett / Clr Findley)                                                                                  MIN17.190

That Question on Notice - "Adopt a Road" Scheme be received for information.

CARRIED

 

Note: Clr Findley acknowledged, Jo Power who received an International Womens Award for her work along Bendalong Beach and Plastic Free NSW Facebook and instagram pages.

 

 

Procedural Motion - Adjournment of Meeting

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Pakes)                                                                                  MIN17.191

That the meeting be adjourned for 10 minutes, the time being 7.00pm.

CARRIED

 

 


 

 

Procedural Motion - Resumption of Meeting

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Pakes)                                                                                  MIN17.192

That the meeting be reconvened, the time being 7.12pm when the following members were present:

Clr Andrew Guile - Chairperson

Clr Joanna Gash

Clr John Wells

Clr Patricia White

Clr John Levett

Clr Nina Cheyne

Clr Annette Alldrick

Clr Kaye Gartner

Clr Amanda Findley

Clr Mitchell Pakes

Clr Mark Kitchener

Clr Bob Proudfoot

Mr Russ Pigg - General Manager

CARRIED

 

 

Reports

 

SA17.65     Economic Development Strategy - Draft Report to be Placed on Exhibition

HPERM Ref: D17/73359

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That

1.    Council place the draft Economic Development Strategy (2017-2026) on public exhibition for a minimum of 28 days.

2.    A report be submitted to Council including comments from submissions received with the view to have the Economic Development Strategy (2017-2026) adopted by Council.

 

RESOLVED (Clr Proudfoot / Clr Wells)                                                                               MIN17.193

That the matter of Economic Development Strategy - Draft Report to be Placed on Exhibition be defered to the Ordinary Meeting, Tuesday 28 March 2017 and a copy of the Draft Economic Development Strategy be made available as an attachment to the report.

CARRIED

 

SA17.66     Citizens Panel

HPERM Ref: D17/82371

Recommendation (Option 2)

That:

1.    Council randomly select a total of 24 persons from the existing 24 Consultive Community Bodies (CCBs), Council’s Advisory Committees & Boards, and the Business Chamber Executives, to form a Community Reference Panel to provide input into the Community Strategic Plan (CSP) review process and the Delivery Program/Operational Plan (DPOP) and budget community engagement process.

 

2.    This Panel undertake 3 workshops to provide feedback on the priorities for expenditure of the Special Rate Variation (SRV) and the projects and priorities of the CSP and DPOP

3.    Council allocate a budget of $10,000 to meet staff and other costs to form and assist the Community Reference Panel in the process.

4.    Council also utilise alternative community engagement methods to reach other stakeholders of Shoalhaven, to actively seek their feedback on their priority areas for expenditure of the proposed SRV as part of this year’s DP/OP and budget and allocate $5,000 to fund materials and resources for these engagement methods

5.    Council consider providing a budget in the 2017/18 financial year for the establishment of a permanent randomly selected Community Reference Panel that could be externally facilitated and used for a number of projects of Council throughout the year and form part of Council’s overall community engagement strategy

 

RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr Guile)                                                                                       MIN17.194

That the Citizens Panel Report be received for information.

CARRIED

Note: Clr Gartner left the meeting – 7.19pm

 

 

SA17.67     Request for Alternate Delegates - Nowra CBD Revitalisation Strategy Committee

HPERM Ref: D17/56377

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That there be no change to the Terms of Reference in relation to membership of the committee.

 

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Gash)                                                                                   MIN17.195

That there be no change to the Terms of Reference in relation to membership of the committee.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.68     Shoalhaven Family Day Care - Consultation Process And Feedback Re Transfer Of Service

HPERM Ref: D17/8966

 

Item dealt with earlier/later in the meeting.

 

 

SA17.69     Shoalhaven Homelessness Taskforce - Terms of Reference

HPERM Ref: D17/60968

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council

1.    Establish the Shoalhaven Homelessness Taskforce as a section 355/377 Committee of Council;

2.    Endorse the Terms of Reference of the Shoalhaven Homelessness Taskforce

3.    Confirm the three councillor representatives on the taskforce.

 

 

 

RESOLVED (Clr Cheyne / Clr Levett)                                                                                 MIN17.196

That Council

1.    Establish the Shoalhaven Homelessness Taskforce as a section 355/377 Committee of Council;

2.    Endorse the Terms of Reference of the Shoalhaven Homelessness Taskforce with the following changes:

a.      That all councillors be members of the taskforce.

b.      The Chairperson be appointed for a term of 2 years

For:            Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Alldrick, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg

Against:    Clr Guile and Clr Kitchener

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.70     Overview/Update - Shoalhaven Section 94 Contributions Plan Review

HPERM Ref: D17/67071

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That:

1.    The report on the proposed reforms to the Shoalhaven Contributions Plan 2010 be received for information

2.    The funds from recoupment projects and identified deleted projects be transferred to a “recoupment fund” and used as Council’s apportionment to projects and to provide seed funding for community infrastructure projects identified in the revised Contributions Plan.

 

RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr White)                                                                                      MIN17.197

That:

1.    The report on the proposed reforms to the Shoalhaven Contributions Plan 2010 be received for information

2.    The funds from recoupment projects and identified deleted projects be transferred to a “recoupment fund” and used as Council’s apportionment to projects and to provide seed funding for community infrastructure projects identified in the revised Contributions Plan.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.71     Telstra Tech Savvy Seniors Grant Funding

HPERM Ref: D17/70549

Recommendation

That Council:

1.    Accept the NSW Government and Telstra Tech Savvy Seniors grant funding to the value of $1,800 for Shoalhaven Libraries to deliver a series of technology training modules to the Shoalhaven Community and adjust the budget accordingly.

2.    Write to the NSW Government accepting the grant offer.

 

Conflict of Interest Declaration – Clr White – less than significant non pecuniary interest –SA17.71 Telstra Tech Savvy Seniors Grant Funding – her husband is a previous Telstra Dealer, Council is receiving grant funding of $1800 for library programs and no remuneration or advantage will be received by her husband  – left the room, did not take part in discussion or vote.

 

Recommendation (Clr Proudfoot / Clr Alldrick)

That Council:

1.    Accept the NSW Government and Telstra Tech Savvy Seniors grant funding to the value of $1,800 for Shoalhaven Libraries to deliver a series of technology training modules to the Shoalhaven Community and adjust the budget accordingly.

2.    Write to the NSW Government accepting the grant offer.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.72     2017 Future of Local Government National Summit

HPERM Ref: D17/73086

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the Committee

1.    Notes the details of the 2017 Future of Local Government National Summit scheduled for 25-26 May 2017 in Melbourne.

2.    Authorises available Councillors to attend the conference and such attendance be deemed Council Business.

3.    Travel, registration fees, accommodation and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses be met in accordance with its adopted policy.

4.    Request Councillors attending the conference to provide a written report within 30 days of returning from the conference.

 

Note Clr White returned to the meeting.

 

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Cheyne)                                                                               MIN17.198

That the Committee

1.    Notes the details of the 2017 Future of Local Government National Summit scheduled for 25-26 May 2017 in Melbourne.

2.    Authorises available Councillors to attend the conference and such attendance be deemed Council Business.

3.    Travel, registration fees, accommodation and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses be met in accordance with its adopted policy.

4.    Request Councillors attending the conference to provide a written report within 30 days of returning from the conference.

CARRIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SA17.73     2017 Australian Local Government Women's Association Conference

HPERM Ref: D17/81524

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the Committee

1.    Notes the details of the 2017 Australian Local Government Wormen’s Association Conference scheduled for 4 to 6 May 2017 in Penrith.

2.    Authorises available Councillors to attend the conference and such attendance be deemed Council Business.

3.    Travel, registration fees, accommodation and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses be met in accordance with its adopted policy.

4.    Request Councillors attending the conference to provide a written report within 30 days of returning from the conference.

 

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Cheyne)                                                                               MIN17.199

That the Committee

1.    Notes the details of the 2017 Australian Local Government Wormen’s Association Conference scheduled for 4 to 6 May 2017 in Penrith.

2.    Authorises available Councillors to attend the conference and such attendance be deemed Council Business.

3.    Travel, registration fees, accommodation and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses be met in accordance with its adopted policy.

4.    Request Councillors attending the conference to provide a written report within 30 days of returning from the conference.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.74     Bomaderry Aquatic Centre & Nowra Aquatic Park - Winter Swimming In Northern Shoalhaven

HPERM Ref: D17/83607

 

Item dealt with earlier in the meeting.

 

 

 SA17.75    Funding Options - Sealing - Bishops Drive Mollymook

HPERM Ref: D17/37745

 

Item dealt with earlier in the meeting see MIN17.186

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SA17.76     Long Term Parking Facility Proposal - Bomaderry Railway Station

HPERM Ref: D17/56033

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the report on the availability of land in the vicinity of the Bomaderry Railway station to be used for all day/night parking, be received for information

 

RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr Gash)                                                                                      MIN17.200

That the report on the availability of land in the vicinity of the Bomaderry Railway station to be used for all day/night parking, be received for information.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.77     Bus Service - Bomaderry Rail Station to Nowra CBD

HPERM Ref: D17/56121

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the report on the feasibility of subsidising a shuttle bus service, or facilitating timely bus services, from Bomaderry railway station to the Nowra CBD, be received for information.

 

RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr Cheyne)                                                                                  MIN17.201

That the report on the feasibility of subsidising a shuttle bus service, or facilitating timely bus services, from Bomaderry railway station to the Nowra CBD, be received for information.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.78     Report - Traffic Management - Milton/Ulladulla Area - Summer Holiday Period - By-pass Proposal

HPERM Ref: D17/80036

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the Report of the General Manager (Director of Assets & Works) be received for Information and council note the status of this matter as detailed in the Princes Highway Corridor Strategy.

 

Motion (Clr White / Clr Gash)

That:

1.      The Report of the General Manager (Director of Assets & Works) be received for Information and council note the status of this matter as detailed in the Princes Highway Corridor Strategy.

2.      Council continue to lobby the State Government for funding for the Milton Ulladulla Bypass and involve our community in that lobbying

 

Amendment (Clr Guile / Clr Proudfoot)

That:

1.      The Report of the General Manager (Director of Assets & Works) be received for Information and council note the status of this matter as detailed in the Princes Highway Corridor Strategy.

2.      Council continue to lobby the State Government for funding for the Milton Ulladulla Bypass as a priority Princes Hwy Project and involve our community in that lobbying

For:            Clr Guile, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg

Against:    Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Alldrick

CARRIED on the casting vote of the chair

 

The AMENDMENT became the MOTION and was PUT and CARRIED on the casting vote of the chair

RESOLVED (Clr Guile / Clr Proudfoot)                                                                               MIN17.202

That:

1.      The Report of the General Manager (Director of Assets & Works) be received for Information and council note the status of this matter as detailed in the Princes Highway Corridor Strategy.

2.      Council continue to lobby the State Government for funding for the Milton Ulladulla Bypass as a priority Princes Hwy Project and involve our community in that lobbying

For:            Clr Guile, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg

Against:    Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Alldrick

CARRIED ON THE CASTING VOTE OF THE CHAIR

 

 

SA17.79     Shared path signage - citywide

HPERM Ref: D17/25041

Recommendation

That the General Manager (Director of Assets & Works)

1.    Continues to ensure that signage for cycleways complies with Australian Standard AS1742.9 (Bicycle facilities) and AUSTROADS Guide to Road Design Part 6A (Pedestrian and Cyclist paths)

2.    Includes a ‘share the path’ educational component in the pamphlet for distribution with the rates notices at a future time.

3.    Develops a strategy to install additional signage at key locations along the shared path network within existing budget constraints.

 

Recommendation (Clr Cheyne / Clr Levett)

That the General Manager (Director of Assets & Works)

1.    Continues to ensure that signage for cycleways complies with Australian Standard AS1742.9 (Bicycle facilities) and AUSTROADS Guide to Road Design Part 6A (Pedestrian and Cyclist paths)

2.    Includes a ‘share the path’ educational component in the pamphlet for distribution with the rates notices at a future time.

3.    Develops a strategy to install additional signage at key locations along the shared path network within existing budget constraints.

CARRIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SA17.80     Review - Graffiti Management Policy

HPERM Ref: D17/73999

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council reaffirm the Graffiti Management Policy with the minor update to nominate Assets & Works as the responsible Council Group.

 

RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr Levett)                                                                                     MIN17.203

That Council reaffirm the Graffiti Management Policy with the minor update to nominate Assets & Works as the responsible Council Group.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.81     Road Verge Improvements & Maintenance Policy (POL16/157).

HPERM Ref: D17/53061

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council reaffirm the Road Verge Improvements & Maintenance Policy (POL16/157).

 

RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr Findley)                                                                                   MIN17.204

That Council reaffirm the Road Verge Improvements & Maintenance Policy (POL16/157).

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.82     Ratepayers Advance Kerb & Gutter Construction - 58 - 64 Basin View Pde, Basin View

HPERM Ref: D17/73903

Recommendation

That Council enter into a Ratepayers Advance Agreement, executed under the Seal of Council with:

1.    Peter Brown of 58 Basin View Parade, Basin View in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction to the value of $5,379.72 (advance) of which $1,722.12 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $3,657.60 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $4,572.00.

2.    Stephen Long of PO Box 460, Wollongong in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction at 60 Basin View Parade to the value of $5,621.72 (including additional an $242, which includes $22 GST, for a single driveway) (advance) of which $1,964.12 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $3,657.60 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $4,572.00.

3.    Russ Pigg of PO Box 1150, Nowra in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction at 62 Basin View Parade to the value of $7,372.80 (including an additional $484, which includes $44 GST, for a 4.8 mt driveway) (advance) of which $2,689.20 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $4,683.60 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $5,854.50.

4.    Sean Butcher of PO Box 30, Coniston in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction at 64 Basin View Parade to the value of $7,130.80 (including an additional $242, which includes $22 GST, for a single driveway) (advance) of which $2,447.20 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $4,683.60 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $5,854.50.

 

5.    Graham Butler of 68 Basin View Parade, Basin View in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction to the value of $8,408.88 (advance) of which $2,070.16 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $6,338.72 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $7,923.40.

6.    The Common Seal of Council of the City of Shoalhaven be affixed to any documentation required to be sealed otherwise the General Manager be authorised to sign any documentation necessary to give effect to the resolution.

 

Conflict of Interest Declaration – Russ Pigg - pecuniary interest – SA17.82 Ratepayers Advance Kerb & Gutter Construction - 58 - 64 Basin View Pde, Basin View – he is one of the property owners – left the room, did not take part in discussion or vote.

Recommendation (Clr Wells / Clr White)

That Council enter into a Ratepayers Advance Agreement, executed under the Seal of Council with:

1.    Peter Brown of 58 Basin View Parade, Basin View in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction to the value of $5,379.72 (advance) of which $1,722.12 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $3,657.60 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $4,572.00.

2.    Stephen Long of PO Box 460, Wollongong in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction at 60 Basin View Parade to the value of $5,621.72 (including additional an $242, which includes $22 GST, for a single driveway) (advance) of which $1,964.12 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $3,657.60 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $4,572.00.

3.    Russ Pigg of PO Box 1150, Nowra in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction at 62 Basin View Parade to the value of $7,372.80 (including an additional $484, which includes $44 GST, for a 4.8 mt driveway) (advance) of which $2,689.20 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $4,683.60 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $5,854.50.

4.    Sean Butcher of PO Box 30, Coniston in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction at 64 Basin View Parade to the value of $7,130.80 (including an additional $242, which includes $22 GST, for a single driveway) (advance) of which $2,447.20 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $4,683.60 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $5,854.50.

5.    Graham Butler of 68 Basin View Parade, Basin View in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction to the value of $8,408.88 (advance) of which $2,070.16 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $6,338.72 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $7,923.40.

6.    The Common Seal of Council of the City of Shoalhaven be affixed to any documentation required to be sealed otherwise the General Manager be authorised to sign any documentation necessary to give effect to the resolution.

CARRIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SA17.83     Exercise of Option - Lease - Part First Floor - 12 Berry Street Nowra - Shoalhaven Community Radio Incorporated

HPERM Ref: D17/71592

Recommendation

That Council:-

1.       Approve the additional five (5) year term of the  lease agreement with Shoalhaven Community Radio Incorporated for the continued occupation of Part 12 Berry Street, Nowra;

 

2.       Affix the Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to the lease agreement and any other documentation required to be sealed to enable the lease to be finalised.

 

Recommendation (Clr Wells / Clr Gash)

That Council:

1.       Approve the additional five (5) year term of the  lease agreement with Shoalhaven Community Radio Incorporated for the continued occupation of Part 12 Berry Street, Nowra;

 

2.       Affix the Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to the lease agreement and any other documentation required to be sealed to enable the lease to be finalised.

 

 

SA17.84     Road Closure - Lot 28 DP 755927 - Conjola

HPERM Ref: D17/59419

Recommendation

That Council resolves to:

1.    Make an application to the Minister administering the Roads Act 1993, for the unformed part of Wollybutt Road Conjola, shown by red shading on Attachment “1”, to be closed and vested in Council as Operational Land, then sell to the owners, J B McCloghry & V M Gautier, for consolidation with the adjoining Lot 28 DP755927,;

2.    Authority be given to affix the Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to any documents required to be sealed and that the General Manager be authorised to sign any documents necessary to give effect to the resolution;  and

3.    Council authorise the sale of the closed road to J B McCloghry & V M Gautier in exchange for the land shown by blue hatching on Attachment “1” pursuant to Section 44 of the Roads Act 1993 and thatsuch land be dedicated as public road in the plan of consolidation pursuant to Section 9 of the Roads Act 1993;

4.    All costs associated with this matter are to be met by the applicant.

 

Note: Russ Pigg returned to the meeting.

