Agenda of Strategy and Assets Committee

Minutes of the Strategy and Assets Committee

Meeting Date: Tuesday, 23 July 2019

Location: Council Chambers, City Administrative Centre, Bridge Road, Nowra

Time: 5.00pm

The following members were present:

Clr John Wells - Chairperson

Clr Joanna Gash

Clr Amanda Findley

Clr Patricia White

Clr Nina Digiglio

Clr Annette Alldrick

Clr John Levett

Clr Mitchell Pakes

Clr Greg Watson

Clr Bob Proudfoot

Mr Stephen Dunshea - Chief Executive Officer

Apologies / Leave of Absence

Apologies were received from Clr Gartner, Clr Guile and Clr Kitchener.

Confirmation of the Minutes

RESOLVED (Clr Gash / Clr White) MIN19.470

That the Minutes of the Strategy and Assets Committee held on Tuesday 11 June 2019 be confirmed.

CARRIED

Declarations of Interest

Clr Findley – CSA19.7 Processing of kerbside collected recycling – Confidential Report – less than significant non pecuniary interest declaration – Will leave the room and will not take part in discussion or vote – the Director of Shoalhaven Recycling is known to her.

Clr Levett – “SA19.93 Notice of Motion – Pedestrian / Cyclist Safety – Erowal Bay Road – less than significant non pecuniary interest declaration – will remain in the room and will take part in discussion or vote – his daughter, son-in-law and grandchildren reside in Erowal Bay.

Call Over of the Business Paper

The following items were called up for debate:

MMS19.3, SA19.91, SA19.92, SA19.95, SA19.96, SA19.98, SA19.99, SA19.100, SA19.101, SA19.102, SA19.104, SA19.105, SA19.107, SA19.108, SA19.110, CSA19.7.

SA19.93 and SA19.94 were initially resolved en bloc but were later reintroduced for debate.

The following items were resolved en bloc (Clr White/Clr Digiglio) at this time. They are marked with an asterisk (*) in these minutes:

SA19.97, SA19.103, SA19.106, SA19.109, SA19.111, SA19.112, SA19.113, SA19.114, SA19.115.

Mayoral Minutes

MMS19.3 Mayoral Minute - Farewell Carmel Krogh OAM

HPERM Ref: D19/211759

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council receive the report for information and congratulate Carmel Krogh OAM on her service to Council over the past 12 years.

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Gash) MIN19.471

That Council receive the report for information and congratulate Carmel Krogh OAM on her service to Council over the past 12 years.

CARRIED

Deputations and Presentations

SA19.91 - Notice of Motion - Safe Navigable Entrance - Sussex Inlet

Mrs Janis Natt, President, Safe Navigation Action Group, addressed the meeting and spoke for the recommendation.

SA19.96 - Hyams Beach - Peak Tourist Period Management - Progress Update

Mr Mark Crowther addressed the meeting and spoke against parts of the recommendation.

Mr Chris Alison, of the Hyams Beach Store & Café, addressed the meeting and spoke in favour of parts of the recommendation.

SA19.99 - Donation Request - Shoalhaven Art Society

Ms Alison Stewart, President of the Shoalhaven Art Society, addressed the meeting and spoke for the recommendation.

SA19.110 - Request - Emergency Helicopter Utilisation - Nowra Showgrounds

Ms Suzanne Harris, representing the Illawarra-Shoalhaven Local Health District, addressed the meeting and spoke for the recommendation.

Note: Mr Robert Hayward gave a deputation on item SA19.108 Solar Garden Update later in the meeting - see MIN19.482

Procedural Motion - Bring Item Forward

RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr White) MIN19.472

That the matter of the following items be brought forward for consideration:

SA19.91 - Notice of Motion - Safe Navigable Entrance - Sussex Inlet

SA19.99 - Donation Request - Shoalhaven Art Society

SA19.110 - Request - Emergency Helicopter Utilisation - Nowra Showgrounds

SA19.96 - Hyams Beach - Peak Tourist Period Management - Progress Update

CARRIED

Notices of Motion / Questions on Notice

SA19.91 Notice of Motion - Safe Navigable Entrance - Sussex Inlet

HPERM Ref: D19/222866

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That

1. The Chief Executive Officer report to Council regarding the possibility of having a preliminary design done aimed at achieving a reasonably safe navigable entrance for the River at Sussex Inlet.

2. Consideration also be given to the possibility of obtaining a grant to meet part of the cost of the study/design.

3. Council express concern to the relevant State Government Minister regarding St Georges Basin and River as an ICOLL in a Government map, as the River has never closed in recorded memory.

RESOLVED (Clr Watson / Clr White) MIN19.473

That

1. The Chief Executive Officer report to Council regarding the possibility of having a preliminary design done aimed at achieving a reasonably safe navigable entrance for the River at Sussex Inlet.

2. Consideration also be given to the possibility of obtaining a grant to meet part of the cost of the study/design.

3. Council express concern to the relevant State Government Minister regarding St Georges Basin and River being classified as an ICOLL in a Government map, as the River has never closed in recorded memory.

4. Council make the necessary correction to its Coastal Zone Management Plan so that the St Georges Basin and River (Sussex Inlet entrance) is not classified as an ICOLL.

For: Clr Wells, Clr Gash, Clr White, Clr Digiglio, Clr Alldrick, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Proudfoot and Stephen Dunshea

Against: Clr Findley and Clr Levett

CARRIED

SA19.99 Donation Request - Shoalhaven Art Society

HPERM Ref: D19/226232

Recommendation

That Council provide sponsorship of $2,500 to the Shoalhaven Art Society for the 54^th Annual Open Art Exhibition held from 3 to 31 August 2019, from the Unallocated Donations Budget.

RECOMMENDATION (Clr Proudfoot / Clr Alldrick)

That Council provide sponsorship of $2,500 to the Shoalhaven Art Society for the 54^th Annual Open Art Exhibition held from 3 to 31 August 2019, from the Holiday Haven Promotional Budget.

CARRIED

SA19.110 Request - Emergency Helicopter Utilisation - Nowra Showgrounds

HPERM Ref: D19/209106

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council agree to the request received from the Illawarra-Shoalhaven Local Health District (ISHLD) to use the Nowra Showground precinct for emergency medical helicopter patient transfer on limited occasions when the existing Helicopter Landing Site (HLS) at Shoalhaven Hospital cannot be used, subject to:

1. The use only being for the period associated with the redevelopment of the hospital;

2. The current hospital HLS continuing to be used as the primary HLS for the hospital and any use of the Showground being infrequent and only on limited occasions when the current HLS is not able to be used; and

3. ISHLD working with Council staff to refine and finalise the draft Operating Procedure for possible emergency helicopter operations at the Showground and ensuring that relevant procedures are in place (communications plan, indemnification etc) prior to any use.

RESOLVED (Clr Alldrick / Clr Gash) MIN19.474

1. The use only being for the period associated with the redevelopment of the hospital;

CARRIED

SA19.96 Hyams Beach - Peak Tourist Period Management - Progress Update

HPERM Ref: D19/169635

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council:

1. Note that given the complexity and expertise required to progress the following “long-term solutions”, separate reports to future Strategy & Assets meetings are being prepared, and that the outcomes of deliberations on those further reports will be consolidated into the Draft Hyams Beach Access and Management Master Plan:

a. Out of village parking: Actively pursue options for parking outside of Hyams Beach Village.

b. Options for traffic management long term: Feasibility, funding and installation of a permanent roundabout to ease traffic congestion and control access into Hyams Beach at peak holiday times.

c. Paid parking: Continue to actively investigate the viability of paid parking through the required traffic studies.

d. Illegal Camping and installation of a gate at Seamans Beach carpark: Installation of a gate on Seamans Beach carpark with associated options and costings, including locking toilets, additional disabled parking and additional line-marking.

e. Funding opportunities: Outcomes of the Restart NSW Environment and Tourism fund.

f. Smart Technology: EOI process to identify potential Smart Technology solutions to challenges faced in Hyams Beach peak tourist periods.

g. Additional parking in the village: There is mixed feedback about carparking and various options that have been discussed.

h. Amenities: Planned upgrades, timeframes and additional opportunities for improvements.

i. Footpaths and pedestrian access around the village: options and associated costs.

j. Community Hall: Community requests for access to the hall, identified challenges and associated costs.

2. Note that ultimately the Draft Hyams Beach Access and Management Master Plan will be presented to Council for adoption following a formal public consultation process.

RESOLVED (Clr Proudfoot / Clr White) MIN19.475

That:

1. Council:

a. Take all necessary steps to introduce paid parking and in the interim consider establishing a park and ride scheme.

b. Explore all funding opportunities, including the outcomes of the Restart NSW Environment and Tourism fund, to establish a footpath along Booderee Avenue and parking along Naval College Road.

2. Council note that given the complexity and expertise required to progress the following “long-term solutions”, separate reports to future Strategy & Assets meetings are being prepared, and that the outcomes of deliberations on those further reports will be consolidated into the Draft Hyams Beach Access and Management Master Plan:

a. Options for traffic management long term: Feasibility, funding and installation of a permanent roundabout to ease traffic congestion and control access into Hyams Beach at peak holiday times.

b. Illegal Camping and installation of a gate at Seamans Beach carpark: Installation of a gate on Seamans Beach carpark with associated options and costings, including locking toilets, additional disabled parking and additional line-marking.

c. Funding opportunities: Outcomes of the Restart NSW Environment and Tourism fund.

d. Smart Technology: EOI process to identify potential Smart Technology solutions to challenges faced in Hyams Beach peak tourist periods.

e. Additional parking in the village: There is mixed feedback about carparking and various options that have been discussed.

f. Amenities: Planned upgrades, timeframes and additional opportunities for improvements.

g. Footpaths and pedestrian access around the village: options and associated costs.

h. Community Hall: Community requests for access to the hall, identified challenges and associated costs.

3. Council note that ultimately the Draft Hyams Beach Access and Management Master Plan will be presented to Council for adoption following a formal public consultation process.

CARRIED

SA19.92 Notice of Motion - 2019 Fire & Rescue NSW - Firefighters Championships - Berry

HPERM Ref: D19/230987

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council

1. Support the 2019 Fire and Rescue NSW Firefighters Championships being held in Berry.

2. Allocate $3000 from the unallocated donations fund to support the running of the event.

RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr White) MIN19.476

That Council support the 2019 Fire and Rescue NSW Firefighters Southern Region Championships by way of a Sponsorship of $3000 from Shoalhaven Water.

CARRIED

HT19.4 SALT Reboot Program

HPERM Ref: D19/147648

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council:

1. Note that the Shoalhaven Homelessness Interagency is to facilitate an event to bring together relevant organisations, including business chambers and the Shoalhaven Professional Business Association, to receive information including a presentation on the Salt RE-BOOT Program and tour of existing homeless services.

2. By way of support of the RE-BOOT Program, write to the appropriate members of Parliament, including Local Members, to encourage their attendance at the Homelessness Interagency event.

3. Staff work with SALT to source possible opportunities for a building that may be capable of supporting the RE-BOOT program.

RESOLVED (Clr Digiglio / Clr Findley) MIN19.477

That Council:

2. By way of support of the RE-BOOT Program, write to the appropriate members of Parliament, including Local Members, to encourage their attendance at the Homelessness Interagency event.

3. Staff work with SALT to source possible opportunities for a building that may be capable of supporting the RE-BOOT program.

CARRIED

Procedural Motion - Reintroduction of Item

RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Wells) MIN19.478

That SA19.93 and SA19.94 be reintroduced for discussion to align with the Code of Meeting Practice.

CARRIED

SA19.93 Notice of Motion - Pedestrian / Cyclist Safety - Erowal Bay Road

HPERM Ref: D19/239993

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That a report come back to Council from appropriate Staff on the feasibility, options and costings of providing safe pedestrian and cycle access across the creek at the western end of Erowal Bay Road where it meets Naval Parade at the entrance to Erowal Bay Village.

RESOLVED (Clr Levett / Clr Proudfoot) MIN19.479

CARRIED

SA19.94 Notice of Motion - Local Government NSW Annual Conference - Motion

HPERM Ref: D19/241508

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Shoalhaven City Council puts a Motion to the Local Government NSW Annual Conference urging the State Government to change the Companion Animals Act so that domestic cats are no longer free to wander and are confined to the house of their owner and/or an appropriate meshed cat run.

