Strategy and Assets Committee
Meeting Date: Tuesday, 18 July, 2017
Location: Council Chambers, City Administrative Centre, Bridge Road, Nowra
Time: 5.00pm
Clr Andrew Guile - Chairperson
All Councillors
General Manager or nominee
Please note: Council’s Code of Meeting Practice permits the electronic recording and broadcast of the proceedings of meetings of the Council which are open to the public. Your attendance at this meeting is taken as consent to the possibility that your image and/or voice may be recorded and broadcast to the public.
Agenda
1. Apologies / Leave of Absence
2. Confirmation of Minutes
· Strategy and Assets Committee - 13 June 2017......................................................... 1
3. Declarations of Interest
4. Mayoral Minute
5. Deputations and Presentations
6. Notices of Motion / Questions on Notice
Nil
7. Reports
SA17.174.... Policy Determination - Not Allowing Circuses that utilise Exotic Animals on Council Land.............................................................................................................. 23
SA17.175.... South Coast Regional Jobs Investment Package - Council Projects.......... 31
SA17.176.... Revenue Options Follow Up Report............................................................. 52
SA17.177.... Abseiling and Rock Climbing Policy - withdrawn......................................... 56
SA17.178.... Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre - Hiring Policy....................................... 58
SA17.179.... Berry District Park Master Plan.................................................................... 60
SA17.180.... Bay & Basin Summer Shuttle Bus and Shoalhaven River Festival Accessible Shuttle Bus 2017 Funding Success.......................................................................... 64
SA17.181.... Council Policy Review - Strategic Infrastructure Planning........................... 67
SA17.182.... Beyond Plastic Pollution - Pathways to Cleaner Oceans Conference........ 71
SA17.183.... North Nowra Link Road - Southern Option.................................................. 76
SA17.184.... Public Policies for Review - July 2017 - Asset Management...................... 79
SA17.185.... 2017-2018 Path Construction Program....................................................... 81
SA17.186.... Jervis Bay Maritime Museum - Fish Pond................................................... 84
SA17.187.... Classification of Operational Land - Part Shoalhaven Community & Recreational Precinct - 109, 111, 111A & 113 Cambewarra Road, Bomaderry............... 86
SA17.188.... Lease - 1 Mattes Way, Bomaderry - Kiama Community College................ 88
SA17.189.... Holiday Haven Tourist Parks - Management & Operation Contract Extension - Lake Conjola Entrance Holiday Park.................................................................... 90
SA17.190.... Holiday Haven Tourist Parks Tender for the Management & Operation of the Huskisson Beach Holiday Park.................................................................... 92
SA17.191.... Council Policy Review - Waste Services..................................................... 94
SA17.192.... Indian (Common) Myna Bird Program......................................................... 97
SA17.193.... Review of the Shoalhaven Bushcare/Parkcare Policy and Procedures ... 103
SA17.194.... Tenders - Floodplain Risk Management Studies & Plans - Lower Shoalhaven River and St Georges Basin................................................................................ 105
SA17.195.... Review of Shoalhaven Water Group Policies............................................ 107
Reports
CSA17.11.... Holiday Haven Park Management Contract extension - Lake Conjola Entrance Holiday Park
Local Government Act - Section 10A(2)(d)(i) - Commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests.
CSA17.12.... Tenders – Management & Operation Huskisson Beach Holiday Park
Local Government Act - Section 10A(2)(d)(i) - Commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests.
CSA17.13.... Tenders – Floodplain Risk Management Studies & Plans – Lower Shoalhaven River and St Georges Basin
Local Government Act - Section 10A(2)(d)(i) - Commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
There is a public interest consideration against disclosure of information as disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page iv |
Strategy and Assets Committee
Delegation:
Pursuant to s377 (1) of the Local Government Act 1993 the Committee is delegated the functions conferred on Council by the Local Government Act 1993 (LG Act) or any other Act or delegated to Council, as are specified in the Schedule, subject to the following limitations:
i. The Committee cannot exercise any function delegated to the Council which by the terms of that delegation cannot be sub-delegated;
ii. The Committee cannot exercise any function which s377(1) of the LG Act provides cannot be delegated by Council;
iii. The Committee cannot exercise a function which is expressly required by the LG Act or any other Act to be exercised by resolution of the Council; and
iv. The Committee cannot exercise any function which is a function of the General Manager under s335 of the LG Act.
Schedule:
1. Make recommendations to Council and consider, formulate, review and adopt policies in relation to Council’s corporate & community planning under Part 2 of Chapter 13 of the LG Act, asset management and in connection with the other functions listed in this Schedule and in particular to make recommendations to Council in respect of the content of Council’s community strategic plan, delivery program, resourcing strategy and operational plan within the meaning of Part 2 of Chapter 13 of the LG Act;
2. Make recommendations to Council and consider, formulate, review and adopt Council policies, plans and strategies other than those in respect of town planning and environmental matters, and any other matter referred to the Committee by the General Manager.
3. Make recommendations in respect of the introduction of new fees or charges or the alteration of existing fees and charges for inclusion in the Council’s next operational plan within the meaning of s405 of the LG Act;
4. Monitor, review and consider matters relating to the operations and strategic direction of Council’s Holiday Haven Tourist Parks Group;
5. All functions in respect of the management of, and facilities provided on Crown Land in respect of which Council is the ‘reserve trust manager’ within the meaning of s92 of the Crown Lands Act 1989, and the making of recommendations to Council regarding such matters where the function cannot be delegated by Council;
6. Provision of corporate direction to the Shoalhaven Water Group in respect of powers delegated to it by Council regarding the construction, alteration or maintenance of water and sewerage works, effluent works and pump out removal;
7. Authorise the expenditure of funds raised under s64 of the LG Act within the limits outlined in, and in accordance with Council’s adopted Development Servicing Plan and other relevant adopted Council policies;
8. Make recommendations to Council in respect of fees and charges for water and wastewater services provided by Council;
9. Develop, implement, review and adopt strategic policies for water, sewerage and effluent operations of Council;
10. Undertake preliminary investigations (feasibility, cost benefit, risk analysis, etc.) into development opportunities for Council’s strategic land holdings and make recommendations to Council.
11. Review and make recommendations to Council in relation to:
a) The sale prices of land in connection with residential and industrial Council subdivisions;
b) The sale of Council property or the purchase or resumption of land;
c) The compensation to be offered in respect of land resumed by Council; and
d) Properties leased or rented by Council, other than those delegated to the General Manager for approval and execution in accordance with MIN14.912 and MIN15.237 of the Council.
12. To determine and accept all tenders with a value of $1 Million or more, except those tenders required by law to be determined by full Council (MIN17.334).
Minutes of the Strategy and Assets Committee
Meeting Date: Tuesday, 13 June 2017
Location: Council Chambers, City Administrative Centre, Bridge Road, Nowra
Time: 5:01pm
The following members were present:
Clr Andrew Guile - Chairperson
Clr Joanna Gash
Clr John Wells
Clr Patricia White
Clr John Levett
Clr Nina Cheyne
Clr Kaye Gartner – arrived 5.03pm
Clr Amanda Findley – arrived 5.03pm
Clr Mitchell Pakes
Clr Greg Watson
Clr Mark Kitchener
Clr Bob Proudfoot
Mr Russ Pigg - General Manager – arrived 5.03pm
Apologies / Leave of Absence |
An apology was received from Clr Alldrick.
Confirmation of the Minutes |
RESOLVED (Clr White / Clr Cheyne) MIN17.483 That the minutes of the Strategy and Assets Committee held on Tuesday 16 May 2017 be confirmed. CARRIED
|
Declarations of Interest |
Clr Proudfoot – “SA17.148 – Event Policy Update” – less than significant non pecuniary interest declaration – will remain in the room and will take part in discussion and vote – “He is a member of the Sanctuary Point Community Pride who made a submission”.
Clrs Findley and Gartner and Russ Pigg arrived at the meeting at 5.03pm.
Mayoral Minutes
MMS17.3 Mayoral Minute - Support for Gareth Ward, Member for Kiama's Budget Bids |
HPERM Ref: D17/187127 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Shoalhaven City Council supports the Member for Kiama, Gareth Ward, in his budget bids that will have a high degree of impact on the Shoalhaven.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Guile) MIN17.484 That Shoalhaven City Council supports the Member for Kiama, Gareth Ward, in his budget bid for Berry - Bomaderry Bypass that will have a high degree of impact on the Shoalhaven. CARRIED
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Guile) MIN17.485 That Shoalhaven City Council supports the Member for Kiama, Gareth Ward, in his budget bid for the Shoalhaven Memorial Hospital Car Park that will have a high degree of impact on the Shoalhaven. CARRIED
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Guile) MIN17.486 That Shoalhaven City Council supports the Member for Kiama, Gareth Ward, in his budget bid for a Bus/ Coach Service to supplement the South Coast Rail line from Kiama to Bomaderry that will have a high degree of impact on the Shoalhaven. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Levett, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson and Clr Kitchener CARRIED
|
Deputations and Presentations
Mrs Annette McCarron addressed the Committee in relation to SA17.159 Proposed Road Closure of Part Battys Road Upper Kangaroo River, sale to Robert McCarron and Annette Miles and consolidation with Lot 2 DP839210 and Lot 1 DP846976
Mr Phil Crowe addressed the Committee in relation to SA17.159 Proposed Road Closure of Part Battys Road Upper Kangaroo River, sale to Robert McCarron and Annette Miles and consolidation with Lot 2 DP839210 and Lot 1 DP846976
Mr George Kruk (Collingwood Beach Preservation) addressed the Committee in relation to SA17.167 Coastal Hazard Review – Outcome of public exhibition
Mr Ian Zandstra addressed the Committee in relation to SA17.170 Renew Deed of Agreement - Shoalhaven REMS
Procedural Motion - Bring Item Forward |
Motion (Clr Cheyne / Clr Pakes) That the following matters be brought forward for consideration:
CARRIED |
SA17.159 Proposed Road Closure of Part Battys Road Upper Kangaroo River, sale to Robert McCarron and Annette Miles and consolidation with Lot 2 DP839210 and Lot 1 DP846976 |
HPERM Ref: D17/146784 |
Recommendation That: 1. Council resolves to make an application to the Minister administering the Roads Act 1993, for the northern part of Battys Road, Upper Kangaroo River shown by hatching on Attachment “1” to be closed and sold to the owners of the adjoining Lot 2 DP839210 and Lot 1 DP846976, Robert McCarron and Annette Miles; 2. Authority be granted to affix the Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to any documents requiring to be sealed; 3. Council authorise the sale of the closed road to Robert McCarron and Annette Miles for $7,000.00 (plus GST if applicable) provided that the land comprised in the closed road, Lot 2 DP 839210 and Lot 1 DP 846976 are consolidated into one (1) lot; and 4. All costs associated with this road closure are to be met by Robert McCarron and Annette Miles.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Gash / Clr Findley) That: 1. Council resolves to make an application to the Minister administering the Roads Act 1993, for the northern part of Battys Road, Upper Kangaroo River shown by hatching on Attachment “1” to be closed and sold to the owners of the adjoining Lot 2 DP839210 and Lot 1 DP846976, Robert McCarron and Annette Miles; 2. Authority be granted to affix the Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to any documents requiring to be sealed; 3. Council authorise the sale of the closed road to Robert McCarron and Annette Miles for $7,000.00 (plus GST if applicable) provided that the land comprised in the closed road, Lot 2 DP 839210 and Lot 1 DP 846976 are consolidated into one (1) lot; and 4. All costs associated with this road closure are to be met by Robert McCarron and Annette Miles. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Cheyne carried
|
SA17.167 Coastal Hazard Review- Outcome of public exhibition |
HPERM Ref: D17/36024 |
Recommendation That Council 1. Adopt the Shoalhaven Coastal Hazard Review, that includes Council’s adopted sea level rise projections, in accordance with Council’s resolution (D15/39660); and 2. Submit the adopted Shoalhaven Coastal Hazard Review to the NSW Government, replacing the 2009 Coastal Hazard Assessment, as part of the Shoalhaven draft 2012 Coastal Zone Management Plan for certification, in accordance with Council’s resolution (MIN16.849); and 3. Review the Shoalhaven Local Environmental Plan 2014 and Shoalhaven Development Control Plan 2014 to reflect the outcomes of the Shoalhaven Coastal Hazard Review and a further report be provided on the proposed amendments.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Proudfoot / Clr Wells) That Council: 1. Adopt the Shoalhaven Coastal Hazard Review, that includes Council’s adopted sea level rise projections, in accordance with Council’s resolution (D15/39660); and 2. Submit the adopted Shoalhaven Coastal Hazard Review to the NSW Government, replacing the 2009 Coastal Hazard Assessment, as part of the Shoalhaven draft 2012 Coastal Zone Management Plan for certification, in accordance with Council’s resolution (MIN16.849); and 3. Review the Shoalhaven Local Environmental Plan 2014 and Shoalhaven Development Control Plan 2014 to reflect the outcomes of the Shoalhaven Coastal Hazard Review and a further report be provided on the proposed amendments. 4. Write to the Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) to confirm whether or not a more accurate engineering alternative to the Bruun Rule can be used to assess coastal hazards and if not what level of error is the OEH prepared to attribute to the Bruun Rule. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Nil carried
|
SA17.170 Renew Deed of Agreement - Shoalhaven REMS |
HPERM Ref: D17/67782 |
Recommendation That Council 1. Authorise the General Manager to sign the new REMS Deeds of Agreement with each participating land manager using reclaimed water 2. Approve the signing and use of the Common Seal of Council on the Deeds if required; 3. Provide reclaimed water at no charge to end users for a further 15 year period.
|
|
Note: Clr Cheyne left the meeting 6.14pm |
|
Recommendation (Clr Wells / Clr Guile) That Council: 1. Authorise the General Manager to sign the new REMS Deeds of Agreement with each participating land manager using reclaimed water 2. Approve the signing and use of the Common Seal of Council on the Deeds if required; 3. Provide reclaimed water at no charge to end users for a further 15 year period. CARRIED
|
Notices of Motion / Questions on Notice
SA17.140 Notice of Motion - Callala Bay Sailing Club Erosion |
HPERM Ref: D17/180313 |
Note: Clr Cheyne returned to the meeting 6.16pm |
|
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council 1. Urgently repair the erosion caused by works carried out by Council in 2016. 2. Remove the rocks that were used and have now rendered the dune unsafe and unusable. 3. Replace the three access tracks and upgrade them with timber structures. 4. Consult with the Sailing Club Committee before undertaking the works. 5. Replant all the grass and any other shrubs that were removed when the 2016 works were carried out.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Proudfoot) MIN17.487 That Council: 1. Staff report back to Council on alternate access paths and possible funding sources and costs for; a. Urgent repair of the erosion caused by works carried out by Council in 2016. b. Removal of the rocks that were used and have now rendered the dune unsafe and unusable. c. Replacement of the three access tracks and upgrade them with timber structures. d. Replanting of all the grass and any other shrubs that were removed when the 2016 works were carried out. 2. Consult with the Sailing Club Committee before undertaking the works. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Nil CARRIED
|
SA17.141 Notice of Motion - Drainage - Orient Ave, Orient Point |
HPERM Ref: D17/180496 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That 1. Council urgently repair the drainage along both sides of Orient Ave, Orient Point (House number 16 to 38 Eastern side and 19 to 25 western side) 2. Works to include a. Cleaning and scraping of road verges. b. Creation of a table drain down both sides of Orient Ave. c. Bitumen spraying of the table drains.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Proudfoot) MIN17.488 That: 1. Council repair the drainage along both sides of Orient Ave, Orient Point (House number 16 to 38 Eastern side and 19 to 25 western side) 2. Works to include: a. Cleaning and scraping of road verges. b. Creation of a table drain down both sides of Orient Ave. c. Bitumen spraying of the table drains. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener and Clr Proudfoot Against: Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner and Russ Pigg CARRIED
|
SA17.142 Notice of Motion - Drainage - Prince Edward Ave, Culburra Beach |
HPERM Ref: D17/180517 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That 1. Council undertake urgent maintenance works on the open drains along Prince Edward Ave Culburra Beach. 2. Council start work on drains that run along house’s 2 to 28 Prince Edward Ave 3. Works include mowing, clearing and cleaning to ensure water flows effectively through the drains and eliminates the risk of flooding.
|
|
Motion (Clr Pakes / Clr Proudfoot) That Council: 1. Undertake maintenance works on the open drains along Prince Edward Ave, Culburra Beach. 2. Start work on drains that run along house’s 2 to 28 Prince Edward Ave 3. Works include mowing, clearing and cleaning to ensure water flows effectively through the drains and eliminates the risk of flooding. 4. Discuss with residents the opportunities regarding the drainage work and report back to Council. For: Clr Guile, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener and Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley lost
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Gash) MIN17.489 That the matter regarding Notice of Motion - Drainage - Prince Edward Ave, Culburra Beach be deferred pending discussions with residents regarding opportunities of the drainage work at 2 to 28 Prince Edward Avenue, Culburra Beach and report back to Council. For: Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Guile and Clr Pakes CARRIED
|
SA17.143 Notice of Motion - Public Toilet Facilities upgrade |
HPERM Ref: D17/180649 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council 1. Undertake a maintenance program to clean and freshen up our public toilet facilities. 2. Urgently address the poor condition of the following toilet facilities by re-painting them a. Crookhaven Heads boat ramp, b. Callala Bay boat ramp, c. Callala Beach Road car park, d. Greenwell Point pool reserve
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Proudfoot) MIN17.490 That Council: 1. Continue the maintenance program to clean and freshen up our public toilet facilities. 2. Urgently address the poor condition of the following toilet facilities by re-painting them a. Crookhaven Heads boat ramp, b. Callala Bay boat ramp, c. Callala Beach Road car park, d. Greenwell Point pool reserve For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Levett CARRIED
|
Report of the Aboriginal Advisory Committee - 15 May 2017
Items marked with an * were resolved ‘en block’.