Recommendation (Clr White / Clr Cheyne)

That Council resolves to:

1.    Make an application to the Minister administering the Roads Act 1993, for the unformed part of Wollybutt Road Conjola, shown by red shading on Attachment “1”, to be closed and vested in Council as Operational Land, then sell to the owners, J B McCloghry & V M Gautier, for consolidation with the adjoining Lot 28 DP755927,;

2.    Authority be given to affix the Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to any documents required to be sealed and that the General Manager be authorised to sign any documents necessary to give effect to the resolution;  and

3.    Council authorise the sale of the closed road to J B McCloghry & V M Gautier in exchange for the land shown by blue hatching on Attachment “1” pursuant to Section 44 of the Roads Act 1993 and thatsuch land be dedicated as public road in the plan of consolidation pursuant to Section 9 of the Roads Act 1993;

4.    All costs associated with this matter are to be met by the applicant.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.85     Variation to Compensation - Acquisition of Easement for Water Supply at Terara

HPERM Ref: D17/75193

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council resolve to amend MIN16.914 (3) by inserting $15,000 plus GST in lieu of $8,500 plus GST.

 

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr White)                                                                                   MIN17.205

That Council resolve to amend MIN16.914 (3) by inserting $15,000 plus GST in lieu of $8,500 plus GST.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.86     June 2016 Storm Remediation Response

HPERM Ref: D16/400617

Recommendation

1.    Council consider funding the Coastal Management and Infrastructure Reserve (MIN16.998) by transferring $500,000 each year from the Strategic Projects Reserve or another source, to fund priority coast and estuary management and infrastructure projects commencing in 2017/18 financial year.

2.    In 2017/18 Council allocate $400,000 to complete and implement the Currarong coastal erosion strategy and determine the source of funds during the consideration of the draft 2017/18 budget.

 

Recommendation (Clr Wells / Clr White)

1.    Council consider funding the Coastal Management and Infrastructure Reserve (MIN16.998) by transferring $500,000 each year from the Strategic Projects Reserve or another source, to fund priority coast and estuary management and infrastructure projects commencing in 2017/18 financial year.

2.    In 2017/18 Council allocate $400,000 to complete and implement the Currarong coastal erosion strategy and determine the source of funds during the consideration of the draft 2017/18 budget.

CARRIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SA17.87     Dealing With Development Applications Lodged by Council Staff or Councillors

HPERM Ref: D17/72258

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council adopt the following policies with minor amendments:

1.    Dealing With Development Applications Lodged by Council Staff or Councillors

 

Conflict of Interest Declaration - Clr Proudfoot – less than significant non pecuniary interest SA17.87 Dealing With Development Applications Lodged by Council Staff or Councillors – he has a Development Application before Council – will leave the room, will not take part in discussion or vote.

RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr White)                                                                                      MIN17.206

That Council adopt the following policies with minor amendments:

1.      Dealing With Development Applications Lodged by Council Staff or Councillors

CARRIED

 

Introduction of Items as Matters of Urgency

RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Alldrick)                                                                                  MIN17.207

That the following addendum reports be introduced as matters of urgency:

1.       SA17.88 NSW State Government Restart NSW - Environment and Tourism Grants Program

2.       SA17.89 Greenwell Point Timber Jetty Decommissioning

CARRIED

The Chairperson ruled the matters as ones of urgency as they relate to urgent business of Council and allowed their introduction.

Note: Clr Proudfoot returned.

 

 

Addendum Reports

 

SA17.88     NSW State Government Restart NSW - Environment and Tourism Grants Program

HPERM Ref: D17/86241

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council make applications for the following projects to the NSW State Government Restart NSW – Environment and Tourism Grants program.

·    Project - Round the Bay walk incl. Moona Moona Creek, Way Finding, Callala Bay - $1M

·    Project – Woollamia – Maintaining the Tourism Fleet - $2.242M

·    Project – South Nowra Rotary Park - $600,000

·    Project – Nowra Showground Enhancements $1.05M

·    Project – Beach Erosion Ulladulla Harbour - $750,000

·    Project – Additional Boating Facilities Greenwell Point - $3M

·    Project – Shoalhaven Heads River Road Precinct - $750,000

 

RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr White)                                                                                      MIN17.208

That Council make applications for the following projects to the NSW State Government Restart NSW – Environment and Tourism Grants program.

·    Project - Round the Bay walk incl. Moona Moona Creek, Way Finding, Callala Bay - $1M

·    Project – Woollamia – Maintaining the Tourism Fleet - $2.242M

·    Project – South Nowra Rotary Park - $600,000

·    Project – Nowra Showground Enhancements $1.05M

·    Project – Beach Erosion Ulladulla Harbour - $750,000

·    Project – Additional Boating Facilities Greenwell Point - $3M

·    Project – Shoalhaven Heads River Road Precinct - $750,000.

CARRIED

 

 

SA17.89     Greenwell Point Timber Jetty Decommissioning

HPERM Ref: D17/86839

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the timber jetty, adjacent to the Crown’s concrete wharf at Greenwell Point, be demolished and an application for funding be made to the State Government at the appropriate time for a replacement berthing facility

 

RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Cheyne)                                                                                 MIN17.209

That:

1.      The timber jetty, adjacent to the Crown’s concrete wharf at Greenwell Point, be demolished and an application for funding be made to the State Government at the appropriate time for a replacement berthing facility

2.      Notifcation be made to Community Consultative Bodies at Greenwell Point and user groups including adjacent local business operators advising that Council supports the replacement as a priority and will be continuing to seek funding for this project

CARRIED

 

 


 

 

Confidential Reports

 

Pursuant to Section 10A(4) the public were invited to make representation to the meeting before any part of the meeting is closed, as to whether that part of the meeting should be closed.

 

No members of the public made representations.

 

RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr Pakes)                                                                                     MIN17.210

 

That the press and public be excluded from the Meeting, pursuant to section 10A(1)(a) of the Local Government Act, 1993, to consider the following items of a confidential nature.

                       

CSA17.6         Red Rocks UHF CB Repeater

Details of systems and/or arrangements that have been implemented to protect council, councillors, staff and Council property.10(A)(2)(f)

There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to expose a person to a risk of harm or of serious harassment or serious intimidation.

CSA17.7         Pump Procurement Contract

Information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.10(A)(2)(c)

There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests.

CARRIED

 

 

The meeting moved into confidential the time being 8.35pm.

 

 

The meeting moved into open session, the time being 8:38pm.

 

Report from confidential session

 

The following resolutions of the meeting, whilst closed to the public, were made public.

         

CSA17.6    Red Rocks UHF CB Repeater

HPERM Ref: D17/28810

RESOLVED                                                                                                                       MIN17.211C

That Council advertise its intention to relinquish its Red Rocks UHF CB licence and consider any feedback prior to removal of the equipment.

 

 

There being no further business, the meeting concluded, the time being 8.39PM.

 

 

Clr Guile

CHAIRPERSON


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 21

 

 

SA17.90     Notice of Motion - Council Meetings - Order of Business

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/107475

 

Submitted by:    Clr Joanna Gash

 

     

 

Purpose / Summary

The following Notice of Motion, of which due notice has been given, is submitted for Council’s consideration.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That

1.    Council changes the Order of Business for future meetings and places Notices of Motions at the end of the business paper;

2.    The Ordinary council meetings commence at 4pm;

3.    A further review take place after six months.

 

 

Background

Since the last council election changes were made to have Council meetings starting an hour later at 5pm however have gone well past 4 hours in duration in order for all issues to be addressed. This results in council staff working longer after hours together with it not being good for ones health to sit that long.

 

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 22

 

 

SA17.91     Notice of Motion - Callala Beach Community Centre - Vegetation Issues

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/114249

 

Submitted by:    Clr Patricia White

Clr Greg Watson

Clr Mitchell Pakes

 

     

 

Purpose / Summary

The following Notice of Motion, of which due notice has been given, is submitted for Council’s consideration.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council authorise the Callala Beach Community Hall Facilities Committee to undertake selective pruning of vegetation located:

1.    Adjacent to the Eastern windows of the Callala Beach Hall which is obscuring the view of Jervis Bay

2.    The area immediately behind the Tennis Courts to clear a pathway around the tennis courts

 

 

Background

Councillors Watson, Levett, Gash & White met with the Executive of Callala Beach Community Hall Facilities committee on Friday 7th April to discuss issues surrounding the Hall and Management.

Previously the outside community toilets were located directly behind the Hall however, Council has relocated the toilets to the east of the Hall.   This has resulted in overgrowth of tea tree bush and other species of bushes directly behind the hall.  Additionally, there appears to be a large amount of rubbish in the bush area.

The Facilities Committee acknowledges that the bush provides protection to the dune, however, the overgrowth is now impeding on the activities of the Hall and Tennis courts.  Additionally, there are issues with safety of young children and security of the Hall from break-ins. 

The Committee has sort feedback from the local Land Care and Bush care groups who have no issues with selective pruning of the vegetation.

Previously, on a Councillor Familiarity Tour, this matter has been discussed with the Committee and the Committee is now requesting Council approval for the work.  The work will be undertaken by the Facilities Committee who will discuss with Council staff on the pruning.

 

Note by the General Manager

While there may well be reasonable grounds for some of the vegetation management proposed, especially along the side of the tennis court, Council needs to appreciate that before any approval is considered, the extent of the proposed work should be more fully quantified and an assessment carried out to meet legislative requirements. The Tennis Courts already have a gap between the fence and the existing dune vegetation and there are some smaller re-growth of Coastal Wattle (Acacia sophorae) and Tea Tree that could be pruned back to the existing line of dune vegetation without damaging or compromising the dune vegetation structural stability

Currently there is an opportunity for public viewing of Jervis Bay beside the community centre and adjacent the beach access track. Vegetation is pruned at this point to allow access to the beach and affords 160 degree views Jervis Bay as shown below

 

 

The pruning of dune vegetation (which is mainly comprised of Coastal Tea Tree (Leptospernum leavigtum) to provide a view from the hall raises the following issues that would need to be addressed:

 

1.   Further information and details are required as to the extent, depth and length of dune vegetation that is to be pruned. As without this information it is difficult to assess the impact on the dune vegetation and the integrity/stability of the dune.

2.   Callala Beach has been identified in the Coastal Zone Management Plan/Hazard Mapping as one of three coastal locations at highest risk in Shoalhaven. The hazard mapping also indicates that the community hall would be one of 60 buildings extending into the zone of wave impact and slope adjustment for future coastal inundation for 2050 & 2100.

3.   The proposed height that the dune vegetation is to be pruned would need to be known as heavy pruning of the Coastal Tea Tree can weaken the plant structurally and leave them susceptible to attack from pest and disease, resulting in the die back of the Tea Trees across the dune. This loss of primary vegetation can lead to a dune scalping effect, resulting in dune sand becoming mobile and potentially impacting on the Community Hall and the car park (see photo below for an estimate of extent vegetation height pruning that might be required).

4.   Pruning of the dune vegetation will trigger a 5 part test as part of a Review of Environmental Factors under EPA Act and details of the extent of pruning would need to be known.

 

 

In consideration of the above points it is recommended (under the committee’s delegation) that:

1.   Council arrange for appropriate vegetation maintenance adjoining the tennis court area; and

2.   Council request the necessary assessment of the proposal be undertaken and that the General Manager report back to the Committee on what works can be approved in the Dune area.

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 25

 

 

SA17.92     Notice of Motion - Shaolin Temple Foundation

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/114693

 

Submitted by:    Clr Greg Watson

 

     

 

Purpose / Summary

The following Notice of Motion, of which due notice has been given, is submitted for Council’s consideration.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council write to the Shaolin Temple Foundation to make enquiries as to when they intend to start work on the project.

 

 

  


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 26

 

 

SA17.93     Delegations to the General Manager

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/112674

 

Group:                General Manager's Group  

 

    

 

Purpose / Summary

Council to consider clarifying the delegation to the General Manager and granting additional delegation to another body in respect to the consideration and determination of tenders as a result of the changes to S377 (1)(i).

 

Recommendation

That Council

1.    Delegate authority to the Strategy & Assets Committee to determine and accept all tenders with a value of $1M or more, except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council;

2.    Delegate authority to the General Manager to determine and accept any tenders with a value less than $1M except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council; and

3.    Delegate authority to the General Manager to determine and accept any tenders initiated by the Illawarra (Pilot) Joint Organisation (IPJO) on behalf of all or a majority of member councils.

 

 

Options

1.    As recommended.

Implications: This will facilitate more timely determination of tenders and reflect the rationale of the State Government’s amendments to S377 of the Local Government Act.

2.    That Council amend the existing delegations to the General Manager to restrict ability to determine tenders.

Implications: This will negate any operational benefits that was intended by the State Government’s amendments to the Local Government Act.

3.    That Council make different delegations and threshold amounts.

 

Background

Councillors are aware of the changes to the Local Government Act which passed through Parliament in August ’16.

Some changes commenced on 30/8/16, some on 23/9/16 & others 1/10/16.

One significant change was the ability for Council to now delegate consideration and determination of tenders EXCEPT:

“the acceptance of tenders to provide services currently provided by members of staff of the Council”.

A Councillor Briefing on these changes was held on 8/12/16.

Council may, in accordance with S377 of the Local Government Act, delegate to the General Manager or any other person or body (not including another employee of the Council) any functions that are able to be delegated.

The requirements to call tenders for works & services where estimate of cost is $150,000 or more has not changed.

In respect to the current delegation to the General Manager which says:

“2.   The person who from time to time holds the position of General Manager of Council ("General Manager"), being at the date of this instrument RUSSELL DESMOND PIGG, be delegated authority under:

2.a     Section 377 of the LG Act, to exercise and/or perform on behalf of Council the Council's Functions under all Acts and Regulations in force and as amended from time to time:

i.     Subject to any condition or limitation on a Function specified in Schedule 1; and

ii.     Excluding those Functions:

1.         that are expressly prohibited from delegation as listed under Section 377 of           the LG Act;

2.         which are expressly required by legislation to be exercised by a resolution            of the Council.”

this would now allow the General Manager to accept tenders in line with the amendment to S377 effictive 23 September ’16.  This authority has not been excercised by the General Manager to date and tenders have continued to be referred to Council.

The change in legislation was to recognise that tenders were in essence operational matters for the General Manager to deal with and also allow delegations to regional organisations such as the IPJO to accept procurement tenders on a regional basis.

To facilitate more timely determination of tenders it is proposed that Council delegate this function subject to some limitations as follows:

a)   Delegate authority to the Strategy & Assets Committee to determine and accept all tenders with a value of $1M or more, except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council;

b)   Delegate authority to the General Manager to determine and accept any tenders with a value less than $1M except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council; and

c)   Delegate authority to the General Manager to determine and accept any tenders initiated by the Illawarra (Pilot) Joint Organisation on behalf of all or a majority of member councils.

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 28

 

 

SA17.94     Response from Risk & Audit Committee on matters raised by Mark Crowther

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/112239

 

Group:                General Manager's Group  

 

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To report back to Council, the Risk & Audit Committee’s resolution in respect to the referral of the Mark Crowther matters to the Committee.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council:

1.    Receive the report for information noting that the Audit Office of NSW has identified the Issue of Risk of “Fair Valuation of Infrastructure, property, plant & equipment (IPPE)” as a Key Issue in the Audit Plan for 2016/17 as follows:

Issue or Risk

Exposure

Audit Response

Fair Valuation of Infrastructure, property, plant and equipment (IPPE)

 

 

Council’s IPPE asset base, which includes water and sewer assets, is significant. All IPPE assets are held at fair value.

Council needs to be satisfied the carrying value of all IPPE assets materially reflects fair values.

Council plans to comprehensively revalue its water and sewer assets in 2016-17.

Asset values are based on complex methodologies, judgements and estimates increasing the risk of misstatement.

Similarly, IPPE depreciation expense is significant with its calculation based on estimates of replacement values and useful lives of IPPE asset components.

We will assess:

·      effectiveness and reliability of management’s process for determining and agreeing fair value of assets

·      reasonableness of methodology used

·      reasonableness of useful lives and depreciation

·      qualifications and experience of any experts used

·      whether there are any indicators of impairment

·      adequacy of disclosure in the financial statements.

 

2.    Note the resolution of the Risk & Audit Committee.

 

 

Options

1.    As recommended.

2.    Council consider additional actions.

Background

Council is aware of the sequence of events leading to the referal of matters raised by Mark Crowther to the Risk & Audit Committee.

The matters raised by Mark Crowther in early January ’17 were the subject of a Councillor Briefing on 24/1/17 and Council subsequently resolved to ask the Risk & Audit Committee to consider these issues.

The matter was considered by the Risk & Audit Committee at its meeting on 27 March including:

·    Meeting notes of the meeting between Councillors & Mark Crowther of 10/1/17;

·    The Councillor Briefing Presentation of 24/1/17;

·    Letter from Pitcher Partners.

The Risk & Audit Committee Resloved as follows:

“The committee endorse the action taken in this case (Mark Crowther) and the following Actions be taken in future:

a.    Any errors highlighted need be addressed

b.    That the Risk & Audit Committee be involved a bit earlier in the process

c.    Acknowledge that the external audit plan from the Audit Office NSW focusses on the key issues that have been raised

d.    The public should be reminded that they can make submissions when the financial statements are placed on public exhibition”

The Audit Office of NSW also issued its Client Services Plan on 15/3/17 for the Audit of 2016/17 financial year.

The Audit Plan is very comprehensive and includes three Key Issues:

Issue or Risk

Exposure

Audit Response

Fair Valuation of Infrastructure, property, plant and equipment (IPPE)

 

 

Council’s IPPE asset base, which includes water and sewer assets, is significant. All IPPE assets are held at fair value.