RESOLVED (Clr Levett / Clr Wells) MIN19.480

CARRIED

Procedural Motion - Bring Item Forward

RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr White) MIN19.481

That the matter of item SA19.108 Solar Garden Update be brought forward for consideration.

CARRIED

SA19.108 Solar Garden Update

HPERM Ref: D19/193544

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council:

1. Receive the update report on the status of the Solar Garden Project

2. Endorse the Repower Shoalhaven funding model, whilst removing any further in-kind contributions made by Council.

3. Delegates authority to the CEO to negotiate the following with Repower Shoalhaven in relation to the Animal Shelter site:

· A lease for use of the land;

· A behind the meter energy cost (per KWh) to power the Animal shelter.

4. Note that any income from rent and ground maintenance related savings is to be directed into the newly established Council Revolving Energy Fund (MIN19.419), for investment in energy efficient projects by Council.

Motion (Clr Findley / Clr White)

That Council:

1. Receive the update report on the status of the Solar Garden Project

2. Endorse the Repower Shoalhaven funding model, whilst removing any further in-kind contributions made by Council.

3. Delegates authority to the CEO to negotiate the following with Repower Shoalhaven in relation to the Animal Shelter site:

· A lease for use of the land;

· A behind the meter energy cost (per KWh) to power the Animal shelter.

PROCEDURAL Motion (Clr Findley / Clr Gash)

That the standing orders of the Committee be suspended, and that Mr Robert Hayward representing RePower Shoalhaven give a deputation.

For: Clr Wells, Clr Gash, Clr Findley, Clr White, Clr Digiglio, Clr Alldrick, Clr Levett, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson and Stephen Dunshea

Against: Clr Proudfoot

CARRIED

Standing Orders suspended at 7.10pm

DEPUTATION

Mr Robert Hayward, representing RePower Shoalhaven, addressed the meeting and spoke in favour of the recommendation.

Standing Orders resumed at 7.15pm

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr White) MIN19.482

That Council:

1. Receive the update report on the status of the Solar Garden Project

2. Endorse the Repower Shoalhaven funding model, whilst removing any further in-kind contributions made by Council.

3. Delegates authority to the CEO to negotiate the following with Repower Shoalhaven in relation to the Animal Shelter site:

· A lease for use of the land;

· A behind the meter energy cost (per KWh) to power the Animal shelter.

For: Clr Wells, Clr Gash, Clr Findley, Clr White, Clr Digiglio, Clr Alldrick, Clr Levett, Clr Proudfoot and Stephen Dunshea

Against: Clr Pakes and Clr Watson

CARRIED

Report of the Homelessness Taskforce Shoalhaven - 17 June 2019

HT19.4 SALT Reboot Program

HPERM Ref: D19/147648

Item dealt with earlier in the meeting see MIN19.477

Reports

SA19.96 Hyams Beach - Peak Tourist Period Management - Progress Update

HPERM Ref: D19/169635

Item dealt with earlier in the meeting see MIN19.475

The following items were resolved en bloc and are marked with an asterisk (*):

SA19.97 Risk and Audit Committee Charter Amendments

HPERM Ref: D19/193770

RECOMMENDATION* (Clr White / Clr Digiglio)

That Council:

1. Receive the report.

2. Endorse the proposed amendments to the Risk and Audit Committee Charter.

CARRIED

SA19.98 Donation Request - Currarong Community Association - New Year's Eve Fireworks 2019

HPERM Ref: D19/184706

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council provide a donation of $5,000 to Currarong Community Association for their 2019 New Year’s Eve Fireworks, from the 2019/2020 Unallocated Donations Budget.

RESOLVED (Clr Watson / Clr White) MIN19.483

That Council

1. Provide a donation of $5,000 to Currarong Community Association for their 2019 New Year’s Eve Fireworks, from the 2019/2020 Unallocated Donations Budget.

2. Congratulate Currarong Community Association on their continuing support for the community and the visitors to Currarong in the holiday season.

CARRIED

SA19.99 Donation Request - Shoalhaven Art Society

HPERM Ref: D19/226232

Item dealt with earlier in the meeting.

SA19.100 Sustainability Initiatives

HPERM Ref: D19/238223

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That the Committee receive the Sustainability Initiatives report for information.

RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Gash) MIN19.484

That the Committee receive the Sustainability Initiatives report for information.

CARRIED

SA19.101 Sale of Council Land to RMS - New Shoalhaven River Bridge - Nowra

HPERM Ref: D19/212516

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Approve the sale of the following land parcels to the NSW Roads & Maritime Services. The land parcels to be compulsorily acquired at the agreed compensation of $2,618,500 (excl. GST):

a. Lot 1 DP1127316,

b. Lot 6 DP813461,

c. Lot 5 DP813461,

d. Lot 5 DP262460,

e. Lot 3 DP625514,

f. Lots 25, 29 and 35 DP1245213,

g. Lots 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26 and 31 DP1254210.

2. Accept, in addition to 1 above, compensation for disturbance (Sec 55(d)) under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act covering:

a. Council’s legal and valuation fees at cost

b. Playground equipment: $48,000 (Located on Lot 1 DP 1127316)

c. Toilet block: $120,000 (Located on Lot 7302 DP 1164490 being Crown Land)

3. Approve the granting of a temporary construction lease of the following land parcels to the NSW Roads and Maritime Services from 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2022 at a rental of $52,200 plus GST per annum:

a. Lots A & B DP158942,

b. Lot 11 DP1254213,

c. Lot 4 DP1254210,

d. Lot 5 DP1254210.

4. Require all costs associated with the sale of Council land parcels to be paid by Roads and Maritime Services;

5. Authorise the allocation of proceeds from part 1 above as follows:

a. $425,000 towards a new structure to house the “Shoalhaven flood boat”;

b. $930,000 (excl GST) repaid to the Industrial Land Development Reserve; and

c. The residual placed in the Property Reserve for future property acquisitions.

6. Approve the affixing of the Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to any documents required to be sealed, otherwise the Chief Executive Officer is authorised to sign any documentation necessary to give effect to the resolution.

RESOLVED (Clr Watson / Clr Gash) MIN19.485

That Council defer the item pending a detailed Councillor Briefing on the valuations and processes.

CARRIED

SA19.102 Update on Proposed Classification & Categorisation of Crown Land as a consequence of the Crown Land Management Act 2016

HPERM Ref: D19/172097

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council receive the report on progress to date regarding the classification and categorisation of Crown land under Council management and note that further reports will be provided in due course.

RESOLVED (Clr White / Clr Findley) MIN19.486

CARRIED

SA19.103 Options - Grant Funding Proposal - Currarong Road

HPERM Ref: D19/167542

RESOLVED* (Clr White / Clr Digiglio) MIN19.487

That:

1. Council note the new grant application proposal currently being prepared for a 4.2km section of Currarong Rd 7.5 to 11.7km (generally to the west of Lighthouse Road intersection) and that any grant offer will be reported to Council for consideration.

2. The CEO (Director Assets and Works) prepare a future report regarding the establishment and operation of a Roads and Bridges Grants Contribution Reserve for the purpose of matching large grant funding opportunities to upgrade Council’s roads and bridge assets.

CARRIED

SA19.104 Community Connect, Bawley Point to Kioloa shared pathway project - Lot 1 DP 782318 - Australian National University Licence to Shoalhaven City Council

HPERM Ref: D19/193885

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Enter into the Licence agreement with the Australian National University (ABN 52 234 063 906) for twenty (20) years at $1.00 (plus GST) per annum over part Lot 1 DP 782318, Murramarang Road, Kioloa commencing 1 June 2019;

2. Authorise the CEO to sign all documentation required to give effect to this resolution and to affix the Common seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to all documentation required to be sealed.

RECOMMENDATION (Clr Proudfoot / Clr White)

That Council:

CARRIED

SA19.105 Kerb & Gutter Construction - Ratepayer Advance - 35 Elizabeth Dr Vincentia

HPERM Ref: D19/190538

Recommendation

That

1. Council enter into a Ratepayers Advance Agreement, executed under the Seal of Council with G Antonelli of 21 Crescent Street, Dobroyd Point NSW 2045 in respect of Kerb and Gutter construction to the value of $5,852.16 (advance) of which $1,859.28 (excluding GST) is the contribution, $3,992.88 is the loan and the amount to be repaid to the Ratepayer in 5 years at 5% interest per annum is $4,991.10.

2. The Common Seal of Council of the City of Shoalhaven be affixed to any documentation required to be sealed otherwise the General Manager be authorised to sign any documentation necessary to give effect to the resolution.

RECOMMENDATION (Clr Proudfoot / Clr Wells)

That

CARRIED

SA19.106 Proposed Lease - 3 Stewart Place Nowra

HPERM Ref: D19/203225

RECOMMENDATION* (Clr White / Clr Digiglio)

That Council:

1. Accept the surrender of the lease with Alfred & Roslyn Parker for the occupation of part Lot 1 DP 115782 and part Lot 1 DP 434714 known as 3 Stewart Place Nowra (previously known as 1 Stewart Place Nowra);

2. Enter into a lease for three (3) years with three (3) year option with Franco & Narelle Fulginiti over part Lot 1 DP 115782 and part Lot 1 DP 434714 known as 3 Stewart Place Nowra, at a commencing rent of $18,712.44 per annum, plus GST, with an annual CPI increase, commencing 1 August 2019; and

3. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to sign all documentation required to give effect to this resolution and to affix the Common seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven where required to give effect to this resolution.

CARRIED

SA19.107 Notification to Council - EOI for Lease & Management of Building 3, 80 Park Road, Nowra - Authorisation of Lease

HPERM Ref: D19/203338

Recommendation

That:

1. Central Shoalhaven Mobile Preschool be offered a lease to occupy Building 3, 80 Park Road, Nowra;

2. Concurrence be granted to finalise the terms of the lease with Central Shoalhaven Mobile Preschool;

3. The Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority to endorse the terms of the lease, that are not yet settled; and

4. The Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven be affixed to any documents required to be sealed, otherwise the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to sign any documentation necessary to give effect to this resolution.

RECOMMENDATION (Clr White / Clr Wells)

That:

1. Central Shoalhaven Mobile Preschool be offered a lease to occupy Building 3, 80 Park Road, Nowra;

2. Concurrence be granted to finalise the terms of the lease with Central Shoalhaven Mobile Preschool;

3. The Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority to endorse the terms of the lease, that are not yet settled; and

CARRIED

SA19.108 Solar Garden Update

HPERM Ref: D19/193544

Item dealt with earlier in the meeting see MIN19.481

SA19.109 Processing of Kerbside Collected Recycling

HPERM Ref: D19/240943

RESOLVED* (Clr White / Clr Digiglio) MIN19.488

That Council consider a separate confidential report in accordance with Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993.

CARRIED

SA19.110 Request - Emergency Helicopter Utilisation - Nowra Showgrounds

HPERM Ref: D19/209106

Item dealt with earlier in the meeting see MIN19.474

SA19.111 Readoption of Council Policy for Waiving of Development Application Fees and Other Fees

HPERM Ref: D19/156401

RESOLVED* (Clr White / Clr Digiglio) MIN19.489

That Council place the policy on public exhibition for 28 days in accordance with section 610E (2) of the Local Government Act 1993.

CARRIED

SA19.112 Draft Shoalhaven Tree and Vegetation Vandalism Prevention Policy

HPERM Ref: D19/204489

RESOLVED* (Clr White / Clr Digiglio) MIN19.490

That Council

1. Place the Draft Shoalhaven Tree and Vegetation Vandalism Prevention Policy on public exhibition for a period of 28 days; and

2. Receive a report following the exhibition period outlining submissions received and any recommended amendments to the Draft Policy prior to adoption by Council.

CARRIED

SA19.113 Acquisition of Easement for Water Supply - Lot 174 DP755952 - 67 Wogamia Road Longreach

HPERM Ref: D19/173884

RECOMMENDATION* (Clr White / Clr Digiglio)

That Council:

1. Acquire an Easement for Water Supply 3m wide over part of Lot 174 DP755952, at 67 Wogamia Road, Longreach, shown coloured yellow on attached easement sketch plan.

2. Pay compensation of $20,000, plus GST if applicable, and reasonable legal costs associated with the acquisition in accordance with the provision of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, from Shoalhaven Water’s Water Fund. If warranted, the compensation is to be adjusted based on the area determined by final survey plan.