AA17.8 Adoption of Applications - Membership - Four (4) Year Term |
HPERM Ref: D17/61973 |
RESOLVED* (Clr Cheyne / Clr White) MIN17.491 That: 1. Council acknowledge the applications of Membership and appoint the following members for a continuing four (4) year term: a. Janet Atkins b. Sylvia Timbery c. Patricia Lester d. Christine Finney e. Shane Brown f. Leonie Ebzery g. Valda Corrigan h. Leslie Halls i. Sue-Anne Cutmore j. Noel Wellington 2. The completed application from Paul McLeod be accepted and he be appointed to the Aboriginal Advisory committee for a term of four (4) years 3. The two (2) Youth applications from Janaya Hennessy and Morgan Blakeney be accepted and appointed for a term of four (4) years 4. Consultation continue to work to obtain a representative member of each of the three (3) Aboriginal Land Councils as members on the Aboriginal Advisory Committee. 5. Should representation from each of the Land Councils not be achieved, then the Committee should consider how such vacancy will be managed. CARRIED
|
AA17.10 Local Government Regional NAIDOC Awards |
HPERM Ref: D17/123899 |
RESOLVED* (Clr Cheyne / Clr White) MIN17.492 That the Aboriginal Advisory Committee financially contribute $2,000 to the 2017 Local Government Regional NAIDOC Awards. CARRIED
|
AA17.12 Additional Item - Conference - NSW Local Government Aboriginal Network |
Recommendation That: 1. An Aboriginal Advisory Committee Member be funded to attend the NSW LGAN Conference in Albury Entertainment Centre Wednesday 13 to Friday 15 September 2017; 2. The Cost of attending the conference be funded from the General Manager and Councillors Budget.
|
RESOLVED (Clr White / Clr Cheyne) MIN17.493 That: 1. An Aboriginal Advisory Committee Member be funded to attend the NSW LGAN Conference in Albury Entertainment Centre Wednesday 13 to Friday 15 September 2017; 2. The Cost of attending the conference be funded from the Conference Budget. CARRIED
|
Procedural Motion - Adjournment of Meeting |
Motion (Clr Findley / Clr White) That the meeting be adjourned for 15 minutes. CARRIED The meeting adjourned the time being 7.13pm.
|
Procedural Motion - Resumption of Meeting |
The meeting reconvened the time being 7.27pm. The following members were present: Clr Andrew Guile - Chairperson Clr Joanna Gash Clr John Wells Clr Patricia White Clr John Levett Clr Nina Cheyne Clr Kaye Gartner Clr Amanda Findley Clr Mitchell Pakes Clr Greg Watson Clr Mark Kitchener Clr Bob Proudfoot Mr Russ Pigg - General Manager
|
Reports
SA17.145 Public Policy for Review - Statement of Business Ethics |
HPERM Ref: D17/165974 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That the public policy, Statement of Business Ethics, be adopted with minor changes as indicated in Attachment 1.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr Cheyne) MIN17.494 That the public policy, Statement of Business Ethics, be adopted with minor changes as indicated in Attachment 1. CARRIED
|
SA17.146 Shoalhaven Economic Development Strategy (2017 - 2026) - Adoption of the Strategy |
HPERM Ref: D17/183404 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That 1. Council adopt the Shoalhaven Economic Development Strategy 2017 - 2026 2. The new Strategy be referred to the Business, Employment and Development Committee to discuss and recommend priority settings for the “Recommended Actions” within the Strategy, acknowledging the resource/capacity limitations of the Economic Development Section.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Cheyne / Clr White) MIN17.495 That: 1. Council adopt the Shoalhaven Economic Development Strategy 2017 - 2026 2. The new Strategy be referred to the Business, Employment and Development Committee to discuss and recommend priority settings for the “Recommended Actions” within the Strategy, acknowledging the resource/capacity limitations of the Economic Development Section. CARRIED
|
SA17.147 Sale of Council Industrial Land - Lot 105 Cumberland Ave, South Nowra - Revision of Sale Price |
HPERM Ref: D17/183462 |
Recommendation That Council set the minimum sale price for Lot 105 DP 1096630 Cumberland Ave South Nowra at $355,000 plus GST.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Wells / Clr White) That Council set the minimum sale price for Lot 105 DP 1096630 Cumberland Ave South Nowra at $355,000 plus GST. CARRIED
|
SA17.148 Event Policy Update |
HPERM Ref: D17/152355 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council endorse the new Events Policy taking into consideration the changes made from the comments received during the public exhibition period.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr White) MIN17.496 That Council endorse the new Events Policy taking into consideration the changes made from the comments received during the public exhibition period. CARRIED
|
SA17.149 Workplace Surveillance Report |
HPERM Ref: D17/158690 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council accept this report for information.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr Cheyne) MIN17.497 That Council accept this report for information. CARRIED
|
SA17.150 Policy Review - Water Safety |
HPERM Ref: D16/352846 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council adopt the amended Recreation Community & Culture - Water Safety Policy POL16/220 as indicated in the report.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Gartner / Clr Gash) MIN17.498 That Council adopt the amended Recreation Community & Culture - Water Safety Policy POL16/220 as indicated in the report. CARRIED
|
SA17.151 Access Area for Dogs |
HPERM Ref: D17/162059 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council re adopt the public policy, Access Area for Dogs, without changes.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Gartner / Clr White) MIN17.499 That Council re adopt the public policy, Access Area for Dogs, without changes. For: Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Guile CARRIED
|
SA17.152 Private Functions On Public Reserves Policy - Amendment |
HPERM Ref: D17/162332 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council amend the Private Functions on Public Reserves Policy to include Bannister Reserve to the Medium Function Criteria and Map.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Cheyne / Clr Gartner) MIN17.500 That Council amend the Private Functions on Public Reserves Policy to include Bannister Reserve to the Medium Function Criteria and Map. CARRIED
|
SA17.153 Bay and Basin Community Hub - Draft Master Plan Exhibition Complete - Request for Detailed Design Phase |
HPERM Ref: D17/162815 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council: 1. Adopt the Draft Bay & Basin Master Plan, with minor wording changes to the report as outlined in the submission table 2. Council support progressing this project to the next stage of detailed design.
|
|
Motion (Clr Proudfoot / Clr Kitchener) That: 1. Council not proceed with the Basin Community Hub Detailed Design Phase at this stage, and a Council committee be formed to deal with the matter 2. Council staff prepare a report on a new plan which includes an additional 25 metre pool, an increased gymnasium as well as an overall refurbishment of the Leisure Centre, but excludes the library and additional meeting rooms. 3. Alternate sites for a library be proposed with consideration given to the expansion of Sanctuary Point Library, the Lady Denman precinct, the old Vincentia Village Shopping Centre and the new Vincentia Market Place Shopping Centre. 4. Council staff be thanked for their work on the Draft Master Plan.
|
|
(Amendment) RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Cheyne) MIN17.501 That this matter be deferred to a future meeting of the Strategy and Assets Committee in August 2017 and this matter be the subject of a Clr Workshop/Briefing. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr Wells, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Proudfoot CARRIED
|
SA17.154 Section 355 Management Committee - Terms of Reference - Nowra Showground |
HPERM Ref: D17/165021 |
Recommendation That Council 1. Endorse the Terms of Reference and committee membership numbers for the establishment of a 355 Management Committee for Nowra Showground as outlined in the report, 2. Advertise for members to establish a 355 Management Committee for Nowra Showground. 3. In accordance with MIN15.622 and the delegation provided therein, the General Manager approve the membership appointments to the 355 Management Committee for Nowra Showground. 4. The once the committee is established staff continue to work with the committee to establish an appropriate operational budget and determine how works will be undertaken (i.e. existing council staff, contract or volunteers).
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Guile) MIN17.502 That Council: 1. Endorse the Terms of Reference and committee membership numbers for the establishment of a 355 Management Committee for Nowra Showground as outlined in the report, 2. Advertise for members to establish a 355 Management Committee for Nowra Showground. 3. In accordance with MIN15.622 and the delegation provided therein, the General Manager approve the membership appointments to the 355 Management Committee for Nowra Showground. 4. The once the committee is established staff continue to work with the committee to establish an appropriate operational budget and determine how works will be undertaken (i.e. existing council staff, contract or volunteers). CARRIED
|
SA17.155 Australian Local Government Association - 2017 National Local Roads & Transport Congress |
HPERM Ref: D17/164049 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council: 1. Notes the details of the Australian Local Government Association – 2017 National Local Roads & Transport Congress scheduled for 7-9 November 2017 in Albany, Western Australia. 2. Authorises available Councillors to attend the conference and such attendance be deemed Council Business. 3. Travel, registration fees, accommodation and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses be met in accordance with its adopted policy. 4. Request Councillors attending the conference to provide a written report within 30 days of returning from the conference.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr White / Clr Guile) MIN17.503 That Council: 1. Notes the details of the Australian Local Government Association – 2017 National Local Roads & Transport Congress scheduled for 7-9 November 2017 in Albany, Western Australia. 2. Authorises available Councillors to attend the conference and such attendance be deemed Council Business. 3. Travel, registration fees, accommodation and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses be met in accordance with its adopted policy. 4. Request Councillors attending the conference to provide a written report within 30 days of returning from the conference. CARRIED
|
SA17.156 Crown Land Management Act 2016 |
HPERM Ref: D17/151835 |
Recommendation That Council receive the report for information on the Crown Land Management Act 2016 and refer this to the Natural Resource and Floodplain Committee for information.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr White) MIN17.504 That Council receive the report for information on the Crown Land Management Act 2016 and refer this to the Natural Resource and Floodplain Committee for information. CARRIED
|
SA17.157 Shoalhaven City Council Property Strategy - Public Exhibition |
HPERM Ref: D17/109720 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That 1. Council place on public exhibition the draft Shoalhaven City Council Property Strategy for a minimum of 28 days for comment. 2. Should Council receive no objections or submissions that would mean only a minor alteration to the Strategy, then the Strategy be deemed adopted at the conclusion of the submission period. 3. Should Council receive submissions that are considered to have a significant effect on the Strategy then a further report be presented to Council.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Cheyne) MIN17.505 That 1. Council place on public exhibition the draft Shoalhaven City Council Property Strategy for a minimum of 28 days for comment. 2. Should Council receive no objections or submissions that would mean only a minor alteration to the Strategy, then the Strategy be deemed adopted at the conclusion of the submission period. 3. Should Council receive submissions that are considered to have a significant effect on the Strategy then a further report be presented to Council. CARRIED
|
SA17.158 Proposed Sale of Land - 11 Grandview Street, Erowal Bay |
HPERM Ref: D17/142694 |
Recommendation That Council: 1. Advertise its intention to dispose of 11 Grandview Street, Erowal Bay (Lot 24 Sec 1 DP9182) in accordance with Policy 16/256 (POL16/256) and advise the local CCB, and if no objections are received, authorise the sale of the property by public auction; 2. Authorise the General Manager to set the auction reserve (based on valuation advice) and to finalise the terms of a sale within 10% of the reserve or list price in the case of a private treaty sale if the property fails to sell at auction; 3. Fund all costs associated with the sale from Job Number 88650 and the net income from the sale be placed in the Strategic Property Reserve; and 4. Grant authority to affix the Common Seal of the Council to any contract or sale documents required to be sealed.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr White) MIN17.506 That this matter be deferred to the Ordinary Meeting Tuesday 27 June 2017. CARRIED
|
SA17.159 Proposed Road Closure Of Part Battys Road Upper Kangaroo River, Sale To Robert McCarron and Annette Miles and Consolidation With Lot 2 DP839210 and Lot 1 DP846976 |
HPERM Ref: D17/146784 |
Item dealt with earlier in the meeting.
|
SA17.160 Transfer of Land within Heritage Estates to NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service |
HPERM Ref: D17/156728 |
||||||||||||||
Recommendation That Council: 1. Advertise its intention to transfer, for nil consideration, the Council owned lots located within the Heritage Estates at Worrowing Heights, listed in the table below, transfer to the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (or their nominee) and if no objections are received and subject to no adverse implications for the transfer from the pending court case, authorise the transfer of the Council owned lots:
2. Grant authority to affix the Common Seal of the Council to any documents required to be sealed.
|
|||||||||||||||
Recommendation (Clr Findley / Clr Guile) That Council: 1. Advertise its intention to transfer, for nil consideration, the Council owned lots located within the Heritage Estates at Worrowing Heights, listed in the table below, transfer to the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (or their nominee) and if no objections are received and subject to no adverse implications for the transfer from the pending court case, authorise the transfer of the Council owned lots:
2. Grant authority to affix the Common Seal of the Council to any documents required to be sealed. CARRIED
|
SA17.161 Surrender of Lease - Milton Ulladulla Ex-Servos Club Ltd - Ulladulla Civic Centre, Princes Highway, Ulladulla |
HPERM Ref: D17/156785 |
Recommendation That Council: 1. Resolve to approve the surrender of the consecutive lease agreements (including the associated licence agreements) with Milton Ulladulla Ex-Servos Club Ltd for the use and occupation of the Council owned café / bar area of Ulladulla Civic Centre; 2. In its capacity as Reserve Trust Manager of Ulladulla (R87268) Reserve Trust, resolve to approve the surrender of the licence agreement between The Trust, the Minister for Lands and Forestry and Milton Ulladulla Ex-Servos Club Ltd for the Crown Land component of the Ulladulla Civic Centre and surrounds; and 3. Grant authority to affix the Common Seal of the Council to any documents required to be sealed and that the General Manager be authorised to sign any documents necessary to give effect to this resolution.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Gash / Clr Gartner) That Council: 1. Resolve to approve the surrender of the consecutive lease agreements (including the associated licence agreements) with Milton Ulladulla Ex-Servos Club Ltd for the use and occupation of the Council owned café / bar area of Ulladulla Civic Centre; 2. In its capacity as Reserve Trust Manager of Ulladulla (R87268) Reserve Trust, resolve to approve the surrender of the licence agreement between The Trust, the Minister for Lands and Forestry and Milton Ulladulla Ex-Servos Club Ltd for the Crown Land component of the Ulladulla Civic Centre and surrounds; and 3. Grant authority to affix the Common Seal of the Council to any documents required to be sealed and that the General Manager be authorised to sign any documents necessary to give effect to this resolution. CARRIED
|
SA17.162 Classification of Operational Land - Sewer Pump Station - Lot 3 DP1227133 - The Links Road, Nowra Hill |
HPERM Ref: D17/167768 |
Recommendation That Council resolve to classify the land described as Lot 3 DP1227133 at The Links Road, Nowra Hill as Operational Land.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Cheyne / Clr Gartner) That Council resolve to classify the land described as Lot 3 DP1227133 at The Links Road, Nowra Hill as Operational Land. CARRIED
|
SA17.163 Extinguishment of Drainage Easement - 32 Kings Point Dr, Kings Point |
HPERM Ref: D17/174320 |
Recommendation That Council: 1. Resolve to extinguish the easement for drainage 3 wide over Lot 72 DP28562 at Kings Point; 2. Accept the offer of compensation of $5,000 plus costs from the owner; and 3. Authorise the General Manager to sign all documents required to give effect to this resolution and to affix the Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to all documentation required to be sealed.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr Proudfoot / Clr White) That Council: 1. Resolve to extinguish the easement for drainage 3 wide over Lot 72 DP28562 at Kings Point; 2. Accept the offer of compensation of $5,000 plus costs from the owner; and 3. Authorise the General Manager to sign all documents required to give effect to this resolution and to affix the Common Seal of the Council of the City of Shoalhaven to all documentation required to be sealed. CARRIED
|
SA17.164 Renewal Strategy - Footbridge over Kangaroo River, Upper Kangaroo Valley |
HPERM Ref: D17/39809 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That 1. The timber deck and approach ramp of the bridge over Kangaroo River be replaced with Fibre Reinforced Plastic (FRP) and funded under the 2017/18 Bridge Maintenance Program 2. The timber pylons of the bridge be replaced and funded under the 2018/19 Bridge Maintenance Program
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Findley / Clr Cheyne) MIN17.507 That 1. The timber deck and approach ramp of the bridge over Kangaroo River be replaced with Fibre Reinforced Plastic (FRP) and funded under the 2017/18 Bridge Maintenance Program 2. The timber pylons of the bridge be replaced and funded under the 2018/19 Bridge Maintenance Program. CARRIED
|
SA17.165 Road Network Strategy - Nowra / Bomaderry |
HPERM Ref: D17/170005 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That 1. The report on the Strategic Overview of the road network for Nowra – Bomaderry be received for information 2. Council endorse the priorities and timing of the Nowra Key Road Projects 3. State and Federal Members of Parliament be advised of the endorsed projects to commence advocacy and to seek their commitment to future planning and funding 4. Staff work collaboratively with State Government roads and transport authorities to assist in the planning of these projects
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Proudfoot / Clr Pakes) MIN17.508 That: 1. The report on the Strategic Overview of the road network for Nowra – Bomaderry be received for information 2. Council endorse the priorities and timing of the Nowra Key Road Projects 3. State and Federal Members of Parliament be advised of the endorsed projects to commence advocacy and to seek their commitment to future planning and funding 4. Staff work collaboratively with State Government roads and transport authorities to assist in the planning of these projects CARRIED
Note: This item was reintroduced – see MIN17.510 |
SA17.166 Investigation - Repair Beach Access - Ocean St Culburra |
HPERM Ref: D17/224 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That the report on upgrading the Ocean Street, Culburra Beach car park be received for information.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Proudfoot) MIN17.509 That: 1. The report on upgrading the Ocean Street, Culburra Beach car park be received for information. 2. Council report back on feasible access points. CARRIED
|
SA17.167 Coastal Hazard Review- Outcome of Public Exhibition |
HPERM Ref: D17/36024 |
Item dealt with earlier in the meeting.