Council needs to be satisfied the carrying value of all IPPE assets materially reflects fair values.

Council plans to comprehensively revalue its water and sewer assets in 2016-17.

Asset values are based on complex methodologies, judgements and estimates increasing the risk of misstatement.

Similarly, IPPE depreciation expense is significant with its calculation based on estimates of replacement values and useful lives of IPPE asset components.

We will assess:

·      effectiveness and reliability of management’s process for determining and agreeing fair value of assets

·      reasonableness of methodology used

·      reasonableness of useful lives and depreciation

·      qualifications and experience of any experts used

·      whether there are any indicators of impairment

·      adequacy of disclosure in the financial statements.


 

Related Parties

 

 

AASB 2015-6 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards’ extended related party disclosures to not-for-profit entities. From 30 June 2017, the financial statements must disclose key management personnel remuneration, related party relationships, transactions and balances.

 

Risk of non-compliance with the requirements as per AASB124 ‘Related Party Disclosures’, especially the risk of incomplete disclosure.

 

We will gain an understanding of Council’s policies and procedures to capture and disclose related party information as at 30 June 2017.

We will audit the related party disclosures to determine whether the Council has materially complied with AASB 124.

Procurement and contract management risk

 

 

Council spends a substantial amount each year to procure goods and services and its contracts vary in nature, size and complexity.

Lack of probity, accountability or transparency in procurement operations increases the risk of:

·      unauthorised purchases

·      corruption and /or fraudulent behaviour

·      value for money not being achieved

·      non-compliance with the Local Government legislation and internal policies and procedures.

If contracts are not managed appropriately, this increases the risk of service delivery failure, unapproved scope variations and potential legal disputes.

We will gain an understanding of Council’s procedures around procurement and contract management.

We will review tendering procedures to identify any probity and related party issues.

For a sample of contracts, the audit team will review:

·      compliance with Council’s procurement policies

·      updating of the contract register.

 

 

Financial Implications

There has been some matters identified to make alterations within the Asset Register valuations and depreciation schedules however the quantum of change has not been considered “material” in the overall Financial Reports by Council’s external Auditor.  The Risk & Audit Committee have simply noted that “any errors highlighted needs to be addressed” and staff have already done so.

The Audit Office of NSW is understood to be including this as a key issue in many councils.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 31

 

 

SA17.95     Risk and Audit Committee Annual Report 2015 - 2016

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/102147

 

Group:                General Manager's Group 

Section:              Executive Strategy

 

Attachments:     1. R&AC Annual Report 2016 (under separate cover)

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To table the 2015 – 2016 Risk and Audit Committee annual report.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council receive and note the Risk and Audit Committee annual report 2015 – 2016.

 

 

Options

1.    Council receive the Risk and Audit Committee annual report 2015 – 2016.

 

2.    Council do not receive the Risk and Audit Committee annual report 2015 – 2016 and provide an alternative suggestion.

 

Background

Council’s Risk and Audit Committee’s objective is to provide independent assurance and assistance to Council on risk management, control, governance and external accountability responsibilities.

As per the Risk and Audit Committee communications guidelines established in its Charter, the Chair of the Risk and Audit Committee reports to Council annually on the key issues and activities considered. 

The Chair of the Risk and Audit Committee has tabled the fourth annual report to provide an overview of the key issues that the committee has dealt with in 2015 – 2016. Dr Phil Ross will provide a verbal report on the Risk and Audit Committee Annual Report at the Strategy and Assets Committee meeting.

The annual report is also attached for consideration.

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 32

 

 

SA17.96     Risk and Audit Committee Charter Amendments and Appointment of Risk and Audit Committee Chair

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/102563

 

Group:                General Manager's Group 

Section:              Executive Strategy

 

Attachments:     1. Risk & Audit Committee Charter with amendments

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s endorsement for the amendments to the Risk and Audit Committee Charter and the appointment of Risk and Audit Committee Chair in line with Council’s Risk and Audit Committee Charter.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council:

1.    Endorse the proposed amendments to the Risk and Audit Committee Charter.

2.    Endorse the appointment of Dr Philp Ross as the Risk and Audit Committee Chair.

 

 

Options

1.    Endorse the proposed changes to the Risk and Audit Committee Charter and endorse the appointment of Dr Philp Ross as the Risk and Audit Committee Chair.

 

2.    Seek further information in relation to the matter.

 

Background

Risk and Audit Committee Charter

The Risk and Audit Committee Charter is a formal document that defines the purpose, authority, responsibilities and administrative arrangements for the Risk and Audit Committee. The Charter has been revised for relevancy and reflects the following changes:

§   Recruitment process of the committee members;

§   Appointment of the Risk and Audit Committee Chair; and

§   Communication of committee minutes to all Councillors and executive management team.

The amended charter was presented and endorsed at the March 2017 Risk and Audit Committee meeting.

 

Appointment of Risk and Audit Committee Chair

As per the Risk and Audit Committee Charter requirements and Office of Local Government guidelines; ‘Internal Audit Guidelines, September 2010’, the chair of the Risk and Audit committee should be independent and should not be the Mayor or a member of Council.

The former chair’s term expired in December 2016.  Recruitment of a new independent member was finalised in January 2017.  A nomination for the chair was called in the March 2017, Risk and Audit Committee meeting. The Risk and Audit Committee resolved to appoint Dr Philp Ross as the chair for his remaining term on the Risk and Audit Committee. 

Dr Ross is appointed for the period of February 2015 to December 2018. Dr Ross has held senior accounting and audit roles in the public and private sector and he is a specialist in risk management, corporate governance and education. He has also held a number of senior positions in academia including Associate Professor and Head of School (Accounting) at the University of Western Sydney. Dr Ross is a Chartered Accountant and he holds a B.Bus (Accounting), M.Com (Accounting) and a PhD (Accounting). He has published in national and international journals on audit and governance issues in local government and he is also the Chair of Audit and Risk committees for the two largest Councils in NSW.

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 34

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 42

 

 

SA17.97     Council Policy Revision - BMX Circuits, Skate Parks, Temporary Storage (shipping) Containers on Public Land and Community Gardens

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/57934

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group 

Section:              Recreation Community & Culture

 

Attachments:     1. BMX Policy

2. Skate Parks 

3. Temporary Storage (Shipping) Containers on Public Land

4. Community Gardens

 

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To review and reaffirm the following current policies:

·    BMX Circuits

·    Skate parks

·    Temporary Storage (shipping) Container Public Land

·    Community Gardens

 

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council adopt the revision of the following policies with minor changes as detailed in this report:

·    BMX Circuits

·    Skate parks

·    Temporary Storage (shipping) Container Public Land

·    Community Gardens

 

 

Options

1.    Adopt the recommendations.

Implications: This will allow inclusion of minor changes to make the relevant policies relevant and up to date.

 

2.    Amend the recommendation

Implications: Any significant change to the policy(s) should consider consultation and input from the wider community and/or alternatively may have a resourcing implication.

 

3.    Rescind the Policies

Implications: Not recommended as this will result in a loss of provisions and controls for the relevant policy

 

Background

The following policies have been developed over a number of years and have been reviewed in line with current implementation, legislation and community feedback.

 

BMX Circuits

This policy was initially endorsed by Council in December 2002 and has been successful in defining the role of Council and community in providing BMX Circuits appearing on public land.

A summary of the recommended changes to the policy are detailed in Attachment 1 and summarised below:

·    Policy name change to make it easier for the community to reference / understand.

·    Encourages an interested community group to evaluate the success of the BMX Circuit and works towards activating the facility.

·    Assesses the project under the related statutory legislative process.

·    Encouraging location close to transport networks.

·    Suitable buffer from adjacent private residents.

·    Construction cost increased to $15,000 to reflect recent construction costs.

·    Minor text changes.

 

Skate parks

This policy was initially endorsed by Council in July 2001 and has been successful in delivering a number of popularity of Skate parks.

A summary of the recommended changes to the policy are detailed in Attachment 2 and summarised below:

·    Policy name change to make it easier for the community to reference / understand.

·    Encourages an interested community group to evaluate the success of the Skate park and works towards activating the facility.

·    Bay & Basin Skate park (Vincentia) is a district Skate park to reflect past Council resolutions.

·    Eligibility text changes.

·    Assesses the project under the related statutory legislative process.

·    Encouraging location close to transport networks.

·    Suitable buffer from adjacent private residents.

·    WHS and project management text added.

·    Minor text changes.

 

Temporary Storage (shipping) Container on Public Land

This policy was initially endorsed in February 2015 and was created as a cost effective solution to the shortfall in storage for community groups that operate on Council owned and/or managed land.

A summary of the recommended changes to the policy are detailed in Attachment 3 and summarised below:

·    Removal of “Type of Approval” section to acknowledge a resolution of the Shoalhaven Sports Board that sporting groups will not pay fees to licence a shipping container on a sportsground.

·    Defining that concrete footings will be anchors for a container in flood ways.

·    Graffiti clean up is the responsibility of the container owner.

·    Minor text changes.

 

Community Gardens

This policy was initially endorsed in August 2005 and has facilitated provision of a number of community gardens. 

A summary of the recommended changes to the policy are detailed in Attachment 4 and summarised below:

·    Encourages growth of fruit and vegetable options as well as permaculture.

·    Update to reflect current liability cover.

·    Site access will not be locked.

·    Maintenance of garden surrounds to be consistent Council’s Parkcare Policy.

·    Minimum number of members for a community garden group be 20 members.

·    Council reserves the right to remove and/or demolish abandoned garden.

 

Community Engagement

The review of the above policies is considered a minor policy change that does not warrant community engagement.  Community engagement is recommended only if the policy is significantly considered for amendment by the elected Council.

 

Policy Implications

Reaffirmation of the above policies to make them relevant and up to date.

 

Financial Implications

No additional financial implications result from reaffirming the above policies.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 45

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 48

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 51

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 55

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 57

 

 

SA17.98     Milton Showground - Second Croquet Court Options - Follow Up Report

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/67958

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group 

Section:              Recreation Community & Culture

 

Attachments:     1. Strategy & Asset Committee Report - 11 October 2016

2. Plan of second croquet court

3. Letter from Milton Show Society Requesting use of temporary fenced area of the proposed second croquet court

4. Hawkesbury Working Dogs using the proposed second croquet court area

5. Copy of letter confirming arrangement for a croquet event on the exiting croquet court during the Milton Show

6. Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club signage erected during Milton Show

7. Photos of Milton Show 2017

8. Narrawallee Subdivision Reserve Information

9. Proposed Narrawallee Subdivision Croquet Court Facility

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To update Council on options for a second croquet court for Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club following the Milton Show which was held on 3 & 4 March 2017.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That:

1.    Council endorse construction of a second croquet court at Milton Showground which is consistent with Council’s adopted Milton Showground Plan of Management.

2.    Council continue to work with the Milton Showground Management Committee and Milton Show Society to minimise the impact of a second croquet court at Milton Showground and to increase use of all areas of the Showground.

3.    Council continue to work with land owners adjacent to Milton Showground to formalise offsite parking options via a licence agreement to increase capacity for future large events at the Showground.

4.    Council adopt the Croquet User Agreement (as outlined in the report to Council’s Strategy & Assets Committee meeting on 11 October 2016) and inform both Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club & Milton Showground Management Committee that they are to abide by this agreement.

5.    Council advise both the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club & Milton Showground Management Committee of the above Council resolution.

 

 

 


 

Options

 

1.    Adopt the recommendation and Council staff continue progressing to deliver a second croquet court at Milton Showground which is consistent with Council’s adopted Milton Showground Plan of Management.

Implications: This will enable staff to continue progressing projects as discussed in this report.

 

2.    Not adopt the recommendation and provide an alternative resolution with direction for staff.

Implications: Unknown until the Committee identify alternatives

 

Background

Related Council Resolution

In response to Council’s Strategy & Assets Committee meeting on 11 October 2016 considering a report on second croquet court & expansion options at Milton Showground, Council resolved that MIN16.768:

1.   Council continue to work with land owners adjacent to Milton Showground to formalise offsite parking options via a licence agreement for future large events at the Showground.

2.   Council peg out and temporary fence the area of the proposed second Croquet Court at the Milton Showground for the 2017 Milton Show to trial the potential impact of the development of the croquet court on the show which could also demonstrate the impact on similar large events especially in relation to parking.

3.   Staff review the impacts on parking and other aspects of the show and seek formal feedback from the Showground Management Committee, The Milton Show Society and the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club to include in a report to Council after the 2017 Milton Show

4.   The croquet club submit a letter to the show management committee and show society requesting to run an event in March 2017.

5.   Council undertake a review of the management plan of the Milton Showground.

In addition to the above resolution, the Strategy & Assets Committee meeting of 11 October 2016 also made a separate confidential resolution at this meeting that related to further investigation of acquisition of property adjacent to the Milton Showground.

The public report presented to the Strategy & Assets Committee meeting on 11 October 2016 is provided as Attachment 1.

Status of Second Croquet Court

As reported to the Shoalhaven Sports Board meeting on 3 August 2016, Council has received an application for Council’s Voluntary User Contribution Policy funds (VUCPF) from the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club to construct a second croquet court at Milton Showground.  The application requested $50,000 from the VUCPF to construct a second court to the value of $126,000 which the Club had designed and costed.  The design is based on an area identified for the facility in the Milton Showground Plan of Management which Council adopted in February 2010.  Since making this application, the Club has advised Council that it has received grant funding of $20,000 from the Federal Government Stronger Communities Programme to deliver this project.

An assessment by Council staff has determined that the second croquet design is consistent with the Council adopted Milton Showground Plan of Management (Plan of Management can be viewed at http://doc.shoalhaven.nsw.gov.au/Displaydoc.aspx?Record=D11/116086).

The second croquet court design plan as outlined in VUCPF application to the Shoalhaven Sports Board is provided as Attachment 2.

Previous Community Representation

Council has received representation both for and against a second croquet court at Milton Showground.  Representation for the second court has primarily been received from the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club which is wanting to expand their playing area and to ensure adequate court space for current and future club members.  Representation against the second court has primarily been received from the Milton Showground Management Committee and Milton Show Society which is related to loss of space for onsite car parking and event use.

Peg Out & Temporary Fence the Area of the Proposed Second Croquet Court

As outlined in Committee resolution of 11 October 2016 MIN16.768, Council requested to peg out and temporarily fence the area of the proposed second Croquet Court at the Milton Showground for the 2017 Milton Show.  This resolution was aimed at trialling the potential impact of the development of the second croquet court on the Milton Show and/or similar large events.  At the request of the Milton Show Society, Council staff allowed for this temporary fence to be removed to permit the Hawkesbury Working Dogs to attend the Show and as outlined in the letter (see Attachment 3).  Photos of how this area was used during the Show is provided as Attachment 4.

Croquet Club Event at Milton Show

As outlined in Council Committee resolution of 11 October 2016, the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club submitted a letter to the Milton Show Society and an agreement was reached for the Club to run an event on the existing croquet court during the Milton Show.  A copy of a letter confirming this arrangement is shown as Attachment 5 and signage erected by the croquet club during the show is shown as Attachment 6.

Milton Show Assessment / Review

Council staff undertook visual assessment of the Milton Show on both days of its operation being Friday 3 & Saturday 4 March 2017.  Unfortunately on both these days significant rainfall occurred and subsequently events were cancelled and the overall public attendance to the show was reported to Council staff as being down 40% on previous years.  Photos of the Milton Show, including an aerial photo, are shown as Attachment 7.  These photos identified a large area on the western side of the showground that was not fully utilised and reserved for the purpose of “Dog Exhibitors Parking”.

Onsite Car Parking

As shown in the photos in Attachment 7, Council staff undertook visual review of the impacts on parking from the proposed second croquet area at the Milton Show.  Whilst acknowledging that public attendance at the Show was down 40% on previous years these photos identified that considerable parking was available onsite and not all parking areas were used.  In addition, the surrounding road/streets had capacity for on street car parking.

Adjoining Property Owner Feedback

Since Council making the above resolution, and conclusion of the annual Milton Show, the adjoining property owners have not changed their position / feedback as reported to Council Committee on 11 October 2016.  Therefore, Council staff have not been able to investigate options to expand the showground site area.  The only option here would be compulsory acquisition which is not recommended in this case.


 

Croquet User Agreement

As outlined in Council Committee resolution of 11 October 2016, finalisation of a Croquet User Agreement between Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club & Milton Showground Management Committee remains outstanding due to both parties being unclear on the future arrangements of Croquet on the Showground site. 

Other Site Options

Recognising the above challenges in providing a second croquet court & expansion options at Milton Showground, Clr White has facilitated discussions with the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club, Milton Showground Management Committee and Council staff representatives to examine possible Council owned land options that could facilitate a croquet site off the Showground site.  These discussions have identified the possibility of relocating the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club to a future public reserve (not currently in Council ownership) that will be dedicated to Council as part of the Hazcorp South Coast subdivision development at Narrawallee.

This potential Narrawallee public reserve that could provide for a croquet facility is shown in Attachment 8 and is the largest of three public reserves proposed in this subdivision.  An initial concept plan of how a croquet court facility could be provided on this reserve (provided by the subdivision developer) is shown in Attachment 9.  This reserve is currently heavily vegetated and has no services supplied and at this time the exact timing of handover of this land to Council ownership is unknown.

Another possibility, whilst not investigated further other than an idea, is the potential use of part of the Milton Pony Club Grounds for a croquet court facility and to examine co-sharing or, again not investigated, in the future the Pony Club consider relocation to the Milton Showground.  It should be noted that their requirements for the site are unknown and whether these would have a similar potential impact on space at the showground that does not resolve the current concerns.  At present, Council staff are aware that the Pony Club has a relatively small membership and could be open to this proposal.