3. Authorise the Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven be affixed to any documentation requiring to be sealed and delegate to the Chief Executive Officer authority to sign any documentation necessary to give effect to this resolution.

CARRIED

SA19.114 Review Policy - Water and Sewerage Headworks Charges (Section 64 Contributions) Assistance for Developments

HPERM Ref: D19/231445

RESOLVED* (Clr White / Clr Digiglio) MIN19.491

That Council reaffirm its Water and Sewerage Headworks Charges (Section 64 Contributions) – Assistance for Developments Policy for the 2019/20 financial year or until Council adopts of new Development Servicing Plans.

CARRIED

SA19.115 Energy Management Update

HPERM Ref: D19/231792

RESOLVED* (Clr White / Clr Digiglio) MIN19.492

That the Committee receive the Energy Management Update report for information.

CARRIED

Confidential Reports

Pursuant to Section 10A(4) the public were invited to make representation to the meeting before any part of the meeting is closed, as to whether that part of the meeting should be closed.

No members of the public made representations.

RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr White) MIN19.493

That the press and public be excluded from the Meeting, pursuant to section 10A(1)(a) of the Local Government Act, 1993, to consider the following items of a confidential nature.

CSA19.7 Processing of kerbside collected recycling - Confidential Report

Commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.10(A)(2)(d)(i)

There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests.

CARRIED

The meeting moved into confidential the time being 7.55pm.

The meeting moved into open session, the time being 8.14pm.

There being no further business, the meeting concluded, the time being 8.14pm.

Clr Wells

CHAIRPERSON

Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 13 August 2019

Page 0

SA19.117 Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club Facility Update

HPERM Ref: D19/97008

Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group

Section: Recreation Community & Culture

Attachments: 1. Croquet Court Facility Construction Estimates ⇩

2. Concept Floor Plan ⇩

Purpose / Summary

1. To update Council on the progress of the delivery of the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club (MUCC) facility at Ulladulla Sports Park:

· Identify work to date

· Advise Council on the further investigations that are being undertaken to confirm if the site can be used to deliver a 4-court facility on the land identified for courts 3 and 4 (Stage 2)

· Seek a time extension to enable the delivery of Stage 1 in order to complete the further investigations.

Recommendation

That Council:

1. Accept the report for information.

2. Maintain status quo with the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club continuing to use the court at the Milton Showground, whilst further investigating to confirm the possibility for 4 courts at the Ulladulla Sports Park.

3. Receive a further report on outcomes of environmental investigation at Ulladulla Sports Park with the aim to definitively confirm the possibility of 4 courts at the site under the current legislation requirements.

Options

1. That Council

a. Accept the report for information

b. Maintain status quo with the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club continuing to use the court at the Milton Showground, whilst further investigating to confirm the possibility for 4 courts at the Ulladulla Sports Park.

c. Receive a further report on outcomes of environmental investigation at Ulladulla Sports Park with the aim to definitively confirm the possibility of 4 courts at the site under the current legislation requirements.

Option 1 is Recommended

2. That Council

a. Accept the report for information

b. Not proceed with the croquet facility at Ulladulla Sports Park and continue to provide the existing single court facility at the Milton Showground with no further enhancements.

c. Receive a further report on the use of the balance of $722,278 funds as a matter of priority.

Implications:

· This would cancel any further environmental investigation into the Ulladulla Sports Park site at this time.

· This will not meet the expectations of the MUCC user group, who have long petitioned Council for the need for additional courts to increase their membership

· Perceived by community to limit the development of croquet in the southern Shoalhaven, which is known to address community need for inclusion and belonging

· Cost savings to Council, with no requirement to seek additional funding of $644,159, and ability to reallocate the balance of funds, $722,278 to other community and recreation projects. A further report would be provided to Council on options for budget allocation.

· Shoalhaven will continue to feature a centre of excellence for croquet in Bomaderry. This is part of the Shoalhaven Community and Recreation Precinct Master Plan (SCARP) which is endorsed by Council and includes 4 croquet courts and associated infrastructure.

· The Milton Croquet Club would continue to use the Croquet Court at Milton Showground under the same arrangement with the Milton Showground Management Committee. The dedicated fee in the adopted Fees and Charges would continue and would be paid by MUCC annually to the Management Committee.

3. That Council

a. Allocate an additional budget of $644,159 to proceed with the delivery of Stage 1, despite the uncertainty of final outcomes of further environmental investigations to confirm the possibility of 4 courts at the facility. This would mean completion of Stage 1, which comprises 2 croquet courts, clubhouse and associated infrastructure at the Ulladulla Sports Park.

b. Receive a further report at the completion of the Review of Environmental Factors and Heritage Assessment investigations relating to courts 3 and 4 (Stage 2) of development at the Ulladulla Sports Park, noting that Courts 3 and 4 are currently unfunded.

c. When Stage 1 is complete, decommission the croquet court at Milton Showground and return to open space as part of the broader Milton Showground amenity.

Implications:

· Council will need to identify an expenditure source to provide an additional budget of $644,159 to deliver the project with 2 croquet courts as per Council’s previous resolution MIN17.788

· This would mean 2 courts would be built without confirmation that 4 could be delivered at the site. MUCC have confirmed in recent meetings that a 4-court facility is a priority and they would not be happy with only 2 courts long term.

· The Quantity Survey (costings) has been undertaken by an external consultant and has not been market tested, which would happen as part of the Request for Tender (RFT) process

· There are limited grant opportunities for single use facilities, therefore additional funding from external sources is unlikely

· Broader community may show dissatisfaction regarding the high expenditure for the site and single user group facility

· This site has capacity to deliver 4 courts contingent on the outcomes of the REF and Heritage Assessment. However, this is not in line with the expectations of the community user group

· The REF including Heritage Assessment (which may take up to 15 months including 12 months of environmental observation if required) has commenced for courts 3 and 4. This is proposed to run concurrently with the construction of 2 courts at the site.

· Subject to funding being allocated, a Request for Tender (RFT) for a 2-court facility, clubhouse and associated infrastructure, would be prepared and put to market via a RFT.

· Decommissioning the single croquet court at Milton Showground will provide additional space for showground users and meet the requirements of the Management Committee and Milton Show Society

· MUCC would no longer have an agreement with the Milton Showground Management Committee and would enter a lease at the new location. This is commensurate with arrangements Council has with Nowra Croquet.

4. That Council deliver a second croquet court at the Milton Showground as soon as possible and continue to liaise with stakeholders. When demand requires, report back to Council on options to deliver a further 2 additional courts at the site, making 4 in total.

Implications:

· A second court at Milton Showground can be built in a shorter timeframe than the current delivery time estimates for Ulladulla Sports Park.

· MUCC speculate the need for 4 courts in the future. This site has room to deliver Courts 3 and 4 at a later stage when demand requires; however, this is not in line with Council’s adopted Plan of Management (POM) which currently identifies only 2 courts.

· Potential conflict with existing user groups will need to be acknowledged and managed. This is not in line with the expectations of user groups and confirmed in recent discussions with the Management Committee and the Milton Show Society.

· This is inconsistent with the previous Council resolution (MIN17.788) and the expectations of the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club.

· Scoping and design works will need to be undertaken.

· Anticipated to have significant budget savings with the delivery of a single croquet court.

· The Milton Croquet Club would continue the same arrangement with the Milton Showground Management Committee. The dedicated fee in the adopted Fees and Charges would continue and would be paid by MUCC annually to the Management Committee.

5. Do not adopt the recommendation and provide an alternate direction in relation to the delivery of Croquet facilities in the Southern Shoalhaven.

Implications:

· The alternate direction of Council will be inconsistent with the previous Council resolution (MIN17.788) and the expectations of the Club

Briefing

Council staff had proposed to put a report to Strategy and Assets in April 2019 outlining the current status of this project, timelines and funding needed to deliver Stage 1. Due to the complexities of this project, a Councillor Briefing was held on 23 May 2019. Information contained in this report was presented to the Councillors attending the meeting and available through the Hub.

Following the Briefing, Council’s CEO and Acting Director of Finance, Corporate & Community Services have met separately with the 3 key stakeholder groups:

· MUCC, 28 June 2019

· Milton Show Society, 18 July 2019

· Milton Showground Management Committee, 18 July 2019

Background

In October 2016, Council’s Strategy and Assets Committee received a report in relation to croquet court expansion options at the Milton Showground. Community feedback was sought for this proposal. Council resolved not to support the expansion at Milton Showground and directed Council staff to identify an alternative location in consultation with community.

Currently, The Milton Croquet Club are not under lease and work under the Milton Showground Management Committee. There is a dedicated fee in the adopted Fees and Charges that is paid annually to the Management Committee.

Council staff reported the investigation to Council’s Ordinary Meeting on 26 April 2017.
At this meeting Council resolved (MIN17.323) to:

1. Decline the opportunity to construct a second croquet court at Milton Showground.

2. Actively work with Milton Croquet Club to relocate the croquet facilities to a suitable venue within 18 months. The new location is to contain sufficient land for construction of two courts and four courts in the future, a suitably sized club house, fencing of an area for four courts; car parking spaces, landscaping and other comparable facilities to those that the Club already has at the Milton Showground.

3. Establish a working group of available Councillors, Executive of Milton Croquet Club and Council staff to facilitate the relocation.

4. Allocate funding for project planning in 2017/2018; and construction of two croquet courts to commence in the first quarter of 2018/2019, with the courts and facilities completed by the end of the third quarter of 2018/2019.

5. Continue to work with the Showground Management Committee and owners adjacent to Milton Showground to formalise offsite parking options via a licence agreement to increase capacity for future large events at the Showground.

6. Review the Milton Showground Management Plan within 12 months, in consultation with the Showground Management Committee.

7. Advise both the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club & Milton Showground Management Committee of the above Council resolution.

8. Receive a further report on the financing options for the new facility.

Site Research

An extensive review was undertaken of Council owned or managed land in the Milton Ulladulla region for the purpose of a 4-court facility. 4 sites with potential for Croquet were reviewed by Council staff to identify the most suitable sites for the future of the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club; they were:

· Milton Pony Club

· Leo Drive Narrawallee

· Ulladulla Sports Park

· Milton Showground

The Milton Croquet Club were specific in their requirement that the site needed to be able to develop 4 courts. According to the table below, the only site other than the existing Milton Showground site that could develop 4 croquet courts and amenities is the Ulladulla Sports Park.

Following the Council resolution, the investigation undertaken by Council staff led to the identification of Ulladulla Sports Park as a suitable site due to the opportunity to develop 4 courts. However, the site came with constraints, as there was an existing Council stockpile which required relocation to enable construction of croquet courts. Nevertheless, the site was the preferred location and was ultimately supported by MUCC committee members and Council.

A subsequent report was considered by Council’s Strategy and Assets Committee in August 2017 to identify potential costings for the relocation of the stockpile site from Ulladulla Sports Park to the Council Depot and the development of the 2 courts and amenities.

MIN17.788 Council resolved that:

1. Council endorse the relocation of Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club Inc. from Milton Showground to Ulladulla Sports Park in line with Croquets requirements and Council MIN17.323

2. Council allocate $350,000 in the 2018/19 budget to undertake the relocation of the stockpile from Ulladulla Sports Park to the Ulladulla Council Depot once assessment is completed

3. Council allocate $765,000.00 to undertake a detailed design ($15,000) in the 2017/18 budget and development of two Croquet Courts at Ulladulla Sports Park ($750,000) in the 2018/19 budget.

4. Staff seek grant funding to assist in the delivery of this project.

5. If Council is not in a position to fund some or all of the project, that the timeline be reconsidered.

The allocated funding towards the removal of the stockpile was insufficient and additional costs have been incurred to complete this work. This impacted on the timeline and delayed the process of relocating the stockpile.

In October 2018, staff reported to Council in relation to the previous MIN17.323 (Item 4) regarding timeframes for delivery, requesting an extension due to the delays in the removal of the stockpile site. Council revised the timeframe for the construction of the croquet courts as detailed in Item 4 of MIN17.323.

Council resolved in October 2018 (MIN18.813) to:

1. Commence construction in fourth quarter of 2018/2019

2. Complete construction of the courts in second quarter of 2019/2020

Since this Council minute, Council staff have completed the relocation of the stockpile, a Review of Environmental Factors (REF) for Stage 1 delivery (2 courts only, clubhouse and associated infrastructure), and geotechnical investigations.