|
SA17.168 Installation of Barriers to Regulate Traffic - Captain St - Blenheim Beach Reserve - Vincentia |
HPERM Ref: D17/93251 |
Recommendation Council seek approval from the NSW Roads and Maritime Services to erect a gate and barriers at Captain St for the purpose of regulating traffic to prevent illegal activities, such as camping and rubbish dumping and the risk to the public from dangerous driving following community consultation undertaken by Council.
|
|
Recommendation (Clr White / Clr Gartner) That Council seek approval from the NSW Roads and Maritime Services to erect a gate and barriers at Captain St for the purpose of regulating traffic to prevent illegal activities, such as camping and rubbish dumping and the risk to the public from dangerous driving following community consultation undertaken by Council. CARRIED
|
Procedural Motion - Reintroduction of Item |
Motion (Clr Watson / Clr Proudfoot) That SA17.165 be reintroduced for discussion to allow for further questions. For: Clr Guile, Clr Gash, Clr White, Clr Levett, Clr Cheyne, Clr Gartner, Clr Findley, Clr Pakes, Clr Watson, Clr Kitchener, Clr Proudfoot and Russ Pigg Against: Clr Wells CARRIED
|
SA17.165 Road Network Strategy - Nowra / Bomaderry |
HPERM Ref: D17/170005 |
The item was reintroduced to allow for futher questioning. |
|
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That 1. The report on the Strategic Overview of the road network for Nowra – Bomaderry be received for information 2. Council endorse the priorities and timing of the Nowra Key Road Projects 3. State and Federal Members of Parliament be advised of the endorsed projects to commence advocacy and to seek their commitment to future planning and funding 4. Staff work collaboratively with State Government roads and transport authorities to assist in the planning of these projects
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Watson / Clr Guile) MIN17.510 That: 1. The report on the Strategic Overview of the road network for Nowra – Bomaderry be received for information 2. Council endorse the priorities and timing of the Nowra Key Road Projects 3. State and Federal Members of Parliament be advised of the endorsed projects to commence advocacy and to seek their commitment to future planning and funding 4. Staff work collaboratively with State Government roads and transport authorities to assist in the planning of these projects 5. The timing for the projects be as outlined in the report attachment on page 274 of the attachments (as shown below). CARRIED |
SA17.169 Review of Biodiversity Conservation Legislation in NSW and proposed Vegetation SEPP - Council Submission |
HPERM Ref: D17/157645 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council make a submission based on the contents of this report (including Attachment 1) to the NSW Government on the exhibited Land Management and Biodiversity Conservation Legislation Reforms and the proposed State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation) 2017.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Gartner / Clr Cheyne) MIN17.511 That Council make a submission based on the contents of this report (including Attachment 1) to the NSW Government on the exhibited Land Management and Biodiversity Conservation Legislation Reforms and the proposed State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation) 2017. CARRIED
|
SA17.170 Renew Deed of Agreement - Shoalhaven Rems |
HPERM Ref: D17/67782 |
Item dealt with earlier in the meeting.
|
SA17.171 Review of Shoalhaven Water Group Policies |
HPERM Ref: D17/166686 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council reaffirm the following policies with minor changes: 1. POL16/89 – Connection of Properties to Council’s Sewerage System. 2. POL16/90 – Water and Sewerage Headworks Charges (Section 64 Contributions) – Assistance for Developments. 3. POL16/91 – Provision of Water and Sewerage Infrastructure – Developments Not Included In Development Servicing Plans.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Wells / Clr White) MIN17.512 That Council reaffirm the following policies with minor changes: 1. POL16/89 – Connection of Properties to Council’s Sewerage System. 2. POL16/90 – Water and Sewerage Headworks Charges (Section 64 Contributions) – Assistance for Developments. 3. POL16/91 – Provision of Water and Sewerage Infrastructure – Developments Not Included In Development Servicing Plans. CARRIED
|
SA17.172 Floodplain Management Conference 2017 |
HPERM Ref: D17/163932 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council receive the report from Clr Annette Alldrick on the Floodplain Management Conference 2017 for information.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Pakes / Clr Gartner) MIN17.513 That Council receive the report from Clr Annette Alldrick on the Floodplain Management Conference 2017 for information. CARRIED
|
SA17.173 Australian Coastal Councils Conference |
HPERM Ref: D17/167695 |
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council receive the report from Clr Patricia White, Clr John Wells and Clr John Levett on the Australian Coastal Councils Conference for information.
|
|
RESOLVED (Clr Cheyne / Clr White) MIN17.514 That Council receive the report from Clr Patricia White, Clr John Wells and Clr John Levett on the Australian Coastal Councils Conference for information. CARRIED
|
There being no further business, the meeting concluded, the time being 8.08pm.
Clr Guile
CHAIRPERSON
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 23 |
SA17.174 Policy Determination - Not Allowing Circuses that utilise Exotic Animals on Council Land
HPERM Ref: D17/201866
Group: General Manager's Group
Attachments: 1. Shellharbour City Council - Report ⇩
2. Shellharbour City Council - Resolution ⇩
3. IPJO Request ⇩
Purpose / Summary
To determine a Council position on this matter.
Options
1. Council note the report and adopt a “policy” position of not allowing any Circus, which utilise exotic animals, to hire/occupy any Council land (owned or as Trustee) and advise Illawarra Pilot Joint Organisation (IPJO) accordingly. This will then be reflected in the Sustainable Events Policy.
2. Council note the report and not adopt any “exclusion” Policy as set out by Shellharbour City Council and advise IPJO accordingly.
Background
Shellharbour City Council recently considered a report (Attachment 1) on this matter and resolved (in part) “that Council list this topic for discussion at the next IPJO meeting” (see Attachment 2 for full resolution).
IPJO has subsequently referred the matter to each individual member council to consider in the first instance (Attachment 3).
Council land may provide a site suitable for a circus however in recent times visiting circuses have held their “shows” on private land eg Stocklands, Nowra and IRT, Ulladulla.
The Shellharbour report provides information on the pros and cons of allowing circuses, which utilise exotic animals, to occupy Council land.
Councils current position is reflected in the “Sustainable Events policy”. This states:-
22. Performing Animals
Events that feature animals must be conducted in accordance with the Exhibited Animals Protection Act 1986 and the Exhibited Animals Protection Regulation 2005.
Under NSW legislation, circuses are required to be licensed in accordance with the above Act and Regulation.
Animals used as part of a temporary exhibit require approval through NSW Agriculture eg. Mobile Farm Shows, Camel rides and pony rides are exempt from approvals.
A copy of approvals must be submitted with Sustainable Events Application Form
Community Engagement
Not undertaken at this stage. This has not been an issue of significance raised by the community with Council.
Financial Implications
Not relevant to this topic.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 31 |
SA17.175 South Coast Regional Jobs Investment Package - Council Projects
HPERM Ref: D17/216330
Group: General Manager's Group
Section: Economic Development
Attachments: 1. Map of potential sites for consolidation ⇩
2. Detailed cash analysis - Burrill Lake Site ⇩
3. Detailed Cash Analysis - Bill Andriske ⇩
Purpose / Summary
Recently the South Coast Jobs Initiative program was announced. Council is eligible to apply and certain projects are now being worked up for application submissions. In considering this opportunity Council also needs to consider what the future use of the former Ulladulla STP site will be – industrial or sporting fields.
That the following projects and Council funding commitments be submitted under the South Coast Regional Jobs Investment Package: 1. Woollamia Boat Lift and Shed – SCC contribution: $200,000 (from Economic Development Reserve) 2. Greenwell Point Boating Facilities – SCC contribution: $750,000 (from Economic Development Reserve) 3. Provision of electricity to Huskission Business Precinct – SCC contribution: $50,000 (from Economic Development Reserve and/or streetscape funding) 4. Former Ulladulla STP Industrial Land Subdivision – SCC contribution:$2,219,000 (from Industrial Land Development Reserve) 5. Defence Support Training Needs Analysis – SCC contribution: $25,000 (from Economic Development Reserve)
|
Options
1. The Strategy and Assets Committee approve the recommendations to Council for the submission of the aforementioned projects.
Implications: - Council will submit the application outlined and budgetary adjustments will be made should the grants be successful
2. The Strategy and Assets Committee do not approve the submission.
Implications:- Council may miss the opportunity to secure Federal funding for a number of significant projects for the city.
Background
The South Coast Regional Jobs Investment Package is a $20 million investment by the Australian Government to help diversify the regional economy, stimulate economic growth and deliver sustainable outcomes.
There are three project streams all of which require at least a 50% cash contribution from the applicant.
• Local Infrastructure – a funding stream for local governing bodies and not-for-profit organisations to invest in new or upgraded infrastructure. The minimum funding amount is $50K. Projects must be ready to commence within 12 weeks of signing the funding agreement.
• Business Innovation – this funding is to enable business to build scale and capability to be competitive in new or growing markets that create sustainable employment. Minimum funding amount is $50K. Projects must be ready to commence within 12 weeks of signing the funding agreement.
• Skills and Training – this is for local government bodies and agencies and not-for-profit organisations to support training and upskilling of the regional workforce to meet regional priorities, take advantage of emerging opportunities and withstand major labour market changes.
The maximum amount of funding per grant is the limit of the grant funding for the region (i.e. $20 million).
All grant applications will be assessed against four merit criteria.
1. The extent to which your project addresses the Local Investment Plan’s sectors and strategic priorities (20 points)
2. Economic benefit delivered to a region – short and long term (30 points)
3. Value for money (30 points)
4. Capacity, capability and resources to carry out the project (20 points)
The South Coast Region Local Investment Plan has identified the following key priority business sectors:
• Tourism and tourism support
• Manufacturing and transport logistics
• Primary industry
• Health and human services
• Specialised education services
Shoalhaven City Council could submit five grant applications – four in the Local Infrastructure stream and one to the Skills and Training stream.
Project overview – Infrastructure Stream
Woollamia Boat Lift and Shed
9 FTEs and $5.4M of economic output per annum
Project Cost: $380,900
Grant funding request: $180,900
SCC contribution: $200,000 (from Economic Development Reserve)
There are no boat maintenance facilities located within Jervis Bay. This project will consist of the construction of a hardstand area, associated drainage and environmental controls, erection of a shed, connection to utilities, fencing and the purchase of a hydraulic boat lift - all the components required to create a boat maintenance facility at Woollamia. This facility will be heavily utilised by visiting and local commercial and recreational boaters. The facility, including hydraulic boat lift, will be leased generating 3FTEs.
The lack of a boat maintenance facility has been cited by many local businesses as an impediment to business expansion. Construction of such a facility will lead to increased year round, permanent employment in local businesses including ship repairers, boat builders, marine survey and local upholsters.
This project has been developed in close consultation with a number of key stakeholders including Marine Rescue NSW, Jervis Bay Yacht Club, JB Game Fishing Club, JB Sailing Club and a number of local businesses. All agree that this facility is greatly needed and will result in increased employment, business expansion and a stronger and more diverse economy.
This project will create 3 FTEs in Ship and boat manufacturing which will lead to the creation of another 6 jobs in the broader community through flow on effects.
Greenwell Point Boating Facilities
9FTEs and $4.6M of economic output per annum
Project Cost: $1,494,339
Grant funding request: $744,339
SCC contribution: $750,000 (from Economic Development Reserve)
The main wharf at Greenwell Point consisted of two separate structures; the Crown owned concrete T jetty and the smaller Council owned timber jetty. The timber jetty had reached the end of its useful life and has been demolished. The demolition of the timber jetty has resulted in a number of boats without access to the wharf. Demand for wharf space is quite high. This project proposes to construct a berthing facility for a minimum of 12 vessels to cater for commercial operators and touring vessels.
Part of this project is to develop a final design and then seek community feedback. As the design is not finalised all projected income and benefits have been calculated on a conservative berth yield of 12 berths while costings have been based on the construction of the more expensive option illustrated below.
*Note: Above image is for concept purposes only
This project will create 9 FTEs based upon:
• 4FTE charter boat operator
• 3FTE charter boat operator indirect effect
• 2FTE charter boat user accommodation
Provision of electricity to Huskisson Business Precinct
Impact is undetermined at this stage. Any of the major developments on the northern side of Owen St will require this upgrade and to add additional floorspace above the retail southern side of Owen St will also require this electricity network upgrade. Over 300 people work in the Huskisson business precinct. This figure could easily double with the right stimuli and providing augmentation to the electricity network will certainly achieve this. An extremely conservative estimate would be the creation of 30FTEs and $6.6m additional economic output annually.
Project Cost: $550,000
Grant funding request: $275,000
SCC contribution: $50,000 (from Economic Development Reserve and/or streetscape funding)
Endeavour Energy: $225,000
The Economic Development Office commissioned akh Design Services to conduct a Huskisson CBD Power Survey. The report was completed in October 2015. The main findings of that report are that:
• “The ongoing development of Huskisson and the continued increase in electrical load within the CBD will require the installation of additional substation assets to supply future loads”
• That there are limited locations in which to install a pad substation with suggested locations being on Council land
• Work on the installation of pad substations should coincide with design and works to underground high and low voltage on the southern side of Owen Street between Sydney Street to Currambene Street. This would improve the network and future network capacity and well as improving the amenity of the main street of Huskisson.
Current practice in terms of electricity connection is that the next one to develop will be required to install costly substations that will improve capacity not only for that development but for other future unrelated developments as well. The cost of this work is not equitably spread among all those who will benefit from this infrastructure and is borne by a single development. It is apparent that a number of current approvals are stalled and other DAs are not moving forward and the availability of electricity supply has been quoted as a factor.
The Economic Development Office has approached Endeavour Energy to collaborate on ‘Provision of electricity to Huskisson Business Precinct’ to be submitted as a SCRJIP application. It is proposed that Council apply for funding to pay for 50% of the cost of installation of two pad-mount sub-stations and associated works which also includes the relocation of existing overhead power to underground for those businesses on the south side of Owen Street. Endeavour Energy have indicated a willingness to co-operate and negotiations are proceeding along these lines.
Former Ulladulla STP Industrial Land subdivision
178 FTE’s and $76.6M annual economic output (once all lots have been sold and businesses have established)
Project Cost: $4,219,000
Grant funding request: $2,100,000
SCC contribution: $2,219,000 (from Industrial Land Development Reserve)
In considering if to make an application for this project, Council also needs to consider its position on the future use of the former STP site.
In May 2016 Council resolved the following: (MIN16.393)
That the General Manager develop a report to Council on the proposed sale and options for future use of the Council owned land known as ‘Future Park’ on Camden St West Ulladulla.
At a Councillor briefing in February 2017, Council were presented with two potential future use options for the site; a light industrial subdivision or expansion of the adjoining Ulladulla Sportspark. The information below expands on this briefing and will allow Council to make a decision on the future use of the site.
SUBJECT LAND
188 Camden St, Ulladulla, Lot 1 DP1137716. Area 4.94 ha, zoned Light Industrial (IN2) with a small portion along the southern boundary zoned Environmental Conservation (E2).
HISTORY
The land was acquired from the Crown in the early 1970’s, with adjoining land compulsorily acquired from land owners to the East (towards the Princes Hwy) and vegetation planted to create a buffer. The site was operated as a sewage treatment plant (STP) from 1975 until it was decommissioned in November 2005.