Cost / Benefit Analysis of Croquet Court Facility Relocation

Should Council consider relocation of the croquet court facility from the Milton Showground to another site, it needs to understand the associated costs / benefits which is briefly summarised in the table below.

Cost / Benefit Analysis Item

Milton Showground Site

Alternative Site
(future Narrawallee Reserve)

Likely cost (provide clubhouse and 2 courts)

$126,000 (as identified in VUCPF application) to provide a second croquet court.

Unknown at this time.  If vegetation clearing, services, soil, site levelling, drainage, car parking is required the cost of providing is clubhouse and 2 courts is likely to be in the order of $1,000,000 (based on recent earthworks at the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre).

Site Issues

An approximate court area of 820m2 (25.6m x 32m) is potentially no longer available for car parking and event use.

Unknown at this time and needs to be determined during further detailed investigation however, as shown in Attachment 9 the reserve has sufficient space to provide a two court croquet facility including clubhouse and car parking.


 

Cost / Benefit Analysis Item

Milton Showground Site

Alternative Site
(future Narrawallee Reserve)

User Issues

Recognition that the site is a multi-use venue for all the community to use.  The proposed additional croquet court is consistent with the specific site Plan of Management.  An outstanding point, the user agreement between the Management Committee and Croquet Club has not been signed off.

Recognition that this potential site is a multi-use venue for all the community to use.

Timing

Site area is available and construction is pending completion of an REF which is unlikely to impede or deter court construction.

Unknown and pending completion of REF and design investigations.

 

Resolution Need

Resolution of a preferred option to provide or not provide for second croquet court for the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club is required.  A final decision on this matter will also determine how to treat the grant funding that the Club has received and also determine the arrangements of the Croquet User Agreement between Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club & Milton Showground Management Committee.

Milton Showground Plan of Management Review

Depending on the Council resolution, a review of the Milton Showground Plan of Management may need to be brought forward by Council and with identified resources.  This matter will need to be considered if the above recommendation is changed.

 

Community Engagement

Ongoing community engagement has been occurring with Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club & Milton Showground Management Committee and both these groups will be updated on the Council resolution from this report.

 

Financial Implications

The Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club is seeking consideration of funding from Council’s VUCPF at the next Sports Board meeting to allow construction to commence on a second croquet court at Milton Showground.  A decision to relocate the croquet court facility to another site will have a related financial implication.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 62

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 66

 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 67

 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 68

 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 69

 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 70

 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 71

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 74

 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 75

 

PDF Creator

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 76

 

 

SA17.99     Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence - Project Status Update

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/67960

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group  

Section:              Recreation Community & Culture

 

Attachments:     1. Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence Master Plan (under separate cover)

2. DA Approved site plan

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To update Council on the following matters related to the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence:

·    Project status for current stage 1 works;

·    Options for development approval to assist in delivery of future stages; and,

·    Options for Berry Riding Club to use the site.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council

1.    Accept the status report for stage 1 of the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence.

2.    Lodge a DA application for the remaining area of Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence Master Plan.

3.    Work with the Berry Riding Club to negotiate a future licence area that aligns with relevant Development Application approvals.

4.    Note that the budget reallocations as detailed in the report will form part of the March Quarterly Budget Report submitted in May.

 

 

Options

1.    Adopt the recommendation and Council staff continue progressing completion of the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence.

Implications: This will enable staff to continue progressing the project as discussed in this report.

 

2.    Not adopt the recommendation and provide an alternative resolution with direction for staff.

Implications: Unknown until the Committee identify alternatives.

 


 

Background

Related Council tender resolution / Project Budget

Council at its Ordinary meeting of 19 April 2016 resolved that:

a)   Council accept the tender of TCL Constructions Pty Ltd for works only in the amount of $425,394 excl. GST;

b)   Authorise the General Manager, (Director Community and Corporate) to finalise and execute the contract with TCL Constructions Pty Ltd on behalf of Council;

c)   Authorise the General Manager, (Director Community and Corporate) to adjust the contract for variations for components under the contact.

d)   Council allocate additional project funding of $31,664 in the 2016/2017 budget to meet the shortfall plus any minor project variations.

Based on the above resolution, the agreed Council budget for the project was $457,058 for the tender contract component of the project delivery.

 

Master Plan

The master plan which guides development of the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence is provided as Attachment 1.

 

Stage 1 works

As reported to the Council meeting of 28 June 2016, Council endorsed Development Application (DA) approval for stage 1 works for the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence which consists of a storage shed, a spectator shelter, two (2) grassed warm up/training areas, a multipurpose equestrian arena associated earthworks, car parking and access for construction.  The purpose of the DA was to provide ‘like for like’ facilities on the Equestrian Centre site for the Berry Riding Club which was displaced as part of the Berry Highway Bypass works and which the RMS provided $450,000 in compensation.

 

Stage 1 - Status report / construction budget increases

Prior to obtaining DA approval on 28 June 2016, Council accepted the above tender resolution on 19 April 2016 as tenders were initially advertised in anticipation that DA approval would be approved prior to tender submissions expiring.  Unfortunately, the DA assessment was delayed and hence the tender process was reported to Council to avoid Council having to re-tender for the project, to minimise project delays, and to minimise the impost to the Berry Riding Club.

Upon receiving the DA approval, a number of changes / additions were required to deliver stage 1 of the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre which are summarised below:

·    Providing a hardstand car park 60M x 20M

·    Additional internal road

·    Disabled Car Parking

·    Hardstand Wash Bay

·    Extra Water Line

·    Boundary landscaping / fencing improvements

Provision of these changes / additions to the accepted tender document were then negotiated with the successful tenderer and subsequently added additional construction costs of approximately $140,000 to the project.

The delivery of the project has been delayed as a result of a design oversight and heavy rainfall.  The design oversight related to cut and fill calculations not allowing for a contingency amount for unpredicted high topsoil required quantities.  The initial design quantities could not be used and compacted to form the multipurpose equestrian arenas. 

This design oversight resulted in a shortfall of approximately 4,500 cubic metres of fill material which was subsequently sourced and imported at no cost for the soil material from the adjacent Berry Highway Bypass works however, resulted in additional construction costs of approximately $40,000 for the tenderer to spread this additional soil across the site.

When delivering the site earthworks program, the need was recognised to integrate the adjacent current temporary equestrian riding area used by the Berry Riding Club into the stage 1 project.  This increases the footprint of the Stage 1 works which was previously unfunded, although part of the overall masterplan to be delivered in a subsequent stage.

This involved scraping and burying a section of rock material at cost of approximately $6,000 that previously formed a vehicle access road.  It was necessary to undertake this work at this point in time due to the economies of having available machinery on site.

The impact of recent heavy rainfall on the project, and other related incidental costs, including additional project management costs incurred as a result of addressing the aforementioned items, have resulted in increased construction costs that at this time are estimated to cost $27,000.

 

Stage 1 - Budget shortfall

The combined effect of meeting both contemporary requirements for an equestrian centre and the above project variations to complete the project has resulted in the following project construction budget shortfall.

Shortfall summary

Original project budget (adopted at tender acceptance)

$457,058

Meet contemporary requirements (engineering)

$140,000

Earthwork shortfall

$40,000

Removal of previous vehicle access road

$6,000

Heavy rainfall / related incidental costs

$27,000

Total project budget required

$670,058

Total project budget shortfall

$213,000

 

To address the construction shortfall, the following existing funding sources/budgets have been or are identified to be transferred into the original project budget.  This will result in these activities / projects not being undertaken.

 

Original Stage 1 project budget (adopted at tender acceptance – job number 88801)

$457,058

Future business planning / design budget for the site Stage 2 (job number 88803 already transferred to the project in a previously quarter review to assist meeting DA Approval requirements)

$120,000

Nowra Showground arena replacement fencing budget (job number 82513)

$75,000

Implementation of Plans of Management budget (job number 82511)

$18,000

Total project budget

$670,058

 


 

Temporary Berry Riding Club licence area

The Berry Riding Club has been displaced from their original site beside the Berry Sporting Complex to allow for construction of the Berry Highway Bypass.  Their preferred site for equestrian activities is the Equestrian Centre site, the Club has - via a licence agreement with Council – been temporarily using a small area of the Equestrian Centre site.  This is located between stage 1 site and the highway with access to the site via the adjacent Department of Primary Industries land - shown in Attachment 2.

Unfortunately, due to construction delays with providing stage 1 works, and withdrawal of access via Department of Primary Industries land by the Department, the temporarily licenced area is not able to be accessed by the Berry Riding Club until stage 1 is completed.  This is due to access not being permissible through the construction site. 

Currently the Riding Club activities have been suspended until the works have been completed. It is anticipated that this will be completed in late Quarter 2 dependant on prevailing weather conditions.

 

Additional Berry Riding Club improvements

In addition to seeking permanent use of the temporary areas located beside the stage 1 site, the Berry Riding Club is also wanting to erect a portable cabin on the site to commence establishing a clubhouse facility and developing trails as identified in the master plans which will require works around a creek line.  To do this the Riding Club will need to seek DA approval and associated building approvals for these works.  Attachment 2 shows the approved DA area.

 

Development Approval to assist in delivery of future stages

Recognising that current DA approval only covers stage 1 works, subsequent DAs are required and need to be reported to Council to meet relevant legislation as this is Council owned land. 

To minimise the requirement to report subsequent DAs related to the Equestrian Centre which are consistent with the Council adopted master plan, it is recommended that staff lodge a DA application for the remaining master plan area. 

Should Council approve a Development Application for the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence Master Plan, subsequent DA applications consistent with the Master Plan would not need to be reported to Council however, DA applications which are variations to the Master Plan would be needed to be reported to Council for endorsement – for example the Berry Riding Club seeking to locate a temporary Club House on site, which is not shown in the masterplan.

 

Future Berry Riding Club licence area

It is proposed that Council work with the Berry Riding Club to negotiate a future licence area that aligns with relevant Development Application approvals.

 

Community Engagement

Community engagement continues with the Berry Riding Club.

 

Financial Implications

As outlined above, to complete all requirements for delivery of stage 1 works, and to balance the construction budget, for the Shoalhaven Equestrian Centre of Excellence requires transfer of funds in the upcoming budget review into the Equestrian Centre job number (88801).  


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 80

 

PDF Creator

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 81

 

 

SA17.100   Community Infrastructure Guidelines

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/95343

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group 

Section:              Recreation Community & Culture

 

Attachments:     1. Community Infrastructure Guidelines  (under separate cover)

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To introduce the Community Infrastructure Guidelines to Council and to respond to the upcoming Notice of Motion from Clr Proudfoot requesting a report on broadening the potential for the ways that "in kind" contributions from community groups can be used for capital works projects.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council notes the Community Infrastructure Guidelines report for information.

 

 

Options

1.    Adopt the recommendation.

Implications: This will update Council on the Community Infrastructure Guidelines that staff are implementing.

 

2.    Not adopt the recommendation.

Implications: This may require providing direction to Council staff on how to broaden the potential for the ways that "in kind" contributions from community groups can be used for capital works projects

 

Background

Upcoming Notice of Motion

In the Council Ordinary Business Paper of 4 April 2017 a Notice of Motion was proposed by Clr Proudfoot which was deferred to the Ordinary Meeting on 26 April 2017:

That Council staff prepare a report on broadening the potential for the ways that "in kind" contributions from community groups can be used. The report would need to include, but not be restricted to applications for funding and constructing capital projects.

The note by the General Manager related to the above resolution indicated that Council staff were currently preparing Community Infrastructure Guidelines that address potential ways that "in kind" contributions from community groups can be used to deliver minor infrastructure projects which is presented at this Strategy & Assets Committee meeting.  Unfortunately, the above Notice of Motion was deferred to the following Council Meeting however, staff have presented this report in anticipation of meeting the requirement of this Notice of Motion.


 

Community Infrastructure Guidelines

The Community Infrastructure Guidelines are designed to encourage and define "in kind" contributions from community groups for capital projects.  In doing this, the Guidelines define the extent to which community driven infrastructure projects may be funded by Council, and the roles of other partners contributing to the project (i.e. community, other levels of government). The Guidelines are shown in Attachment 1.

 

Community Engagement

Community engagement and feedback will be encouraged through implementing the Guidelines and where appropriate the Guidelines will be updated and improved with this feedback.

 

Policy Implications

There are no policy implications for the implementation of the Guidelines which are designed to complement existing Council policies such as the Voluntary Users Contributions, Skate Parks and other similar policies which encourage in kind contributions from community groups for capital works projects.

 

Financial Implications

There are no foreseen financial implications for the implementation of these Guidelines which value add to Council’s capital works program and/or encourages delivery of external grant funded projects.

 

Risk Implications

There are no immediate foreseen risk implications with community groups undertaking relevant capital works projects which are covered by Council’s blanket volunteer insurance coverage.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 83

 

 

SA17.101   Future operations and management of Nowra Showground

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/97283

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group 

Section:              Recreation Community & Culture

 

Attachments:     1. Nowra Showground Ownership map

 

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To respond to part 4 of the Council resolution of 22 November 2016 (Minute 16.888) and outline options for further feasibility investigations for a caretaker arrangement at the Nowra Showground.

 

Recommendation

That Council:

1.    Continue to retain existing arrangements at Nowra Showground which involves daily Ranger site visits.

2.    Consider a preferred “caretaker model” (if any) from the options within the report and request further details or analysis.

3.    Consider whether additional funding is needed in the 2017/18 budget to increase Ranger site visits and security night patrols to the Nowra Showground to ensure adequate surveillance and enforcement of compliance requirements.

4.    Receive a further report at its May 2017 Strategy and Assets Committee Meeting regarding feedback from the Nowra Showground Ideas Day held with the community to address Council Minute MIN16.886.

 

 

 

Options

1.    Adopt the recommendation and provide further direction to staff.

Implications: This will enable staff to focus on the future arrangements to be implemented at the Showground.

 

2.    Not adopt the recommendation and provide alternate resolution with direction for staff.

Implications: Unknown until the Committee identify alternatives.

 

Background

Related Council resolutions

Council at its Ordinary Meeting of 22 November 2016, made the following resolutions:

Minute 16.888, that states:

1     Council apply a ban in respect of casual camping at Nowra Showgrounds in tents with exception of camping associated with an event.

2.        Council reaffirm its policy to actively encourage the use of the Nowra Showground for motor homes and caravans.

3.        Council ensure that any booking in respect of the above does not overlap the days when the Showground is used for the Nowra Show. 

4.        The General Manager report back to Council on the feasibility of reinstating a Caretaker for the Nowra Showground.

5.        Council lobby the State and Federal Governments to increase funding for homelessness services in the Shoalhaven.

 

Minute 16.886, that states:

That staff prepare a report to Council on a suite of improvements and approximate costs that could improve the Nowra Showgrounds, including but not limited to improving the look out and picnic facilities, sealing of roads within the showgrounds, landscaping and demarcation for camping.

 

The above resolutions will be discussed in this report however, the main purpose of this report is to outline options for further feasibility investigations for a caretaker arrangement at the Nowra Showground.Site context

Nowra Showground is a public reserve which consist of both Crown Land and Community Land (Sportsground) – see Attachment 1 demonstrating land ownership.  The site is approximately 18 hectares of which 13 hectares are Crown Lands and the remainder is Community Land.  The site has 3 vehicle controlled (gated) entrances from Scenic Drive, Junction Street and Worrigee Street.  In addition, the site has controlled pedestrian access at the Junction Street and Worrigee Street vehicle entrances and pedestrians can enter the site (which are not normally locked) with open access from the adjacent Bens Walk.  The site is used regularly for sporting activities, events, meetings, functions, vehicle/caravan based camping, public recreation and other activities.

On Crown Land which makes up the Showground, approval for new activities and infrastructure needs to be sourced from the Crown.  In seeking approval Council staff would need to approach the Crown and possibly (dependent on the activity) need to seek a lease agreement.

In addition, Council needs to be aware there is currently a blanket Aboriginal Land Claim over the site and therefore there is no guarantee of Crown support for leases or building works until this Claim is resolved.

Homelessness

When considering options for further feasibility investigations for a caretaker arrangement at the Nowra Showground, the matter of homelessness related to the site needs to be considered.  As Councillors would be aware, the homelessness issue is increasing in the Shoalhaven and the Nowra Showground remains an option for the homeless who live in a registered car or caravan.  In addition, homeless people camping in tents or the alike have been deterred from using the Showground.

In response to considering this matter recently, Council at its Strategy & Assets Committee Meeting of 21 March 2017, resolved (MIN17.196) that Council:

a)   Establish the Shoalhaven Homelessness Taskforce as a section 355/377 Committee of Council;

b)   Endorse the Terms of Reference of the Shoalhaven Homelessness Taskforce with the following changes:

·    That all councillors be members of the taskforce.

·    The Chairperson be appointed for a term of 2 years.

As outlined at the meeting of 21 March 2017, the Taskforce is comprised of service providers in the homelessness sector, faith based organisation and community groups and members.  The Taskforce will aim to better understand the complexities of homelessness, develop a strategic framework to address the issues of homelessness and to advocate for homelessness solutions throughout the Shoalhaven.

This Taskforce formed under the above Terms of Reference have not yet met and it would be beneficial for this group to have input into any proposed caretaker arrangements at the Nowra Showground.

In addition, Council has endorsed the NSW Protocol for Homeless People protocol which means it is obligated to treat homeless people in public places in the same way as anyone else and not discriminate.