Additional issues where identified through this process and further affected the timing of the delivery of the project:

· Stockpile Relocation: The stockpile relocation was completed in February 2019, due to insufficient funding, the project was delayed until funds could be sourced and therefore resulted in the completion five months over schedule. The final cost for relocation was $443,207, $93,207 over the allocated budget.

· Contamination and Geotechnical Investigation: Council staff had engaged a consultant to undertake a contamination and geotechnical investigation. The investigation was to investigate potential contamination of the land resulting from a previous use of the site as a tea tree plantation which utilised effluent for irrigation purposes. The investigation is now complete, and no contamination has been found.

· Environmental Concerns: A Review of Environmental Factors, including Archaeological Factors, including Archaeological Factors for the delivery of Stage 1 (the first 2 courts, clubhouse and associated infrastructure) identified sensitive flora and fauna and potential heritage artefacts in the south eastern section of the site.

o Following discussions with MUCC, this resulted in changes to the orientation of the 2 courts, a means of moving forward with the Stage 1 of the project, with Stage 2 (Courts 3 + 4) subject to further studies and investigation in the future.

o The Club agreed to the modification as it would still result in the provision of 2 courts. This process required the design to be amended, which caused minor delays and extra costs. Below, Figure 1 shows the original design for the first 2 courts and Figure 2 shows the amended design avoiding potential environmental and archaeological / heritage concerns, which are still subject to further investigation.

Figure 1. Original design.

Figure 2. Updated design (post Stage 1 REF results).

o So that Council and MUCC have more certainty for future delivery of the additional 2 courts to complete the development of the full 4 courts, another REF is required to identify if there are any environmental or archaeological / heritage concerns for the site in the south east section.

o Stage 2 investigation and studies are estimated to cost $15,000 and will take approximately 15 months to complete, this will include 12 months of environmental monitoring, however this could change as investigations progress and should be considered as a guide only.

o These studies will not impact on any works that commence for Stage 1; however, the outcome of this further REF may impact on the future deliverability of Stage 2 (i.e. courts 3 & 4).

Further details of REF timelines for Stage 2 are detailed below:

· Review of Environmental Factors, including Archaeological Investigation (REF)

o Investigation into using an external consultant was estimated an additional 2 months. To avoid further delays, this is scheduled to be completed by Council staff and is in the current work plan.

o 3-4 months for environmental review, if significant species (flora or fauna) is found, estimated additional 12 months from discovery, if environmental monitoring will be required.

o If artefact found (highly possible) additional time will be needed, up to an estimated 9 months from discovery, to secure Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit (AHIP)

o Cost estimated to be a minimum $15,000 (based on previous costs)

o Scope of works, the requirement for this study and estimated timelines have been confirmed externally through a peer review process.

· Electrical Substation Upgrades: The review of the electrical capacity for the site identified that there is not enough power to support the proposed facility, including the clubhouse, floodlights and three-phase power.

An investigation to upgrade the pole-mounted substation was completed in March 2018. Council staff have identified a budget of $50,000, from the Active Recreation Minor Improvements Budget in 2019/20, to undertake the required upgrades to the substation.

This work commenced in May 2019 and will not have an impact on the development of the croquet courts. It is due for completion before the end of 2019.

The upgraded substation will increase capacity from 200kVA to 400kVA and will support the broader Ulladulla Sports Park.

· Irrigation: Council staff have investigated the opportunity of designing the irrigation system for the croquet courts to Council’s Recycled Effluent Management System (REMS).

Currently, Rugby League and AFL fields have REMS-supported irrigation, an upgrade to the filtration systems is necessary for additional irrigation systems to be added.

However, this is not an option for croquet at this time. A review of REMS irrigation will be addressed when Council staff update the site Master Plan. This will not be undertaken for the Croquet Court development.

To address the current inability to connect to REMS, staff have investigated connecting to town water for the irrigation system. This has required additional time and budget to complete the investigation.

An irrigation system has been designed and includes a tank and a pump system to provide adequate pressure for irrigation of the croquet courts. The costs for a tank and pump system were not included in the original cost estimates.

· Clubhouse and Grant Funding Opportunities: Council staff have been proactive in investigating grant opportunities. It was identified once detail design was completed that the funding would not be sufficient to provide clubhouse facilities. To date no grant funding has been achieved. In 2018, Council staff were unsuccessful in the Community Sport Infrastructure Grant for the clubhouse facilities.

The Clubhouse is estimated to cost $323,000 according to the cost estimates from the detail design, however this estimate is subject to confirmation at the time of Tender.

Council staff recently requested the assistance of the Club in a recent grant program, ‘My Community Project’. The grant program offered $20,000-$200,000 for eligible applications. The Club indicated that Council’s minute resolved to deliver the facility inclusive of the clubhouse and therefore believed it was Council’s responsibility to identify a budget to deliver on the Council minute. However, the Club have advised they are happy to provide letters of support for any submissions Council make.

Options have been considered to relocate the existing MUCC Clubhouse from Milton Showground to Ulladulla Sports Park; however, given the age and structural integrity of the building, this is not considered a viable option. This is not supported by MUCC as they have identified the need for a larger clubhouse to support their club’s needs.

Discussion have been held with Holiday Haven about the possibility to secure a cabin that is being decommissioned from their stock. This is dependent on the availability and suitability of a cabin as they turnover and replace ageing infrastructure. This remains a possible option.

Regional Croquet Facilities – a new approach

Council are currently finalising detailed design of the Artie Smith Oval, on Cambewarra Road Bomaderry, which is a component of SCARP. This design will deliver a regional centre of excellence for croquet with 4 new courts, carparking, clubhouse, and associated facilities such as storage areas, kitchen, outdoor areas. The Nowra Croquet Club, who currently occupy the facilities on Cambewarra Road, has 69 members, has its own webpage and is sponsored by local companies. They are active in grant writing and membership growth. Below is a breakdown of various courts and membership totals in the Shoalhaven, Illawarra and Southern Highlands.

Regional Croquet Clubs	Membership	Quantity of Courts
Nowra	69	Currently 2 Total of 4 at a new site (with SCARP)
West St	14	1
Milton Ulladulla	39	1 (with outcomes to be decided from this report)
Jamberoo	76	3
Narooma	24	1
Southern Highland	49	2
Wollongong	57	2

Community Infrastructure Strategic Plan (CISP)

Council has developed the Community Infrastructure Strategic Plan as an evidence-based approach to identify passive and active recreational infrastructure needs in the Shoalhaven. The future direction according to the CISP is that community infrastructure is built, upgraded or embellished on an “as needs” basis and as multi-purpose facilities wherever possible. SCARP is in line with the CISP. As part of the CISP, community consultation identified that people would prefer to see Council create and fund larger and higher quality facilities rather than several smaller facilities in more places. People also indicated that if such facilities existed, they are willing to travel.

A Regional Facility at Artie Smith

It is proposed that Council prioritise the Artie Smith site as a regional centre of excellence for croquet and maintain status quo with our other facilities at this time. This will provide opportunity for strategic grants and resource allocation.

Community Engagement

MUCC

Community and Recreation staff continue to meet and liaise with the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club to discuss the progression of the infrastructure project, including discussing the issues raised in this report. The club have provided a concept floor plan for the clubhouse facility and supported the reorientation of the revised layout for courts 1 and 2. In addition, monthly updates are provided prior to club meetings.

MUCC Registered membership, as of July 2019 reported on the NSW Croquet website, is reported to be 39 registered members.

Council’s CEO and Acting Director of Finance, Corporate and Community Services met with the executive and representatives of the MUCC on 28 June 2019. At this meeting the club reaffirmed their requirement for a 4 court facility at the Ulladulla Sports Park.

Milton Show Society

Council’s CEO and Acting Director of Finance, Corporate and Community Services met with representatives from the executive of the Show Society on 18 July 2019. At this meeting the Show Society reaffirmed their preference not to have a second croquet court at the Milton Showground, and for croquet in its entirety to be relocated to another site.

Milton Showground Management Committee

Council’s CEO and Acting Director of Finance, Corporate and Community Services met with the chair of the Milton Showground Management Committee on 18 July 2019. At this meeting the Chair reaffirmed their preference not to have a second croquet court at the Milton Showground, and for croquet in its entirety to be relocated to another site.

SCARP

Council have undertaken extensive community consultation over several years in relation to the SCARP facility. This includes ongoing consultation with the Nowra Croquet Club, who are in support of the project and are actively working with staff and seeking grant funding opportunities wherever possible.

Breakdown of Ulladulla Sports Park Croquet Facility Costs

Council voted an initial budget of $765,000 for the croquet facility and $350,000 for stockpile removal, totalling $1,115,000.

The initial cost estimates were $1,366,437 for a 2-court facility, inclusive of a clubhouse and associated infrastructure that meets the needs of the Club to deliver Stage 1 (being 2 croquet courts, 10 parking spaces including 2 accessible spaces, landscaping, drainage, irrigation, floodlighting, and clubhouse).

The project to date has cost Council $555,424, comprising:

· Stockpile removal $443,207 (this includes $93,207 for the stockpile over budget)

· Design, preliminary investigations (survey, REF, geotechnical) and project management have cost to date a total of $132,722

Some of the costs for the stockpile reallocation where covered by Council’s operational budget. At the time of writing this report, Finance have verified that the remaining budget for the construction of the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Facility is $722,278.

The revised cost estimate for Stage 1 is $1,942,366

· Works to date have cost a total of $575,929 (stockpile, design and investigation works etc)

· Balance of funds remaining in the job number is $722,278

· Current shortfall for Stage 1 of the project, including initial investigations for Stage 2, is $644,159

Should Council determine to undertake Stage 1 and later complete Stage 2, the construction of a further 2 courts (if permitted) is currently estimated to be an additional $461,866. (costings as at April 2019).

Hence, the total cost for a 4-court croquet facility with clubhouse and associated infrastructure (if decision to proceed to Stage 1 and 2) is estimated to cost $2,388,760 (based on costings as at April 2019).

The costs identified below are for delivery of Stage 1 only – 2 croquet courts, clubhouse and associated infrastructure.

Task	Estimated Costs as per Original Minute	Actual Budget Allocated as per Original Minute	*Actual, Commitment and Revised Estimated Costs**	Actual & Potential* Budget Shortfall
Stockpile Removal	$350,000	MIN 17.788 $350,000	$443,207	$93,207
Sub-total			$443,207
MUCC Clubhouse and Facilities Original budget including Detail Design Cost	$765,000	MIN 17.788 $15,000 Detail Design $240,000 Courts $500,000 Clubhouse	$1,366,437* Refer to Attachment 1 $168,723.50 - Bulk Earthworks $874,713.95 - Southern Car Park & courts 1&2 Refer to Attachment 2 $323,000 - Clubhouse as per MUCC design	$601,437*
Geotechnical Investigations	NIL	NIL	$9,230	$9,230
Project delivery Costs/REFS & Irrigation included (Stage 1)	NIL	NIL	$46,822	$46,822
Electrical Costs	NIL	NIL	$47,490	$47,490
Additional Design	NIL	NIL	$14,180	$14,180
Review of Environment Factors (for Stage 2 delivery)	NIL	NIL	$15,000	$15,000*
Sub-total			$1,499,159	$734,159
Less: Budget Transfer from Operational				$90,000
Total Shortfall					$644,159

Due to the procurement requirements of the Local Government Act 1993 which inform Council’s procurement procedures, staff could not proceed with a Request for Tender without an adequate allocated budget.

Financial Implications

Options	Total Money Spent to Date	Existing Budget	Additional Request	Project Total
Option 1 Accept the report for information, maintain status quo with the Milton Ulladulla Croquet Club continuing to use the court at the Milton Showground, whilst further investigation to confirm the possibility for 4 courts at the Ulladulla Sports Park. Report back to Council on outcomes of environmental investigation at Ulladulla Sports Park with the aim to definitively confirm the possibility of 4 courts at the site under the current legislation requirements.	$575,929 (including stockpile removal)	$722,278	NIL at this time pending outcomes of REF and further report to Council	$1,942,366 pending outcomes and future decisions of Council
Option 2: Accept the report for information and allocate an additional budget of $644,159 to proceed with Stage 1 - the delivery of the 2 croquet courts, clubhouse and associated facilities at the Ulladulla Sports Park. (Stage 1 only)	As Above	$722,278	$644,159	$1,942,366
Option 3: Deliver second croquet court at the Milton Showground as soon as possible and continue to liaise with MUCC. When demand requires, report back to Council on options to deliver two additional courts at the site.	As above	$722,728	$0	To be determined, however estimated to be within the remaining balance
Option 4: Maintain status quo. MUCC to continue to use the existing court at Milton Showground.	As above	$722,728	$0	$0 Future report on remaining balance, $722,728 reallocation to other active recreation priority projects.