The STP relied on a trickling filter and extended aeriation treatment processes with reclaimed water being discharged into the ocean.
The site is affected by contamination (asbestos and effluent bio-solids) as a result of the use of the site as an STP. Prior to any redevelopment of the site remediation will be required. The site is further constrained by an estimated 1.29 ha of environmentally sensitive vegetation.
Approximately 0.65 ha of the site has been allocated for use of the SES (existing) and Milton Ulladulla Men’s Shed (proposed). From a total area of 4.9 ha, the total developable area is 3 ha (30,000 sqm).
The site has been the subject of previous development concepts, none of which has progressed and apart from the allocation of land for the SES and Milton Ulladulla Men’s Shed, the site has been idle since 2005.
Under CSP Council is to maintain a stock of industrial land for sale and development throughout the city. In the south this has been frustrated by Council’s inability to secure land to develop for this purpose. This opportunity will allow Council to break into this market in Ulladulla with the view to stimulate further development of this type or motivate the other major landowner to develop or joint venture with Council for the economic growth of the Milton/Ulladulla area.
Zoning
The current zoning of the former Ulladulla STP site is IN2 – light industrial. The objectives of the zone are:
· To provide a wide range of light industrial, warehouse and related land uses.
· To encourage employment opportunities and to support the viability of centres.
· To minimise any adverse effect of industry on other land uses
· To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of workers in the area.
· To support and protect industrial land for industrial uses.
· To allow a diversity of activities that do not significantly conflict with the operation of existing or proposed development.
This is one of the few vacant sites in Ulladulla that has an IN2 zoning. Whilst playing fields are permissible with consent in the zone, in this instance there is some question as to whether the use would meet the zone objectives that being to “support and protect industrial land for industrial uses”.
The site was specifically rezoned when the old STP was decommissioned to enable industrial development. The LEP does also acknowledge the possibility that the site could also be used for and extension of the South Ulladulla sports fields or aquaculture development – this was done because Council was considering these possibilities around at the time.
The preferred longer term use of this site given its nature and adjoining uses is industrial development consistent with its zoning. It would be extremely difficult to rezone it to for example a recreational zone given the State Government planning directives that exist to protect existing industrial zoned land.
REMEDIATION & FUTURE USE
Since 2006 Council has engaged consultants to provide advice on remediation and future use options.
2006
GHD provided a Rehabilitation Plan on the assumption the land was to be used as a sportsfield. Contamination was identified, including extensive asbestos containing material.
Draft design and costings for an AFL sportsfield were included in the GDH report.
Recommended remediation did not occur.
2016
GHD provided an updated Contamination Assessment Report and Indicative Costs of Remediation (for both sportsfield and industrial land).
Level of contamination largely unchanged; the site unsuitable for any future use without remediation. The extent and method of remediation is reliant upon agreement upon intended future use.
2016 - 2017
Council’s Property Unit liaised with Byron Shire Council; a Council whom has already completed and continues decommissioning similar STPs. Byron have used Tender processes to engage an ‘end to end’ contractor to complete each of their remediation works. Works in each case have been completed in 10-12 weeks.
Based on the anecdotal evidence from Byron and the estimates provided by GHD, a remediation budget of $1,200,000 to $1,800,000 should be considered irrespective of the final use.
FUTURE USE OPTIONS:
OPTION 1 – LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION
SUPPLY & DEMAND FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND
There is a shortage of suitably sized serviced and available industrial land in Ulladulla; there are currently no Lots of industrial land available for sale. In the last 18 months the volume of industrial land sales has been low, 6 Lots of industrial land sold (ranging in size from 1485sqm to 1.16ha), a further 5 Lots have been withdrawn from sale.
The last subdivision of industrial land occurred at West Ulladulla in Coller Road in 1988. Adjoining this land is 19 ha of undeveloped industrial land owned by the Crown. Discussions were held between the Crown and Council for the proposed acquisition and development of up to 33 industrial Lots between 2005 and 2010, however previous and current Aboriginal Land Claims prevent this project progressing until such time as any land claims are resolved.
To service demand for industrial land, the former STP site has a potential to yield up to 10 lots ranging in area from 2,500m² to 3,500m². It is proposed to develop 10 Lots at an average sale price per Lot of $300,000.
POTENTIAL JOBS GENERATION
The Economic Development Office expect that each lot would support on average 8.9 Full Time Equivalent positions (FTE’s) as is the case on a per square metre basis for 3000m². This is dependent on the nature of the business that is established on the industrial lots. A conservative estimate of job yield and mix could be as follows:
• 20 FTE’s in Manufacturing
• 10 FTE’s in Residential Building Construction
• 5 FTE’s in Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
• 20 FTE’s in Wholesale Trade
• 15 FTE’s in Transport & Warehousing
• 10 FTE’s in Automotive Repair and Maintenance
80 jobs generated at the former Ulladulla STP would lead to the creation of an additional 98 jobs through flow on effects.
Employment created at this site would result in an annual direct output of $42.98M. The flow on industrial effects would be $23.27M and an additional $10.30M would be generated through consumption impacts.
COST OF DEVELOPMENT
Remediation |
||||
Estimated Remediation Costs |
$1,800,000 |
|||
Contingency (20%) |
$ 360,000 |
|||
TOTAL REMEDIATION (A) |
$2,160,000 |
|||
Construction costs |
Approx Qty |
Unit |
Rate |
Estimated Amount |
Road and drainage |
400 |
m |
2500 |
$1,000,000 |
Sewer retic |
700 |
m |
250 |
$ 175,000 |
Water retic |
450 |
m |
180 |
$ 81,000 |
Elec & Telstra retic |
450 |
m |
450 |
$ 203,000 |
Elec Substation |
1 |
item |
|
$ 100,000 |
Detention basin |
1 |
item |
|
$ 200,000 |
Total Construction (Ex GST) |
$1,759,000 |
|||
|
||||
Non- Construction costs |
Approx Qty |
Unit |
Rate |
Estimated Amount |
Consultant, Council & Authority Fees |
10 |
Lots |
30,000 |
$ 300,000 |
TOTAL SUBDIVISION COST (B) |
$2,059,000 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL PROJECT COST (A) + (B) |
$4,219,000 |
FUNDING SOURCES
Should Council decide that the former Ulladulla STP be developed as industrial land in line with its current zoning, then the Economic Development Office of Shoalhaven City Council would seek grant funding to alleviate the cost of bringing this land to market.
The South Coast Regional Jobs and Investment Package (SCRJIP) is a $20M federal government program specific to the South Coast region. Funding for infrastructure is available through this scheme to Local Government. It is proposed that a grant for $2,100,000 be sought to offset the cost of this development, with the balance to come from the Industrial Land Development Reserve.
TOTAL RETURN ON INVESTMENT |
|
Sales - 10 Lots @ $300,000 |
$3,000,000 |
Less |
|
Legal @ $2,000 / Lot |
-$ 20,000 |
Holding Costs* (over 5 years) – interest, rates, maintenance |
-$ 160,000 |
NET SALES INCOME (C) |
$2,820,000 |
NET GRANT FUNDING (D) |
$2,100,000 |
TOTAL NET INCOME (C) + (D) |
$4,920,000 |
TOTAL PROJECT COST |
-$4,219,000 |
NET RETURN TO COUNCIL |
$ 1,000 |
*Holding costs only true if able to secure $2.1M in grant funding. If no grant, then add in a further $140,000 in holding costs and deduct $2.1M of grant income– therefore potential Net Return (Loss) to Council = -$1,539,000
OPTION 2 - SPORTSFIELD
The Ulladulla Sports Park is home to cricket and netball in summer, rugby league, AFL and netball in winter. The complex also houses a skate bowl and has the capacity to accommodate the Milton Croquet Club (4 courts). The southern field was constructed in 2010 and further upgrades to existing facilities occurred between 2008 and 2013, including the sealing of the carpark.
STRATEGIC DIRECTION
In May 2017, Shoalhaven City Council adopted the Community Infrastructure Strategic Plan 2017-2036 (CISP). The CISP:
‘has been developed to provide a strategic framework to guide the direction, actions and priorities for the provision of community infrastructure in the present and for the next 21 years. The CISP will become Council’s one-stop approach to the forward planning and management of community infrastructure’
Overall, a key recommendation of the CISP is to aim for ‘quality over quantity’ – in practical terms this means to:
• Rationalise or decommission infrastructure that is of low use; and
• Upgrade or embellish infrastructure to make it multi-purpose and attractive to the greater region.
In its analysis of the most southern section of the local government area (Planning Area Five), the CISP reports that:
‘33.3% of those residents that completed the community survey are not happy with the supply of sports parks in the planning area. However, only a third of the sports parks are being used thirteen hours plus per week. With only 62.5% of residents rating their quality as good and very good, there is opportunity to upgrade the existing sports parks to better cater to the sporting needs of planning area five’s residents.
For example, there is opportunity to expand Ulladulla Sports Park into the old Sewerage Treatment Plant site’ (p.XVII)
Furthermore, section 12.2 of the CISP provides area specific community infrastructure recommendations – these include:
· Ulladulla Sports Park – investigate the potential to expand onto the adjacent land at the old wastewater treatment site and develop netball courts and internal paths
· Bill Andriske Oval – investigate the potential to relocate to Ulladulla Sports Park.
The Ulladulla Sports Park currently includes:
• AFL field
• Rugby field
• Cricket field
• Netball courts
• Skate Park.
The expansion of the Park could include croquet courts and an all-purpose sports field to cater to NRL, AFL, Rugby and Cricket. By providing such facilities would then establish a Southern Shoalhaven Sports Hub to match the Bay & Basin Hub in the mid Shoalhaven and the Shoalhaven Community & Recreation Precinct at Bomaderry in the northern section of the region. If this opportunity to embellish the current Sport Park site is not harnessed, the opportunity to replicate it in another location in the southern Shoalhaven may be lost.
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY WELLBEING BENEFITS
There are a range of potential economic and community wellbeing benefits associated with establishing this site as a comprehensive sports hub. For example, a regional sporting facility such as this has the potential to host a range of key regional sporting events that in turn can promote much in the way of tourism and economic development. For example, a 2 day sports event attracting 100 domestic day visitors and 400 domestic overnight visitors is estimated to contribute $158,000 per event directly into the local economy (prior to any multiplier effect is accounted for) (REMPLAN 2017). If one of these events are held each month, that equates to $1,896,000 economic activation per year.
In addition to the economic benefits, the establishment of a full sports hub could also provide a range of community wellbeing outcomes. As is evidenced in the report Sport for Community Development (Australian Sports Commission, 2017) these can include:
• Strengthening of community identity, as a focal point for personal interaction and community engagement
• Address social inequities and disadvantage through improved social capital
• Improved social participation and feelings of trust
• Promotes better work-life balance
• Reduction in mental health symptoms
• Reduction in racism and homophobia
• Reduction in crime and anti-social behaviour
• Reduction in preventable health conditions such as obesity and cardio-vascular disease.
Although hard to quantify, there is also an economic benefit to the public that results from the numerous community wellbeing outcomes. For example, the Centre for Sport and Social Impact at Latrobe University calculated the social return on investment for an average Australian Rules Football community club to be $4.40 return for every $1 spent to run the club (Value of a Community Football Club, 2014). The Australian Rugby League Commission calculated that the cost-benefit ratio of a range of NRL based community development programs was 1:5, meaning for every $1 invested, the value of the social return was $5 (NRL Social Impact Report 2015). As can be seen from the above statements, the benefit to the community from the provision of appropriate, quality sporting facilities is varied and abundant.
All of the above mentioned economic and community wellbeing benefits need to be recognised in the greater context of local government and in particular, our core social justice principles of:
• Equity
• Access and connectedness
• Participation
• Rights.
These social justice principles are reflected in the community’s key priorities as listed in the current Community Strategic Plan:
1. Resilient, safe and inclusive communities
1.1 Build inclusive, safe and connected communities
1.2 Activate communities through arts, culture and events
1.3 Support active, healthy, liveable communities.
These key priorities can be adequately addressed through the establishment and provision of a comprehensive sports hub.
COST OF DEVELOPMENT
Remediation |
Estimated Amount |
|
Estimated Remediation Costs |
$1,200,000 |
|
Contingency (20%) |
$240,000 |
|
TOTAL REMEDIATION |
$1,440,000 |
|
|
|
|
Construction costs |
||
Field Construction |
|
$1,500,000 |
Club House |
|
$1,000,000 |
Lighting |
|
$450,000 |
Services |
|
$250,000 |
Reticulation |
|
$150,000 |
Parking |
|
$100,000 |
Road Upgrade |
|
$500,000 |
Total Construction (Ex GST) |
$3,950,000 |
|
|
||
Non- Construction costs |
Design Consultant |
$395,000 |
|
||
TOTAL PROJECT COST |
$5,785,000 |
The difference is in the two options in relation to the costs of decontamination are that the sports field option would reuse the bio solids as back fill thereby saving approx. $600k.
FUNDING SOURCES
There are 2 potential funding sources;
· Grant funds,
· Council funds - consolidation of existing sports reserves which could be relocated to the expanded and embellished Ulladulla Sports park,
or a combination of any of the above.
Council Funded
The expansion and embellishment of the Ulladulla Sports Park would create a surplus of sporting facilities as the users of following sites have the potential to utilise the new facility; Burrill Lake Sportsground, Bill Andriske Oval and Frogs Holla Reserve (see Attachment 1 for map and detail on each site).
Users of Burrill Lake Sportsground and Bill Andriske could relocate and these sites be developed and sold for residential use. (see Attachment 2 and 3 for detailed cash analysis). Users of Frogs Holla could potentially relocate (thereby moving to a site that does not have the current issues of poor drainage and lighting) but this site to be retained by Council.
It should be noted that the potential redevelopment of a site such as Bill Andriske Oval will generate considerable community interest and comment while at the same time potentially providing significant opportunities for the local community.
POTENTIAL NET RETURN- RECYCLING OF BURRILL LAKE & BILL ANDRISKE OVAL
RECYLED SITE |
NET RETURN |
Burrill Lake Sportsground |
$1,866,092 |
Bill Andriske |
$4,067,713 |
NET PROCEEDS OF SALE |
$5,933,805 |
|
|
TOTAL PROJECT COST (SPORTS FIELD) |
- $5,785,000 |
|
|
TOTAL SURPLUS TO COUNCIL |
$148,805 |
Conclusion
With the grant funding from this funding scheme the Light Industrial Land option meets a range of financial and employment indicators and is in line with the site zoning and State Government directions in relation to the protection of industrial land. Staff are not recommending that the site be used for the expansion of the Ulladulla Sports Park.
Project Overview – Skills and Training stream
Defence Support Training Needs Analysis
Benefit undetermined
Project Cost: $100,000
Grant funding request: $50,000
SCC contribution: $25,000 (from Economic Development Reserve)
Industry: $25,000 (to be confirmed)
This project is to investigate the Australian defence support training capability with an aim to establish the Shoalhaven as a defence support training hub for relevant skills. Defence support training is highly skilled with limited demand elsewhere. Access to training can be very expensive as training providers deliver training to limited class sizes. Delivering training of this nature is not profitable. There is concern that without government intervention such highly specialised training may cease to be delivered as training providers are unable to carry the costs. Already there has been a national decrease in the delivery of some courses. This project is to assess industry need and develop a defence support training hub that will deliver training nationally. There is a risk that our national defence support industry may not be able to access Australian defence support training impacting Shoalhaven’s defence support capability.
Community Engagement
There has been a range of community consultations each of these projects has been developed over the years.
Financial Implications
The financial implications are outlined in each of the proposal above and are again summarised below.
Woollamia Boat Lift and Shed
Project Cost: $380,900
Grant funding request: $180,900
SCC contribution: $200,000 (from Economic Development Reserve)
Greenwell Point Boating Facilities
Project Cost: $1,494,339
Grant funding request: $744,339
SCC contribution: $750,000 (from Economic Development Reserve)
Provision of electricity to Huskisson Business Precinct
Project Cost: $550,000
Grant funding request: $275,000
SCC contribution: $50,000 (from Economic Development Reserve and/or streetscape funding)
Endeavour Energy: $225,000
Ulladulla STP Industrial Land subdivision
Project Cost: $4,219,000
Grant funding request: $2,100,000
SCC contribution: $2,219,000 (from Industrial Land Development Reserve)
Defence Support Training Needs Analysis
Project Cost: $100,000
Grant funding request: $50,000
SCC contribution: $25,000 (from Economic Development Reserve)
Industry: $25,000 (to be confirmed)
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 52 |
SA17.176 Revenue Options Follow Up Report
HPERM Ref: D17/198634
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Purpose / Summary
To report back to Council on resolutions from the Extraordinary Council meeting of 1 February 2017 in relation to possible alternate funding options, levy’s and tourist accommodation charges.
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council note the information provided in this report.
|
Options
1. Council adopt the recommendation as stated
Implications: No further action will be undertaken outside the normal operational practice of seeking all possible revenue opportunities.
2. Council can choose to make an alternate recommendation
Implications: The implications will be dependent on the actual resolution made.