Caretaker context/Definition

Upon reviewing part 4 of the Council resolution of 22 November 2016 (Minute 16.888), the notion ofcaretaker arrangement” at the Nowra Showground is quite broad and hence feasibility options cover a variety of scenarios.  The role of the caretaker could simply be a person or community group to monitor the site and report non permissible activities to Council and/or police; or a dedicated Ranger and/or paid person/company onsite; and/or a person/company that only deals with camping matters at the Showground.  Therefore, in considering this matter, Council needs to define the caretaker role.

Caretaker considerations

Dependent on the preferred context/role of the caretaker, the following considerations also need to be considered prior to determining the appropriate caretaker option.

Development Application Approval

If a new building is to be provided on the site as a residence, this Application would need to address issues such as siting context within a heritage precinct, access provisions, parking etc.

Plan of Management

The existing Plan of Management does not currently address caretaker’s provisions and therefore amendments to the Plan would need to be undertaken in consultation with the Crown.  As previously mentioned, there is currently a blanket Aboriginal Land Claim over the majority of the showground site and therefore there is no guarantee of Crown support for a Development Applications or building.

Human resourcing considerations

It is estimated that a caretaker wage for 365 day cover would be approx. $130,000 per year, plus call out fees (for out of hours calls) and relief manager costs (to cover leave) of approx. $1,800 per week.  Council engages management contractors to manage the properties in its Holiday Haven group through the tender process and these management contractors maintain the site and manage their own staff and bookings on behalf of Council.  Given the “other” public activities that occur on the showground site, a caretaker would not have the enforcement powers of a Council Ranger.

Jurisdictional Authority

A caretaker may be authorised to refuse entry or ask someone to leave the grounds, but if the direction is not adhered to, a Ranger or the police would need to be called.  The jurisdictional powers of the caretaker would need to be addressed in line with Crown Lands Act, Residential Tenancy Act and Local Government Act.  Council’s Rangers currently have the ability to enforce these requirements at the showground.


 

Site access

As mentioned above, the showground has 3 entry points that are locked at night by a Security Patrol company.  Bens Walk provides open public access to the showground and the public nature / use of the site makes it difficult to limit access during the day for both casual use and the regular organised users of the site.

Caretaker period

Upon considering a caretaker arrangement, the period of time required onsite needs to be defined.  For example, a caretaker could be onsite for specific days/ times or alternatively it could be 24 hour/7 day a week role.

Precedents with other showgrounds

Council may also need to consider the current arrangements at other showgrounds within the Shoalhaven. In addition to Nowra, the Shoalhaven has three other showgrounds – Berry, Milton and Kangaroo Valley.  All of these showgrounds, except Nowra, are run by a Management Committee, i.e. community volunteers.  Of those, Kangaroo Valley does not permit regular/casual camping as they have a camp ground immediately next door.  Berry and Milton do permit camping, including tent based camping, and the Management Committees are responsible for handling community inquiries, taking bookings, maintaining the site and collecting fees, thereby acting as caretakers.

Current site costs and revenue

According to Crown Lands reporting, the Nowra Showground ran at a deficit of $133,549 in the 2015/16 financial year and is currently running at deficit of $101,664 for the current 2016/17 financial year.

According to Council’s financial information, the Nowra Showground made $12,962 in camp fees in the 2014/15 financial year and $7,481 in the 2015/16 financial year.  This current revenue from camping, and its future potential revenue, needs to be analysed when considering future improvements and the cost/benefits of associated decisions.

Caretaker options for further investigations

In consideration of the matters outlined above, the following caretaker options are available and will be further investigated to understand the specific needs and resourcing requirements.

1.   Council continue to retain existing caretaker arrangements at Nowra Showground which involves daily Ranger site visits

Currently, Nowra Showground operations are overseen by Council’s Facilities Coordinator within the Social & Infrastructure Planning Unit and currently there is no Management Committee or caretaker in place.  All camping inquiries, bookings and camp fee collections are managed by the Nowra Visitor Information Centre.  Maintenance is coordinated by Council’s Parks staff and Rangers conduct daily visits to check and enforce compliance matters.

2.   Council allocate additional funding to increase Ranger site visits and night time security patrols to the Nowra Showground to ensure adequate surveillance and enforcement of compliance requirements

An alternative option is to employ additional Ranger services and night time security patrols to provide extra site surveillance and enforce compliance requirements. It is estimated that a Ranger with this role would need to be paid wages of approx. $60,000 per year and would not be full time at the site but would visit mornings and afternoons.

This arrangement would then be available to assist the Rangers in other priority enforcement areas when not needed at the Showground.  The current security arrangements include 2 visits per day – 1 at open and 1 at lock up - at a cost of $19 per day.  Increasing these by 2 additional visits per day/night would cost an additional $20 per day, which equates to $140 per week or $7,280 additional each year at current rates.

3.   Provide an alternative off site management option – i.e. Holiday Haven

An option exists for site bookings to be managed through a reservation management system similar to that used by Council’s Holiday Haven group. Bookings would be able to be made either through the Visitor Information Centre or online.  Council would continue maintaining the site.

This arrangement could involve a roving caretaker who would visit the site once/twice per day, but would have little jurisdiction over the site. Therefore, if there were issues with compliance, the Rangers or police would need to be called.

To allow this option to go ahead, the Showground would need to be embellished with formalised camp sites, amenities and the like to increase patronage and revenue.  These works would need planning, approvals, construction and costings would need to be investigated.

Alternatively, Council could look to advertise for an external management company to monitor the site and collect fees – cost of this option is unknown.

4.   Caretaker in former caretaker building

Previously, there was an on-site caretaker at the Nowra Showground who lived in the building just inside the main gates, located off Worrigee Street, and had limited obligations (i.e. walk the site and lock gates).  This building has since been altered and is currently utilised as a multipurpose facility and is licenced to three community organisations:

Spinners and weaver      – licenced until 2 February 2024

Woodcraft Society          – licenced until 2 February 2024

Men’s Shed                      – licenced until 31 July 2024.

The existing licences provide the current users with security of tenure and therefore if Council proposed to terminate these agreements, alternative facilities and/or compensation would need to be negotiated.

5.   Provide a new building on site

If a new caretaker cottage were to be built, a Development Application would be required.  Initial inquiries to purchase, install and provide services to a new building (a two bedroom 8.5m x 5.3m cabin) suggest the costs would be approx. $100,000.  There would also need to be accommodation for the relieving manager when the caretaker is on leave, or alternatively this period could be covered by Rangers.

It should be noted as previously commented due to the Aboriginal Land Claim there is no guarantee that Crown Lands will give permission for further development of the site until the Claim is resolved.  In addition, such a building could be considered to accommodate an overnight Ranger with the relevant additional staffing costs provided.

6.   Establish a Management Committee

In line with Berry and Milton Showgrounds, an option is to establish a Management Committee and Council delegate the caretaking responsibility for all matters such as handling inquires, taking bookings, maintaining the site and collecting fees to this volunteer group. However, it must be recognised that use of volunteers in such an arrangement has limitations with required abilities and capacities.  At both Berry and Milton Showgrounds this caretaker arrangement is almost at capacity and is a potential significant financial liability to Council if these arrangements were handed back to Council to manage directly as volunteer arrangements currently add significant in-kind value and make the operations viable.

A further limitation of this arrangement is that Rangers or Police would need to be called to enforce compliance issues if they arise.  This option would allow for the Management Committee to monitor on a daily basis who is coming into the Showground and therefore prevent homeless people in tents from camping at the Showground and also direct people who may be homeless to appropriate services in the first instance.

7.   Cease all forms of camping at Nowra Showground

This option would cease all forms of camping at Nowra Showground, in line with Kangaroo Valley Showground, and direct all camping requests to the surrounding tourist parks, etc.  This could be considered a more cost effective approach given the current revenue that the Showground site generates.

Nowra Showground Ideas Day

To commence actioning Council resolution (Minute 16.888 – see above) Council staff, in conjunction with the Nowra Show Society, organised and facilitated an Ideas Day on Sunday 26 February 2017 at the Showground which approximately 70 participants attended.

The Nowra Showground Ideas Day was very successful and had great input from the community.  Council staff are currently analysing feedback and will report back to Council in May 2017.  It should be noted that camping at the Nowra Showground was a significant feedback theme at the Ideas Day, along with more defined caretaker role to improve the overall showground facility.

 

Community Engagement

Depended on the preferred options for further feasibility investigations for a caretaker arrangement at the Nowra Showground, it is likely that further community engagement may be required.

 

Financial Implications

Dependent on the preferred options for further feasibility investigations for a caretaker arrangement at the Nowra Showground, it is likely that the financial implications will need to be reported at a later date.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 89

 

PDF Creator

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 90

 

 

SA17.102   Community War Memorials Grant Funding - Nowra Showground Memorial Gates

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/97733

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group  

Section:              Recreation Community & Culture

 

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To seek Council endorsement to accept a successful grant funding application under the NSW Community War Memorials Fund for $5,000.

 

Recommendation

That

1.    Council accept the NSW Community War Memorial Fund grant and vote the funds of $5,000 to engage a stonemason to fund repairs and to colour match and repoint in tuck-pointing on the Nowra Showground Memorial Gates.

2.    Write to the NSW Community War Memorial Fund accepting and thanking them for the grant offer.

 

 

Options

1.    Council adopt the recommendation as printed.

Implications: Adoption of recommendation will fund necessary repointing and repair works to the Nowra Showground Memorial Gates.

 

2.    Council reject the recommendation

Implications: Repointing and repair works to the Nowra Showground Memorial Gates will remain unfunded and works subsequently won’t occur.

 

Background

Over many years, various repairs have been done on the stonework pointing on the Nowra Showground Memorial Gates.  These repairs have been ad hoc and not necessarily to a professional stonemason standard and cement colour does not match the stonework.

The historical method of tuck-pointing is required to match the original finish of the mortar. Tuck-pointing is a way of using two contrasting colours of mortar in the mortar joints of brickwork, one colour matching the bricks themselves, to give an artificial impression that very fine joints have been made

Grant funding of $5,000 from the NSW Community War Memorial Fund will allow Council to engage a suitably qualified stonemason to remove the past poor quality repairs and to colour match and repoint in tuck-pointing on the Nowra Showground Memorial Gates.

Therefore, it is recommended that Council accept this grant offer.

 

Community Engagement

Nowra RSL Sub Branch were consulted prior to the grant application being submitted and the Sub Branch supports the undertaking of this repair work on the Nowra Showground Memorial Gates.

 

Financial Implications

The $5,000 grant funding will cover all the proposed repair works on the Nowra Showground Memorial Gates.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 92

 

 

SA17.103   Request for annual donation - Missionaries of Charity Soup Kitchen - Nowra School of Arts Annex

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/101457

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group 

Section:              Recreation Community & Culture

 

    

 

Purpose

To seek Council endorsement for an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees (as per Council’s Fees & Charges) for the Lay Missionaries of Charity Soup Kitchen to operate weekly in the Nowra School of Arts Annex.

 

 

Recommendation

That Council provide an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees (as per Council’s Fees & Charges) for the Lay Missionaries of Charity Soup Kitchen to operate weekly in the Nowra School of Arts Annex.

 

 

Options

1.    As per the recommendation.

Implications: This will enable the soup kitchen to continue operation in the Nowra School of Arts Annex without having to provide fees for the related building hire.

 

2.    Not adopt the recommendation and provide an alternative resolution with direction for staff.

Implications: Unknown until the Committee identifies alternatives.

 

Background

The Lay Missionaries of Charity volunteers have been conducting a weekly soup kitchen on Fridays at the Nowra School of Arts for the homeless and underprivileged since 17 April 2015 (initially operated out of the Nowra Showground Committee Room and moved to the Nowra School of Arts Annex in 2016).  The Charity provides food as well as support services for approximately 40 people per soup kitchen day.

All services involved with the soup kitchen are voluntary and all food is provided through local business donations.  Approximately 50 volunteers from different groups, including St Michael’s Church and The Red Cross work on a 6-weekly roster to provide the soup kitchen.  Some of the Nowra local businesses that donate food and services include:

Farms Fresh

East Nowra Bakery

Nowra Fresh, fish & meat market

Hot Bake

St Vincent de Paul – break & milk

Vincentia High School – class of children with disabilities make soup/dessert

Shoalhaven High School Support Unit for disadvantaged children bring dessert

Water bottles – anonymously donated

Murrays Carpets – carpet clean

Bomaderry Bowling Club – 14-seater bus provides transport for disabled patrons

Centrelink – sent Liaison Officer for support benefits advice & processing at the facility

Carers with Homeless Groups (for emergency accommodation) bring patrons to eat.

In the 2015/16 financial year, the fee for hire of the Nowra School of Arts Annex was funded by Council from the Unallocated Donations Budget being, $4,747.50.  The Charity has requested continued fee support from Council for use of the Nowra School of Arts Annex, indefinitely into the future.

Acknowledging the significant voluntary contribution that the Lay Missionaries of Charity Soup Kitchen is providing for the Shoalhaven community, and the limited ability it has to raise funds to cover related hire fees of the Nowra School of Arts Annex, it is recommended that Council provide an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees.  This annual donation will need to be adjusted annually to meet any fee changes that Council adopts in its annual Fees & Charges.

 

Community Engagement

The Lay Missionaries of Charity volunteers have been very grateful for Council’s donations to date and they wish to continue providing their associated soup kitchen services to the Shoalhaven community.  In addition the Charity speaks highly of Council contribution and this is communicated regularly by volunteers at every luncheon event, and in any media coverage. 

 

Financial Implications

While Council community facilities available for hire are provided for the benefit of the community, fees are set by Council to cover associated building maintenance costs.  To recover the associated fees for operation of the soup kitchen in the Nowra School of Arts Annex in the 2017/18 financial year it is recommended that Council cover these fees from an annual donation allocation.

This donation amount will need to be adjusted annually to meet any fee changes that Council adopts in its annual Fees & Charges.  In current financial year, the fee for hire of the Nowra School of Arts Annex for the Charity is $4,227.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 94

 

 

SA17.104   Request for annual donation - Helping the Homeless Soup Kitchen - Nowra Showground Pavilion

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/101517

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group  

Section:              Recreation Community & Culture

 

    

 

Purpose

To seek Council endorsement for an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees for the Helping the Homeless Soup Kitchen to operate weekly in the Nowra Showground Pavilion.

 

 

Recommendation

That Council provide an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees (as per Council’s Fees & Charges) for the Helping the Homeless Soup Kitchen to operate weekly in the Nowra Showground Pavilion.

 

 

Options

1.    As per the recommendation.

Implications: This will enable the soup kitchen to continue operation in the Nowra Showground Pavilion without having to provide fees for the related building hire.

 

2.    Not adopt the recommendation and provide an alternative resolution with direction for staff.

Implications: Unknown until the Committee identifies alternatives.

 

Background

The Helping the Homeless volunteers have been conducting a weekly soup kitchen on Tuesdays at the Nowra Showground Pavilion for the homeless and underprivileged since 23 February 2016.  The volunteers provide food as well as support services for approximately 40 people per soup kitchen day.  All services involved with the soup kitchen are voluntary and all food is provided through local business donations.  Approximately 20 volunteers work to provide the soup kitchen. 

In 2016 the fee for this hire of the Nowra Showground Pavilion was waived by Council.  The Helping the Homeless Soup Kitchen volunteers have requested continued fee support from Council for use of the Nowra Showground Pavilion, indefinitely into the future.

Acknowledging the significant voluntary contribution that the Helping the Homeless Soup Kitchen is providing for the Shoalhaven community, and the limited ability it has to raise funds to cover related hire fees of the Nowra Showground Pavilion, it is recommended that Council provide an annual donation allocation to cover related hire fees.  This annual donation will need to be adjusted annually to meet any fee changes that Council adopts in its annual Fees & Charges.

 

Community Engagement

The Helping the Homeless volunteers have been very grateful for Council’s donations to date and they wish to continue providing their associated soup kitchen services to the Shoalhaven community.  In addition the Charity speaks highly of Council contribution and this is communicated regularly by volunteers at every luncheon event and in any media coverage. 

 

Financial Implications

While Council community facilities available for hire are provided for the benefit of the community, fees are set by Council to cover associated building maintenance costs.  To recover the associated fees for operation of the soup kitchen in the Nowra Showground in the 2017/18 financial year, it is recommended that Council provide this from an annual donation allocation.

This donation amount will need to be adjusted annually to meet any fee changes that Council adopts in its annual Fees & Charges.  In the 2017/18 year the donation amount requested is estimated to be $6,380.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 96

 

 

SA17.105   Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/99881

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group 

Section:              Recreation Community & Culture

 

Attachments:     1. Draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan (DIAP) 2017 (under separate cover)

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To provide the Committee with the opportunity to review the draft Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan and endorse it for public exhibition. There is a legislative requirement for the Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan to be lodged with the NSW Government by July 1, 2017.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council

1.    Endorse public exhibition of the draft Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan for a period of 28 days.

2.    Advise stakeholders involved in the preparation of the draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan of its Public Exhibition

3.    Receive a further report after the public exhibition of the draft Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan

 

 

Options

1.    Adopt the recommendation.

Implications: This will allow the community the opportunity to comment on the draft plan before it is submitted to the NSW Government by July 1, 2017.

 

2.    Council not adopt the recommendation and provides further direction to staff.

Implications: There is a legislative requirement for the Shoalhaven Disability Inclusion Action Plan to be lodged with the NSW Government by July 1, 2017. The plan must be on public exhibition for 28 days and we will need time to incorporate public feedback into the final plan before the submission deadline. If the committee does not endorse the plan at this meeting we risk not meeting the deadline.

 

Background

Shoalhaven City Council has a Disability Action Plan which is registered with the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. A new “Disability Inclusion Bill 2014” has been passed by the NSW Parliament and is now known as the Disability Inclusion Act 2014.