Discussions have been held with Financial Services and at this time a funding source of $644,159 required to deliver Stage 1 of this project has not been identified. Should Council decide to proceed with the project, there are options to review projects that are funded in the recently adopted DPOP and potentially reallocate money to facilitate this project. Alternatively, Council could consider borrowing funding, however further investigations and a future report to Council would be required if this was a potential way forward.

4. If Council decide to remain status quo for MUCC at Milton Showground, there is a balance of $722,278 in funds that can be reallocated to other priority projects. Council staff will prepare a further report for Council to consider priority projects.

5. Given the uncertainty at this point in time around the ability of the Ulladulla Sports Park site to construct 4 croquet courts it is suggested that an appropriate way forward is to maintain the status quo with the MUCC remaining at Milton Showground on a single croquet court until the outcome of the REF is known.

6. It would not be appropriate to commit additional Council funding to this project without the certainty on the ability to deliver a 4-court facility that meets the MUCC expectations. A further report, and the associated funding implications, will be presented to Council when these investigations are completed.

Risk Implications

· The Review of Environmental Factors (REF) and Archaeological Factors was for Stage 1 only. If Council determine to proceed the Stage 2 REF may result in an inability to deliver Stage 2 (courts 3 and 4).

· If limitations occur and Stage 2 cannot be completed at the site, the growth of MUCC membership would be limited by infrastructure and is not in line with community expectations, and Council will have expended funds on a 2 court facility. The infrastructure project, as per MIN17.788, cannot be delivered without provision of additional budget. This is not in line with the expectations of the Club or the broader community.

· A funding source of $644,159 has not been identified in discussions with Financial Services, a review of the DPOP and currently funded projects would be required to facilitate securing this funding, however this may adversely impact on currently funded projects and community expectations.

· Whilst cost estimates are provided, these have not been market tested. There is a risk that actual costs will vary when the Tender goes to market. This will potentially impact the total budget costs.

· There is a risk that the MUCC may be divided on their aspirations. There is a risk that the club could split, and some will move to new facilities, if built, and some will request to stay at the Milton Showground. This will leave Council being responsible for two facilities.

Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 13 August 2019

Page 0

SA19.118 Council and local communities having greater access to School Facilities.

HPERM Ref: D19/77626

Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group

Section: Recreation Community & Culture

Attachments: 1. Collated Responses from Schools ⇩

2. Department of Education Policy - Community Use of School Faculties. ⇩

Purpose / Summary

To provide information to Council on the outcome of inquiries related to the potential for greater use of public-school facilities for the broader community in accordance with MIN17.645.

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council receive the report on investigation into the greater use of public-school facilities for broader community access for information.

Options

1. Council receive the report for information.

Implications: This will ensure Council understands that Public Education facilities are currently, and have provision to continue to be, utilised by the community.

2. Council provide an alternative resolution.

Implications: This is unknown.

Background

A Notice of Motion was put to the Ordinary Meeting in July 2017 relating to the following.

That

1. Council write to our local state members of parliament seeking their in-principle support for investigating ways that the wider community can have greater access to facilities in our public schools. This may include libraries, halls, meeting rooms and sporting fields

2. Our CCB’s, School Principals, P&Cs and Youth Advisory Committee be asked to contribute to the discussion and offer any ideas they may have regarding possible duplication of facilities

3. A report be provided to Council on where any local communities have embarked up a similar project in their area.

In relation to Part 1:

In August 2017 the then Director of Finance Corporate and Community wrote to local State Member of Parliament shortly after the Notice of Motion.

In relation to Part 2:

In August 2017 the then Director of Finance Corporate and Community wrote to public Primary and Secondary School Principals and P&Cs in the Shoalhaven requesting the following information.

“…… I seek your advice with respect to the application of the current NSW Department of Education Policy, Community Use of School Facilities Reference Number: PD/2009/0400/V03 and specifically advice as to how your school allows and encourages use of your facilities by the wider community.

Can you please advise

1. Do you actively encourage community groups using your facilities?

2. Do you currently have community groups utilising the school facilities and during which days and hours?

a. If so what types of activities take place?

b. What groups use the facilities?

c. What are the rules / restrictions?

3. How do you determine what activities are permissible?

4. What fees if any are in place?”

Council received eight (8) responses from Primary Schools only. The collatedresponses are attached to this report, see Attachment 1. The inquiry showed that of the schools who responded, they allow community groups to use their facilities and have current hirers. Groups are using them for a broad range of community projects and programs. Anecdotally, it has also been reported that our high schools currently also hire to groups such as karate and dance classes.

In addition, Council currently have a licence with two local high schools, Nowra and Shoalhaven High, for use of their sporting facilities for the community. Nowra High had been utilised by Cricket and Shoalhaven High School is utilised by Athletics. Council pays a yearly fee to the Department of Education for both sites and undertakes mowing and maintenance at Nowra High.

In relation to Consultative Community Bodies hiring and utilising facilities, Executive Strategy along with Council’s Booking Officer often direct community members to the Department of Education Facilities if Council owned facilities are not suitable or unavailable.

In relation to Part 3:

The NSW Education System provide and encourage the use of their facilities outside school times such as halls and sports fields. The Department of Education has a policy, which is attached to this report, Attachment 2, regarding the Community Use of School Facilities.

From our inquiries, public schools are readily available and are being utilised by our communities. The Department of Education’s website https://education.nsw.gov.au/policy-library/policies/community-use-of-school-facilities has significant resources to enable and assist the public for this to occur.As it is common practice for schools to allow access to facilities for community groups, there are many communities across NSW who make use of this service.

Library

In relation to the use of school libraries by the public, our investigation indicated there were two examples in NSW that were started but are no longer operating due to a number of factors such as: working with children checks, having access to the libraries out of school hours, and the content of school libraries not meeting the requirements of the public.

The NSW Teachers Federation’s current position on joint use libraries is:

1. That the school library and the public library are two separate concepts with different, although complementary, roles.

2. That school libraries and public libraries make two separate systems, neither of which is fully developed on the Australian scene.

3. That any process of amalgamation - whether it be glorified by the name “community library” or not - which attempts to web the concepts of school and public library will only make certain that neither system is ever fully developed.

This advice was presented to Councillors in August 2017 during a Councillor Briefing on libraries.

A poll was undertaken by the South Coast Register in August 2017 regarding community having access to school libraries halls etc with the results below.

The Youth Advisory Committee

The Youth Advisory Committee, at their meeting on 26 July 2017, discussed the Notice of Motion. The committee thought that this was a good idea and offered their support formally.

At the time, the YAC committee were considering annual partner funding grant applications from their budget. These projects are implemented to provide programs, projects and activities for young people in the LGA.

The committee resolved to fund an application from Ulladulla High School’s P&C for some bike racks outside the high school, commenting that they felt that this showed good faith and a good example of how facilities could be better utilised by the whole community.

Community Engagement

Council will continue to seek opportunities and inform the public, as well as internal staff, of the potential of schools for hiring as the need arises.

Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 13 August 2019

Page 0

SA19.123 Traineeship, Apprenticeship and Cadetship Programs

HPERM Ref: D19/227953

Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group

Section: Human Resources, Governance & Customer Service

Purpose / Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide further information on Council’s Traineeship, Apprenticeship and Cadetship Programs in response to a Notice of Motion submitted to the Ordinary Meeting held on 25 June 2019.

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council receive the report on Traineeship, Apprenticeship and Cadetship Programs for information.

Options

1. As recommended above.

Implications: Nil

2. Council resolves otherwise.

Implications: Unknown as dependent on resolution.

Background

A Notice of Motion was submitted at the Ordinary Meeting of 25 June 2019 seeking further information regarding Council’s Traineeship, Apprenticeship and Cadetship Programs. Council subsequently resolved (MIN19.413):

That the General Manager (Finance Corporate and Community Services) provide a report to Council that:

1. Provides details of the current traineeship, apprenticeship and cadetship programs within Council; and

2. Identifies any opportunities for potential expansion of current programs in place.

Council has a number of youth employment programs and initiatives in place including:

(i) Traineeship and Apprenticeship Programs through Hunter Valley Training Company

(ii) Student Work Placement Program through Workplace Learning (Illawarra, Shoalhaven, Southern Highlands)

(iii) Cadetship Program

(iv) High School Student Work Experience Program and University Internship opportunities

(v) Participation in the University of Wollongong Careers Expo and individual school Careers Expos to promote the opportunities within Council

(vi) Mock interview program at local high schools

(vii) Creation of & participation in Shoalhaven Aboriginal and Youth Employment Forum (SAYE)

In accordance with the above resolution, this report will focus primarily on the programs detailed in (i) to (iii) above.

Traineeship and Apprenticeship Programs (through Hunter Valley Training Company)

Council Traineeship and Apprenticeship Programs are run through Hunter Valley Training Company (HVTC) with Council taking on the role as host employer. The benefits of placing traineeship and apprenticeship programs through HVTC include the following:

· Allows Council to leverage HVTC’s expertise in managing the whole apprenticeship or traineeship cycle

· HVTC is a specialist in Vocational Education and Training regulations and requirements

· HVTC manage competency-based completions and progression, training plan and RTO requirements

· Provide support in the unique challenges of working with youth

· Address any performance management issues

· Handle all employment related matters including payroll processing

Council provides a large number of opportunities per annum under these programs as can be seen in the table below.

Table 1: Number of traineeships and apprenticeships

Cal Year	No. of new trainees that commenced	No. of new apprentices that commenced	Total No. trainees and apprentices – ongoing & new	No. new trainees/ apprentices who identified as indigenous	No. who secured ongoing position within Council
2014	15	0	15	3	9
2015	28	6	38	3	5
2016	26	4	57	4	12
2017	28	6	58	8	12
2018	27	8	61	4	12
2019	26	8	68	7	8

Table 2: Qualifications provided under Traineeship and Apprenticeship Programs

Certificate II in Water Industry Operations

Certificate II in Conservation and Land Management

Certificate II in Civil Construction

Certificate II in Construction Pathways

Certificate III in Carpentry

Certificate III in Civil Construction

Certificate III in Painting and Decorating

Certificate III in Electronics and Communications

Certificate III in Horticulture

Certificate III in Arboriculture

Certificate III in Electrotechnology Electrician

Certificate III in Engineering - Mechanical Trade

Certificate III in Light Vehicle Mechanical Technology

Certificate III in Engineering - Fabrication Trade

Certificate III in Water Industry Operations

Certificate III in Information, Digital Media and Technology

Certificate III in Surveying and Spatial Information Services

Certificate III in Business Administration

Certificate IV in Business Administration

Work Placements Program (through Workplace Learning)

Council is a host employer for industry-based VET (Vocational Education and Training) courses students choose as part of their studies for the Higher School Certificate. The table below provides details of the number of placements at Shoalhaven City Council.

Table 3: No. Work Placements (data available and provided by Workplace Learning)

Calendar Year	No. Students
2019	15
2018	20
2017	28

Cadetship Program

Council currently has 10 cadet positions (persons studying degree qualifications) across the organisation in the areas of:

· Planning and Development,

· Environmental Services,

· Engineering, accounting,

· IT/GIS and

· Human Resources.

The organisation provides generous study support as part of this program.

Opportunities for potential expansion

Council already has in place extensive traineeship, apprenticeship and work placement programs. In considering any potential expansion of these programs consideration needs to be given to the current and potential capacity of the organisation and funding available as it is critical that appropriate on-the job supervision and training is provided to these young people to ensure:

· Appropriate coaching and mentoring is provided;

· They receive relevant on the job experience and obtain required competencies;

· They are safe in our workplace.

Council currently operates its traineeship and apprenticeship programs through HVTC as its does not have the capacity to manage these programs (and associated requirements) in-house. A large proportion of the current traineeships and apprenticeships are within the outdoor workforce and therefore consideration is being given to any further traineeship opportunities within customer service and administrative functions. Just recently Council has taken on additional new administration trainees. Council is also working with HVTC and SAYE to identify opportunities to increase the application rate of indigenous youth.