Background
At the Extraordinary Council meeting on 1 February 2017 Council made the following resolutions as part of an 11 part resolution about the proposed Special Rate Variation
6 The General Manager report back to Council on how Council could capture any business that is operating from residential premises and re-categorise to business and if there are any legislative hurdles should Council wish to pursue this as an ongoing part of revenue review. This should include the cost for resourcing such a project- this suggestion was put to Council by concerned ratepayers.
7. The General Manager report back if any other Councils apply a levy or any other mechanism to increase rates on those properties that are known to supply accommodation to the tourism industry and are essentially a business- these properties would be those listed by real estate agents and online mechanisms such as Air BnB and Stayz –this suggestion has been raised by concerned business operators.
8. The General Manager also report back on any measures that can be used to essentially pass some of the financial burden of maintaining assets onto the many tourist that come to the Shoalhaven, suggestions that have come through include parking meters for peak tourist times and places and bed taxes. The report should also include any legislative or resourcing issues for such matters.
9. In reporting back could the General Manager please comment on any timing issues that could be foreseen if such mechanisms were to be adopted by Council.
This report provides information in response to these resolutions.
Under Sec 516 Land is to be categorised as residential if it is a parcel of rateable land valued as one assessment and:
(a) its dominant use is for residential accommodation (otherwise than as a hotel, motel, guest-house, backpacker hostel or nursing home or any other form of residential accommodation (not being a boarding house or a lodging house) prescribed by the regulations), (the regulations prescribe that caravan parks and manufactured home estates are not to be categorised as residential and retirement villages, serviced apartments or time-shares are to be categorised as residential) or
(b) in the case of vacant land, it is zoned or otherwise designated for use under an environmental planning instrument (with or without development consent) for residential purposes, or
(c) it is rural residential land.
Under the current LG Act our options are extremely limited. Special rates and sub-categories are options available but staff do not believe Council could apply these to address this issue, due to this type of accommodation often being scattered amongst normal business and residential properties.
Special rates would need to apply to all land, which would benefit from any special rate not just those that are being used as tourist accommodation, that is, all the business or residential properties in the nominated area would be subject to the special rates.
A special rate category (sub-category) for tourist accommodation would also not be possible again due to the location of the tourist accommodation. Sub-categories must either be within a ‘centre of population’ for residential or ‘centre of activity’ for business. All land within that sub-category must be levied the same. Staff do not believe that Council would be able to create a residential sub-category for tourist accommodation using a ‘centre of population’.
From a rating perspective staff do not believe that Council would be able to extract more dollars from tourists.
A tourism levy, as such, would not be possible under rating but perhaps it could be a fee of some sort that could be charged on these types of properties. This would then have to be charged by an invoice being raised by Accounts Receivable. If Council were to go down this path, Council would need to ensure that it had a system in place that would allow the tracking of tourist accommodation properties. Both the commencement of and termination of this type of accommodation being offered would need to be recorded and Council would also need to determine if it would be an annual charge or a seasonal charge depending on the type of tourist accommodation. Staff do not believe that rating systems are designed for this type of data collection.
Special Rates
OLG Council Rating and Revenue Raising Manual
Sec 495 of the Act enables council to make a special rate for or towards meeting the cost of any "works, services, facilities or activities" provided or undertaken, or proposed to be provided or undertaken, by council within the whole or any part of council's area, other than "domestic waste management services".
By virtue of Sec 495(2), the special rate is to be levied on such rateable land in council's area as, in council's "opinion":
• benefits or will benefit from the works, services, facilities or activities; or
• contributes or will contribute to the need for the works, services, facilities or activities; or
• has or will have access to the works, services, facilities or activities.
With respect to local rates, council is required to form a certain "opinion" as a necessary precondition to the making and levying of a special rate. It is the land which will benefit from, contribute to the need for, or have access to the particular works, services, facilities or activities the subject of the rate. Council must define, with some precision, the work, service, facility or activity in question which will benefit, etc., the land.
The opinion must correspond exactly with the "substance" and "effect" of the rate, that is, all land rated must be identical to the land which will benefit from, contribute to the need for, or have access to the particular works, services, facilities or activities the subject of the rate. Thus, the rate must not be levied on any land which will not, in council's reasonable opinion, benefit from, contribute to the need for, or have access to those works, services, facilities or activities. All land which will, in council's reasonable opinion, benefit from, contribute to the need for, or have access to those works, services, facilities or activities must be rated.
Sub-Categories
LG Act – Sec 529 Rate may be the same or different within a category
(1) Before making an ordinary rate, a council may determine a sub-category or sub-categories for one or more categories of rateable land in its area.
(2) A sub-category may be determined:
(a) for the category “farmland”—according to the intensity of land use, the irrigability of the land or
economic factors affecting the land, or
(b) for the category “residential”—according to whether the land is rural residential land or is within a centre of population, or
(c) for the category “mining”—according to the kind of mining involved, or
(d) for the category “business”—according to a centre of activity.
OLG Council Rating and Revenue Raising Manual
It is for council to consider the definition when making decisions about sub-categories for the purpose of residential rating. Nevertheless the following guidelines are provided for councils:
• Separate towns or villages may be regarded as discrete centres of population.
• Wherever contiguous urban development exists the criteria that should be present in order to constitute a centre of population are:
§ that there is a discernible community of interest amongst the residents which differs from those living outside that part of the area; and,
§ that part of the council area is independently serviced by infrastructure which reflects the focus of that part of the area as a centre of population.
• A centre of population should not be a device intended to enable rating variations within an homogeneous suburb or suburbs, or by street, or by any special feature such as proximity to water.
It is clear that sub-categorisation on the basis of centres of population may have limited application within the suburbs of the main urban centres.
Other options
There has been discussion by some Council’s about the introduction of a tourism levy or bed tax. No evidence has been found of any council undertaking this in a targeted manner that simply levies accommodation providers. Some Councils do have tourism levies. These are either across all commercial/business categories or across all ratepayers.
There are a number of opportunities that could be considered to seek additional revenue from the tourists who visit the Shoalhaven. These include:-
· Partnership deals with advertisers such as sign boards at key tourism locations that charge rent to companies like ohhh media
· Paid parking at key destinations; this could see income from the tourist/visitors. Locals would already have their own parking in their homes or Council could have a local free parking permit system. Such a strategy could reduce numbers of visitors.
· Lobby for state / federal governments to add a bed tax to websites, like an additional booking fee on sites like stayz, Airbnb and the other 50 plus booking channels, so that funds raised go back to LG infrastructure costs. EG “local tourism sustainability fee” on checkout per transaction.
· Fee for service;
- Fees for operators to run on public land - like beach use for surf schools
- This could impact how many operators who would want to move or work in the region
In considering this matter Council also need to be mindful of the fact that the tourist inject over $800Million per year into the local economy. It could be argued that every resident in the Shoalhaven benefits either directly or indirectly from the tourist industry. Commercial, industrial and retail providers already pay rates and in some way they are here due to tourism and therefore are contributing to the costs of the city from business they derive directly and indirectly from tourists.
Community Engagement
Consultation has not occurred with the local community in relation to this report.
Policy Implications
There are no policy implications as a result of this report
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications as a result of this report
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 56 |
SA17.177 Abseiling and Rock Climbing Policy - withdrawn
HPERM Ref: D17/208127
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Purpose / Summary
The purpose of this report is to formally rescind Council’s Abseiling and Rock Climbing Policy.
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That the public policy, Abseiling and Rock Climbing, be rescinded.
|
Options
1. Rescind the policy.
Implications: The current policy is now superflous as the Civil Liability Act 2002 Sect 5L deals with dangerous recreational avtivities and Councils duty of care.
2. Reconfirm the previous policy, as previously adopted.
Implications: As the policy is now superflous, this is red tape for its own sake.
3. Reconfirm the policy, with amendments
Implications: As the policy is now superflous, this is red tape for its own sake.
Background
This policy was first adpted by Council on 16 June 1996, and has since be re-confirmed upon it’s expiry in 2005, 2009, and 2013.
In 2002, the Civil Liability Act 2002, was enacted by the NSW Government, dealing with Council’s duty of care for dangerous recreational activities. The following provisions cover the issues that the policy attempted to cover.
Section 5L of the Civil Liability Act provides:
No liability for harm suffered from obvious risks of dangerous recreational activities
5L No liability for harm suffered from obvious risks of dangerous recreational activities
(1) A person ("the defendant" ) is not liable in negligence for harm suffered by another person ("the plaintiff" ) as a result of the materialisation of an obvious risk of a dangerous recreational activity engaged in by the plaintiff.
(2) This section applies whether or not the plaintiff was aware of the risk.
Policy Implications
Rescinding this policy, will have no impact of the Shoalhaven Community as Council’s duty of care is covered in the Act.
Financial Implications
Rescinding this policy from use will create a slight saving to Council, due to a reduction in the number of policies maintained and reviewed as required.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 58 |
SA17.178 Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre - Hiring Policy
HPERM Ref: D17/208657
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Recreation Community & Culture
Attachments: 1. Draft Policy (under separate cover) ⇨
Purpose / Summary
To review the revised Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre Hiring Policy and place on public exhibition.
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
Implications: Provides clear guidelines stating Council’s strategic business and cultural development intentions for the Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre – to assist venue management in programming and hiring, and enables the Policy to be placed on Public Exhibition.
2. Decline to accept the recommendation
Implications: Loss of strategic framework for SEC management, community and hirers regarding programing of the facility
3. Provide an alternate recommendation
Implications: Unknown at this point – however programming is a key function of the facility and significant changes to the intent of the Policy will have ramifications on the centre program and potential revenue base.
Background
This policy is due for review within the first year of an election of a new Council.
Review of the policy is a regular component of business planning and ensuring the Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre (SEC) keeps pace with Council and community expectations, and is benchmarked against national industry standards.
The review of the policy was based on interviews with frontline venue staff, who are responsible for venue bookings, technical support, marketing support and box office, and community and industry stakeholders including hirers.
Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre also benchmarked with other performing art centres and based its review on their policies and procedures.
There are no fundamental changes to the way SEC intends to continue conducting its business. The intention of the changes are to clearly communicate Council’s expectations of facility to operate as a business unit. It establishes guiding principles that are transparent and equitable. It identifies the priority for programming and hiring of spaces at the Entertainment Centre, and charges for use of the venue and its services.
The Policy provides a framework for a balanced mix of quality events and performances, which maximises the venue’s artistic, community and commercial profile within the Shoalhaven region. (Attachment 1)
Community Engagement
The requirements of community hirers, international, national and state independent touring companies, and promoters have been taken into consideration.
Shoalhaven Entertainment Centre meets regularly with clients in the lead up to major events to understand their requirements, and holds debrief meetings following major commercial and community hires in its quest for continuous improvement, and to build the business. These findings have been taken into consideration in the review and update of the policy.
Given the extent of the changes it is proposed that the Policy should be placed on Public Exhibition for 28 days and if no significant adverse comments are received the Policy be deemed adopted.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 60 |
SA17.179 Berry District Park Master Plan
HPERM Ref: D17/192881
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Recreation Community & Culture
Attachments: 1. Attachment 1 - Berry District Park Options Report - Final (under separate cover) ⇨
2. Attachment 2 - Option A Master Plan - Final ⇩
Purpose / Summary
To present the recommended Berry District Park Master Plan Option A to Council for adoption, to allow for progress through to detailed design and construction.
Options
1. Adopt Berry District Park Master Plan Option A without amendment
Implications: This would allow for progress towards detailed design with minimal delay, in line with the community’s wishes.
2. Adopt Berry District Park Master Plan Option A with amendment
Implications: This would allow for progress towards detailed design however may result in further delay, if changes are significant and require going back to the community, and may cause community concern with the delayed progress.
3. Recommend an alternate Berry District Park Master Plan
Implications: This would cause significant delay in the progress of the project and would cause significant community concern with the lack of progress.
Background
The initial Berry District Park Master Plan was developed and reported to Council’s Ordinary Meeting on 24 November 2016 for adoption. The report included a number of recommendations to allow for finalisation of the Master Plan, to select a name for the park and to advance the project towards a detailed design.
In response, Council resolved:
1. That Council form a Working Group, which is Co – Chaired by a Councillor and Community member with the following membership:
a. all Councillors
b. Three (3) representatives of the Berry Community Forum (Including one (1) representative from the Berry Sporting Complex Management Committee
c. Two (2) representatives of the Berry Rotary Club
d. One (1) representative of the Berry Chamber of Commerce.
e. If possible a young person be included as one of the community representatives.
2. Council work with the community project reference group involved in progressing the finalisation of the masterplan, detailed design and determine the preference of the name of the Berry District Park.
3. Council allocate $35,000 from the strategic project reserve immediately to undertake staged detailed design and development of a Business Case and Plan, and Funding and Procurement Plan to guide future delivery of Berry District Park and ensure it is “shovel ready” for future grant applications
4. Council reallocate from the Berry Strategic Plan Project $17,000 to the Berry District Park and $10,000 to the Berry Trails Project subject to approval by RMS for the reallocation of their grant funding for the Berry Strategic Plan. (MIN16.791)
The Working Group was formed on 28 February 2017, as a sub-committee of The Berry Forum, where it became evident that the community desires for the park inclusions have changed. Subsequently, the Working Group members decided that it would be worthwhile to have a stakeholder workshop to re-consult with key stakeholders, review the Master Plan and come up with a revised plan.
A community stakeholder workshop was held on 4 April 2017 and as a result, three (3) Master Plan options were developed. Locale Consultants were engaged to review the options and generate two (2) options for final consideration by the Working Group. Locale prepared a comprehensive report outlining the process and final options for consideration (Attachment 1 – Berry District Park Options Report - Final).
The Report was presented to the Working Group on 2 May 2017 at which time they agreed to recommend Option A (Attachment 2 – Option A Master Plan – Final). The Working Group then presented their recommendation to The Berry Forum on 8 June 2017 for endorsement at which it received unanimous support.
The Option A Master Plan is now being presented to Council for final adoption, once adopted council can proceed to detail design and costings of the project.
Community Engagement
The overarching community engagement process was the Working Group, as per the Council resolution MIN16.791. The Working Group was co-chaired by James Robinson (a member of The Berry Forum and member of the Berry community) and by Councillor John Wells. There were on average six (6) other people on the Working Group representing the Berry Forum, Berry Sporting Complex Management Committee, Rotary, Chamber of Commerce, Landcare and children and families. The Working Group provided advice to Council staff on the broader community engagement process.
Another key feature of the community engagement process was the Stakeholder Options Workshop held on 4 April 2017. The Workshop engaged 28 community members from a range of interested groups and facilitated a process for review and design of a new master plan. A detailed Options Report (Attachment 1) details the Workshop process and outcome.
The final community engagement activity was the presentation of the Master Plan Option A recommendation to The Berry Forum meeting on 8 June 2017 where it received unanimous support.
Policy Implications
There are no policy implications associated with this recommendation.
Financial Implications
$165,000 was approved in the 2017/18 budget to complete detailed designs for the Berry District Park. In addition to this, The Berry Rotary Club have $100,000 that they will contribute towards the construction of the playground section of the development. Council will continue to pursue grant funding to assist in the delivery of this project, and work with other stakeholders to support and assist them in securing external funding.
Risk Implications
There are no risk implications associated with this project.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 64 |
SA17.180 Bay & Basin Summer Shuttle Bus and Shoalhaven River Festival Accessible Shuttle Bus 2017 Funding Success
HPERM Ref: D17/199103
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Recreation Community & Culture
Purpose / Summary
Council accept funding grants totalling $11,264 (excluding GST), being $9,309 (excluding GST) funding for the Bay and Basin Summer Shuttle Bus and $1,955 (excluding GST) funding for the Shoalhaven River Festival Accessible Shuttle Bus from Transport for NSW, to undertake the Bay & Basin Summer Shuttle Bus and the Shoalhaven River Festival Accessible Shuttle projects respectively.
That Council: 1. Accept the grants of; a. $9,309 (excluding GST) to undertake the Bay & Basin Summer Shuttle Bus project and; b. $1,955 (excluding GST) to undertake the Shoalhaven River Festival Accessible Shuttle project. 2. Write and thank Transport for NSW.
|
Options
1. Council accept the funding grants of;
$9,309 (excluding GST) to undertake the Bay & Basin Summer Shuttle Bus and $1, 955 (excluding GST) to undertake the Shoalhaven River Festival Accessible Shuttle projects.
Implications: This will ensure the delivery of two projects that will enhance our community.
2. Council decline to accept the funding grants of;
$9,309 (excluding GST) to undertake the Bay & Basin Summer Shuttle Bus and $1, 955 (excluding GST) to undertake the Shoalhaven River Festival Accessible Shuttle projects.
Implications: Funds will not be accepted and projects will not be delivered.
3. Council determine an alternative recommendation.
Implications: As per Council determination if provided.