The Act aims to achieve for people with a disability its objects acknowledging human rights, promoting independence and social and economic inclusion of people with a disability enabling choice and control, setting up safeguards and where practical supporting the United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with a Disability.

The Act also recognises particular groups such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with a disability, people from cultural and linguistically diverse backgrounds with a disability and women and children with a disability.

Under the Act the NSW Government must develop a four (4) year State Disability Inclusion Plan to guide how the whole of Government’s work towards the inclusion of people with a disability in the community. The State Disability Inclusion Plan will show how it improves access to mainstream services and community facilities.

The Act requires NSW Government, local Councils and some other public authorities to develop and implement a Disability Inclusion Action Plan. Local Governments/Councils plans must be in place by July 1 2017.

Jenny Bray Training and Consulting was engaged to prepare the Draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan for Shoalhaven City Council. Targeted stakeholder consultations and workshops formed a key process in developing the draft Plan. A copy of the draft Plan has been provided to Councillors in the Councillors Information Folder.

 

Community Engagement

Initial community engagement for the draft Plan commenced through the key stakeholder input. The recommended public exhibition process will enable wider community input in to the draft Plan. A project page will be set up on Get Involved. A survey will be available for completion, there will be an option to talk with a Community Development Officer and a workshop will be conducted with Shoalhaven Self Advocacy Group.

The proposed community engagement process will include public exhibition for a minimum period of 28 days

 

Financial Implications

The work to develop the Plan has been funded through the Community Development budget.

A budget bid for the implementation of the Disability Inclusion Action Plan of $100,000 has been submitted. If this is not successful the Plan’s actions will need to be met within current works programs and will result in a delay in the implementation of the plan and a potential risk to the reputation of council.

 

Risk Implications

The minimum legislative requirements for local government in relation to preparing a DIAP are set out in the DIA 2014. These are:

·    NSW councils to prepare a DIAP by 1 July 2017

·    Consulting people with disability must be undertaken and documented as part of the planning process

·    Councils must give a copy of the DIAP actions to the Disability Council NSW

·    Councils must report on implementation of their DIAP in their Annual Report, and forward a copy to the Minister

·    Council must review their DIAP every four years.

There is a reputational risk to council if this does not occur.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 98

 

 

SA17.106   Council Policy Revision - Road Naming Policy and Property Addressing Policy

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/86701

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group 

Section:              Information Services

 

Attachments:     1. Road Naming

2. Property Addressing

3. Land and Property Information - NSW Address Program and NSW Addressing Committee

 

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To review and reaffirm the following current policies:

·    Road Naming

·    Property Address Numbering – renamed to Property Addressing

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council adopt the revision of the following policies with minor changes as detailed in this report:

1.    Road Naming

2.    Property Addressing

 

 

Options

1.    Adopt the recommendation

Implications: This will update the policies to incorporate and comply with the NSW Addressing Policies.

 

Background

The following policies have been developed over several years and have been reviewed in line with recent NSW state addressing policies and guidelines that have formalised and standardised the road naming and property addressing processes.

The NSW State government has recently created several policies and guidelines to improve efficiency and effectiveness of delivery for emergency services, postal services, good delivery, government and utility services.

Please see the attached Council support letter from the NSW Land & Property Information department.

The policy changes in both documents are to formalise this acceptance of these polices and guidelines.

 


 

Road Naming

This policy was initially endorsed by Council in January 1974 and has been successful in defining the guidelines Council uses for any road naming proposals.

The changes to this policy were to adopt the NSW state policies and guidelines and to remove local criteria that were already included in those documents. Links to those polices and guidelines were added where relevant.

 

Property Addressing

This policy was initially endorsed by Council in July 2014 and has been successful in defining the guidelines Council uses for property addressing.

The changes to this policy were to adopt the NSW state policies and guidelines and to remove local criteria that were already included in those documents. Links to those polices and guidelines were added where relevant.

The name of the policy was also changed from Property Address Numbering to Property Addressing. This was to reflect that addresses are now more than one single number per property but allow for multiple complex address types per property that are part of the State policies & guidelines

 

Policy Implications

Reaffirmation of the above policies to make them relevant and up to date.

 

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 100

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 103

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 106

 

PDF Creator

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 107

 

 

SA17.107   Local Government Conference - 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government - Proposed Motions

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/108863

 

Group:                Finance Corporate & Community Services Group 

Section:              Human Resources, Governance & Customer Service

 

    

 

Purpose / Summary

This report details Council’s proposed Motions to be submitted to the Australian Local Government Association – 2017 National General Assembly scheduled for 18 to 21 June 2017 in the National Convention Centre Canberra, ACT. Motions are required to be submitted by 21 April 2017.

 

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council endorse the six (6) motions as detailed in this report for submission to the Australian Local Government Association – 2017 National Assembly.

 

 

Options

1.    As per the recommendation

Implications: The Motions and supporting text are finalised and ready for submission prior to the deadline.

 

2.    That alternate Motions be presented for consideration.

Implications: Motions are required to be submitted by 21 April 2017. In order for the deadline to be reached both the motion and supporting text will be required.

 

Background

A report was submitted to Ordinary Meeting of 28 February 2017 which recommended in part 6. “Call for a Councillor Briefing to be convened to consider Notices of Motion for the Australian Local Government Association National General Assembly. “

A Councillor Briefing was held Thursday 11 March 2017 to discuss draft Motions for submission.

Further at the Ordinary Meeting of the Council held on 28 March 2017, Council resolved in relation to Report CL17.65 Notice of Motion – Balloon Release Ban (MIN17.233) as follows:

              “That Council…

                            Asks Amanda Findley, our voting delegate at the Australian Local Government Association 2017 National General Assembly, to introduce a Notice of Motion urging Environment Minister, Josh Frydenberg to introduce similar bans.”

 


 

The Six (6) motions proposed for submission arising from the briefing and the Council Resolution are as follows:

 

1.  FAMILY DAY CARE FUNDING

Motion

That Federal Government Funding for Family Day Care Services that meet or exceed the National Quality Standards be re-established in a manner that provides continuity of financial support for quality services.

National Objective:

·   The Community Support Program assists Family Day Care providers to maintain viable services in parts of the country where they might not otherwise be viable or able to meet the unique requirements of the community, such as in disadvantaged or regional and remote areas. This funding will cease with the implementation of the Jobs for Families Package on 1 July 2018.

·   The intent of the Jobs for Families Child Care Package is to make child care more affordable, accessible and flexible. Quality Family Day Care services already meet all these requirements however ongoing funding is needed to ensure the standards are maintained and this flexible option of Early Childhood Education and Care remains available to families.

Summary of Key Arguments:

·   Family Day Care services which have been rated as ‘Exceeding the National Quality Standards’ or ‘Excellent’ have provided to children and their families quality Education and Care. There is a significant amount of research which links high levels of investment in quality early childhood education to greater developmental and social outcomes for children, and later adults. This in turn correlates to significant savings for taxpayers and governments.

·   Family Day Care services which exceed the National Quality Standards have proven their ability to use funding with integrity to maintain their coordination units to recruit, train and support Educators in providing quality care as well as monitoring to ensure compliance with all relevant legislation. In addition they have proven their ability to support children and their families. Regional and rural areas encounter additional operating expenses in ensuring support and compliance visits are maintained on both a regular and spontaneous basis, as well as providing professional development opportunities for all staff and Educators.

·   Quality Family Day Care services recognise the value of relationships between Coordinators, Educators, Families and the Community. In some instances Family Day Care is the only form of Education and Care, or the only form of care which has the flexibility and local knowledge to meet a family’s needs.

·   Services rated as ‘Excellent’ or ‘Exceeding the National Quality Standards’ have proven their ability to work under an ethic of continuous improvement based in their Quality Improvement Plan. These services are proactive rather than reactive in working towards best practice.

 

2.   INNOVATION FUND - REMOVAL OF PLASTIC WASTE

 

Motion :

That the Federal Government implement an Innovation Fund for the specific purpose of reducing plastic waste.

National Objective:

To position our nation at the forefront of recognising and acting upon the serious problem of plastic pollution.


Summary of Key Arguments:

·   Legislation is required for key business and corporate stakeholders to implement strong process that leads to reduction of manufacture of single use plastics.

·   The Community has become aware of the plastic pollution problem and are looking for leadership in changing habits and practices.

·   There needs to be a focus on sustainable, long lasting solutions and community plays a vital role in the acceptance and implementation of any legislative change.

 

3.   NATIONAL NATURAL DISASTER FUNDING

 

Motion :

That the Federal Government’s Natural Disaster Funding Programs include natural and built assets as eligible works when impacted by natural disaster events and affects of climate change and Sea Level rise.

National Objective:

Federal Government Natural Disaster Funding is available to local government to manage natural resources (beaches, estuaries, and foreshores) and infrastructure impacted by climate change and Sea Level rise.

Summary of Key Arguments:

·   Most public assets that are impacted upon by sea level rise and the impacts of climate change cannot be insured and are not eligible for natural disaster grant funding. These include foreshore access structures and existing coastal erosion protection measures which protect public (roads, water, sewer, access, walking tracks and boardwalks, parks etc.) and private infrastructure (residential and commercial).

·   Legislation requires that Councils provide public access to foreshore areas and protect these foreshore, most of which are on Crown Land that Councils are required to manage, however there is no funding available to renew or restore these assets and the foreshore when natural disaster/damage occurs.

·   Recreational infrastructure contributes to building and maintaining community resilience as well as building a community’s health and well-being.  Whether a sporting field or shared pathway/walking track or a park, they can provide places where community members can regain a sense of normality, interact with other users or have a break away from the demands of restoration tasks in the event of a natural disaster.  Eligibility for funding could be linked to projects, facilities or locations that can demonstrate outcomes around rebuilding communities and their resilience that can also contribute to economic development e.g. provision of recreation facilities to encourage the return of tourists post-disaster.

·   Funding is required to proactively manage assets (natural or built) that are impacted by climate change and sea level rise to ensure that they are more resilient to the likely impacts of a natural disaster.

 

4.   FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS

 

Motion :

That the Federal Financial Assistance Grants to Local Government be restored to the level of 1% of total Taxation Revenue.

National Objective:

The Whitlam Government identified that the lack of adequate services and infrastructure in Australia was due to the poor funding of local government, it rectified this by giving local government access to funding through the Commonwealth Grants Commission.  The level of need for funding has not changed however the amount of grants have – this needs to be restored for the benefit of all Communities across the nation.

Summary of Key Arguments:

·   Current levels of funding for local government via Federal Financial Assistance Grants are insufficient to adequately support the provision of adequate services and local infrastructure across the nation.

·   Without restoration of the Federal Financial Assistance Grants to the initial share of total taxation Local Government infrastructure and services will continue to be at risk and decline.

·   The FAG’s are untied giving local government the flexibility needed to meet the varying needs of it’s communities.

 

5.   ROADS TO RECOVERY FUNDING

 

Motion :

That the Federal Government be commended for the ‘ Roads to Recovery’ Program funding and be encouraged to continue funding at the current levels  

National Objective:

The 2015 National State of the Assets report produced for the Australian Local Government Association found that of the $73.7 billion of roads assets, $8.2 billion (11%) were in a poor to very poor state.  It will require significant levels of funding from all levels of government to start addressing the backlog of roads in poor condition.  The ‘Roads to Recovery’ Program is therefore a critical funding source for local councils to renew their roads.

Summary of Key Arguments:

Communities expect their local councils to provide safe, serviceable and efficient road networks.  However, many councils do not have the financial resources to arrest the deterioration of their networks.  This leads to increasing road safety risks, higher vehicle operating costs and more expenditure on road maintenance and renewal than would otherwise be necessary. 

 

6.   BALLOON RELEASE BAN

 

Motion :

That the Minister for the Environment and Energy, the Hon Josh Frydenberg MP, be requested to bring into force national bans on the use of helium to inflate balloons and the release of balloons.

National Objective:

To prohibit the release of balloons and the use of helium to inflate balloons across the nation due the recognised threat they cause to wildlife and the environment.  

Summary of Key Arguments:

·   Approximately 95% of released balloons burst in the atmosphere and litter small pieces of plastic to earth. The remaining 5% do not reach a high enough altitude to burst and instead can drift hundreds of kilometres before coming down at land or at sea.

·   Balloons can cause significant harm to land and sea creatures. Even the natural latex balloons take months to break down and are known to harm and kill animals both in the marine environment and on land. The attached strings and clips on balloons last a long time in the environment and can be eaten by or entangle marine species.

·   Helium is non- renewable gas which is extracted from the earth’s crust and there is currently a shortage of this gas. The use of helium to inflate balloons not only exacerbates the problem with the travel of balloons and impact on the environment, but also creates demand for this scarce gas. This is a problem as helium is an important gas used in medicine – It is used in MRI scanners and is mixed with oxygen to aid respiration for the ill and in particular newborn babies.

 

 

              


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 111

 

 

SA17.108   Public Transport in the Shoalhaven

 

HPERM Ref:      D16/324854

 

Group:                Assets & Works Group

Section:              Asset Management

 

Attachments:     1. Shoalhaven Integrated Transport Strategy 2000 (under separate cover)

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To report on the status of a public transport strategy for the Shoalhaven.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That

1.    The Shoalhaven Integrated Transport Strategy be initially reviewed by the Shoalhaven Transport Working Group to recommend the scope and resources necessary for the formal review process

2.    The Strategy retain its public transport focus and be re-named the Shoalhaven Public Transport Strategy.

3.    That Council consider a budget allocation of $15,000 in 2017/18 to undertake a review of the Strategy.

 

 

Options

1.    Receive the report for information and review the Shoalhaven Integrated Transport Strategy  (Recommended)

 

2.    Make some other recommendation

 

Background

Council resolved at its meeting on 4 October 2016 (Minute MIN16.754) that

the General Manager report to council on what plans are in place to improve public transport in the Shoalhaven.

Also, Council resolved at its meeting on 22 November 2016 (Minute MIN16.897), on a related matter, that

the General Manager provide a report on the availability of any Shoalhaven wide public transport strategy that would integrate present and future cycle ways, bus routes and train arrivals and departures. And also report on the availability of State Government funding to assist with the establishment of such a network.

This report addresses these Council resolutions.

Council’s role in public transport is mainly advocating for improvements and providing support infrastructure.  Whereas the State government is responsible for strategy, planning, policy, regulation and funding allocation for all modes of transport in NSW including road, rail, ‘point to point’, regional air, cycling and walking.

Council adopted the Shoalhaven Integrated Transport Strategy in 2000. To assist the implementation of the Strategy, a Public Transport Working Party was established, as a committee of Council, and operated until 2005 when it was disbanded and replaced by a non-council committee called the Shoalhaven Transport Working Group. The Group includes respresentatives from Transport for New South Wales, bus companies and Council staff including the Road Safety Officer. Council continues to host meetings of the Group which are organised by Council’s Traffic and Transport Unit.

Over recent years, the business of this Group has focussed on bus-related matters as a separete ‘cycling committee’ was established in 2014 to review Council’s Bike Plan and to recommend priority actions for the next two to three years.

Some of recommendations of the Shoalhaven Integrated Transport Strategy, which have already been implemented, include:

·    Upgrading Bomaderry railway station access

·    Installation of bus shelters, ‘J’ poles and bus bays

·    Public transport signage

·    ‘Bus to Go’ scheme

·    Completion of many ‘shared user’ paths

·    Public transport forums

·    Timetable alignment between bus and train arrivals and departures

·    Continuing operations of a Transport Working Group

·    Planning for bus interchanges

In relation to ‘non-motorised’ transport, Council’s Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP) and the Bike Plan contain priority path projects which already integrate with transport hubs.

 

Community Engagement

Over the 17 years since the adoption of the current Shoalhaven Integrated Transport Strategy, the Transport Working Group has carried out a number of actions in collaboration with Transport for New South Wales.  It is timely to review the Strategy assumptions, expected outcomes and the progress of its recommended actions.

The initial review could be undertaken by the existing Shoalhaven Transport Working Group. If the Group believes that significant sections of the Strategy need re-writing, then a consultant could be engaged to facilitate the review process.  If, however, relatively minor changes are required, staff could undertake the review.

In either case, an amended Strategy would be reported to Council for subsequent broader community consultation.

However, the Strategy’s primary focus is on public transport so is not truly an ‘integrated transport strategy’ as no mention is made of upgrading the road network to cater for future development and the subsequent growth in traffic of all kinds.   Council may wish to include a section on road network upgrading in a revised Strategy.  If so, this would be a signifcant change requiring input from a transport planning consultant.

 

Financial Implications

Council continues to deliver shared user paths as funds allow.  The main funding source is from Roads and Maritime Services which provides grants on a 50:50 basis.  The RMS’s grants for 2016/17 total about $225,000, which Council matches, and also allocates its own funds for other path projects which do not qualify for grant funding.  In 2016/17, Council’s total allocation to new path construction is about $1,200,000.

The only other regular grant funding source is from the State Government’s Country Passenger Transport Infrastructure Grants Scheme (CPTIGS).  This Scheme provides subsidies to support the construction or upgrade of bus stop infrastructure such as shelters, seats and lighting.  The last CPTIGS grants to Council were $52,700 for bus shelters and $39,700 for the Stewart Place bus interchange.  Applications for CPTIGS grants closed in September 2016 for the 2016 to 2018 period but no announcements on successful applications have yet been made by the State government.