Council is constantly monitoring opportunities for cadetships as part of a ‘grow your own strategy’ for positions where Council is unable to attract qualified resources; however, such programs can be been restricted at times by the tertiary course offerings available locally. Some key initiatives to date have included:

· Graduate engineering positions offered within Shoalhaven Water and Assets and Works;

· Grade range positions to allow people to commence or continue with formal study to obtain qualifications and gain experience within the workplace at the same time and be provided the opportunity to progress and be rewarded as they achieve their qualifications and experience.

Council has a policy position that is very supportive in relation to both study time and financial assistance to cadets. Council is continuing to actively identify opportunities to bring young people into the organisation as it is very cognisant of the current age profile of the workplace and the challenges that will present to the organisation in the future. However, it is always a balance with ensuring there are adequately qualified and experienced people within the organisation to ensure Council can maintain service levels to the community, deliver key infrastructure and not place the organisation at unnecessary risk.

Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 13 August 2019

Page 0

SA19.125 Comerong Island Ferry - Service Review

HPERM Ref: D19/176914

Group: Assets & Works Group

Section: Commercial Services

Attachments: 1. Comerong Island Ferry History ⇩

2. Comerong Island Land Holdings ⇩

3. Comerong Island Ferry Ramps ⇩

4. Extract from Transport Maritime Navigation Map ⇩

5. Email Extract - Tono Group ⇩

6. Letter to Residents ⇩

7. Comerong Island Ferry Usage Graph ⇩

8. Comerong Island Ferry User Survey ⇩

9. Example - Submission ⇩

Purpose / Summary

This report allows Council to consider the operation of the Comerong Island ferry service given the age of the current vessel named the “Cormorant”.

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That

1. Council notes that the key aspects of the current Comerong Island Ferry arrangements are as follows:

a. The service operates between 6am and 10pm, 7 days a week, with afterhours call out service available to residents on the island. This call out fee is $120/hour, and this charge is not in Council’s “Fees and Charges Document”.

b. The Ferry has a design load limit of 36 tonnes but, given its age, has been operating at a 20-tonne limit since 2010. This limit is sufficient to service the maintenance needs of Council, the response needs of the Rural Fire Service (RFS) and general truck needs of residents (i.e. water delivery). Loads larger than 20 tonnes need to be broken down or special punt arrangements need to be made by the entity requiring the larger load.

c. The current ferry is approaching the end of its life and is due for replacement, preferably before the next “out of water service” which his due in November 2020.

d. The service is operated via a contract with Tono Group Pty Ltd which commenced on 19 July 2017 and will conclude on the 30 June 2022. The cost to operate and maintain the Ferry is approximately $420,000 per year (including depreciation).

e. The residents, their visitors and contractors travel at no cost. For other visitors to the island, the cost of a return ticket is $10, payable by EFTPOS only.

f. The income generated from the return ticket arrangement is approximately $19,000 (exc. GST) per year.

g. The residential property which used to be available to the operator at no cost is now available at “market rates”, and if the operator wants to utilise the residence they were required to build that into their costing structure.

2. Council endorse the current Comerong Island Ferry operating arrangements (described by the contract with Tono Group Pty Ltd) as being the preferred arrangements to operate the ferry and that the Chief Executive Officer (Director Assets and Works) take the necessary steps to replace the existing Comerong Island Ferry with a vessel that has a load limit of 20t and dimensions capable of carrying at least two passenger vehicles or a council grader, or a tipper truck or a 13 tonne fire truck, prior to November 2020.

3. The CEO (Director Assets and Works) look to make savings by reviewing the operating times and usage costs and report back to Council.

Options

1. Business as usual option – Council subsidised

Replace the ferry with a vessel that has a load limit of 20t and dimensions capable of carrying at least two passenger vehicles or a council grader, or a tipper truck or a 13-tonne fire truck. With Council continuing to budget for a user income of approximately $19,047 (exc GST per year).

Implications: Tenders for the supply of a new ferry will need to be called and Council will still be exposed to an annual cost to operate the ferry of approximately $420,000 (inc depreciation) per year.

Recommendation:

1. That Council endorse the current Comerong Island Ferry operating arrangements (described by the contract with Tono Group Pty Ltd) as being the preferred arrangements to operate the ferry and that the Chief Executive Officer (Director Assets and Works) take the necessary steps to replace the existing Comerong Island Ferry with a vessel that has a load limit of 20t and dimensions capable of carrying at least two passenger vehicles or a council grader, or a tipper truck or a 13 tonne fire truck, prior to November 2020.

2. The CEO (Director Assets and Works) look to make savings by reviewing the operating times and usage costs and report back to Council.

2. Business as usual option – User Pays

Replace the ferry with a vessel that has a load limit of 20t and dimensions capable of carrying at least two passenger vehicles or a council grader, or a tipper truck or a 13-tonne fire truck. With the cost of the service being predominately covered by a user pays system.

The following 2 scenarios provide some very rudimentary numbers for illustrative purposes:

2.1 Assuming 15,500 vehicle trips a year and an annual operating cost of cost (including depreciation) of $420,000 per year plus an annualised “out of water” service of $80,000 ($400,000/5), each trip would cost $32.30 (i.e. $500,000/15,500). If the concrete remaps are included this would be an additional $1.20 per trip, i.e. $441,750*2/50 years/15,500 vehicles.

2.2 The Total General Rate income from Comerong Island is currently $36,770. Assuming that 10% of visits are not rateable property visits (i.e. tourists) Council could seek to recover 90% of $420,000, i.e. $378,000, by applying a special rate levy. Using simple maths to provide a guide $378,000/27ratepayers = $14,000, obviously the actual figure is more complicated than this.

Implications: This option would need further substantial development and consultation and has not been explored in detail in this report. If Council was serious about a higher cost recovery from users option, operating “essentials” and “priorities” may change.

The recommendation to pursue an option along these lines would be:

“That CEO prepare a report outlining options for a user pay approach to operate the Comerong Ferry based on a vessel that has a load limit of 20t and dimensions capable of carrying at least two passenger vehicles or a council grader, or a tipper truck or a 13 tonne fire truck, operating between 6am and 10pm, 7 days a week, with afterhours call out service available to residents on the island, and such report be presented to a future meeting of Council for consideration before wider community consultation occurs and any final decision is made. Tender documents for such a vessel are to be prepared at the same time.”

3. Buy back Option

Implement Option 1 but with a sunset clause on the operation of the ferry and progressively implement a property buy back strategy which would seek to return the island to a wilderness state with no ferry service provided.

The following scenario illustrates this option in a very basic manner:

3.1 Assuming that the annual Council “whole of life costs” to service the Comerong Island including the access ramps, ferry and road network on the island and all operating costs is say $600,000

3.2 The total property value of all the privately-owned land on the Comerong Island is valued at approximately $31,000,000.

Thus, using very basic maths as a ballpark guide the payback period of any buy back option would be in the order of 52 years (i.e. $31,000,000 / $600,000).

Implications: This option would need further substantial development and consultation and has not been explored in detail in this report. If Council was serious about a buy back option, a detailed business case, financial analysis and legal process would need to be prepared. Financing costs and asset decommissioning costs would add to the payback period.

The recommendation to pursue an option along these lines would be;

“That CEO prepare a business case report outlining the possibility of buying back the existing private holdings on Comerong Island including an estimate of a payback period (due to saving in providing access etc) , and such report be presented to a future meeting of Council for consideration before wider community consultation occurs and any final decision is made.”

4. Further Consideration Option

That the CEO make arrangements to conduct the out of water service on the existing ferry (scheduled for November 2020) and conduct a workshop involving all Councillors and appropriate staff to discuss the future management of the Comerong Island Ferry.

Implications: This option does not involve a wider audience in the process initially as this can raise expectations and concerns, community consultation would be a matter explored at the workshop, and it is conceivable that further wider meeting(s) may be an outcome of any workshop.

Background

At the Strategy & Assets Committee on 17 April 2018 the Committee resolved (MIN18.268):

“That:

1. Council retain the current services to Comerong Island.

2. Council defer the replacement of the ferry until a councillor briefing has been held.

3. A Councillor familiarisation tour to Comerong Island be organised.

4. The National Parks and Wildlife Service and Rural Fire Service be invited to the councillor briefing for comment.”

On 11 December 2018 a familiarisation tour was organised for Councillors. The familiarisation tour allowed staff to brief Councillors on the capacity of the existing ferry service to facilitate firefighting responses, and inspect the assets (ferry, ramps, road etc) and thus this report is now provided.

Report

Council provides a ferry service to Comerong Island from the mainland at Numbaa and a timetable can be located on Council’s website by following the link below:

https://www.shoalhaven.nsw.gov.au/Discover-Shoalhaven/Getting-around

The ferry links the road network between these locations, which are formed and maintained by Council.

The stretch of water between the mainland and the island is manmade and is approximately 165m long. It provides the only navigable water from Shoalhaven River, via Greenwell Point to the ocean and the canal is heritage listed as Australia’s first man-made canal.

Ferry History

Robyn Florance Ass/Dip LAH (UNE) has researched and prepared a history of The Comerong Island Ferry and this is attached for Councillors information (see Attachment 1).

It appears that in 1883 a small horse drawn punt was “gifted” to the Comerong Island residents by the Minister for Works.

The ferry was vested in the South Shoalhaven Council in 1905 and thus some form of Government ownership/responsibility has occurred since about that time.

The current ferry service is provided by a vessel named the “Cormorant”. It was commissioned sometime around 1945 and thus is approximately 74 years of age. It has been in service with Shoalhaven City Council since 1 June 1993

The ferry is the maintained link between the mainland and the island for the island residents; a sand connection exists to Shoalhaven Heads. The western side of the island has numerous private property ownerships and the eastern side is a Nature Reserve, managed by the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS). There are some basic services on the island for visitors.

Vehicle access via the sand beach was available and used for public access about 25 years ago before Comerong Island National Park was gazetted.

Island Arrangements

Attachment 2 shows the current land holdings on the island and lists their ownership as private or government department and land size.

Currently there are 27 private properties on the island with a total value of these properties being approximately $31 million.

Approach Ramp and Cable Facilities

The current arrangement provides two concrete ramps at either end of the cable and a photo of this arrangement is provided in Attachment 3.

The cable is set at 2.4m below the low tide level. This cable restricts large vessel access to the Shoalhaven River and on occasions it must be lowered to allow for passage, which can be done on request. The cable is noted on navigation charts as per Attachment 4.

The ramps are approaching the end of their life and are likely to cost of the order of $441,750 per ramp to replace. No capital reserve has been set aside for this liability.

The cable offers easy operation in the relatively fast flowing waters and facilitates the drive on drive off arrangement.

Ferry Infrastructure

The “Cormorant” was formerly a spare ferry of the South Australian Roads Board, working on the Murray River, and was designed to carry a maximum load of 35 tonnes.

The ferry can carry vehicles and operates by pulling itself along a submerged cable that is anchored at each end. It is currently rated to carry a maximum of 6 passenger vehicles or 20t; this reduction in load capacity occurred in 2010. The ferry currently only carries one or two vehicles per trip, although there is intermittent need for maintenance and commercial operation vehicles.

The 20t carrying capacity caters for the realistic needs of Council and the RFS (i.e. can carry a grader, or tipper truck, or fire truck). At the RFS Strategic Planning Committee meeting (6 December 2018) the RFS confirmed that 13 tonne vehicles would be dispatched as a first response and this could be backed up by two other similar vehicles from different stations. The closest three stations that would provide an initial response are as follows:

Station	Vehicles	Response Times
Greenwell Point	Category 1 Tanker	10 mins
Culburra	Category 1 Tanker	17 mins
West Nowra	Category 1 Tanker	15 minutes

Should a larger project, commercial or emergency need arise other access and response vehicles would be accessed, and this would typically be at the expense of those who provided that service or generated that need.

It worth noting that the cable ferry option also “ties” the ferry operation to the current location and rules out future different or supplementary services from Shoalhaven Heads or Greenwell Point.