Background
Bay & Basin Summer Shuttle Bus Project
The free Bay & Basin Summer Shuttle Bus will be an inter-village continuous loop shuttle bus transport service over a 16 day peak summer school holiday period to connect young people (young people under 12 years of age must be supervised by an adult) and their community to social and commercial opportunities and experiences in the Bay & Basin area.
There is no regular public transport available in this area and social interaction and opportunities are very limited for young people. The service will connect young people to youth specific social infrastructure such as skate parks, libraries, sea pools, leisure centres, youth centres/hubs, cinemas, cafes and restaurants & retail precincts in the area. It is anticipated to run the shuttle service on a continuous loop in the area over a 4-hour period each day. The service will operate daily (except public holidays) from the 18 December 2017 to 5th January 2018.
The young people of the Bay & Basin areas will be provided with a safe and appropriate chartered free transport service, where currently none exists, to facilitate their participation in the community and healthy passive recreational and retail activities. The primary aims of these youth activities are to:
· provide opportunities for young people to be engaged in an active, vibrant and inclusive lifestyle
· provide and promote safe spaces for social interaction
· support initiatives and activities that increase youth engagement and participation
· improve youth health & well-being outcomes
· present opportunity and experience to assist young people to develop life skills by using a transport system to meet their social and transport needs
· crime prevention strategy to reduce anti-social behaviour
Retailers and the Bay & Basin Leisure Centre are on board with special offers and discounts as incentives for Summer Shuttle Bus participants and users.
Shoalhaven River Festival Accessible Shuttle Project
A shuttle bus service (gold coin donation) to provide accessible travel between the Bomaderry Railway Station and the CBD to the Shoalhaven River Festival activities located on the Shoalhaven River foreshore in Nowra.
Under this project, community members of all abilities would be able to access this important local cultural event. Another benefit of the project would be the reduction of traffic around the festival area and reduced parking difficulties at the venue.
Community Engagement
Bay & Basin Summer Shuttle Bus
Young people constantly request affordable transport options to access social infrastructure and social opportunities in the Bay & Basin area. Council's Community Strategic plan identifies transport as an ongoing issue, but especially for communities in outer lying villages of the LGA.
Consultations that have informed this project are as follows - with Vincentia High School, the only high school in the Bay & Basin area (approx. 1200) students - local area youth centre and hub - local Lions Club.
Shoalhaven River Festival Accessible Shuttle
Members of Shoalhaven Access Advisory committee advised council of the need for accessible transport to the Shoalhaven River Festival due to its location on the river foreshore where there is no connecting transport and a lack of connected pathways between the CBD and the venue.
This need is echoed in the consultations with people with Disability that inform Council's Disability Inclusion Action Plan that told us that people with disability struggle to access community celebrations and cultural participation.
Financial Implications
All funds will be provided by the grant funding; therefore, there will be no financial implication to Council.
Community Development staff will undertake project management and implementation of the project within existing budgets and resources.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 67 |
SA17.181 Council Policy Review - Strategic Infrastructure Planning
HPERM Ref: D17/211789
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Recreation Community & Culture
Attachments: 1. Reserve Signage Standard (under separate cover) ⇨
2. Motor Vehicle Access to Public Reserves ⇩
Purpose / Summary
To consider the rescission of two (2) existing Public Policies, Signs – Reserve Signage Standard POL12/258 and Motor Vehicle Access to Public Reserves POL12/212 – and list these as Corporate Procedures for internal use by staff.
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
Implications: This would ensure that issues relating to signs and motor vehicle access to reserves can be implemented by staff, updated and reviewed in accordance with the operational aspects of Council business.
2. Not adopt the recommendation and resolve to make amendments to the Policies
Implications: This would not meet Council’s deadline to review all existing policies within a year of Council’s election. These documents relate to operational aspects of Council’s business and as such are more appropriate as Corporate Procedure.
Background
The following Policies are recommended to be rescinded and adopted as Procedures as they detail operational processes. No changes have been made to the processes. The existing Policies Reserve Signage Standard POL12/258 and Motor Vehicle Access to Public Reserve POL12/212 as attached would not have any changes to their wording, but would change their name from Policy to Procedure.
The Reserve Signage Standard shows Councils signage templates for reserves, from an operational perspective these may require change from time to time to meet current legislated requirements, this has previously occurred, for example, to address emergency situations such as drownings, environmental damage and vandalism.
The Motor Vehicle Access to Public Reserve POL12/212 is an operational procedure for access to the reserves, and is currently managed as such.
Policy Implications
Rescinding these two (2) Policies and making them Procedures will more accurately reflect their intent as administrative and operational tool.
Financial Implications
Nil financial implications
Risk Implications
The risk implications remain the same.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 71 |
SA17.182 Beyond Plastic Pollution - Pathways to Cleaner Oceans Conference
HPERM Ref: D17/218058
Group: Finance Corporate & Community Services Group
Section: Human Resources, Governance & Customer Service
Attachments: 1. Conference program ⇩
Purpose / Summary
To consider Councillor attendance at the Beyond Plastic Pollution - Pathways to Cleaner Oceans Conference scheduled for 30 October to 1 Novemver 2017 in Darling Harbour, Sydney.
Options
1. As per the recommendation.
2. That Council limit the number of Councillors attending the Conference and such attendance be deemed Council Business.
3. That Council not approve Councillor attendance at the Conference as Council Business.
Background
The Beyond Plastic Pollution - Pathways to Cleaner Oceans Conference is considered relevant to local government, Information in relation to the conference is attached to this report and further information may be found at www.beyondplasticpollutionconference.org.au.
Costs associated with the conference are estimated as follows:
· registration : $1135.05
· travel, accommodation and out of pocket expenses : not yet determined.
An option available to Council is to define the number of Councillors attending the conference and for Council to determine the appropriate Councillors authorised to attend. This option is presented having regard to the increase in Councillor expenses in recent years, so that Council may pro-actively control this area of expenses when appropriate.
The Conference commences at 9.30am Monday 30 October and concludes at 12.30pm Wednesday 1 November 2017. A meeting of the Shoalhaven Tourism Advisory Group has been scheduled within the period of the conference:
Policy Implications
The Council Members – Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy limits attendance at conferences to three per annum per councillor exclusive of any conference arranged by either the State or National Local Government Associations.
Financial Implications:
Funds are available for Councillors to attend this conference.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 76 |
SA17.183 North Nowra Link Road - Southern Option
HPERM Ref: D17/202578
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Asset Management
Attachments: 1. North Nowra Link Rd -Southern option - Plan Reference 2587_49_1 ⇩
Purpose / Summary
To consider amending the North Nowra Link Road corridor (Southern option) to avoid private property.
Options
1. Amend the North Nowra Link Road corridor (Southern option) (Recommended)
Implications: This will remove an unnecessary encroachment on private property and still retain a viable Link Road option for future consideration.
2. Do not amend the North Nowra Link Road corridor (Southern option) (Not recommended)
Implications: This would unnecessarily impact private property by reducing its development potential and by increasing the cost of acquisition of a road reserve should the existing southern option be adopted as the preferred North Nowra Link Road option some time in the future.
3. Make some other recommendation.
Background
The owner of Lot 22 DP 1173629 has requested that Council considers moving the original southern route option, further north, to avoid encroaching on this property. The area of encroachment is shown shaded in orange in Attachment 1.
The whole corridor would be within Council-controlled Crown Land (Lot 7313 DP 1153421) and NPWS land (Lot 7311 DP 1153421) if it was moved northwards. After a review of this option, there were no apparent reasons the request could not be accommodated so the corridor may be moved without creating any additional future issues.
Community Engagement
Community consultation may not be necessary for such a minor amendment to the corridor.
However, extensive community consultation will be required when a preferred route for the North Nowra Link Road is ultimately being developed.
Financial Implications
There are no direct financial implications associated with this matter.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 79 |
SA17.184 Public Policies for Review - July 2017 - Asset Management
HPERM Ref: D17/113213
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Asset Management
Attachments: 1. Draft Asset Management Policy - Policies for Review Report (under separate cover) ⇨
2. Signs - Public Information Signs - Public Policies for Review - Asset Management (under separate cover) ⇨
3. Renewable Energy Installations on Council Assets - Public Policies for Review - Asset Management (under separate cover) ⇨
4. Asset Management Strategy - POL17/67 (under separate cover) ⇨
Purpose / Summary
To adopt existing public policies which are the responsibility of the Assets and Works Group (Asset Management Section).
Options
1. Adopt the recommendations.
Implications: The draft Asset Management Policy be placed on public exhibition. The Asset Management Strategy, Public Information Signs policy and the Renewable Energy Installations on Council Buildings policy be adopted.
2. Make some other recommendation.
Background
The following policies have been reviewed and amended, where necessary, to allow their adoption within 12 months of a Council election (See attachments).
Asset Management Strategy
The Asset Management Strategy has been updated to align with the 2015/16 Annual Financial Statements. Other minor changes have been included such as additional tasks for the Asset Management Improvement Plan. Consequently, it is recommended that the updated Asset Management Strategy be adopted.
Asset Management Policy
The previous version of this policy was too technically based and a bit difficult to read. The updated version now includes goal and vision statements as required by the Office of Local Government’s publication “Integrated Planning and Reporting Manual for Local Government in NSW”.
The main changes to the current Policy include:
· ‘Scope’ was replaced by ‘Goals and Vision’ and
· ‘Background’, ‘Definitions’ and ‘Relationship to Other Documents’ have been deleted for clarity
As Council’s sustainability, in part, relies on the adoption of asset management principles, this policy may benefit from broader community input. Consequently, it is recommended that the draft Asset Management Policy be exhibited for community consultation with outcomes reported to Council.
Public Information Signs
This policy previously contained references to internal processes and sign specifications, which are not necessarily needed for a public document. Consequently, the policy retains only situations where the public requires special approvals, or the payment of fees, for signs in Council’s road reserves.
Although this policy has been changed to remove operational matters, there are no new provisions proposed so it is recommended that it be adopted without further consultation.
Renewable Energy Installations on Council Assets
This policy has been updated to include current ‘hyper-links’ to relevant documents and to correct minor errors and redundant information. It is recommended that this policy be adopted without further consultation. The Sustainable Futures committee may wish to consider the implementation of this Policy.
Community Engagement
Community consultation is recommended on the draft Asset Management Policy.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 81 |
SA17.185 2017-2018 Path Construction Program
HPERM Ref: D17/180957
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Asset Management
Purpose / Summary
To consider changes to the 2017-2018 Path Construction Program owing to:
· recent funding announcements by the State government;
· a Council resolution (Minute MIN17.408) and
· a recent pedestrian accident in Centaur Ave Sanctuary Point
That 1. The Member for South Coast be thanked for the funding of $1.89 million for path projects 2. $150,000 be allocated from General Fund (Local Road Repair Program) for the construction of a path in Page Avenue, North Nowra, from Judith Drive to Pitt Street 3. $100,000 be allocated from General Fund (Local Road Repair Program) for the construction of a path, and associated kerb and gutter, in Centaur Avenue, Sanctuary Point, from Idlewild Avenue to Francis Ryan Reserve 4. $250,000 be allocated to the 2017-2018 Local Road Repair Program from the 2018-2019 Roads to Recovery Program allocation
|
Options
1. Fund the path projects, as recommended.
Implications: Two high priority path projects will be constructed although the expenditure on the projects is not consistent with Council’s strategy for financial sustainability.
2. Defer the construction of paths in Page Avenue and Centaur Avenue
Implications: The construction of new assets, such as the Page Aveneue and Centaur Avenue paths, has the lowest priority for funding in Council’s strategy for financial sustainability so could readily be deferred until Council’s financial position improves.
3. Make some other recommendation
Background
State Member of Parliament, Shelley Hancock, has announced the following funding for shared path projects in the Shoalhaven:
· $1,000,000 for the Round the Bay Walk project including a new pedestrian bridge over Moona Moona Creek at Huskisson
· $500,000 for the continuation of the Matron Porter Drive path
· $190,000 for the Vincent St to Twyford St path
· $150,000 for the Deering St path
· $50,000 for pedestrian facilities at Green St
There has been a longstanding need to improve pedestrian facilities in Page Ave, North Nowra. Consequently, Council resolved at its meeting on 23 May 2017 (Minute MIN17.408) that
the General Manager (Director Assets and Works) report back with financing options to urgently address the construction of a footpath on the northern side of Page Ave from Pitt Street in the west to Judith Drive to the east where currently there is a well-worn goat track, which has trees growing across it which at times forces pedestrians onto the road or into private properties.
The estimated cost of a 2m wide, 400m long path in Page Avenue is $150,000.
Similarly, over the past few years, requests have been received to construct a path in Centaur Ave, from Idlewild Ave to Francis Ryan Reserve. A recent report of an accident involving a pedestrian in Centaur Ave has heightened awareness of this location although it has not been suggested that the lack of a concrete path contributed in any way to the accident. However, more ‘near misses’ can be avoided if Council now funds the path construction.
The estimated cost of a 1.2m wide, 130m long path with kerb and gutter in Centaur Avenue is $100,000.
The construction of these new assets has not been included in the Long Term Financial Plan, which is based on meeting financial sustainability objectives by mostly funding the maintenance and renewal of existing assets. Consequently, funding the construction of new assets, for which there are no other financial contributions, is contrary to the principles of sustainability. In this context, expenditure on ad-hoc new construction is not recommended.
However, if the construction is pursued, the financing options include:
· General Fund – For this option to be viable, the allocation of an adopted 2017/18 Operational Plan budget program or project would need to be reduced by $250,000 and substituted for the Page Ave and Centaur Ave path construction projects. If part-funding of the project was secured, any Council contribution would similarly need to be funded by reducing the budget allocation for an adopted program or project. However, a General Fund allocation could materialise by bringing forward 2018-2019 Roads to Recovery Program funds.
· Roads to Recovery Program – Path projects such as Page Avenue and Centaur Avenue do not qualify for direct funding under this Program. However, road renewal projects do qualify and there is, at least, a $250,000 allocation of General Fund in the 2017-2018 Local Road Repair Program which could be funded, in advance, from the 2018-2019 Roads to Recovery Program budget. In this way, $250,000 of General Fund is ‘freed up’ to use on the path projects in 2017-2018.
· Strategic Projects Reserve – For this option to be viable, there would need to be spare funds in the Reserve which were not already committed in the Long Term Financial Plan and Council would need to change the type of project funded by the Reserve as Council has previously ‘ring-fenced’ funds for works, other than path projects.
· Grant funding – For this option to be viable, there needs to be a funding source for which the project would qualify. Although there are some small grant opportunities from time-to-time, there are currently no known grant funding sources which would provide $250,000 for thes path projects. However, the State Member of Parliament and Federal Member of Parliament could be requested for special grant funding for the projects. If part-funding was secured for the project, Council’s contribution would still need to be found from one of other the listed options.
· Loan funding – Although possible, Council has not previously borrowed funds for small path projects.
· Contributions Plan funding – Neither project would qualify for funding from any Contributions Plan reserves
· Section 217 of the Roads Act charges – Council could resolve to charge up to 50% of the cost of a new conrete path to landowners with a property frontage adjoining the path. However, the remaining 50% would still need to be secured from one of the viable options above.
· Community funding – As both path projects are in close proximity to schools, it is unlikely that their P & Cs would divert their fund-raising efforts to these non-school projects. Similarly, there would be little interest from other community groups in these projects.
· Special Rate Variation – The revenue from the SRV has been allocated to asset maintenance and renewal projects to meet Council’s financial sustainability objectives. In this case, including these path projects, would not be recommended
Community Engagement
Community consultation on the two path projects may not be necessary as they have been raised with Council in the past. If the projects are funded, project-specific consultation will be undertaken in any case.
Financial Implications
Council had included the construction of the pedestrian bridge over Moona Moona Creek, by loan funding, in its 2017-2018 Operational Plan budget. However, the Member for South Coast’s announcement that State funds will now be available for the project will obviate the need for Council to borrow funds.
Bringing forward the amount of $250,000 from the 2018-19 Roads to Recovery Program to ‘free up’ General Fund seems to be the only practical way of funding the two new path construction projects. Under the R2RP, councils are allowed to bring forward any amounts as long as the total allocation of this five year Program is not exceeded.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 84 |
SA17.186 Jervis Bay Maritime Museum - Fish Pond
HPERM Ref: D16/401033
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Asset Management
Purpose / Summary
To report on progressing a scoping study for opening of the Jervis Bay Maritime Museum fish pond, provision of a pedestrian bridge and provision of associated minor maritime infrastructure.
Options
1. As recommended
2. Council allocate $24,000 for survey, investigation and design (Not recommended)
Implications: A funding source has not been identified.
Background
Council at its Strategy and Assets Meeting of 10th October 2016 resolved, in part, that:
3. A report be submitted on the cost of a scoping study for the necessary works to open the fish pond to the creek.
4. If funds are available from the balance of the launching facility project these be allocated toward design of the Lady Denman fishponds. Council consider allocating funds to the fish pond if this balance is inadequate
Quotations for the launching facility project were reported to Council’s Ordinary meeting of 26 April 2017 and Council resolved to decline to accept any quotation for construction as the offers exceed the budget and delegated authority to the General Manager (Director of Assets and Works) to enter into negotiations.