If a consultant is engaged to facilitate a major review of the Shoalhaven Integrated Transport Strategy a budget of about $15,000 would need to be allowed.  Currently, there is no funding source recognised to undertake a major review.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 114

 

 

SA17.109   Path Construction and Funding Strategy

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/47911

 

Group:                Assets & Works Group 

Section:              Asset Management

 

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To consider adoption of path construction and funding strategy, to seek matching funds from the State Government.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the path construction projects identified from 2017/18 until 2020/21 in this report be included in Council’s draft Four Year Delivery Program and annual Operational Plan

 

 

Options

1.    Adopt the path project priority list  (Recommended)

Implications: This will provide new paths for the community but will commit Council to additional costs of $1,524,000 by the end of the 2020/21 financial year plus another $2,980,000 for the renewal of the paths after the end of their ‘useful’ lives. This option would demonstrate Council’s ongoing commitment to Active Transport and allow Council to continue to benefit from available grant funding for shared user paths.

 

2.    Adopt the path project priority list but indefinitely defer any financial commitment  (Not Recommended)

Implications: This will allow any available budget allocations to be spent on asset renewals instead of the construction of new assets. Council’s financial sustainability principles suggest asset renewals should have budget allocation priority over new construction.

 

3.    Make some other recommendation.

 

Background

Due to successful applications Council has been receiving significant annual grant funding from Roads and Maritimes Services under the NSW Government’s Active Transport Program.  This Program requires contributory funding from Council “up to” 50%.  Council has been successful in attracting grant funding up to approximately $350,000 per year, which Council needs to match if it accepts the RMS offer.

It is desirable to establish a priority list of path projects which meet RMS guidelines for funding.  This allows early investigation and design to be undertaken as grant funding is only available in the year that it is offered.

Table 1 contains the recommended path projects which qualify for grant funding under the Active Transport Program.

 

Table 1

Project Description

Funding

Year

Shared user path (SUP) - Vincent St and Twyford St, Vincentia

SCC - $190000

RMS - $190000

2017/18

SUP - Deering St – Stage 1 to ‘The Bombie’ car park, Ulladulla

SCC - $150000

RMS - $150000

2017/18

Pedestrian crossing improvements – Huskisson town centre

SCC - $100000

RMS - $100000

2017/18

SUP - Deering St – Stage 2 - ‘The Bombie’ car park to lighthouse Ulladulla

SCC - $250000

RMS - $250000

2018/19

SUP – Sanctuary Point to St Georges Basin – ‘missing link’ Stage 1 – The Wool Lane to Wonga Place

SCC - $100000

RMS - $100000

2018/19

SUP – Matron Porter Dr – Bannister Head Rd to Garside Rd

SCC - $280000

RMS - $280000

2019/20

SUP – Sanctuary Point to St Georges Basin – ‘missing link’ Stage 2 – Wonga Place to Claylands Dr (Wonga Place reserve)

SCC - $70000

RMS - $70000

2019/20

SUP – Yalwal Rd – Albatross Rd to Filter Rd

SCC - $240000

RMS - $240000

2020/21

SUP – Shoalhaven Heads Rd – Stage 1 – Mathews St to Jerry Bailey Rd

SCC - $110000

RMS - $110000

2020/21

 

The above list is based on the high priorities in Council’s Bike Plan (which by resolution of Council funding priorities are based), as well as annual feedback from Community Consultative bodies. The Sanctuary Point to St Georges Basin route that is proposed is relatively low cost and an achievable solution which was supported by the Basin Villages CCB, the longer alternative routes would be significantly higher cost due to the need of kerb and gutter, driveway crossing and utility adjustments and therefore would be unlikely to proceed due to funding constraints.

 

The projects and respective stages are limited by the current available funding

 

Based on the Bike Plan as well as annual feedback from Community Consultative bodies, beyond 2020/21 the current priorities are:

·    Continue the Matron Porter Drive shared user path to Narrawallee (several stages)

·    Continue the River Road Shoalhaven Heads shared user path (several stages)

·    Continue the “Round the Bay” shared user path (several stages)

·    Commence the Illaroo Road shared user path (several stages)

·    Extend the “Wool Way”

·    Commence the Croobyar Road Milton shared user path (several stages)

 

Community Engagement

The recommended projects would be included in the annual consultation on Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan.

 


 

Financial Implications

If the grant funding offers are successful and accepted, Council’s financial commitment would be as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Year

Capital Expenditure

On-going Operational Expenditure per year

Total

2017/18

$440,000

$10,000

$450,000

2018/19

$350,000

$8,000

$358,000

2019/20

$350,000

$8,000

$358,000

2020/21

$350,000

$8,000

$358,000

Totals

$1,490,000

$34,000

$1,524,000

 

If the program is adopted the funding will be identified in the long term financial plan and will involve an allocation within the existing Roads and Transport budget.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 117

 

 

SA17.110   Recycling and Waste Facilities Review

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/85988

 

Group:                Assets & Works Group  

Section:              Works & Services

 

Attachments:     1. Submission - Callala Recycling & Waste Depot - Currarong Community Association Inc

2. Submission - sussex inlet and community forum - Sussex Inlet Waste Transfer Station - openiing hours

3. Response - multiple items - Kioloa Waste Transfer  Station hours - Bawley Point and Kioloa Community Association

4. Waste transfer hours of operation - Kangaroo Valley Recycling and Waste facility - Budgong Community Group Meeting Minutes

5. West Nowra Waste - RRP financial Modelling Report - Final - John Desmond

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

This report provides an overview of the second round of community consultation regarding the review of Council’s Recycling and Waste Facilities.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council make changes to the operation of the Recycling and Waste Facilities as follows:

1.    Berry and Callala - change the operating days to three days per week, Friday, Saturday and Sunday and open the buyback facilities on Saturday and Sunday mornings;

2.    Sussex Inlet - change the operating hours to 9am to 3pm, Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday and open the buyback facilities on Saturday and Sunday mornings;

3.    Kangaroo Valley - change the operating days to three days per week, Saturday, Sunday and Monday and open the buyback facility on a Sunday morning;

4.    Kioloa - change the operating days to three days per week, Friday, Saturday and Sunday;

5.    Lake Conjola - change the operation to 2 mornings per weekend from 8am to 12pm;

6.    Bendalong - change the operation to 2 afternoons per weekend from 1pm to 5pm;

7.    Continue operating all facilities for 7 days per week from Christmas to the end of the January school holidays with the exception of Bendalong,  Lake Conjola, Kioloa and Kangaroo Valley;

8.    Operate Lake Conjola,  Bendalong, Kioloa and Kangaroo Valley for 5 days per week during the Christmas school holidays, on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday and Wednesday;

9.    Public holidays - close all ten recycling and waste facilities on all public holidays;

10.  Close and remove the bottle bank at Currarong, Berry, Culburra and Nowra

11.  The changes become effective as of 1 July 2017.

 

 

Options

1.    Council accept the recommendation as presented

Implications: The primary sites of Huskisson, Ulladulla and West Nowra remain unchanged and continue to provide an alternative to the smaller sites 7 days per week. The suggested changes to opening hours and days are considered by the affected CCBs to be acceptable.  With the nominated changes, Waste and Recycling drop off facilities continue to be provided to the community, but with lower accessibility.  The changes reduce expenses by about $387,000 per year, lowering the subsidies to the smaller transfer stations.  The revised operation focuses on the demand at sites and lower utilisation days will be less frequent.

2.    Accept the recommendation but add the need for Nowra, Ulladulla, Huskisson, Sussex Inlet, Callala and Berry to be opened on Easter Monday.

Implications: This proposal is in line with the request by the Sussex Inlet and District Community Forum to open the facility on Easter Monday, based on the fact that the sites will be closed on both Good Friday and Easter Sunday.  The additional staffing cost for implementing this will be approximately $16,500.

3.    Not accept the recommendation and maintain the current service levels

Implications: Council’s transfer stations are operating at a financial loss and are being subsidised by the higher volume of gate fees collected at the West Nowra Waste Facility. Increasing diversion to the Resource Recovery Park will reduce the gate fees collected, reducing the capacity to fund the current level of service or alternatively an increase in the charge will be required. Service level changes are required to reduce operating costs to make Waste Services financially sustainable into the future.

 

Background

Council currently operates 10 recycling and Waste Facilities.  The three main sites are Ulladulla, Huskisson and West Nowra with 7 smaller transfer facilities at Berry, Kangaroo Valley, Callala, Sussex Inlet, Bendalong, Lake Conjola and Kioloa.  The Shoalhaven’s only putrescible landfill is located at West Nowra, with all waste collected at the other sites transferred to this location for disposal.  Inert waste can be landfilled at Huskisson.

Following a Service Review of the Waste Services operation in November 2015, the current operation of all the recycling and waste transfer facilities were reviewed to reduce the reliance on an approximately $3m / year subsidy from the gate fees main landfill facility at West Nowra.  The ability to sustain this subsidy will decline as Council moves to achieve State Government targets to increase diversion of waste from landfill to 70%.  Shoalhaven currently diverts 43% from landfill through kerbside recycling and green waste processing at the depots.  A key element to achieving the required diversion is the development of a Resource Recovery Park, which recently received planning approval.  Increasing diversion will reduce the gate fees collected at west Nowra, reducing the capacity to fund the current level of service (see long term financial plan attached).

In June 2016 Waste Services conducted a public survey to identify potential changes at the smaller Recycling and Waste Facilities that would result in a reduced necessity for a subsidy.  A number of community groups were consulted and a report with provisional recommendations submitted to Council in October 2016.  At the Council meeting of 4 October 2016 (MIN16.735), Council resolved:

1.    That Council proceed to engage with the community regarding the results of the survey and seek feedback on the proposed recommendations as listed below:

a.    West Nowra, Huskisson and Ulladulla - continue operating the three large facilities seven days per week;

b.    Berry, Callala and Sussex Inlet - change the operating days to three days per week, Friday, Saturday and Sunday and open the buyback facilities on Saturday and Sunday mornings;

c.    Kangaroo Valley - change the operating days to three days per week, Saturday, Sunday and Monday and open the buyback facility on a Sunday morning;

d.    Kioloa - change the operating days to three days per week, Friday, Saturday and Sunday;

e.    Lake Conjola - change the operation to 2 mornings per weekend from 8am to 12pm;

f.     Bendalong - change the operation to 2 afternoons per weekend from 1pm to 5pm;

g.    Continue operating all facilities for 7 days per week from Christmas to the end of the January school holidays with the exception of Bendalong and Lake Conjola;

h.    Operate Lake Conjola and Bendalong for 5 days per week during the Christmas school holidays, on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday and Wednesday;

i.     Public holidays - close all ten recycling and waste facilities on all public holidays;

j.     Currarong, Berry, Culburra and Nowra - close and remove the bottle bank;

2.    Staff provide a further report to Council on completion of community engagement, with details and cost analysis of the options and time line for implementation.

 

Between October 2016 and February 2017, four staff engaged with the CCBs in the relevant catchment areas for the smaller Recycling and Waste Transfer facilities.  In general the community developed an understanding of the need to take action, and they were proactive in making various alternative suggestions.  The general consensus, with some minor modifications, was that the original recommendations are acceptable and that they support Council’s efforts to streamline operations and reduce costs.

 

Following these meetings, written submissions have been received from

·    Currarong Community Association – agreed with all proposed measures, but also indicated that the extended hours over the Christmas period may be unnecessary if the site can be open Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday (as current) over the Christmas holiday period (attachment D17/107412).

·    Sussex Inlet and District Community Forum CCB – proposed different opening hours for Sussex Inlet as 9am to 3pm Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday (resulting in a similar saving to the proposal).  The CCB supported the continuation of the additional days for the Christmas Holiday Period and supported the closure of the facilities on public holidays with the exception of Easter Monday (attachment D17/107410).

·    Bawley Point & Kioloa Community Association Inc. – agreed with all proposed measures.

·    Budgong Community Group Meeting Minutes – preference to remain open on Mondays (attachment D17/107415).

 

Applying the recommendations and the modified recommendations following the community engagement, the approximate savings (current offset by West Nowra) for the forthcoming year is estimated to be $387,638 which is approximately 35% of the 2015/16 shortfall at the small transfer facilities.

The most appropriate time for introducing the changes is 1 July 2017 in line with the start of the new financial year.  Council staff will provide information to customers at the waste facilities in the lead up and all the CCBs will be provided with a copy of the recommendations and asked to incorporate the changes in the local newsletter.  The front gate signs will be altered on the day to show the new days/times.

 

Community Engagement

Between October 2016 and February 2017 four Works and Services staff engaged with the CCBs in the catchment areas for the smaller Recycling and Waste Transfer facilities.  The CCBs are listed (with approximate number of people present) as Berry (70); Currarong (10); Greenwell Point (10); Shoalhaven Heads (54); Lake Conjola (15); Callala Bay (21); Callala Beach (14); Culburra (17); Bendalong (Red Head Villages and Manyana) (24); Budgong/Kangaroo Valley (4); Bawley Point (20); and Sussex Inlet.( 42). 

In general the community developed an understanding of the need to take action, and were proactive in making various alternative suggestions.  The general consensus, with some minor modifications, was that the original recommendations are acceptable and that they support Council’s efforts to streamline operations and reduce costs.

 

Financial Implications

Applying the recommendations and the modified recommendations following the community engagement, the approximate savings for the forthcoming year is estimated to be $387,638 which is approximately 35% of the 2015/16 shortfall at the small transfer facilities that is currently funded by West Nowra gate fees.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 121

 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 122

 

PDF Creator

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 123

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 125

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 127

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 137

 

 

SA17.111   Professional Property Officers Conference

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/88410

 

Group:                Assets & Works Group 

Section:              Business & Property

 

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To inform Council that Shoalhaven City Council will be co-hosting the Professional Property Officers Conference at the Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre on 12 & 13 October 2017.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

Council receive the report for information

 

 

Options

1.    Adopt the recommendation

Implication: The conference for Property officers within NSW Councils will proceed

2.    Not adopt the recommendation and provide further direction to staff

 

Background

Shoalhaven City Council is partnering with Local Government NSW (LGNSW) to co-host the NSW Professional Property Officers Conference to be held on Thursday 12 & Friday 13 October 2017 at the Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre. This is primarily for staff working in Local Government.

Based on initial interest, it is anticipated that attendance will be approximately 100 – 150 property related Council staff from across New South Wales.

LGNSW as partner to the event will assist in the handling of:

·    Registration and invoicing process

·    Program and Invitation design

·    Promotion to all Councils through newsletters and links

·    General administration

·    Seeking further Sponsorship through 1500 organisations on their database.

·    Providing future ongoing Professional Development for NSW Local Government Property Officers.

Having LGNSW as an Event Partner will provide exposure, credibility and weight to the event with the potential for State based sponsorship.

In addition to the exposure garnered from the above partnership, Council will also include advertising/media releases distributed via:

·    Emails to the Australian Local Government Property Professionals Group,

·    LGNSW websites and links

·    Professional websites,

·    Newsletters

·    Linkedin Forum

·    A Council Webpage

 

Conference content

A broad range of property related topics have been assembled, comprising the following:

·    Aboriginal Land Claims

·    Native Title

·    Compulsory Acquisitions

·    Easements

·    Telecommunications Carrier occupation agreements

·    Classification and Reclassification of Land

·    Crown Land Management

·    Road Closures

·    Leasing/Licensing Council Properties

·    Ongoing training requirements

 

Speakers

Responses to requests for Guest Speakers has been very promising with confirmation by representatives of:

·    National Australia Bank - Key note speaker

·    Crown Lands;

·    New South Wales Office Local Government;

·    Aboriginal Land Claims Assessment Unit – Dubbo;

·    Native Title Unit;

·    Bartier Perry Lawyers from Sydney; and

·    RMB Solicitors

Council is awaiting attendance confirmation (favourable response already indicated in discussions) from other local businesses along with RMS, and National Parks & Wildlife Service.

 

Boost to local economy

Hosting the event on a Thursday/Friday gives the attendees the opportunity to stay on over the following weekend to enjoy what the Shoalhaven has to offer.

It presents a significant tourism and economic opportunity for the Shoalhaven through attendee accommodation requirements, tours to wider parts of the Shoalhaven and at the conference dinner venue. Based on this opportunity for attendees, their partners and families to stay on over the weekend, it is estimated the boost to the local economy will be in the vicinity of $30,000 - $60,000.

A further opportunity to showcase the Shoalhaven and provide a networking opportunity will be via a small function to be held at Cambewarra Winery on the Thursday night.  Attendees will be transferred by coach leaving SEC at 6.15pm and returning at 8.30pm.

 

Sponsorship

Sponsorship to date has been received by way of:

·    Function sponsorship

·    supplying merchandise eg, tote bags with usb’s, water bottles, notepads etc

·    contribution towards meal breaks

·    contribution of speakers

·    further promotion of the event through corporate websites and “Linkedin”

 

Organisations to date offering sponsorship are:

·    LGNSW as Event Partner

·    Holiday Haven

·    Shoalhaven Water

·    Bartier Perry Lawyers

·    Walsh & Monaghan, Valuers

 

Costings

Income         These figures are based on 100 attendees @ $360.00 for Registration and sponsorship to date.

Expenses     Covers venue, meals, dinner, transport, fees and ancillary items.

 

Total Income

 

 

$41,400.00

Total Expenses

 

 

$29,984.00

 

 

 

 

Surplus

 

 

$11,416.00

 

Council staff have plans to host this Conference as a two yearly event. Any profits generated will be put forward to the next Conference.

 

Financial Implications

There are no financial implications for Council.  All costs are recovered through Registration Fees and Sponsorship.

It is anticipated a small profit will be made and may go towards future events.

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 140

 

 

SA17.112   Policy review and adoption - Management of Mobile Food Vending Vehicles on Council Owned or Managed Land

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/97403

 

Group:                Assets & Works Group 

Section:              Business & Property

 

Attachments:     1. Management of Mobile Food Vending Vehicles on Council Owned or Managed Land - LAP (under separate cover)

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

To seek Council approval to the adoption of the existing Management of Mobile Food Vending Vehicles on Council Owned or Managed Land Policy with minor amendments as discussed at a Councillor’s Briefing on the 21 March 2017 and set out in this report.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council adopt the Management of Mobile Food Vending Vehicles on Council Owned or Managed Land Local Approvals Policy, with minor amendments as outlined in the report.