Attachment 5 is an email from the Tono Group (the current ferry operator) outlining their suggestions with regard to the operation of the ferry service and infrastructure into the future; these include suggestions in relation to:

· The size of the ferry and maintenance needs of the ferry

· Comments about the ramps and the benefits of boom gates

· The cottage use, and the faster response time that would result if the cottage was included in the contract for use by the operator

· Display boards, toilets, and BBQ facilities to increase patronage and thus revenue

Contract Arrangements

Council has a 3-year (maximum 5 years) contract with Tono Ferry Services Pty Ltd to operate the ferry. The end of the third year is 30 June 2020 and the end of the fifth year period would be 30 June 2022.

Under the previous contract (expired 1st July 2017), the ferry operator was able to live in the dwelling adjacent to the ferry at no rent for the term of the contract. The new contract removed this arrangement and the property is now rented at market value, providing an additional revenue source.

Towards the end of 2018 this matter was a point of contention with residents when it became apparent to them that operators of the ferry could have to travel from Nowra and this would add to the time for an emergency response to be provided.

The following contract provisions currently apply as per Section 5 Ferry Service

“l) The contractor shall operate the Ferry outside the core hours to provide access to or from the island in emergency situations. The contractor must supply, maintain and advertise a 7 day / week and 24 hours / day contact phone number for this purpose and respond to all requests within a reasonable time. Services provided outside the core hours will be paid as outlined in the Schedule of Rates.”4

The actual callout rate is $120/hr and would operate from the time the operator left their home until the time they return.

The contract is unclear in that it refers to “a reasonable time”, does not state who pays the callout, and is silent on the calculation of each callout cost.

The situation where the dwelling adjacent to the ferry was at no rent for the term of the contract meant that emergency situations were covered by the operator at no additional cost.

In January 2019 the Director Assets and Works sent two letters to residents outlining these arrangements, those letters are provided as Attachment 6.

Financial Summary

A summary of the operating costs of the ferry is below:

Financial Year	Income (exc GST)			Expenditure (exc GST)
Financial Year	Ferry	House	Total	Expenditure (exc GST)
12/13	$13,275	$0	$13,275	$377,878.28
13/14	$13,363	$0	$13,363	$377,683.82
14/15	$14,753	$0	$14,753	$311,244.13
15/16	$15,464	$0	$15,464	$526,537.17¹
16/17	$17,361	$0	$17,361	$367,943.67
17/18*	$19,526	$12,059	$31,585	$416,691
18/19	$20,736*	$11,070	$31,806	$423,386

^*YTD

¹ Includes out of water survey and hull maintenance

The current year (19/20) operating budget is $392,630 (exc GST and depreciation). A majority of the cost is payment to the contractor to operate the ferry. The balance is for maintenance, insurance and registration. In addition, Council’s long term financial plan allows for ‘out of water’ servicing every 5 years, with an allocation of $15,000 in 19/20 for preliminaries, and $400,000 for 20/21. Each rolling 5 year cycle each year is indexed by CPI. The previous out of water survey and hull maintenance was in November 2015 and the out of water servicing cost for this exercise was $200,000, given the pending “retirement” of the ferry. It is uncertain, until the vessel is removed from the water, as to the extent of maintenance that is required, so the costs can vary from service to service.

Current Service

The ferry is operated between 6am and 10pm every day, with afterhours call out service available to residents on the island. The residents, their visitors and contractors travel at no cost. For other visitors to the island, the cost of a return ticket is $10, payable by EFTPOS only.

It currently takes five (5) minutes for the ferry to load, travel and unload for a single crossing.

The graphs in Attachment 7 show the number of vehicles carried by the Ferry for FY12-13 to FY 17/18 (up to January 18).

In summary:

· The total number of vehicles using the service annually is approximately 15,500 (average). Thus, the total income should be approximately 15,500/2*10=$77,500.

· Revenue is of the order of $19,000 exc GST (approx. 30% of what is could be if everyone paid)

· Use is higher between 9am and 3pm;

· There is low utilisation after 8pm.

The island residents and their visitors generated the bulk of ferry patronage.

Council Obligations

In regard to the provision of the ferry service to the community, Council’s obligations are governed by the Local Government Act (LG Act) and Roads Act.

There do not appear to be any statutory obligations for Council to provide the service, although there are a number of factors, with respect to these Acts, that need to be considered:

· In accordance with the Roads Act, the ferry is regarded as a “road-ferry” and therefore a “road” under the Act;

· Section 24 of the LG Act, indicates the provision of a ferry service is discretionary, but Council needs to make responsible decisions in considering removing or reducing the service. Relevant matters include:

Ø Emergency egress (bushfire, flood);

Ø Provision of emergency vehicle access to the island; and

Ø Access for utility providers, including Council’s own maintenance responsibilities of the public road network on the island.

· General requirement to ensure all residential lots have legal and practical access; and

· Council is able to charge a “toll” or fee for the use of the ferry.

Vessel Inspection Requirements

Vessels in commercial use in Australia require a Certificate of Survey and require regular inspections. The certificate is required by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA).

The Cormorant is classified as a ‘high risk’ vessel because it is able to carry up to 12 people, which includes 2 crew. This classification influences the maintenance and inspection regime.

The classification categories are provided can be found in the following link:

https://www.amsa.gov.au/vessels-operators/domestic-commercial-vessels/vessel-classes-and-service-categories

To keep the Certificate of Survey, the vessel is inspected by the AMSA approved surveyors every year in the water. In addition, there is a requirement for one ‘out of water’ inspection every 5-years. This has evolved from annual inspections to inspections every two years, to every three years, approval to conduct inspections greater that every five years are expected to be difficult to obtain.

Council’s budget provides for inspections every 5 years (2021 $400,000; 2025 $440,000; 2029 $480,000). These inspections need to be done by lifting the vessel out of the water with a crane. The cranage cost alone can exceed $60,000 for each out of water inspection.

The next “out of water service” is due in November 2020.

Basic Cost Saving Analysis

Ferry Size

ARUP (Consulting Engineers) was engaged to consider a number of ferry configuration options and recommended that the current on-chain ferry was best solution for the current Comerong Island service, although there are opportunities for a smaller vessel and different propulsions (i.e. outboard and shaft driven).

Smaller vessels are less expensive to maintain, easier to slip and less weight to propel.

Two vessels were considered:

Vessel 1 – 5t carrying capacity, which is suitable for one passenger vehicle only.

Vessel 2 – 20t carrying capacity, with dimensions to suit maintenance plant (e.g. grader, tipper truck). This would be capable of carrying two passenger vehicles.

Further details for comparison to the existing vessel are provided below:

Specification	Existing Vessel	Vessel 1	Vessel 2
Passenger Vehicles	6	1	2
Plant items	Yes	no	Yes
Load Capacity (tonnes)	20	5	20
Deck Length (m)	18	7.8	13.9
Deck Width (m)	5.5	4.8	4.8
Estimated purchase cost	N/A	$1.5m	$1.8m

Vessel 2 provides a similar service level as the current vessel but is smaller to provide ongoing operating cost savings. The purchase price (estimated) difference is $300k. The ongoing operational costs could only be assessed through a detailed design assessment of the options. The review also looked at options to reduce cost on slipping the vessel. Alternatives to using a large crane to remove the vessel are possible, but again actual solutions would need to be looked at with the vessel design.

Operating Hours

The estimated cost savings for other operating scenarios are provided below:

Scenario	Possible Saving
6am to 10pm	Current Arrangement
6am to 8pm, 7 days	$27,000
Monday to Friday 6am to 10am & 1pm to 8pm Saturday & Sunday 6am to 8pm	$37,000
Monday to Friday 6am to 8pm Saturday & Sunday 6am to 10pm	$15,000

There is limited saving in service level changes, unless significant changes are made to the number of days of operation.

Ticket Prices

There are a number of car ferries in operation through NSW and most of these are operated by the AMSA at no cost to the user.

Port Macquarie-Hastings Council operate two ferries and Ballina Council operate one. Both have a full user pays system for the ferries and include causal and annual charges.

These are for the 17/18 financial year and are provided to give some context. Full details of tickets schedule are available on the respective Council’s websites.

Type of Ticket	Cost
Type of Ticket	Port Macquarie Hasting	Ballina
Resident Concession	$55 / year	Nil
Annual Pass	$350	$306
Concession Ticket Books	$20 for 25 tickets (1 ticket for single car trip)	Not available for passenger vehicles
Monthly ticket	$30 when purchased by a resident	Nil
Weekly Ticket	$10 when purchased by a resident	$56
Single Trip (one way)	Nil	$6

Assuming two vehicles per dwelling both requiring an annual pass of $300 and neither vehicle currently pays to cross the channel, the additional revenue to Council would be of the order of $16,200 if a similar system was implemented for residents of Comerong Island.

The implementation of a permit system to better identify vehicles that are currently exempt from payment would be beneficial and capping the number of free travels is a possibility. Currently resident visitors and resident contractors travel at no cost. Attaching a permit arrangement would allow the claim for free travel to be verified by the ferry operator. Currently this is only an honesty system.

It is also possible to cap the number of free tickets to 50/property/year. It is difficult to measure the additional revenue that can be achieved but formalising the existing process would provide better data on which to make future decisions.

Further changes to the pricing are not recommended at this stage.

Summary

The existing ferry is approaching the end of its commercial life and is due for a full out of water service in November 2020. The cost of this is estimated to be at least $400,000.

There are a number of “new” options that Council could investigate in providing access to Comerong Island including (these have not been covered in this report and would take years to consult and develop and implement);

· Shoalhaven Heads to Comerong Island

· Greenwell Point to Comerong Island

· Road Access to Shoalhaven Heads

A new, smaller ferry that would be more reliable and cheaper to operate and could be repurposed to other routes or resold would allow Council to provide more certainty in relation to the existing service and allow evolution (or revolution) of Comerong Island Access to occur in the future.

There are various opportunities to reducing the net operating cost by changing the operating hours and pricing policy. The following scenario is provided for illustrative purposes:

Change Description	Estimated Cost Saving
Annual Pass for Residents ($300 / year)	$7,800
Reduce Operating Hours Monday to Friday 6am to 10am & 1pm to 8pm Saturday & Sunday 6am to 8pm	$37,000
Total	$44,800

In the overall context of the ferry operation, this savings is relatively minor and is obviously not likely to be supported by the residents. The savings associated with replacing the Cormorant with a smaller vessel are likely to be more significant, but this will need to be verified through the procurement process.

Community Engagement

From 1 March – 31 May 2016, a survey was conducted to better understand how the ferry is used. 174 completed surveys were returned. A template of the survey is included at Attachment 8.

In summary, of the surveys returned:

· 10% owned a property on the Island, with 16 indicating they lived part-time or full time or were a tenant.

· 67% identified as attending the island for Recreational Purposes (fishing, surfing, etc).

· 60% used the service up to 25 times a year.

Also, Council’s contractor undertook a survey of on-board passengers over 62 days between March and May 2016 - 15 days in March (included Easter long weekend), 29 days in April (included ANZAC long weekend) and 18 days in May.

There was a total of 2,857 passengers (not vehicles) who identified as:

User Type	% of Total Passengers (NOT Vehicles)
Fee Paying User
Recreational Users (Fisherman, Surfers etc)	46%
National Parks	1.5%
Total	47.5%
Non-Fee-Paying User
Permanent Resident	36.3%
Part-time Resident / Farmer	4.4%
Council	0.8%
Contractor (Resident Contractor / Service Provider)	10.9%
Total	52.4%

Note: Percentage is based on passengers and there were multiple passengers in some vehicles

Comments received during the survey are included and summarised following:

1. Retain the ferry: People were concerned that Council may be looking at taking the ferry service away.

2. Fee: A number of passengers commented that $10 is a bit steep or the trip should be free.

3. Connection: A number of respondents commented that they have a family or familiar connection with the ferry e.g. used it since I was a boy, came over with my Dad to fish, been fishing off the Island since …. Or 38 years been visiting the island to fish.

4. Positive comments about the Ferry Operators and the service itself.

5. Promotion as a tourism destination – there are no facilities on the island in the Nature Reserve or any facilities, toilets or picnic facilities, supplied by Council.

6. Weight limit raised in reference to the transfer of cattle from the island or to the island by resident and off island ratepayer with rural interests on the island.

7. Most visitors go to the island to fish or surf and would like to continue to do so. They are concerned that they may not be able to access the island in the future.