This resolution has been implemented. Construction work has commenced with the project expected to be completed before October 2017. The negotiated contract reduced the scope of works to exclude construction of a cul-de-sac at the bottom of Dent Street. Consequently, there are no funds available from this project for the fish pond design.
Community Engagement
No community engagement has occurred specifically in relation to the opening up of the fish pond however extensive consultation was undertaken in relation to the museum plan of management that identifies the need for this project. Consultation in relation to possible design solutions will be an important component of the study.
Financial Implications
At this stage, funding is not available for this study as the negotiated price for construction of the launching facility and associated site improvement works will not result in any surplus.
The cost to undertake a scoping study is estimated as follows:
Task |
Cost Estimate $ |
Survey /Hydrosurvey |
3,000 |
Aquatic Assessment |
4,000 |
Review of environmental factors |
5,000 |
Geotechnical |
5,000 |
Concept design(s) /consultation |
7,000 |
Total |
$ 24,000 |
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 86 |
SA17.187 Classification of Operational Land - Part Shoalhaven Community & Recreational Precinct - 109, 111, 111A & 113 Cambewarra Road, Bomaderry
HPERM Ref: D17/184792
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Business & Property
Purpose / Summary
To classify the land described in the following Schedule for the purpose of the Shoalhaven Community & Recreational Precinct at Cambewarra Road, Bomaderry as Operational Land.
That Council resolve to classify the land in the schedule below as Operational Land:
|
Options
1. Resolve as recommended.
Implications: The land will be able to be used as part of the Shoalhaven Community & Recreational Precinct. If any objections are received prior to the close of submissions on 21st July 2017, these will be raised at Council Ordinary meeting on the 25th July 2017.
2. Not resolve as recommended.
Implications: The land will default to Community Land and therefore is subject to the Community Land provisions as outlined in the Local Government Act 1993 (LGA93).
3. Provide further direction to staff and propose an alternative.
Background
109 to 113 Cambewarra Road, Bomaderry, being Lots 1 & 3 DP544264 and Lots 21-22 DP860849 are located at Cambewarra Road, Bomaderry have been acquired to facilitate the development of the Shoalhaven Community & Recreational Precinct.
Section 31(2) of the Local Government Act, 1993 (LGA93) provides that before Council acquires land, or within 3 months after it acquires land, Council may resolve to classify it.
There are two Classification available:
1. Operational Land – land which Council owns as a business entity and upon which it conducts Council business, and
2. Community Land – Land in Council’s ownership which is held for and on behalf of the Community – subject to the Community Land provisions of LGA93.
A resolution of Council, within the time frame prescribed in LGA93, is required to finalise the classification of land as Operational. Should the classification process not be completed, the land will default to Community Land.
Community Engagement
In accordance with Section 34 of LGA93, a public notice of Council’s intention to classify the land as Operational was placed in the local press 21st & 22nd June 2017 allowing 28 days or written submissions, closing 21st July 2017. At the time of writing this report no submissions have been received, however any submissions received prior to the closing time will be advised at Council’s Ordinary meeting on 25th July 2017.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 88 |
SA17.188 Lease - 1 Mattes Way, Bomaderry - Kiama Community College
HPERM Ref: D17/196327
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Business & Property
Purpose / Summary
To seek Council endorsement to enter into a lease agreement with Kiama Community College for the continued use and occupation of 1 Mattes Way, Bomaderry.
That Council: 1. Enter into a lease agreement with Kiama Community College Incorporated for the continued use and occupation of 1 Mattes Way, Bomaderry (Lots 27, 29, 30 & 31 DP793122) for an initial term of three (3) years with two (2) option periods of three (3) years each (i.e. 3 x 3 x 3 year lease) at an initial annual rent of $50,000 plus GST to be increased annually by CPI; and 2. Grant authority to affix the Common Seal of the Council to any documents required to be sealed and that the General Manager be authorised to sign any documents necessary to give effect to this resolution.
|
Options
1. Resolve as recommended.
Implications: Formalising a new lease agreement will provide Kiama Community College (KCC) with nine (9) years security for the continued use of the site. The secure tenure will assist KCC when applying for grant funding for the proposed expanded use as an alternative high school.
2. Not resolve as recommended.
Implications: In order to secure funding for works required to upgrade the facility, KCC require a longer tenure. Not providing the longer tenure will hinder KCC’s attempts to provide an alternative high school for teenagers within the Shoalhaven LGA.
3. Provide further direction to staff and propose an alternative.
Background
Kiama Community College (formerly known as South East Community College) have been in occupation of the Council owned property since 2007. KCC have been operating as a community college offering vocational and trade education such as beauty therapy, hospitality and computer studies since the commencement of their occupation.
Kiama Community College negotiated a sub-lease agreement with Bay & Basin Community Resources for approximately 1/3 of the building to operate community activities such as adult education classes. This agreement commenced in 2009 and is still in operation.
In early 2017 KCC approached Council with a proposal to take occupation of the area currently sublet to Bay & Basin Community Resources. The additional area is required for the purpose of operating an alternative high school for approximately 30 – 60 children. The school will allow children who are unable to attend high school for various reasons, to continue their education and obtain their School Certificate and Higher School Certificate.
The alternative high school will provide places for children living within the Shoalhaven and Kiama Local Government Areas and is a much needed service.
The terms of the lease agreement are as follows:
Premises |
The building, improvements and curtilage on Lots 27, 29, 30 & 31 DP793122 at 1 Mattes Way, Bomaderry |
Term |
Three (3) years |
Option |
Three (3) years + Three (3) years |
Commencement Date |
1 July 2018 |
Initial Rent |
$50,000 plus GST |
Percentage of Outgoings |
100% |
Permitted Use |
Provision of education and training services. |
The date of commencement is the day immediately following the expiration of the current lease agreement.
Community Engagement
This matter is considered to be a local area/low impact issue as detailed in Council’s Community Engagement Policy and Handbook and no community engagement has taken place.
Policy Implications
The proposed lease terms are in accordance with Council’s Occupation of Council Owned and Managed Land Policy.
Financial Implications
There will be minimal financial implications as a result of the adoption of this recommendation. Kiama Community College currently pay a subsidised rent consequent to capital improvements completed on the property at the commencement of their initial occupation. Council considers that the value of such improvements have been amortised over the current lease period and accordingly a full commercial rent will now apply to the subject agreement.
Council will receive a total income of approximately $547,000 (subject to finalised CPI increases) over the 9 year period.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 90 |
SA17.189 Holiday Haven Tourist Parks - Management & Operation Contract Extension - Lake Conjola Entrance Holiday Park
HPERM Ref: D17/206942
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Business & Property
Purpose / Summary
To consider the two (2) year ‘optional’ contract extension for the management and operation of Lake Conjola Entrance Holiday Park from 1 August 2017 to 1 August 2019 as provided under the current contract.
In accordance with S10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 some information should remain confidential and will be considered as part of a separate confidential report to Council. It is not in the public interest to disclose commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice a commercial position of a prson who supplied it.
Options
1. Council accepts the recommendation as presented.
Implications: Consider a separate confidential report outlining the proposal.
2. Provide further direction to staff and propose an alternative.
Background
The current management contractor operating this property has expressed their interest in exercising the option available under their management contract to extend the contract with Council for a further two years. Existing contracts provide for Council to grant the two year extension, without going to tender, following the completion of the first three years of the awarded contract. At the end of the two year extension period in 2019, the management of this property will again be put to open public tender.
This Holiday Park under the current management has increased total revenue in the recent financial years from 2012 to 2015. Expenditure continues to be contained within budgeted estimates, and occupancy of cabins and sites has increased over the previous three years, as detailed in the confidential report.
Community Engagement
All of the Holiday Park properties within the Holiday Haven group are actively involved in industry schemes to improve the economic and environmental sustainability of the businessses in a socially resonsible manner. In the management of Lake Conjola Entrance Holiday Park, the current management contractor, AN MacDougall Pty Ltd have brought their operations into line with Councl’s and industry guidelines in regard to landscaping, water management, trade waste, recycling and energy conservation. These initiatives have brought about a reduction in the environmental footprint for the operation while working towards savings in energy and waste costs.
Financial Implications
Council has a forward business plan that provides significant investment in this property. This investment is designed to improve facilities and provide the type of activities that attract families and repeat business and more powered camping sites and the establishment of other facilities.
A management team maintaining a viable business themselves remains an important part of the operation of the business of the property into the future.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 92 |
SA17.190 Holiday Haven Tourist Parks Tender for the Management & Operation of the Huskisson Beach Holiday Park
HPERM Ref: D17/208503
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Business & Property
Purpose / Summary
The current contract for the Management and Operation for Council’s Holiday Haven Tourist Park at Huskisson Beach is due to expire under the terms of the contract document. Tenders were advertised and potential contractors have been interviewed. Council can now apoint a contractor based on the above process.
Options
1. Committee accept the recommendation as presented.
Implications: Consider a separate confidential report on the matter.
2. Provide further direction to staff and propose an alternative.
Background
Tenders for the Management and Operation of the Huskisson Beach Holiday Park were advertised on 24 May 2017 closing on 14 June 2017.
At the closing date four (4) tenders had been received for the Management & Operation of Huskisson Beach Holiday Park. Tenders were assessed by Council staff for compliance and fulfilment of the stated selection criteria and all tenderers were then advanced to the interview stage.
Community Engagement
The Tender process for the appointment of a management contractor to Council’s Holiday Haven Tourist Park at Huskisson Beach has been followed within the requirements of the provisions of the Local Government Act.
Financial Implications
Financial aspects of the management contracts for Council’s commercially operated Tourist Parks draw a fine line between sufficient funds for the contractor to provide a prudent level of staffing and equipment to effectively operate these complex properties and the need for Council to obtain the best value for money. Holiday Haven considers the cost of operating these properties carefully in order to maintain an adequate business benefit to Council and a return to the Contractor that ensures the properties are operated and maintained for Council to the required industry standards.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 94 |
SA17.191 Council Policy Review - Waste Services
HPERM Ref: D17/208199
Group: Assets & Works Group
Section: Works & Services
Attachments: 1. Disaster Recovery Policy - POL16/128 (under separate cover) ⇨
2. No Charge Tipping of Storm Materials at Waste Depots - POL16/168 (under separate cover) ⇨
3. No Charge Tipping Vouchers - POL16/169 (under separate cover) ⇨
4. Waste Management Community Assistance Policy - Garden Waste Mulch - POL16/170 (under separate cover) ⇨
5. Wate Minimisation and Management Guidelines - POL16/171 (under separate cover) ⇨
Purpose / Summary
All Public and Local Approval Policies are to be submitted to Council within 12 months of the election of Council. The Public Policies proposed for adoption represent the Waste Services responsibilities in the Assets & Works Group, Works and Services Section
That Council 1. Adopt the Disaster Recovery Policy – Waste Management (POL16/82). 2. Adopt the following policies with no or minor changes: a. No charge tipping of storm damaged materials at waste depots Policy (POL16/168 b. Garden Waste Mulch - Community Assistance Policy (POL 16/170); and c. Waste Minimisation and Management Guidelines (POL16/171 3. Adopt the No Charge Tipping Vouchers Policy (POL 16/169), noting commercial properties will no longer receive vouchers from FY18/19.
|
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
Implications: The Disaster Recovery Policy widens the coverage of disasters in which staff are enabled to act swiftly to manage waste produced in a disaster situation. The adoption of the remaining policies will more accurately reflect their intent as administrative and operational tools. System improvements now allow properties liable for the domestic waste management charge to be seperated from commercial properties in the rates mailout. Starting in FY18/19, commercial properties will no longer receive vouchers.
2. Not adopt the recommendation and resolve to make amendments to the Policies
Background
The Waste Services Unit of Council are responsible for the implementation of a number of public policies. These have all been reviewed with minor to significant changes as described below. Further, the flooding events over the last 2 years highlighted that a consistent approach to disasters needed to be developed and a disaster recovery policy was drafted.
Disaster Recovery Policy (POL16/128)
A new Works and Services Section Disaster Recovery Policy is provided for affirmation by Council. The policy provides guidance to staff to respond promptly to a variety of disasters and to be able to respond with surety to the many urgent calls from residents in these situations. This policy is separate to the current No charge tipping of storm damaged materials at waste depots policy, which focusses only on wind storm damage of trees and vegetation.
It is recommended that the policy be adopted.
The current Works and Services Section (Waste Services Unit) policies listed below have been reviewed and amendments have been made as follows:
No Charge Tipping of Storm Damaged Materials at Waste Depots Policy (POL16/168)
This policy was last reaffirmed by Council in May 2013. In the event of a severe storm, the policy provides a pre-determined guideline that, if exceeded, will empower Council staff to accept storm damaged tree waste at the Recycling and Waste Depots at no charge. If the storm event is not classified as a state significant event the costs incurred through the free tipping process would need to be absorbed within the Waste Services operating budget.
It is recommended that the policy be adopted with changes to reflect the new structure.
No Charge Tipping Vouchers Policy (POL16/169);
This policy was last reaffirmed by Council in May 2013. The policy provides for two no charge vouchers to be issued to each assessment which is charged a domestic waste management service and for rural property owners who are not on a domestic waste management charge per year for the disposal of domestic waste. The equivalent tipping fee value of no-charge vouchers during the 2016/17 financial year is approximately $2.436million. The funding for these vouchers is sourced primarily through the domestic waste management charge (DWMC) with a proportionate increase in Waste Depot gate fee for domestic cars and trailers to cover those areas not paying the DWMC.
In practice the commercial premises have been receiving vouchers as there was no mechanism for separating them from properties liable for the DWMC in the rates notice print run. With recent improvements it is possible to make the distinction and in accordance with the policy, as from next financial year (FY18/19), vouchers will no longer be provided to owners of commercial premises.
It is recommended that the policy be adopted with changes to reflect the new structure, and implemented as intended.
Garden Waste Mulch - Community Assistance Policy (POL 16/170);
The policy allows for Shoalhaven residents and community to collect processed garden waste from any Recycling and Waste Depot, when available, for no charge. The requirement is for persons to load themselves, but at the three larger Depots where there is plant available, a small loading fee is applied if customers request that the mulch be loaded for them. The policy also allows for commercial use of the mulch at a charge per tonne.
It is recommended that the policy be adopted with changes to reflect the new structure.
Waste Minimisation and Management Guidelines (POL16/171).
The policy provides guidelines to developers on how to prepare a Waste Plan for submission together with their development application. The intent of the waste plan is to prompt developers into thinking about sustainable management of the waste streams generated during demolition (if applicable), during construction and during the ongoing life of the property. It provides guidance in an easy to understand format with some examples. It promotes recycling of specific materials with a table provided for estimating quantities and possible destinations for the materials. Once the proposed Chapter G7 of the citywide Development Control Plan is submitted to Council for resolution, these separate guidelines will need to be rescinded.
It is recommended that the policy be adopted with no changes.
Financial Implications
The policies are funded in the annual Waste Services Unit budget
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 97 |
SA17.192 Indian (Common) Myna Bird Program
HPERM Ref: D17/133558
Group: Planning Environment & Development Group
Section: Building & Compliance Services
Purpose / Summary
To provide information to Council in relation to the 'Indian Myna Bird Action Programme' which focuses on the humane control of Indian Myna birds in the Shoalhaven Local Government Area (LGA) through community education and access to Indian Myna bird traps.
This is in response to a Notice of Motion on 26 April 2017 from Councillor Levett requesting a report on ways to establish a Council coordinated, community based Indian Myna bird eradication program.
Recommendation (Item to be determined under delegated authority) That Council note the information contained in the report.
|
Options
1. That Council note the report for information.
Implications:- No action is recommended at this stage. There are members of the community who are already actively engaged in the trapping and eradication on Myna birds. Council also needs to consider the costs of implementing a program. Council is already in a deficit budget position and implementation will costs $29,000 or more to commence. Council also needs to consider that if this level of funding were available is this program the highest environmental priority to expend such funds.
2. Council upgrade its website to provide the community with sufficient information for them to instigate an Indian Myna bird eradication programme. Council also develop an urban landscape policy to discourage the proliferation of Indian Myna birds.
Implications:- This is the most cost effective response for Council (other than receiving the report for information). There is sufficient information available for the website to be upgraded including webinars, contact details and links to relevant Indian Myna bird sites. The preferred option at this stage would be to set-up the programme in accordance with Option B and provide the ongoing euthanasia centre. In the first year this would cost $29,000.
3. Council provide funds to support a fully developed community based programme and continue to fund this into the future.
Implications: This will be a significant cost to Council and is not the preferred option. The total cost of $69,277 for the first year includes the initial setup plus the total annual ongoing cost ($48,133). The total annual costs will be ongoing and this will increase over time. Whilst addressing this problem within the community with a holistic approach as outlined benefits Council by increasing its profile in the community by providing positive initiatives, the costs may be prohibitive as this time. Council can always revisit such a programme in the future if it desires.