 

 

Options

1.    Resolve as recommended.

Implications: The adoption of the minor amendments made to the Policy will provide a better management of Mobile Food Van Operators and meet Community needs.

 

2.    Decline minor changes and provide further direction to staff.

 

Background

At Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 20 December 2016 it was resolved under MIN16.1011:

“3.     that consideration of the Management of Mobile Food Vending Vehicles on Council Owned or Managed Land – Local Approvals Policy be deferred for a briefing of Councillors”.

The Councillor Briefing was held on 21 March 2017 and the following minor changes to the Policy were discussed including increase stationary time to 5 hours, remove maximum number of Approvals; and amend 1km distance to be measured by road (shortest route) from shop to MFV Vehicle set up point. The Policy is now being submitted to Council with these inclusions for consideration and adoption.

  


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 141

 

 

SA17.113   Acquisition of Easement for Sewerage Purposes - 35 Brighton Parade, Culburra Beach

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/90672

 

Group:                Shoalhaven Water Group 

Section:              Water Asset Planning & Development

 

Attachments:     1. Easement Plan - 35 Brighton Parade Culburra Beach

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

This report is submitted to seek Council approval to acquire an Easement for Sewerage Purposes 3 metres wide over Lot 1454 DP12278, No.35 Brighton Parade, Culburra Beach, from the Public Trustee of New Zealand (for the Estate of the Late G.E. Johnson).

 

 

Recommendation

That

1.    Council resolve to acquire the Easement for Sewerage Purposes 3m wide over Lot 1454 DP12278 at Culburra Beach, as shown on copy of DP645066 marked Attachment ‘1’.

2.    Council pay compensation of $8,250 and reasonable legal and valuation costs associated with the acquisition, in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, from Council’s Sewer Fund.

3.    The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven be affixed to any documents required to be sealed.

 

 

Options

1.    Resolve as recommended. The easement is required to formalise tenure over an existing pipeline on the subject property.

 

2.    Not resolve as recommended and provide further directions to staff.

 

Background

In 1991 Shoalhaven Water constructed a sewer rising main through the subject property, towards its rear boundary, for the Culburra-Greenwell Sewerage Scheme. Investigations have revealed that the easement for the pipeline has not been acquired.

A valuation undertaken on behalf of Council by Walsh & Monaghan Pty Ltd assessed compensation for the easement at $8,250. A conditional offer was made at that amount plus costs. The owner’s solicitor has advised that the offer is acceptable and their client is not liable for GST on the transaction.

 

Financial Implications

The compensation and reasonable legal and valuation costs associated with the acquisition are to be funded from Council’s Sewer Fund.

 

Risk Implications

Acquisition of the easement is necessary to secure Shoalhaven Water’s access for the operation and maintenance of essential public infrastructure.

The proposed action is administrative and has no environmental impact.

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 143

 

PDF Creator

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 144

 

 

SA17.114   Review of Shoalhaven Water Group Policies

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/101606

 

Group:                Shoalhaven Water Group  

Section:              Water Asset Planning & Development

 

Attachments:     1. Liquid Trade Waste Discharge to Sewerage Policy (under separate cover)

2. Drinking Water Policy (under separate cover)

3. Reclaimed Water Policy (under separate cover)

  

    

 

Purpose / Summary

All Public and Local Approval Policies are to be submitted to Council within 12 months of the election of Council. The three Public Policies proposed for reaffirmation represent “Round 2” of this requirement with respect to Shoalhaven Water Group’s responsibilities.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council:

1.    Change from a Local Approval Policy to a Public Policy and reaffirm with minor changes the following policy

a.    POL16/55 – Liquid Trade Waste Discharge to the Sewerage System

2.    Reaffirm the following policies with minor changes:

a.    POL16/85 – Drinking Water Policy

b.    POL16/88 – Reclaimed Water Policy

 

 

Options

1.    Adopt the recommendation as written

Implications: Minor changes will give greater clarity with regard to what activities are considered to produce Liquid Trade Waste and the fees and charges associated with those activities. Specific details of changes are outlined further below.

 

2.    Not adopt the recommendation.

Implications: Council can request further details, seek community input, remove proposed changes or initiate other changes

 


 

Background

Minor changes have been made to the following policies as shown in the attachments:

Liquid Trade Waste Discharge to the Sewerage System POL16/55

This policy was last adopted in September 2013 and the following changes have been made:

·    Updating the definition of liquid trade waste to include sporting ground canteens and portable ablution block waste and excluding activities in community/public premises where no fee is charged.

·    Updating the requirements associated with premises containing refuelling points to comply with DPI-Water directives

·    Clarifying who is responsible for submitting a Liquid Trade Waste Application

·    Updating which Category 2S activities Council has received assumed concurrence for from DPI-Water

·    Updating the frequency of inspection requirements for the various categories of discharger

·    Clarification regarding in what circumstance the various Liquid Trade Waste fees and charges can be applied

·    Updated Guideline Limits for Perfuorinated Compounds

 

Drinking Water Policy POL16/85

This Public Policy was originally adopted in January 2012 and reaffirmed in 2013 primarily to articulate Council’s commitment to the provision of a safe, high quality drinking water supply.  Minor amendments are proposed to the Policy to reflect currency with Guidelines and other policies.  The proposed changes do not alter the intent nor implementation of the current policy.

The Public Health Regulation 2012 was approved in July 2012 and commenced, along with the Public Health Act 2010, on 1 September 2012.  The objectives of the Regulation are to support the smooth operation of the Public Health Act 2010.

To satisfy these regulations Shoalhaven Water has successfully implemented a quality assurance program in compliance with the 2011 Australian Drinking Water Guidelines’ “Framework for Management of Drinking Water Quality”.  This quality assurance program is comprised largely by Shoalhaven Water’s Drinking Water Quality”.  This quality assurance program is comprised largely by Shoalhaven Water’s Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) which incorporated Council’s Drinking Water Quality Policy.

Shoalhaven Water has also implemented a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with NSW Health (see MIN12.641) which forms an important part of the quality assurance program.

Reclaimed Water Policy POL16/88

This Public Policy was adopted in 2007 (MIN07.1087) then amended in 2009 (MIN03.774) and updated in 2013.  The Policy provides a commitment by Council to the safe and sustainable management of reclaimed water.

Only minor changes are proposed to add clarification with no impact on the intent of the policy.

Community Engagement

There is no statutory requirement to publicly exhibit any of the policies contained in this report. Council may choose to do so should they consider any changes of significance.

Policy Implications

The amended policy would become the new policy for liquid trade waste discharge to the sewerage system.  


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 146

 

 

SA17.115   Community Energy Congress - Conference Report

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/96037

 

Submitted by:    Clr John Wells

Clr Patricia White

 

     

 

Purpose / Summary

To provide a report from Clr John Wells and Clr Patricia White on the Community Energy Congress held in Melbourne in February 2017 in accordance with Clause 3.3(e) of the Council Members – Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the Committee receive and note the report from Clr John Wells and Clr Patricia White on the Community Energy Congress for information.

 

 

Options

1.    Receive the report for information

2.    Request further information on the conference

 

Report from Clr John Wells and Clr Patricia White

Overview

The Power of Community Energy

Communities around the world are playing a critical part in the clean energy transition.

The Conference highlighted Community energy projects bring an added social dimension to renewable energy and harness the passion, time and energy of thousands of committed people across Australia and around the world.

Strengthening community energy helps to deliver substantial economic, environmental, social, technological and political benefits which will in turn help activate deep support for the transition by the community.

Observations at the Congress indicated that Australian Community energy sector is moving from strength to strength and has come a long way since the early 2000’s. There is now over 70 groups developing community energy projects and more than 30 projects up and operating.

The Community Energy Congress 2017 was held in Melbourne in February; it built on the strength of the community energy sector by bringing together the majority of community energy groups from across Australia, including every day residents.  However, it should be noted that Shoalhaven had the greatest number of individual conference attendees from any LGA.

The Community Energy Congress event was organised by the Coalition for Community Energy (C4CE).

Over 500 community energy stakeholders from across Australia attended the Congress, you could say the Melbourne Town Hall was packed to the rafters.  The highlights of the Congress were:-

·    Inspiring speakers and workshops to create change in their communities;

·    Built on developing skills and capacity to deliver community energy projects;

·    Provided an understanding of  pathways for communities, companies, and local and state government to collaborate;

·    It Identified key opportunities and barriers facing the sector

·    Provided successful community energy case studies

·    Provided networking opportunities to share information and strategies about overcoming barriers and realising real opportunities;

·    Provided information on consolidate and coordinate efforts across the nation; and

·    Fostered new networks and relationships within the community energy sector.

The Congress was a 2-day event with a number of side-events held before and after the Congress, including trainings, master classes and field trips.

 

Report

Opening

The key themes for the Congress were:

1.   Energy Justice

2.   Powering the Future together

3.   Empowering Communities

 

Key Note Speakers

Søren Hermansen - spearheaded his community’s efforts to become 100 percent energy independent and has proved to the world that it is possible for communities to become energy self-sufficient.

 

Born and raised on the Island of Samsø in Denmark – the island became the world’s first 100% renewable island in 2007.

 

Søren focused on his experiences of transferring common knowledge into action and translating top down policies into local action. He sees community power as the key to energy democracy and local ownership.

 

He spoke about the 3 challenges:-

·    Climate Change

·    Security of Supply

·    Industry economy and jobs

 

There needs to be a new deal - paving the way for the next 10 to 20 years; it’s about long term energy policies; the need to make new investments in renewable energy; and changes to meet the new technology.   How is this done – reliable policies; brave politics; long term framework and reasonable budgets.

 

Link: www.energiakademiet.dk

 


 

Other Key Note Speakers:

Hon. Lily D’Ambrosio

Candace Vahlsing

Nicky Ison

 

(Presentations available http://c4ce.net.au/congress/congress-output/)

Workshops:

The congress featured a number of breakout sessions which delivered a number of short presentations by speakers on a range of projects and developments in the community energy/renewable energy sectors. Included among these presentations were-

Sydney Renewable Power Co - Is a volunteer operated public company established to install a solar energy grid for Sydney. The company’s first project is the installation of a solar farm on the roof of the new Sydney International Convention Centre. The company secured this project by directing its proposal to a known tenderer for the construction of the facility, a proposal which the NSW Government’s procurement team found appealing from a number of perspectives including a community based case for renewable clean energy in the city centre funded by a public share offer.

Lismore Solar Farms - Funded in part by the OEH, two solar farms situated on Lismore Council’s Leisure Centre and Sewer Treatment Works. The projects were funded by the community with Council establishing a limited shareholder company (20 shareholders) each of whom bought $9000 worth of shares to fund the projects. The share offer which was oversubscribed provides a degree of community ownership/buy-in, with council giving shareholders 5% ROI –a price it felt acceptable.

The Bendigo Sustainability Network - A community group that solarises Council building using Community funding. Council buys the power so generated under a power supply agreement with funds going back to the community for re-investment in other renewable projects

Clear sky Solar Investments - A not for profit community Energy Company based around Sydney’s northern beaches. The company uses Trust funding models to invest in renewable and claims competitive ROI to other Trust investment options

Clean Cowra - A presentation by director Dylan Gowe outlining the company’s focus on biomass aggregation using anaerobic digestion technology to generate methane to drive turbine generators. Very much in the developmental stage, the project claims a capability to deliver 60% of Cowra’s power needs.

Community Energy Financing, Legals and Risk – This presentation was made by Solicitors and Financiers:-

Manny Pasqualini                  Jennifer Lauber Patterson

Simon Currie                         Huon Hoofesteger

Kylie Hitchman

The session discussed the common legal structures and legal considerations for communities in community energy.  Communities need to consider what their vision is; how to develop it; the business plan; legal structure; but the two main messages were: “keep it simple – more efficient” and “what’s best for the community”.   It is about delivery of projects not just talking about it.

The session then provided information on the new Community Energy Funding Toolkit (Toolkit) that has been developed as a “centralised, simplified repository of information” to mobilise the development of community renewable energy projects.  The Toolkit provides:-

§ Increases expertise in developing renewable energy projects

§ Information on funding alternatives and to improve financial literacy of CE project Developers

§ Resources to provides the tools required to enable CE project development

§ Understanding community renewable energy models (with CE Examples) that can be replicated

§ Case studies that show practical application

§ Reduces costs and timeline for delivery and development

Link: http://c4ce.net.au/congress/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Community-Energy-Financing-Legals-and-Risk_Lauber-Patterson-Jennifer.pdf

Website: www.FrontierImpact.org.au

 

Repower Shoalhaven - RePower Shoalhaven; Shoalhaven Councillors and residents who attended the Conference sat down together for approx. 1 hour and discussed and exchanged the opportunities and ideas for the LGA.  These will be discussed at the Climate Change Committee in coming months.

 

Key Note Addresses:

Ben Franklin MLC – Parliamentary Secretary for Renewable Energy - NSW

Shane Rattenburg-Grenns MLA & Minister for Climate Change and Energy - ACT

Chris Picton MP Assistant to the Treasurer - SA

Kristy Gowers, GM of the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)

All demonstrated a commitment by governments to a zero emissions future by at least 2050; a recognition of the role community energy schemes will play in future (household solar panels now produce as much energy as the Snowy Hydro scheme).

Speakers also recognised that the National Electricity Market is dysfunctional arising from failure by Governments and the market to provide incentives for investment into renewable alternatives and distortions caused by open market pricing of gas and failure to dedicate a proportion of the Nations gas resource for domestic energy generation.

 

Conclusion

It was an excellent conference and it was interesting to listen and network with Energy Renewal stakeholders, residents and groups from different areas across Australia and understand the changes over the last 10 years.

In recent times energy renewal, supply and politics has become a real issue for everyone and as a Council, we have vital roles to play.

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 150

 

 

SA17.116   Tourism Conference 2017

 

HPERM Ref:      D17/107708

 

Submitted by:    Clr Mark Kitchener

 

Attachments:     1. Tourism Conference 2017 Report

  

     

 

Purpose / Summary

To provide a report (Attachment 1) from Clr Mark Kitchener on the Tourism Conference 2017 held in Taree on 12-14 March 2017 in accordance with Clause 3.3(e) of the Council Members – Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy.

 

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council receive the report from Clr Mark Kitchener on the Tourism Conference 2017 for information.

 

 

Options

1.    Receive the report for information

2.    Request further information on the conference

 

 

 


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 151

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

   


 

 Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 April 2017

Page 161

 

Local Government Amendment (governance & planning) act 2016

Chapter 3, Section 8A  Guiding principles for councils

(1)       Exercise of functions generally

The following general principles apply to the exercise of functions by councils:

(a)     Councils should provide strong and effective representation, leadership, planning and decision-making.

(b)     Councils should carry out functions in a way that provides the best possible value for residents and ratepayers.

(c)     Councils should plan strategically, using the integrated planning and reporting framework, for the provision of effective and efficient services and regulation to meet the diverse needs of the local community.

(d)     Councils should apply the integrated planning and reporting framework in carrying out their functions so as to achieve desired outcomes and continuous improvements.

(e)     Councils should work co-operatively with other councils and the State government to achieve desired outcomes for the local community.

(f)      Councils should manage lands and other assets so that current and future local community needs can be met in an affordable way.

(g)     Councils should work with others to secure appropriate services for local community needs.

(h)     Councils should act fairly, ethically and without bias in the interests of the local community.

(i)      Councils should be responsible employers and provide a consultative and supportive working environment for staff.

(2)     Decision-making

The following principles apply to decision-making by councils (subject to any other applicable law):

(a)     Councils should recognise diverse local community needs and interests.

(b)     Councils should consider social justice principles.

(c)     Councils should consider the long term and cumulative effects of actions on future generations.

(d)     Councils should consider the principles of ecologically sustainable development.

(e)     Council decision-making should be transparent and decision-makers are to be accountable for decisions and omissions.

(3)     Community participation

Councils should actively engage with their local communities, through the use of the integrated planning and reporting framework and other measures.

 

Chapter 3, Section 8B  Principles of sound financial management

The following principles of sound financial management apply to councils:

(a)   Council spending should be responsible and sustainable, aligning general revenue and expenses.

(b)   Councils should invest in responsible and sustainable infrastructure for the benefit of the local community.

(c)   Councils should have effective financial and asset management, including sound policies and processes for the following:

(i)      performance management and reporting,

(ii)      asset maintenance and enhancement,

(iii)     funding decisions,

(iv)    risk management practices.

(d)   Councils should have regard to achieving intergenerational equity, including ensuring the following:

(i)      policy decisions are made after considering their financial effects on future generations,

(ii)     the current generation funds the cost of its services

 

 

Chapter 3, 8C  Integrated planning and reporting principles that apply to councils

The following principles for strategic planning apply to the development of the integrated planning and reporting framework by councils:

(a)   Councils should identify and prioritise key local community needs and aspirations and consider regional priorities.

(b)   Councils should identify strategic goals to meet those needs and aspirations.

(c)   Councils should develop activities, and prioritise actions, to work towards the strategic goals.

(d)   Councils should ensure that the strategic goals and activities to work towards them may be achieved within council resources.

(e)   Councils should regularly review and evaluate progress towards achieving strategic goals.

(f)   Councils should maintain an integrated approach to planning, delivering, monitoring and reporting on strategic goals.

(g)   Councils should collaborate with others to maximise achievement of strategic goals.

(h)   Councils should manage risks to the local community or area or to the council effectively and proactively.

(i)    Councils should make appropriate evidence-based adaptations to meet changing needs and circumstances.