Following this review and completion of the infrastructure review by ARUP, Council presented options on vessel size, pricing and operating hours to a meeting with the residents on 6 December 2017. The meeting was attended by 18 residents.

The residents did not support any changes to the ferry service. 7 written submissions were received, which were mostly a pro-forma email. An example is included at Attachment 9.

A suggestion from residents was to promote the island (and ferry service) to increase revenue. The main attraction on the island for tourists is the Nature Reserve managed by the National Parks & Wildlife Service (NPWS). Increased visitation may increase the demand for services and the level of maintenance currently provided by NPWS, so they have been consulted for their input to the suggestion and they provide the following response.

“NPWS are bound by the status of Comerong Island Nature Reserve and also by what the Plan of Management for the reserve stipulates (as the POM is a legislative document). The primary purpose of nature reserves are conservation of wildlife, natural environments and significant cultural features. They provide opportunities for recreation where it does not conflict with the conservation objectives of the area.”

Comerong Island is currently not promoted on NPWS public website, which relates to the objective to keep the reserve ‘low key’. Promotion of the island is unlikely to be supported by the NPWS, so is not being considered as a viable option for increased revenue.

Financial Implications

The ferry service is funded in the budget, with a provision for ‘out of water’ servicing in the long term financial plan, and there is no reserve to pay for a replacement ferry.

Due to the age of the vessel, it will need to be replaced in the short to medium term. This will provide an opportunity to reduce the vessel size to better match the current service requirements. Reducing the size is expected to reduce operating costs, maintenance costs and serving costs. This will provide the financial capacity to absorb price increases associated with full compliance with legislated inspection requirements.

Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 13 August 2019

Page 0

SA19.126 Far North Collector Road Network - Bangalee & Cambewarra

HPERM Ref: D19/249281

Group: Assets & Works Group

Section: Project Delivery & Contracts

Attachments: 1. Preliminary Alignment Drawing 5505.06 - Far North Collector Road ⇩

2. Original Concept Plan ⇩

Purpose / Summary

To:

1. Seek Council’s endorsement of adoption of the Far North Collector Road preliminary alignment.

2. Provide a progress update on the Far North Collector Road Network project.

Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority)

That Council note:

1. The proposed Far North Collector Road preliminary alignment which provides for a 1 in 10-year flood access and design speed of 80km/h (Preliminary Alignment Drawing 5505.06 - Far North Collector Road)

2. That at this stage there appears to be a $0.5 million funding deficit, which will not be covered by the Commonwealth funding grant.

3. The detailed design, and thus a better assessment of the required budget, will be available in early 2020.

Options

1. As recommended.

Implications: Council advances project detailed design and land acquisitions, and obtains a better understanding of the cost options before committing to tender stage.

2. Council does not adopt the Preferred Alignment and directs staff to undertake alternative work.

Implications: Directing alternative work may result in a change in the cost of the project and will delay the existing program for delivery.

Background

The Far North Collector Road Network includes the Far North Collector Road (FNCR), a link to Taylors Lane and the upgrading of Taylors Lane to access the Moss Vale Road South Urban Release Area. The Far North Collector Road (FNCR) does not form part of the future Nowra Bomaderry Western Bypass, which is planned to be in a corridor to the west of the FNCR.

The FNCR was referenced in the 2006 Council adopted Nowra Bomaderry Structure Plan which was adopted by the State of New South Wales in 2008. The proposed FNCR was subsequently adopted in the Shoalhaven LEP 2014. This road is planned to link Moss Vale Road at its intersection with Bells Lane, Bomaderry with Illaroo Road at its intersection with West Cambewarra Road, Bangalee.

Council received formal advice in July 2018 of the award of a $13.8M grant from the Department of Infrastructure, Regional Development and Cities for the development of the Far North Collector Road Network, and immediately commenced concept design.

The concept plan at the time is provided in Attachment 2.

Engineering detail drawings and specifications and associated cost estimates are scheduled for completion in March 2020.

Property Acquisitions are scheduled for completion in June 2020 which includes changes made to the affected easements.

The expected date for the completion of the construction is December 2022 which aligns with the grant funding agreement.

General Description - Far North Collector Road Network

The project involves:

· Approximately 1600m of new road construction (2 lane, 2 way FNCR) including road shoulders and off-road shared user path. The finished road surface is proposed at the 1 in 10-year flood level plus 500mm freeboard, which is equivalent to the 1 in 100-year flood level.

· Construction of a signalised intersection at the proposed FNCR / Moss Vale Road / Bells Lane intersection and associated works to RMS satisfaction.

· Closure of the Moss Vale Road / Taylors Lane intersection and redirection of Taylors Lane traffic via the FNCR Network to RMS satisfaction – including approximately 300m of new road linking the FNCR to Taylors Lane (2 lane, 2 way) to Development Control Plan (DCP) requirements including off road shared user path.

· Single lane roundabout at the proposed FNCR / Taylors Lane Link Road.

· Upgrade of Taylors Lane to the Moss Vale Road South Urban Release Area boundary - approximately 900m of road upgrade (2 lane, 2 way) to DCP requirements including off road shared user path.

· Single lane roundabout and associated works at the proposed FNCR / Illaroo Road / West Cambewarra Road intersection.

· Survey, design, project development, and land acquisition to achieve the above works.

Project progress update

Geotechnical

A contract was entered into via tender for the geotechnical work in April 2019 with Cardno (ACT/NSW) Pty Ltd and subsurface work commenced mid-May 2019. The geotechnical engineering firm is programmed to complete its work in July 2019 providing information to the consultant bridge and culverts designer.

Bridge Design

Talis Consultants Pty Ltd was engaged via Council’s panel of professional engineers in May 2019 to assess the flood plain, design a bridge over Bomaderry Creek and several culverts, respecting the floodplain nature of the site. This firm is working to provide Council with the bridge and culvert designs in August 2019, enabling the staff design team to progress the detailed embankment and road design in the latter part of 2019.

Land Acquisitions

Council has purchased three parcels of land for the proposed development at No.125 Moss Vale Road; No.333 Illaroo Road (immediately west of West Cambewarra Road) and the battle-axe parcel located immediately north of No.333 Illaroo Road for the express purpose of road development.

Council has not acquired all the land needed to construct the FNCR Network. Following Council’s adoption of the Preferred Alignment and detailed design staff will manage the final acquisitions.

Environmental

Far North Collector Road

Archaeology

Following the advent of Permits to Enter private lands, Council’s consultant Archaeologist firm, which specialises in Aboriginal heritage, met with representatives from the Local Aboriginal Land Council in January 2019. Some artefacts were reported and while of little heritage significance, these items will be affected by the construction of the FNCR.

Flora

The Preferred Alignment for the FNCR at its approach to Illaroo Road affects a (protected) Property Vegetation Plan (PVP) which was endorsed in 2010 under the Native Vegetation Act 2003 between Council and the Southern Rivers Catchment Management Authority. This plan will need to be modified. Staff have sought advice from the Local Land Services (NSW), and it is intended to pursue the potential terms of an ‘offset’ if Council adopts the Preferred Alignment.

Substantial removal of trees is required around the proposed bridge over Bomaderry Creek. The species are largely casuarina and coral trees. There are also six red cedar trees on the Preferred Alignment, which are proposed for relocation.

Fauna

No threatened species were found on the FNCR Preferred Alignment.

Taylors Lane

Flora and Fauna

The site contains 317 trees – some or all of which may be removed. Further information will be provided to Council following further Community Consultation.

14 of these trees contain visible hollows (several with multiple hollows in individual trees), occurring from heights between 2m and 10m above the ground, that may provide habitat for threatened fauna species including microbats. The trees present on the site are up to 25m+ tall, making a confident determination that all hollows have been accounted for impractical. Trees within the adjacent Lot 1 DP 949932 contain visible hollows to a height of 20m.

Initial investigations determined the presence of microbats including hollow-dependent species Southern Myotis.

The use of the site by other species including threatened owls, parrots, cockatoos and mammals will be determined with confidence through surveys which are currently progressing. To this point there is no evidence that any species other than threatened microbats utilise the site.

Council will be provided with further information following the spring / summer investigations.

Community Engagement

Community Consultation on the FNCR Network was undertaken in late 2018 with little in the way of response received from residents.

Taylors Lane and Taylors Lane Link Road

Community Consultation in late 2018 received three responses generally asking Council to retain the existing stands of spotted gum trees where possible.

Design options were created, and a report will be provided to Council following further Community Consultation.

Private Property Access Agreements

Following the adoption of the Concept Design Alignment in October 2018, negotiations started with the predominantly affected land owners in October 2018.

Staff, with the assistance of external legal advisors, finalised Permits to Enter in January 2019 and commenced the Design Development phase. Access to the land resulted in a redesign of the FNCR Concept Design Alignment, advancing to a ‘Provisional Alignment’ which was internally adopted in late February 2019. This Provisional Alignment was essential for progressing with technical aspects of the project. This design has been developed in-house.

Following external concept design of a bridge over Bomaderry Creek near and west of the Bernie Regan Sporting Complex and other watercourse culverts, Council will advance the FNCR Adopted Alignment to detailed design stage for tender, contract and construction along with the link to Moss Vale South Urban Release Area via Taylors Lane.

Summary of the changes from Concept Design to Preliminary Design

The road corridor was identified in the Nowra Bomaderry Structure plan, and in the Shoalhaven LEP 2014, in the indicative position as shown in attachment 2. This preceded advanced topographical knowledge and crossed the significant electricity transmission lines and the eastern gas pipeline.

Once land access was granted and field surveys progressed, the alignment was amended to reduce the FNCR length and to avoid the services easements. The revised alignment as shown on attachment 1.

Expenditure to date is $250,000 on design and investigation and $2.2 million on property acquisitions.

Policy Implications

External resourcing to date has been undertaken for the procurement of engineering design services in accordance with the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 (as amended) Clause 167 and Council’s Procurement Policy and Procedure.

Financial Implications

The current estimate of cost is $14.3M, composed of $12.3M for the project’s construction based on the current preferred alignment, plus $2M nett land acquisition costs after sales of surplus properties. This equates to an estimated funding deficit of $0.5M. The increase is attributed to the proposed civil works which has now been able to be more accurately estimated.

The current Preferred Alignment (Attachment 1) is in the order of 200m shorter than the 2018 concept design. As the FNCR design is progressed and the most appropriate option for the development of Taylors Lane is identified, a more accurate cost estimate will be developed and will be the subject of a further report to Council.

If required, consideration would then need to be given to either sourcing additional funding or reducing the scope of the project (e.g. reduction in shared user path, kerb and guttering etc.). It is best to avoid lowering the FNCR road level, as this will affect serviceability during flooding, and place the road and embankment at increased risk of overtopping and damage.

The FNCR is not eligible for Developer Contributions now or into the future.

Risk Implications

A cost estimate based on a concept design was originally advised to the Government when the project was being considered, and the approved Project Proposal Report identified that the estimate was exactly that and would need to be refined following detailed design.

The Commonwealth administrators of the grant funding (Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Cities, and Regional Development) have since advised Council that the funding for this project is capped at $13.8 million, and that it is up to Council to identify savings within the project and to fund any cost over runs.

At this early stage of cost estimating there is an apparent risk of the funding for the project being deficient by approximately $0.5M, as described above in ‘Financial Implications’.

Other potential risks are:

· A lack of suitable fill timeously available for construction of the FNCR embankment.

· Potential unknown habitat for threatened species, and the subsequent possible habitat offset requirements.

· Delay and additional cost resulting from community sentiment unduly influencing the adoption of one of the four identified options for widening Taylors Lane.

· Increased flood height of Bomaderry Creek (currently under review and pending design development).

Staff are working to more clearly identify and address risk. This project will be periodically reported to the Audit, Risk & Improvement Committee.

Attachment A - Waiving of Fees for Monthly Markets & Community Events in Public Reserves 2018/2019	$1,758.00
Attachment B – Waiving of Fees for Open Space Venues and Community Services 2018/2019	$8,932.60
Attachment C – Waiving of Fees for Shoalhaven Libraries – Community Events in Council Facilities 2018/2019	$187.00
Attachment D – Waiving of Fee for Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre 2018/2019	$36,409.13

	Registration before 6 September	Registration before 4 October	Regular price
3 day ticket	$1,895	$2,595	$2,995
2 day ticket	$995	$1,595	$1,895
Workshop day only	$995	$1,295	$1,595