4. Council not approve any of the recommendations
Implications: The community are currently doing their own trapping of Indian Myna birds and this may continue. There are a number of Men’s Shed who make and distribute the traps. There is however, no monitoring of the population in the Shoalhaven area and Council may be criticised for not being more pro-active in this space.
Background
The Indian Myna is native to Southern Asia and was introduced to Australia in the 1860’s to control insects in Melbourne market gardens and later to controls insects in the Queensland cane fields. They have been described by the World Conservation Union as one of the World’s 100 most invasive species. Because of their aggression, intelligence and skill as scavengers, they are now one of the most common birds in cities and towns along the east coast of Australia.
The Canberra Indian Myna Action Group and councils such as Wollongong, Campbelltown and Hawkesbury run similar successful programmes of eradication and these would guide the “Shoalhaven Model”.
The programme aims to:
1) Reduce the breeding, feeding and roosting opportunities of these pests;
2) Survey and record Indian Myna bird numbers and impact to assist with research and programme development,
3) Provide advice on a trapping programme that is acceptable to the community, Council and animal welfare agencies; and
4) Develop an urban landscape policy that will discourage the proliferation of Myna birds through planting of low native shrubs and groundcovers and reducing the extent of open grassed areas.
Possible Components of a Program
1. Survey
Council could consider the benefits of a survey to record the numbers of Indian Myna birds in our area. This will determine the extent of the problem, assist with research and also pinpoint hot spots for Indian Myna bird eradication.
The link below shows the survey undertaken for two years for Wollongong City Council at a cost of $5000.
2. Establish a formal programme
a. Website design could be developed to create an Indian Myna bird page on Council’s website. This could include on-line booking if an education component is implemented, uploading statistics and access to mynascan.
The Canberra Indian Myna Group, Wollongong Council and Campbelltown Council are willing to share information from their websites to assist with the development of Shoalhaven’s website. This will be a cost effective programme.
b. Develop an Education Program to inform the public about trapping & euthanasia, animal welfare and the impacts on native flora and fauna.
By providing a holistic approach to the education program Council could value add to the trapping program which benefits the environment and amenity and approaches the Indian Myna bird problem from other angles.
Both Campbelltown and Wollongong City Councils have reported the attendance to their education sessions are decreasing due mainly to the fact they have been running them for some time now. Campbelltown Council is considering developing a webinar to provide the education on-line. This could be explored as part of Council’s programme and be developed in collaboration with other interested councils. The webinar approach would be more cost effective for Council.
Birdlife Shoalhaven has been presenting the “Birds in Backyards” programme to community groups in the Bay and Basin area and are set to cover other parts of the Shoalhaven in the near future. Birdlife Australia are drafting a council engagement strategy for Birds in Backyards to present to Council in an effort to create a holistic approach for this issue. Indian Myna birds could be linked in with this programme.
c. Partnership with Men’s Sheds to ensure there is a trap supply for the public paid for by the public. Traps are already being made at Nowra, Shoalhaven Heads, Sanctuary Point and Sussex Inlet with some men’s sheds reporting good sales. One local men’s shed sells direct on E-Bay. Discussion can be had with men’s sheds to encourage their participation and include in their procedure some guidelines about animal welfare requirements when trapping.
The Wollongong and Berry Men’s Sheds also sell nest boxes which compliments the program to provide habitat for native birds and animals. This could also be explored as part of the programme.
d. Statistics including the number of birds trapped, number of traps sold, number of participants would be helpful.
All programmes report this aspect as being the most problematic component. Ways to encourage the public to submit trapping statistics need to be developed.
e. Policy development in dealing with Indian Myna birds in the urban landscape context is also necessary. This will discourage the proliferation of Indian Myna birds through planting of low native shrubs and groundcovers and reducing the extent of open grassed areas.
5. Euthanasia centres
Council would need to determine locations and staff to operate equipment to euthanase the birds in accordance with animal welfare requirements.
The euthanasia centre is simple and inexpensive to operate. A wooden box is made and the trap is simply placed within the box with a gas hose attached from the gas cylinder. The gas is dispensed for one minute and the birds can be disposed of in the garbage bin.
6. Ongoing Duties – Administration and Other
Support Service Levels
· Respond to enquiries
· Organise gas cylinders
· Raise Purchase Orders
· Maintain & supply information – forms, brochures, etc
· Coordinate bookings, venue and educational materials
· Develop and maintain operating procedures
· Record keeping including signed terms of agreement forms
· Manage trapper list, collate trapping statistics & provide reports
· Liaise with stakeholders including publicity and promotion of workshops
· Liaise with Men’s Sheds about traps, promotion and nest boxes
· Mapping / GIS support to record trapping and roost locations
· Maintain any management plans & databases
· Maintain web page & web based training site
· Keep abreast of legislative requirements, WHS & governance matters
· Coordinate and attend committee meetings (if there is to be a committee)
· Manage volunteers (if there are to be volunteers)
· Consider Council involvement in trapping in CBDs with cooperation from shop owners and in schools during holiday periods (this was undertaken as part of Queanbeyan’s trapping program)
· Grant funding submissions
· Present Education Program to community
Community Engagement
There has been no community consultation at this point. Community engagement would need to be undertaken if Council moved forward with the program to encourage participation in trapping and increasing biodiversity on private land by taking part in the education program and trapping myna birds. This would require a comprehensive approach to advertising, networking and education.
Consideration could be given in the review of the program for 2018/19 whether the formation of a committee to oversee the program and /or recruitment of volunteers would be beneficial.
Policy Implications
The recommended option includes developing an urban landscape policy to discourage the proliferation of Indian Myna birds through planting of low native shrubs and groundcovers and reducing the extent of open grassed areas, where reasonable.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications from the recommendation in this report. Should Council wish to implement a program then costs will need to be considered. These are outlined in the table below. As stated above, Council is already in a deficit position and funding this program is not recommended.
Options C, D and E above are significant costs. These options are not considered to be necessary at this time.
If Council were to proceed with a program at this stage then the preferred option is to set-up the programme in accordance with Option B ($21,144) and then provide the ongoing euthanasia centre at $7,781 per year. In the first year this would cost $28,925. The intention would be to review the program and reconsider the level of involvement in the preparation of the 2018/19 budget.
Risk Implications
If Council chooses to do nothing, members of the community will continue to trap and control Indian Myna birds in their own backyards.
The update of Council website could provide additional information to the community to support their localised management of the Indian Myna bird problem. Whilst it is still heavily reliant on concerned members of the community, the website could provide valuable information to those willing to participate.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 102 |
SA17.193 Review of the Shoalhaven Bushcare/Parkcare Policy and Procedures
HPERM Ref: D17/93261
Group: Planning Environment & Development Group
Section: Environmental Services
Attachments: 1. Amendments - Shoalhaven Bushcare/Parkcare Policy and Procedures (under separate cover) ⇨
Purpose / Summary
To consider the re-adoption of the existing Shoalhaven Bushcare/Parkcare Policy and Procedure with minor amendments as part of the policy review cycle.
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation
Implications: The minor changes made to the policy will assist with policy implementation and interpretation.
2. Not adopt the policy and give further instructions to staff.
Implications: This would depend on what changes were required.
Background
An efficient and effective Bushcare/Parkcare program requires that the responsibilities of volunteers and Council staff be clearly defined. This Shoalhaven Bushcare/Parkcare Policy and Procedures details those responsibilities.
The Policy and Procedures have been reviewed and the minor amendments as listed below are recommended. A copy of the amended Policy and Procedures are attached to this report.
1. Changes to the policy statement to bring into line with the Shoalhaven Community Strategy Plan 2023
2. Extension of the review period for Bushcare/Parkcare Group Action Plans from 3 years to 5 years.
3. Provision of Bushcare Group Coordinator and Bushcare Volunteer role descriptions.
4. Principle responsibility of the policy changes from Asset and Works to the Planning, Environment and Development Group.
5. Streamlining and simplification of the procedure for the setting up of a new Parkcare/Bushcare Group to avoid duplication of groups on the same beach or reserve.
6. Cancellation of the Bushcare/Parkcare permit.Action plans adopted by Council replace the permit.
7. Inclusion of the Council’s Volunteer Health, Safety and Behaviour Induction process into the procedures.
8. Inclusion of consultation methods used for Bushcare/Parkcare Group Action Plan to bring the policy in-line with Councils Community Engagement Strategy.
9. Reduction and simplification of the community consultation process from three tiers of consultation down to two tiers of consultation. This will simplify the consultation process for staff and volunteers.
Remove Council involvement in the selection process of coordinators for each Group. Each Group to select their own coordinator. The review of the Bushcare/Parkcare Policy and Procedures has been reviewed by the Council’s Bushcare Representative Group. The role of the Shoalhaven Bushcare Representative Group is to act as an advisory group on all matters relating to the future direction of the Bushcare Program and Policy.
Financial Implications
The Shoalhaven Bushcare/Parkcare Program provides a financial benefit to the residents/ratepayers of the Shoalhaven. This is achieved through the in-kind labour contribution that the volunteers provide for restoring and maintaining the ecological assets on public land in the Shoalhaven.
From 1st July 2005 to 3rd April 2017 Bushcare volunteers spent 96,453 hours restoring and maintaining natural areas in public ownership. This equates to financial contribution of $2,840,541, at current Volunteering Australia rates, towards the management of our cities public natural area reserves.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 104 |
SA17.194 Tenders - Floodplain Risk Management Studies & Plans - Lower Shoalhaven River and St Georges Basin
HPERM Ref: D17/197911
Group: Planning Environment & Development Group
Section: Environmental Services
Purpose / Summary
To inform Council of the tender process for Floodplain Risk Management Studies and Plans for the Lower Shoalhaven River and St Georges Basin
In accordance with Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993, some information should remain confidential as it would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. It is not in the public interest to disclose this information as it may reveal commercial-in-confidence provisions of a contract, diminish the competitive commercial value of any information to any person and/or prejudice any person’s legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests. This information will be considered under a separate confidential report.
Options
1. Council accept the recommendation for additional funding of both this report and confidential report.
Implications: The Floodplain Risk Management Studies and Plans for the Lower Shoalhaven and St Georges Basin can be undertaken. Without the additional funding both flood studies and plans cannot be completed.
2. Council not accept the recommendation.
Implications: The studies have been identified as key priorities of Council’s floodplain management program. Council has accepted grants for both projects as part of the NSW Government’s NSW Floodplain Management Program. The funds provided as part of this Program, must be expended within approved grant agreement timeframes. The Lower Shoalhaven River and the St Georges Basin are both the highest priority catchments in the Councils flood program, thus it is vital that these studies undertaken as a matter of high priority.
Both studies are due for review, as they are both over 10 years old, with the flood information requiring updating to be able to guide flood planning decisions and provide data to State Emergency Services to support emergency flood response.
Details
Council called Tenders for the Lower Shoalhaven River Floodplain Risk Management Study & Plan and the St Georges Basin Floodplain Risk Management Study & Plan on 16 May 2017, which closed at 10:00am on 8 June 2017. Council received three (3) tenders at the time of closing. These are shown in Table 1 below.
Tenders Received
Tenders were received from the following:
Tenderer |
Location |
Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd |
St Leonards, NSW |
WMAwater Pty Ltd |
Sydney, NSW |
SMEC Australia Pty Ltd |
Wollongong, NSW |
Tenderers were evaluated in accordance with the criteria identified in the tender documents as follows:
· Total cost to Council, including application of Local Preference Policy
· Experience and expertise in nature of work
· Methodology
· Management ability, regarding programming, Quality Systems, OH&S Environmental
· Resource capabilities to complete the works.
Details relating the evaluation of the tenders are contained in a separate confidential report.
Community Engagement:
Advancing Council’s long-term floodplain management program ensures that economic, social and environmental factors relating to the management of floodplains within the Shoalhaven are considered, documented and implemented in Council’s planning programs and policies.
Financial Implications:
Funding for the above project has been provided for under the NSW State Government ‘Floodplain Management Program’ on a 2:1 basis. Council’s matching 1/3 contribution comes from the existing general Floodplain Management Program budget.
An additional Council contribution is required to complete both studies and plans. The additional Council combined contribution for both projects including provisional expenditure is $204,000 over three (3) years or $68,000 per year for three (3) years, the full calculations are in the confidential report. It is recommended that Council contribute these additional funds from the existing 2017/18 floodplain program budget (job number 15706), that includes revotes of unspent funds for 2016/17, adjusted at September 2017 quarterly budget review and apply to OEH for the 30% additional grant funds to allow the projects to commence.
The project is for the provision of consultancy works and will not have any direct or immediate implications on Council’s assets. The studies will be undertaken by consultants who will be managed by staff from the Natural Resources and Floodplain Unit of Council.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 106 |
SA17.195 Review of Shoalhaven Water Group Policies
HPERM Ref: D17/205002
Group: Shoalhaven Water Group
Section: Water Customer & Business Services
Attachments: 1. Determining Residential & Commercial Properties for the Purpose of Levying Water & Sewer Charges Policy ⇩
2. Water Hydrant Standpipe Extraction Policy ⇩
3. Pressure Sewer System Policy - Backlog Sewerage Schemes Policy ⇩
4. Rural Wastewater Connection Policy ⇩
5. Rural Water Supply Policy ⇩
Purpose / Summary
All public policies are to be submitted to Council within 12 months of the election of Council. The five public policies proposed for reaffirmation represent “Round 6” of this requirement in respect of the Shoalhaven Water Group responsibilities.
Options
1. Adopt the recommendation as written.
Implications: Minor changes will assist for currency. There are no significant changes.
2. Not adopt the recommendation.
Implications: Council can request further details, seek further community input or make other changes.
Background
Minor tracked changes have been made to the policies as shown on the attachments. The changes relate to updating the currency of wording, titles and reflect current practices. General formatting changes have also been included.
Community Engagement
There is no statutory requirement to publicly exhibit any of the policies contained in this report. Council may however choose to do so should they consider any changes of significance.
|
Strategy and Assets Committee – Tuesday 18 July 2017 Page 130 |
Local Government Amendment (governance & planning) act 2016
Chapter 3, Section 8A Guiding principles for councils
(1) Exercise of functions generally
The following general principles apply to the exercise of functions by councils:
(a) Councils should provide strong and effective representation, leadership, planning and decision-making.
(b) Councils should carry out functions in a way that provides the best possible value for residents and ratepayers.
(c) Councils should plan strategically, using the integrated planning and reporting framework, for the provision of effective and efficient services and regulation to meet the diverse needs of the local community.
(d) Councils should apply the integrated planning and reporting framework in carrying out their functions so as to achieve desired outcomes and continuous improvements.
(e) Councils should work co-operatively with other councils and the State government to achieve desired outcomes for the local community.
(f) Councils should manage lands and other assets so that current and future local community needs can be met in an affordable way.
(g) Councils should work with others to secure appropriate services for local community needs.
(h) Councils should act fairly, ethically and without bias in the interests of the local community.
(i) Councils should be responsible employers and provide a consultative and supportive working environment for staff.
(2) Decision-making
The following principles apply to decision-making by councils (subject to any other applicable law):
(a) Councils should recognise diverse local community needs and interests.
(b) Councils should consider social justice principles.
(c) Councils should consider the long term and cumulative effects of actions on future generations.
(d) Councils should consider the principles of ecologically sustainable development.
(e) Council decision-making should be transparent and decision-makers are to be accountable for decisions and omissions.
(3) Community participation
Councils should actively engage with their local communities, through the use of the integrated planning and reporting framework and other measures.
Chapter 3, Section 8B Principles of sound financial management
The following principles of sound financial management apply to councils:
(a) Council spending should be responsible and sustainable, aligning general revenue and expenses.
(b) Councils should invest in responsible and sustainable infrastructure for the benefit of the local community.
(c) Councils should have effective financial and asset management, including sound policies and processes for the following:
(i) performance management and reporting,
(ii) asset maintenance and enhancement,
(iii) funding decisions,
(iv) risk management practices.
(d) Councils should have regard to achieving intergenerational equity, including ensuring the following:
(i) policy decisions are made after considering their financial effects on future generations,
(ii) the current generation funds the cost of its services
Chapter 3, 8C Integrated planning and reporting principles that apply to councils
The following principles for strategic planning apply to the development of the integrated planning and reporting framework by councils:
(a) Councils should identify and prioritise key local community needs and aspirations and consider regional priorities.
(b) Councils should identify strategic goals to meet those needs and aspirations.
(c) Councils should develop activities, and prioritise actions, to work towards the strategic goals.
(d) Councils should ensure that the strategic goals and activities to work towards them may be achieved within council resources.
(e) Councils should regularly review and evaluate progress towards achieving strategic goals.
(f) Councils should maintain an integrated approach to planning, delivering, monitoring and reporting on strategic goals.
(g) Councils should collaborate with others to maximise achievement of strategic goals.
(h) Councils should manage risks to the local community or area or to the council effectively and proactively.
(i) Councils should make appropriate evidence-based adaptations to meet changing needs and circumstances.